User talk:Eduardo P

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Eduardo P!


File:Hispânia_intro.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eduardo P (talk) 15:52, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Datas[edit]

Ao carregar uma foto sempre devemos botar a data em que foi tirada. E não o dia do carregamento. Boas edições, HélioVL(Hi!) 00:43, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moro em um bairro próximo ao Centro de Coronel Fabriciano. Quase nunca vou à zona rural nem daqui da cidade quanto mais de Ipatinga, Timóteo ou Valadares. HélioVL(Hi!) 15:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Não. Aquela imagem não é livre. HélioVL(Hi!) 19:44, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: Montagem[edit]

✓ Feito -> File:Piranguinho MG.JPG. --HélioVL (talk) 19:19, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Commons: Renomear imagem sem perder o histórico[edit]

Muito obrigado, Eduardo. Muito obrigado mesmo.

Boas edições,

--HélioVL (talk) 13:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Imagens[edit]

✓ Feito -> File:Prédios do B. Laranjeiras, Rio de Janeiro RJ.jpg. --HélioVL (talk) 23:53, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Feito -> File:Offenbach Senefelderstrasse Overview IMG 0747.JPG. --HélioVL (talk) 12:07, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Feito -> File:Prédio da Rua General Glicério.jpg (aquela data está meio estranha, não?). --HélioVL (talk) 20:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Irei movê-las sim, mas você mesmo pode fazer isso, usando o programa Microsoft Office Picture Manager (é o mais comum e eu uso ele, mas também existem vários outros). --HélioVL (talk) 09:49, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tudo ✓ feito. --HélioVL (talk) 00:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Eduardo P!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Poderia por favor renomear isso[1] pra mim, e aapgar o redirect? abç! 16:21, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

categorias[edit]

Apaguei as duas categorias, mas da próxima vez use {{Duplicate}} em casos obvios de duplicados, {{Copyvio}} em violação de copyrights, {{Bad name}} para nomes de ficheiros improprios, {{Rename}} para pedido de renomeação de ficheiros (ao inves de fazer um novo upload para ter o nome certo) ou {{Speedy}} para casos que não se enquadrem em nenhum dos acima mas acreditas que deve ser deletado por algum motivo (e diga qual o motivo obviamente). Béria Lima msg 18:42, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Movimentação de ficheiros[edit]

Olá Eduardo

neste ficheiro fizeste uma movimentação não aprovada nas politicas. Sugiro que leias COM:RENAME, especialmente esta secção. Béria Lima msg 17:36, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

De qual favela você quer foto? Do Arará? Eu dou aula lá. Abraços, Junius (talk) 22:13, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
É, mas antes vou ter que pedir autorização ao dono do morro senão posso levar um tiro. Antes de tirar fotos de favelas é sempre bom conversar primeiro com os bandidos e explicar a situação. É o que se chama de desenrolar a situação. Junius (talk) 15:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
É Parque Arará, em Benfica. Tenho muitas fotos que ainda não passei para o Commmons de estações de trem, ruas e lugares assim. Abraços, Junius (talk) 12:25, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Primeiro eu tenho que desenrolar com os caras. Junius (talk) 20:35, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vou providenciar fotos do Santo Cristo. Abraços, Junius (talk) 22:08, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Itaipu[edit]

Cuidado Eduardo[2], nem tudo que é chamado de Itaipu é de fato, em se tratando de Região Oceânica, muito cuidado nas categorizações, pois tem algumas áreas como Maravista, que chamam de Itaipu e não é. O mesmo ocorre com o Cafubá que chamam de Piratininga. Abraços! Leandro Rocha (talk) 21:31, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, quando for lá eu tiro essas fotos. Em breve devo ir lá. Abraços, Junius (talk) 03:03, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Eduardo.

Category names should generally be in English. See Commons:Categories for the exact policy. See also the proposal of Naming categories.

Regards--. HombreDHojalata.talk 09:50, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pedido de renomeação[edit]

Oi Eduardo, vc que sabe fazer isso, tem como renomear pra mim a foto File:2011-01-10 Estação Cascadura.JPG para File:2012-01-10 Estação Cascadura.JPG? Abraços! Leandro Rocha (talk) 18:26, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado! Quanto à sua pergunta, não sei exatamente o que são essas galerias, pode me dar uma exemplo de uma? Mas creio que o correto seja por em português, pois o nome das ruas é "Rua X", e não "street", e nomes próprios a princípio não se traduzem. Leandro Rocha (talk) 13:14, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Me mande o link, sem link eu não consigo entender o que vc está falando. Leandro Rocha (talk) 21:52, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
kkk. Mas eu digo, um link onde tenha as tais galerias, e não links vermelhos. Leandro Rocha (talk) 00:00, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pow é só criar então, mas eu pessoalmente não gosto muito dessas galerias não, ainda prefiro as categorias pq a inclusão dos artigos nelas é automática. Mas se vc prefere, é só ir em frente. Leandro Rocha (talk) 02:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Russian consulate in Rio[edit]

Hi Eduardo, I see that you are likely in Rio. I am trying to find someone who can help with taking photos of the Russian consulate, as per User:Russavia/Required_photos#Rio_de_Janeiro. Could you possibly help with this? Or known someone who could help? Cheers, russavia (talk) 00:14, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Parque Lage[edit]

Oi Eduardo! Valeu por organizar quais fotos precisavam estar em cada categoria. Abraço! --Solstag (talk) 22:16, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prédios do bairro Botafogo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 18:08, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Permissão de imagens[edit]

Olá Eduardo, são duas coisas diferentes. Primeiro ela tem de autorizar a liberação das imagens com uma das licenças aceites aqui, como a CC-BY-SA-3. Depois é necessário enviar a prova dessa autorização (normalmente o mail) para o OTRS, e só aí é que se coloca a marca OTRS-pending nas imagens. Abraço, -- Darwin Ahoy! 13:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oi Eduardo! Aparentemente não entendeu que escrevi em Commons:Esplanada#Permissão de uso de fotos, ou? De qualquer jeito: Sem permissão via COM:OTRS... não há permissão. Portanto: no permission nos ficheiros relacionados. Gunnex (talk) 22:12, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eduardo P. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

File:Flores pela Av. Oswaldo Cruz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

+PrinceWilly 15:41, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flores pela Av. Oswaldo Cruz (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

+PrinceWilly 15:42, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flores pela Av. Oswaldo Cruz (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

+PrinceWilly 15:43, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Upload[edit]

Hello, Eduardo P. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Oi! Existe permissão? Gunnex (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

+ File:Skatepark - Aterro do Flamengo.jpg
+ File:Estátua José de Alencar.jpg
+ File:Rua das Laranjeiras, 336.png
+ File:Hortifrutti - Flamengo.jpg
Alerto que em vários casos aquela conta do Facebook reproduz imagens de outros autores. E só para complementar: Não confunde material partilhado de maneira "pública" no Facebook com algum licenciamento de "uso livre" ou parecido... isto são duas coisas completamente diferentes. Gunnex (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
+ File:Botafogo Praia Shopping - fachada.jpg --> "disponibilizada ao público sem restrições" --> de onde tirou isto? Por cima: O ficheiro foi carregado no WikiRio em 11.2011 mas já circulou em 2010...
+ File:Rua Senhor dos Passos.jpg
+ File:Bijuterias Kacy.jpg
+ File:Lanchonete no Saara.jpg
+ File:Casa Cavé.jpg = violação de direitos autoriais = http://www.flickr.com/photos/leojorge/3441757641/ (2009) e roubado por WikiRio pata http://www.wikirio.com.br/Arquivo:CasaCave01.jpg (2012)
+ File:Hostel Zé Carioca.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 19:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Eduardo P. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Hello, Eduardo P. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Volta Alice (3).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Volta Alice (3).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Gunnex (talk) 17:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Problema com ficheiros[edit]

Hello, Eduardo P. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Pay attention to copyright
File:Supermercado Princesa, nº 519 - interior.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Yanguas (talk) 02:13, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Construction en Ferney-Voltaire.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aga (d) 07:43, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prédio em Ferney-Voltaire.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aga (d) 07:43, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bombas de chocolate Flamengo Rio de Janeiro Brasil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 19:53, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conceição de Jacareí[edit]

Olá Eduardo P vc que criou várias imagens sobre Conceição de Jacareí, criei uma categoria onde se criar mais sobre esse local já tem. não precisa nem colocar na categoria sobre Mangaratiba. ok!!!---Biantez msg 15:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eduardo Pazos notebook.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 14:02, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maison en Annemasse (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 21:16, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lua (Moon).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stas (talk) 09:03, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Zona_rural_do_Brasil has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Mateus S. Figueiredo (talk) 04:25, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  русский  svenska  +/−


Thank you for uploading images from Wikipedia to Commons. However, the file you uploaded, File:Mgarr Ix-Xini large.jpg appears to be a scaled down version of the version on Wikipedia. Please reupload the full version of the image. You can then tag the scaled down version with {{duplicate}} to have it deleted. Consider using CommonsHelper to provide the correct image description and licensing tags. Thank you,

Stefan2 (talk) 11:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Núbia no Rio de Janeiro-RJ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 19:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mappuntacana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bawolff (talk) 22:25, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Comida nordestina has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 10:14, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Osteria Policarpo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Osteria Policarpo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Darwin Ahoy! 01:42, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Bar Urca.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bar Urca.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bar Urca.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sturm (talk) 22:41, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cebiche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

62.216.210.8 13:58, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Sporting shops has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 03:47, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]