User talk:Explicit/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Discussion at COM:AN#Possible problematic image source

 You are invited to join the discussion at COM:AN#Possible problematic image source. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:06, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Explicit. Would you mind taking a look at this? It involves files uploaded from what appears to be a Korean website. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:07, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Understand about the other logos. Some of them are actually from Japanese soccer teams, but they too may only need to be relicensed to {{PD-logo}} or something else. What about File:Gimpo Solteo Football Stadium.png? It's also sourced to Namuwiki under a "CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 KR" license. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Marchjuly: I only deleted the very obvious complex logos, like the ones with copyrighted characters on them and such. I got quite caught up at work, so I couldn't adequately considered the ones that were left over. I'll get to them.
The source's description pages describes its use of File:Gimpo Solteo Football Stadium.png as copyrighted and not in the public domain, so it reads like a fair use claim. I have tagged it for lacking permission. ✗plicit 12:14, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again for taking a look at these. My apologies if I it seemed I was pressing you to act asap on these. I'm quite happy to let the normal Commons processes run their course. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:2022-02-14 郑丹妮微博图片.jpg

Revision #629890110. —Tim Wu (talk) 15:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please give images better names

العربية ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ magyar ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

I noticed you've uploaded File:Mty064.JPG and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error. Please give uploaded files meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the file is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename your image with an intuitive name that describes the file itself. Thanks, and happy editing!

Stefan2 (talk) 08:09, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)@Stefan2: In fairness to Explicit, he didn’t originally upload the file; he just moved it to Commons from Wikipedia a few days ago, mostly likely using the same name the file had been using on Wikipedia. In addition, you actually made an edit to the file back in 2016 while it was still on Wikipedia. Was the file name different back then? If it wasn’t, then perhaps the name has been a problem for a long time. Is there some reason you didn’t request a en:WP:FNC back then when you edit the file? Since you both just basically made non-contentious administrative/cleanup-type edits, it might’ve been just as easy to make a Commons FNC yourself than “warn” Explicit about it. — Marchjuly (talk) 10:26, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've suggested that the file be renamed as "File:Monterrey as seen from Cerro del Obispado (September 2005).jpg" based on the description of the image provided by the original uploader. Feel free to change it to something else if this is unacceptable for some reason. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

block and delete edits

please block this User:Zelebot v rau goofball. WikiBayer (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:EmmaWiggs.jpg

Hi Explicit. File:EmmaWiggs.jpg is almost certainly related to en:User talk:Explicit#EmmaWiggs.jpg, but I can't tell whether it's the same as the file that you deleted, but my guess is that it might be. A Google Image search shows the same photo being used as the subject's Twitter profile pick, but I'm not seeing it released as it's licensed on Commons. My guess is that it's not a selfie and probably not the "own work" of the uploader. The uploader probably means well, but this is most likely a case of COM:LL. I'm not sure how this can't avoid at least being tagged with {{Npd}}, but I'm asking you about it on the chance that you might know of another way to resolve this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:33, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting review of the Speedy deletion request of File:Pengsoo.png

Recently, there was a speedy deletion request made by User:린눈라단 who says the work I uploaded, File:Pengsoo.png is a copyright violation because there was no permission from the author. However, considering the terms of the creative commons license of the work from the specified link that I linked, it seems I did not violate any copyright since there is no need for a explicit permission since it is by the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported, and I am confused if I am right about this. So I am requesting your review of this work's licenses. I hope you review on this since I am really not sure.Waltzingmogumogupeach (talk) 17:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just found out that the YouTube video, the source of the file, is a CCL license I'm sorry. However, the YouTube video cannot confirm the exact CCL license because the license is simply stated as CCL. --린눈라단 (talk) 22:21, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I already confirmed to you that it is Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported, as outlined there( you have to click a link to confirm that it is indeed 3.0). If you click the creative commons for youtube, it is that.Waltzingmogumogupeach (talk) 22:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Free version

Hello. I have no idea on how to use Tistory so would you be able to help to find a free version of w:File:Actress Oh In-hye.jpg? --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:00, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Minorax: Unfortunately, my search did not yield a freely licensed image of Oh In-hye. ✗plicit 04:53, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In response to the removal of Squadron Gaming Logo.png

I would like to humbly apologize for any violation I have made uploading the image, I did read the rules and regulations pertaining to Wikimedia Commons prior to uploading so it wasn't a case of negligence. After seeing so much donate to Wikipedia memes I decided to create an account and tried to get my feet wet. Drafting a Wikipedia page for my aspiring gaming group / e-sports team in my personal sandbox after reading the terms and policies pertaining to writing articles about stuff you have direct influence in. Which got taken down under the pretense of 'webhosting', which I assumed is because I shared the link with the members of the gaming group via a WhatsApp group and Discord DM, in hopes of checking spelling errors. Which I was completely fine with just wished I could of copied and pasted it into a word document because I took my time with it and didn't have a back up but such is life. As for the Image I do own the rights as I made it from with open source free for commercial us elements, so there is no copyright infringement on those ends, I even have it legally trademarked in my country of Trinidad and Tobago. But regardless I understand why it has to be deleted under the tense of "non-notable YouTube channel, likely the uploader's own" Which is true as we are nobodies so I agree with the removal and the policy. I just want to know in the case that we actually become notable and someone tries to make an article. Because it was removed originally due to me testing out my sandbox, will it be marked as void and blacklisted via what ever content ID system Wikimedia Commons uses (assuming that there is one). Or can someone in the far future still upload the image and make an article on it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Squadr0nX of SquadronGG (talk • contribs) 18:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by YtoSu (talk • contribs) 16:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pranay Dongre 27

Hi. All of the images this user uploaded are copyright violations. Would you look into it and delete them when you have time? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2603:301D:22B2:4000:95EB:5DB9:B94D:1C83 (talk) 12:07, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harrysemelsdisorder.jpg

Hello Explicit, Can you please transfer this file of image of American actor Harry Semels to Wikipedia Commons?— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.188.212.86 (talk) 00:09, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish language assistance

Hi Explicit. From you user page, you seem to be a native understanding of Spanish. Would you mind taking a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Crimeo III.png? My high school Spanish has been long forgotten and I've been using Google translate to try and keep up. A request for a Spanish speaking admin was made at COM:AN#Admin who reads Spanish needed by another user, and I was just coming here to ask whether you could recommend someone when I saw your user page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:21, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: Hi, I have closed the discussion and deleted the file per my closing rationale. ✗plicit 12:16, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Explicit. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:01, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aerial view of Jamia faridia near Margalla hills, Islamabad.jpg

File:Aerial view of Jamia faridia near Margalla hills, Islamabad.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

KhhHan432 (talk) 06:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Borrar foto La Tota.JNPG

Me urge la foto La Tota.JNPG (Omar Sarmiento), sea borrada de inmediato de la galeia de Wikimedia, por favor, esta fue subida con mi usuario JustinMontarral sin aprobacion, como puedo hacer? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JustinMontarral (talk • contribs) 17:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Town of Randolph from Dome Rock.jpg

File:Town of Randolph from Dome Rock.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magnolia677 (talk) 11:13, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry related question

Hi Explicit. Since you both a Wikipedia admin and a Commons admin, you might be able to provide some input at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections‎#‎Sockpuppetry. While it's true that an account blocked for socking on English Wikipedia doesn't mean it also needs to be blocked on Commons, it seems that user here intends to continue to evade their block on Wikipedia by creating new accounts to add files they upload to Commons to articles. It also seems that based on this edit and this edit that they are going to use their Commons accounts to engage in discussions related to English Wikipedia content. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kriegsspiel 1824 scenario 1.png

File:Kriegsspiel 1824 scenario 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kurzon (talk) 16:44, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kriegsspiel 1824 scenario 2.png

File:Kriegsspiel 1824 scenario 2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kurzon (talk) 16:45, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:NZ AUS 31 OCT 09 A.svg

File:NZ AUS 31 OCT 09 A.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PeeJay (talk) 22:45, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brazil National Football Team (no stars).svg

Hi Explicit. Would you mind taking a look at File:Brazil National Football Team (no stars).svg? It might be argued that it's "PD-logo" under US copyright law, but things seem a bit more complicated per COM:TOO Brazil. FWIW, the same logo (also see en:File:Brazilian Football Confederation logo.svg) has been treated as non-free content on English Wikipedia over the years, including quite a few en:WP:NFCR and en:WP:FFD discussions, and there never seemed to be any consensus that it was even "PD-logo" in the US. If this is really OK for Commons, then the logo with the stars is probably OK as well, and both non-free files can be deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:39, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: Hi, this logo is a little more difficult to assess since the threshold of originality of Brazil is higher than that of the U.S., but it's not so clearly defined at COM:TOO Brazil. I'm erring to the side of caution and not deleting it outright as {{Logo}}. This may be best resolved at COM:DR. ✗plicit 01:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Understand. Thanks for taking a look at this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I started a DR for the file. One question about COM:TOO Brazil though. It states that "consequently the threshold of originality is considerably higher than the United States", but I think that's possibly a mistake. A TOO higher than the US would make it less (not more) restrictive, wouldn't it? The lower the threshold, the less amount of creativity you need for a logo to be eligible for copyright protection. So, it seems that it should say "considerably lower" like it does in COM:TOO United Kingdom. If the Brazil's TOO is truly "considerably higher" than the US's TOO, then much more creativity is required for a logo to be eligible for copyright protection. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
After thinking this over a bit, the wording in TOO Brazil is probably OK; it's just a bit confusing and seems counterintuitive. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


File:想做你手中的奖杯，拥我入怀，让你开心让你笑O(∩ ∩)O (X玖少年团 伍嘉成) (1).jpg

File:想做你手中的奖杯，拥我入怀，让你开心让你笑O(∩ ∩)O (X玖少年团 伍嘉成) (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

EditFake (talk) 00:52, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

블랙핑크 bff들을 위해

친애하는 blackpink 당신의 춤에 대한 훌륭한 수고를 말하고 싶었습니다. 그것은 아름답습니다. 당신을 만나고 싶습니다. 한번쯤은 내 꿈이길 바랄게🥰 2A01:E0A:3EA:89A0:297C:BFA2:937E:1DD0 11:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tour de France logo (black background).svg

File:Tour de France logo (black background).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

186.175.123.144 11:13, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kangs_6.png

Hello,

I don't know how to prove this file and another one ar mine. I made them on my computer. Can you help me please ? the file is deleted I can't make a call... Chrys Laspals (talk) 13:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chrys Laspals: Hi, on the file's description page, you stated that the image is the "Official logo of the Kangourous of Pessac". Are you the graphic designer, or were you a work-for-hire, for this organization? ✗plicit 13:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help. I'm a player of this sports association. The logo have been made by one of the player himself et the draw of the helmet have been drawn by myself. Chrys Laspals (talk) 13:49, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Chrys Laspals: Only the person who holds the copyright to the work is allowed to freely licensed the media file. If they have chosen to do so, please ask that person to follow the instructions outlined at COM:CONSENT to verify the licensing terms. ✗plicit 03:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted my page Vaibhav kumar (Vaibhav9826267) (talk) 20:15, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help for wikipedia

Hi. User:Orijentolog, At first, he edited a page of his own accord, and there was no evidence to change the name of that page. In the following, he has linked me to another user without any evidence and has started an editing war two hours ago. He far from complying with the law, he edits my page. I tell him to please stop his destructive activities, but he continues his behavior. Please stop the destructive activity of this user. I am sure this user will message you and repeat his false claim. I asked him more than twenty times not to edit my page and not to leave a message for me. But he continues to work. This user has been continuously insulting me and others for three hours without citing evidence, and he does not stop his wrong work, but he is also proud of his work!! Ngsharif (talk) 03:55, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ngsharif is a sockpuppet of globally blocked user who is abusing Wiki projects for several years. --Orijentolog (talk) 03:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Male humans with helmets

You do realise that the majority of military photos since WW1 would fall into this category don't you? Soldiers wear helmets, so how is this category in any way useful? Mztourist (talk) 04:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mztourist: This is a question to be asking the author of the category, isn't it? I simply renamed Category:Males with helmets to Category:Male humans with helmets and moved the pages over to the newly renamed category. ✗plicit 05:48, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I fail to see how any males other than human ones would be with helmets (or M16 rifles for that matter). Frankly these are ridiculous categories which I intend to raise at CFD. Mztourist (talk) 05:53, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mztourist: If you haven't already, you may want to review Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/12/Category:Male humans. I agree with your sentiment, but I've seen a recent push to have the subcategories of Category:Female humans and Category:Male humans match its parent crop up on my watchlist. I'm going through subcategory levels and renaming them for consistency. COM:VPP may be a better place to bring this up since CFD on Commons is a ghost town. ✗plicit 06:02, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Noted, thanks! Mztourist (talk) 06:06, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I posted at VPP, I hope you don't mind me referring to your "ghost town" comment. Mztourist (talk) 06:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2022 cover Wordsworth Circle.png

File:2022 cover Wordsworth Circle.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:00, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:호날두 "7번이 가장 좋아하는 번호" (GOAL 인터뷰).webm

Excuse me, Can I ask some help? Since You seems to be familiar with South Korean Videos (A video uploaded by you from GOAL TV), the youtube account GOAL TV is just translate the English interview to Korean, but a user said "It is odd, because it is a video in English apparently posted by a Korean with subtitles in Korean." Puramyun31 (talk) 15:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Puramyun31: Hi, I was able to verify the Creative Commons License through this archived link. However, the video is watermarked by DAZN, not by GOAL TV. ✗plicit 23:52, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black Reel TVAwards Logo-stacked.png

Hi Explicit. Would you mind taking a look at File:Black Reel TVAwards Logo-stacked.png? It's almost certainly not the uploader's own work unless the uploader is blackreelawards.com, but there's nothing indicating the logo has been released as licensed even if that's the case. It's possible that this could be "PD-logo", but I'm not sure about the imagery used for the "L" in the word "Black". Since you're also an admin on Commons, I'd thought you could provide an opinion as to whether this would be kept by Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:51, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: Hi, the lightning bolt doesn't look particularly complex, at least compared to other shapes presented at COM:TOO US. {{PD-textlogo}} should be okay here. ✗plicit 11:07, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the speedy reply. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:09, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for men wearing buttoned shirts

I think we need to clarify whether "buttoned shirts" means shirts that have buttons or shirts whose buttons are fastened. Maybe these should say "shirts with buttons" instead of "buttoned shirts"? -- Auntof6 (talk) 07:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6: A "shirts with buttons" category wouldn't clarify that, would it? Shirts that have buttons or shirts with fastened buttons would still fall into this type of category. Category:Buttoned shirts is complemented by Category:Unbuttoned shirts. ✗plicit 13:55, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification. If "buttoned shirts" means shirts that have their buttons fastened, the categories related to button-down shirts need to be removed from categories for buttoned shirts. Whether a shirt is buttoned (buttons fastened) or unbuttoned (buttons not fastened) is a separate thing from whether it is a button-down shirt. A button-down shirt is a shirt that allows for the collar to be fastened to the shirt via buttons on the collar points. The buttons on those shirts can be either fastened or not fastened. -- Auntof6 (talk) 19:18, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Turbulenz-logo.png

I need help for this logo (File:Turbulenz-logo.png) to be nominated for deletion that fails threshold of originality in the UK, and is similar to EDGE logo (en:File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg). 103.144.38.60 01:13, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Bondi pano.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bondi pano.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Solomon203 (talk) 03:06, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cutting through bricks.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Cutting through bricks.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Wvdp (talk) 07:37, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:머슬마니아 김자연 피트니스2 노컷무대영상.webm, File:머슬마니아 오현교 미즈비키니 노컷무대영상.webm

Excuse me, May I ask a help? per this example, You reviewed some videos from the source YouTube account. Puramyun31 (talk) 13:36, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abdus Sadeque.jpg

Hi Explicit. This is related to en:File:Abdus Sadeque.jpg and en:User talk:Explicit/Archive 49#File:Abdus Sadeque.jpg. The file was uploaded to Commons not few hours after you deleted it locally from English Wikipedia per en:WP:F11. Since it still seems to have the same issues, I've tagged it with {{Npd}}. If permission verification isn't needed in your opinion, please let me know and I'll remove the tag. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:LWS airside.jpg

File:LWS airside.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2600:100C:A207:79CA:4428:5E27:96FB:2E0D 19:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at COM:VPC#File:Kyriakos Pittakis.jpg

 You are invited to join the discussion at COM:VPC#File:Kyriakos Pittakis.jpg. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:22, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Explicit. Maybe you could help figure out what to do here? -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:24, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested revision deletion

Hello, I would like to request revision deletion of the original version of File:DE cycle.png because of copyright violation (the bin symbol). I have previously contacted the creator of the file, and the non-free version has been replaced, but it hasn't been revdel-ed. Janhrach (talk) 09:20, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Janhrach: ✓ Done, revision hidden from public view. ✗plicit 00:03, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Janhrach (talk) 06:36, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chirped pulse amplification.png

File:Chirped pulse amplification.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 07:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hey, I noticed you tagged File:Consensus Flow.png as a derivative work. I just reverted to the non-copyright infringing version (the keyboard icon is a copyvio). Would you mind doing some revision deletion on Commons, and deleting the version on enwiki? Thanks, —MATRIX! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 11:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michinthecat.jpg

File:Michinthecat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Johnj1995 (talk) 04:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My deleted photos

Hello, you deleted all my files on Wikimedia Commons for no reason with no evidence. I took all of these photos and it makes me very heartbroken to have my work deleted like this without warning or reason Dalvago (talk) 18:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Q2 Stadium (stadium in North Austin, Texas, United States) logo.jpg

File:Q2 Stadium (stadium in North Austin, Texas, United States) logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Darth Stabro (talk) 01:20, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lucia Lucas Short Film Preview.webm

Excuse me, The user C.Suthorn apparently claims CC license is revocable simply by deleting a licensed video from the source website such as Youtube, but the argument suggests every video can be CC license-revocable just deleting from the Source page at all. since per this discussion page You also uploaded some YouTube videos on Commons, May I ask for your help? Puramyun31 (talk) 01:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:GordonWBlackwell.jpg

File:GordonWBlackwell.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ixfd64 (talk) 17:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Location of Igrim in Khantia-Mansia.jpg

File:Location of Igrim in Khantia-Mansia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:37, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toribot.svg

File:Toribot.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Damaging the project by enfocing copyright paranoia. This is not helping the Wikimedia movement. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 13:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus: I am well aware of your views on Commons' policy regarding FOP laws and do not care for them. ✗plicit 13:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Explicit/Archive_3&oldid=865234065"