User talk:Dirtsc/Archive/2022
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:Sjng altar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 11:51, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Smb hauptraum.jpg
- File:Smb innen 1.jpg
- File:Smb innen 2.jpg
- File:Smb runde fenster links.jpg
- File:Smb runde fenster rechts.jpg
- File:Smb seitenfenster oben.jpg
- File:Smb seitenfenster unten.jpg
- File:Smb trennwand.jpg
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 11:49, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Dirtsc,
User:Minderbinder hat einige Rename-Request gestellt. Gehen die für dich in Ordnung? VG --Isderion (talk) 14:53, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hallo Dirtsc, vielen Dank für deine vielen Hamburg-Fotos. Der Umbenennungsantrag war nicht respektlos gemeint, die Begründung steht ja drin. --Minderbinder (talk) 17:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Umbenennung ist völlig in Ordnung. Wenn es der Klarheit dient, gerne. Ich habe früher immer Abkürzungen in den Dateinamen verwendet, aber mittlerweile gemerkt, dass das gar nicht mehr erforderlich ist, häufig unpraktisch ist und auch für andere Benutzer meist nicht hilfreich ist. Mittlerweile verzichte ich selber auch auf die Abkürzungen und schreibe Namen aus. Von daher: alles in Ordnung. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 23:33, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Mittlerweile hat ein Kollege die ganzen Umbennenungen durchgeführt, aber gut zu wissen, dass das auch in deinem Sinne geschehen ist --Isderion (talk) 01:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Umbenennung ist völlig in Ordnung. Wenn es der Klarheit dient, gerne. Ich habe früher immer Abkürzungen in den Dateinamen verwendet, aber mittlerweile gemerkt, dass das gar nicht mehr erforderlich ist, häufig unpraktisch ist und auch für andere Benutzer meist nicht hilfreich ist. Mittlerweile verzichte ich selber auch auf die Abkürzungen und schreibe Namen aus. Von daher: alles in Ordnung. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 23:33, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Halloher Gehege bei Latendorf 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eidelstedter Feldmark 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Riesewohld Frühjahr 2021 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Riesewohld Frühjahr 2021 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dosenmoor Sommer 2021 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dosenmoor Sommer 2021 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2022
Hallo Dirtsc,
bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!
Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?
Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.
Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.
Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.
Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.
Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.
Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 06:08, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gartenstadt Hamburg Farmsen 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gartenstadt Hamburg Farmsen 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gartenstadt Hamburg Farmsen 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gartenstadt Hamburg Farmsen 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Barmbek Nord Elligersw-MFranke E30818 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mausoleum Hoefele 2022 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mausoleum Riedemann 2022 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kapelle 3 Ohlsdorf 2022 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mausoleum Baron v Schröder 2022 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kapelle 12 Ohlsdorf 2022 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Bk südfenster.jpg
- File:Hamburg-Lurup, Kirche Zu den Zwölf Aposteln, innen Fensterfront.jpg
- File:Kko ostfenster.jpg
- File:Kko westfenster.jpg
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 10:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)