User talk:Eusebius/Archives/Promotions/September 2009

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eilean Donan Castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best IMO. Meets all criteria. -- Rastaman3000 (talk) 17:30, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support despite File:Eilean Donan castle - 140mm.jpg having more atmosphere, this better shows that it's an an island connected via a bridge. -- H005 (talk) 21:32, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral Scope should include a geographic locator (e.g. Scotland or UK). Lycaon (talk) 18:57, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Why? Is there more than one Eilean Donan Castle? -- H005 (talk) 19:46, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
    • I don't know. Do you? Kidding appart, it is the proper way for buildings. This one may be unique, others aren't. So use the same scope template for related topics. Lycaon (talk) 20:31, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
      • Far from being a standard so far. I have nothing against adding a disambiguation part to the scope, but I think that's part of the link's job. --Eusebius (talk) 20:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Eilean Donan castle - 140mm.jpg: 0
2. Eilean Donan castle - 95mm.jpg: 0
3. Eilean Donan Castle 107.jpg: 0
4. Eilean Donan Castle at Loch Duich.jpg: 0
5. Eilean Donan.jpg: +2
=>
File:Eilean Donan castle - 140mm.jpg: Declined.
File:Eilean Donan castle - 95mm.jpg: Declined.
File:Eilean Donan Castle 107.jpg: Declined.
File:Eilean Donan Castle at Loch Duich.jpg: Declined.
File:Eilean Donan.jpg: Promoted.

--Eusebius (talk) 10:13, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontainebleau - porte du baptistère.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good picture, but I think it could benefit from a tighter crop. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC) good quality --George Chernilevsky 05:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale de Grenoble - nef.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nicely composed image --Herbythyme 14:09, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Malo - château depuis le Sillon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice light, composition is OK. Chould be a bit sharper on the right, but the important parts are sharp enough. --Relic38 03:24, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Loch Ness and Urquhart castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

07:09, 8 September 2009 (UTC)