User talk:DieBuche/Archive 1

Image:Plan battle of Pydna-de.svg

Hallo,

Es gab offensichtlich ein Problem mit diesem Bild; ich habe versucht, es zu verbessern. Grüss. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 22:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Vielen Dank, ich kenn mich mit dem Svg nicht gut aus --DieBuche 12:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992-1998).svg

The image you uploaded seems to be the coat of arms, not the flag... AnonMoos 23:56, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Leo2004

Hey, it seems to me that you signed up on commons as User:Leo2004 and then later forgot your password, is that possible? If so, you can ask on COM:CHU for your username here to be changed to the one you originally signed up with (pending verification). Thanks, Yonatanh 03:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

No, didn't like the old username anymore so II chosed this one --DieBuche 08:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I suppose you created Image:Pax.jpg, could you please change it to GFDL-self if so? Thanks, Yonatan ^talk 15:00, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Abruzzo

Hi DieBuche. I've seen your work with the flag and the coat of Abruzzo. Which program have you used to make the changes? I can't display the images properly so I figure out it is Adobe Illustrator. Anyhow, I manage to correct the little problem. Bye, F l a n k e r 19:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

your right i did it with AI, thanks for your fix --DieBuche 19:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Flag of Santa Catarina

Hi there, exactly what did you fix on that flag? --Tonyjeff 13:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

The Wikimedia software has some problems rendering some svg and in some projects this flag wasn't rendered. I fixed it that it renders better. --DieBuche 12:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Plan battle of Pydna-fr.svg

Hallo,

Diese Karte hat eine Quelle: “Hammond et Walbank, History of Macedonia, t. 3, fig. 19, p. 554”. Aber nicht diese andere Karte. Und ich glaube, dass es besser ist wenn mann sich auf veröffentlichten wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten basiert, nein? Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 18:31, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Ich hatte mich vor kurzem für den deutschen Artikel mit dem Thema beschäftigt und fast alle Literatur (es war nicht sehr viel) und Quellen (v.a. Plutarch, aber auch bei andern Autoren) die ich fand , legte die zweite Karte nahe. Es ist aber leider im allgemeinen schwierig so eine Schlacht ohne archäologische Befunde genau zu lokalisieren --DieBuche 18:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Acetic anhydride

Hi DieBuche. I reverted your changes to Category:Acetic anhydride. Categories are not always plural, for example, Category:Sodium chloride. In the same way that there is no such thing as sodium chlorides, only sodium chloride, there is also no such thing as acetic anhydrides. It was purely a typing mistake on my behalf.

Cheers

Ben 18:55, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, should the acetic anhydrides category be deleted, I could do that? --DieBuche 19:31, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Don't be sorry, this sort of thing happens to all of us all the time :) !

Category:Acetic anhydrides should be deleted, so yes please, go ahead.

Thanks very much

Ben

Maps projects

With your experience in the Commons:Graphic Lab/Maps project, a matter with some relation --place name list/identifier with maps 'Proto-project' is being discussed here: w:Talk:List_of_countries_in_Europe#Proto-proposal -- and I wondered whether you'd care to advise us on what's already in the works of a similar (or identical!) nature to your knowledge. Thanks // FrankB 17:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

As I understand it you want to create maps of regions of Europe in intervals of 25 years; sorry, my english is not too good. --DieBuche 18:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Blair

I do not think at all that Image:Tony Blair UK.jpg is better than the cropped version. It has a bunch of unnecessary background. DragonFire1024 14:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

you're right, I cropped the former picture and uploaded it again because it has more pixels --DieBuche 15:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

USFWS logo

Are you sure that the logo Image:Usfws emblem.gif is really in the public domain? I don't think so! The USFWS clearly states on [1] that the official Service logo is restricted to use on official sites. Since wikimedia commons is a non-government website, I would recommand to revert the changes on Template:PD-USGov-FWS and put back the former image Image:Usfws a.gif, which is one of the six images allowed for non-governmental purposes. --Telim tor 12:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Ja du hast recht: "Not all the information on our site is in the public domain. Some images/graphics are licensed for use under the copyright law, and the use of the Service logo is restricted to official publications" [2]. Ich werd dann mal einen LA stellen.--DieBuche 14:01, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Sicher ist sicher ;-) --Telim tor 14:07, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Mexico-Popocatepetl.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mexico-Popocatepetl.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

-Alvesgaspar 14:27, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Picture of the Year/2007

Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that became a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. -- Bryan (talk to me) 14:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

File:Banville_-_Comédies,_1879,_Charpentier.djvu

I don't understand what the problem is, the tag is pd-old. --Maltaper (talk) 13:52, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

It's about the first page (google logo etc). Could u remove it & reupload it. thx --DieBuche (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Logo page says Please do not remove it. Why should I remove it? --Maltaper (talk) 14:09, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Usage of watermarks is generally discrouraged on commons, see here (and also here).--DieBuche (talk) 17:46, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Then tag images... ~ bayo or talk 17:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)== User:Bayo/Newpages CVG Commons ==

I reverted the speedy delete entry. This is a useful bot page especially for finding new copyright violations. Most older entries are free images. If there are any others or new one, then the images should be proposed for deletion and not this working page. It lists only files. You should also first talk to the user or create a standard delete. Thanks. --Kungfuman (talk) 17:08, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm sry if there was a misunderstanding, I didn't meant the page to be a copyvio but most of the recent images. --DieBuche (talk) 17:38, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

"This file is a copyright violation because Most of these images (except his photos) are copyvios of various games & logos"

LOL. sure i will remove that template. Please open a real deletion request, it will be very funny. Thanks. ~ bayo or talk 19:54, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

If u read above, u'll see that there was an misunderstanding & i already apologized for that --DieBuche (talk) 19:59, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Then tag images... that why this page exists... Tagging the page is an help for nobody, then it is useless. ~ bayo or talk 17:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

File:PearPC 1.png

Jetzt löscht du auch Lizenzen, und wieder ohne den Benutzer zu informieren. Rote Kats interessieren auch nicht. Was soll das denn? --Kungfuman (talk) 17:24, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Im Bild abgebildet ist ein Screenshot von Mac OS X, welches keine freie Software ist. Auf den commons geht das nicht, wenn du es mit fair use begründen willst dann musst du das Bild auf die deutsche wiki verschieben. --DieBuche (talk) 17:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Noch ein Problem bei File:Motocross Madness.png Wieder löscht du einfach nur Lizenzen. Stelle doch bitte LAs für die Dateien und benachricvhtige die Leute. Ich bin übrigens nicht der uploader. --Kungfuman (talk) 17:38, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use claims werden auf commons nicht akzeptiert, siehe COM:FU--DieBuche (talk) 17:40, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Das weiß ich doch. Gerade deshalb solltest du Löschanträge stellen, anstelle nur die Lizenzen zu entfernen. Das hilft doch überhaupt nicht und erschwert die Suche nach diesen URVs. --Kungfuman (talk) 17:42, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Werde ich in Zukunft machen. Bei dem Mac OS X screen habe ich es aber z.B sofort als copyvio getagt, da ich es für sehr unwahrscheinlich halte, dass Apple was zur OTRS schickt. --DieBuche (talk) 18:01, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

File:New England Digital logo.jpg

Diese Datei ist ein simples Logo und auf commons erlaubt, kein SLA-Grund. --Kungfuman (talk) 17:46, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Tschuldigung dafür. SLA ist entfernt, Lizenz ist zusätzlich PD-ineligible. --DieBuche (talk) 17:55, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Hallo DieBuche,
vielen Dank für deine "Aufräumarbeit". Schaue aber noch etwas genauer hin, bevor du badname/duplicate-tag setzt. Z.B. bei File:Three stars.svg war die andere Version zu unterschiedlich. Das darf dann gemäß unserer policy nicht gespeedied werden. Gruß. --Túrelio (talk) 08:21, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Ok, kein Problem. Three stars hab ich vektorisiert, und bei zwei anderen Bildern, die vielleicht zu unterschiedlich sind das dupe entfernt--DieBuche (talk) 12:46, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File:00CYNTHIAROCHROCK.jpg

Hi,

why is this one "missing permission" ? The uploader User:Kungfu94546 is the author. What should he do to provide that "permission" ? thx JJ Georges (talk) 18:00, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

I suspect thats its not taken by him: The image has no Exif data (common for newspaper publishing), first upload of new account, taken at the oscars etc. To clear it up he should provide at least the original picture with exif data--DieBuche (talk) 18:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

FYI, Kungfu94546 is Mark T Gerry. The original picture comes from his facebook account and was not published anywhere else, hence no Exif data can be provided (uploader/author is a personal friend of the subject with whom I am also friend on facebook). It is I who personally asked him if he was ok for the picture to be used on commons and explained him how to create an account and upload a file. Nothing to "suspect" here. I asked him specifically to confirm that this was a personal picture and he confirmed. JJ Georges (talk) 18:11, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Ok, that's fine. Excuse my suspicion, a lot of pictures of celebs are uploaded, which turn out to be copyvios. Removed the note. --DieBuche (talk) 18:15, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Could you please remove this conversation from your talk page now that the issue is resolved ? I don't know if this user would like to have his real name exposed here. thx JJ Georges (talk) 18:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Sfdo-cadiz-bandera.svg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Sfdo-cadiz-bandera.svg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.

--Miguel Ángel "fotógrafo" (talk) 15:24, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

WePad Foto

Ach so... Na ja, ich habe so etwas nicht. Kannst du es dann jetzt löschen? Es wäre schon. --Serv (talk) 15:31, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Ok, danke. Sorg ich für--DieBuche (talk) 15:39, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Reverted a new version upload you did

Hi, I've reverted the "new version" upload you did on File:Hw-metternich.jpg as the images are quite different, and on top of that, your new version is a duplicate of File:Prince Klemens Lothar von Metternich-Winneburg.jpg. If you want to substitute the use of the image across all wikipedias etc, please use User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands to get the image changed. Thanks. -- Deadstar (msg) 11:06, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

I uploaded a new extracted Image of Image:Prince Klemens Wenzel von Metternich.jpg. That fine with you? Otherwise I'll revert--DieBuche (talk) 11:41, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Yep, that looks a lot better. Thanks & kind regards, -- Deadstar (msg) 09:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

File:200px-Adidas Logo.png

Hi. A png cannot be the dupe of a svg. They're not in the same format, it's not the same files, both can stay on Commons. Please stop marking them as dupes. Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 19:48, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Im currently marking thumbnails of svg, which were generated by the MediaWiki interface, but then uploaded by a user. Since MediaWiki will continue to outpu the same file, they are in fact dupes--DieBuche (talk) 19:50, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Btw: how is File:200px-Adidas Logo.png not an "an exact duplicate or scaled-down version of" File:Adidas.png?--DieBuche (talk) 19:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Nah, they're not considered as dupes even though a png is accessible somewhere else (the Mediawiki-generated png is not the "straight" way to access a file, bots don't look at it for instance). It is ok to have the extracted version uploaded as well (although usually the uploaded version is a PNG made by a better software, without MediaWiki's bugs). About Adidas logo: my bad. But I think I remember this version was kept for technical reasons (some kind of rendering problem in a sister project, probably), so I won't delete it myself (because I'm a lazy coward). --Eusebius (talk) 20:00, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

File:800px-DDR-robertschumann-1956-vertical.jpg

Thanks for doing this; all I have is Paint, so I never had the ability to do a better-quality image like you've done. Nyttend (talk) 21:24, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

No problem. You should have a look at a program called GIMP. It's free & quite powerful. cheers --DieBuche (talk) 22:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Flickr reviewer

Hello DieBuche, and thank you for your application to be a flickr reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. Congratulations! Please see Commons:Flickr images if you haven't done so already, and the backlogs at Category:Flickr images needing human review and Category:Flickr review needed. A helpful script for easy-tagging flickr images is at importScript('User:Patstuart/Flickrreview.js'); (which you can add to your monobook.js), and you can add {{User reviewer}} or {{User trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your work on Commons! :) Blurpeace 17:00, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Frage zu File:Храм Иоанна Лествичника Донского монастыря 03.jpg

Hallo. Warum hast du die optimierte Version dieser Datei durch die ursprüngliche überschrieben? Der Uploader, der sich mit der Bearbeitung Mühe gemacht hat, will's wissen. --S^[1] 20:08, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Vorallem weil die Bearbeitete eine geringer Auflösung hatte als die flickr Datei, und es bei flickr Dateien im Allgemeinen ganz gut ist das Original zu haben. Da das ja jetzt in der Versionsgeschichte steckt, kann ich eigentlich auch revertieren. Tschuldigung für die Mühe--DieBuche (talk) 21:16, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

About sadness

Hi! You should have in mind that Commons is not only a store for wikis but also for other wikimedia projects like wikisources, wikibooks & etc. Some pictures that are "out of scope" for wikis are very good ilustrations for poems, romanses, books and so on. Btw. I move these picture to Category:Sadness in art. Maybe now it would be more easy to understend. Regards Electron ^<Talk?> 08:19, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Your recent tags and other issues

1. I would like to have the maps in png format. The coordinates on which I am working at present are between 42 50 and 49 34 N and between 19 40 to 29 60 E

2. I have difficulties understanding your views, but agree that the discusion should not be extended indefinitely. What I want you to take into account as far as maps are concerned, is that in the maps reproduced I do not use a single map as a base, but combine the information contained in various maps into a new map which focuses on the issues I want to highlight.

I have produced myself hydrographic and water development maps as early as the 1960s in capacity of project manager for water resources planning and development. Among other duties I also coordinated the design of maps which were produced using information from military maps of Austria-Hungary, of Romania and of the Soviet Union. In many cases we also reambulated parts of the maps where we had doubts on the available information. I had a team of over 10 cartographers working on drawing the maps. I was also in charge of coordinating the printing of the maps in the printing office which was under my orders and I was giving the final approval for the design and printing of the maps. The maps were produced under contract with the government but not by the government itself. I have used several parts of these maps in books which I have published. Never for the original maps was there ever any discussion of copyright infringement and never did the authorities raise any questions regarding the fact that the maps were original work produced by my team and under my supervision, though the maps have been in circulation for about 50 years. I am not claiming that the maps presented in Wikicommons are the original maps, but they are based on these maps, of course updated and checked with other information. I indicated that the maps were my work but this seems not to be accepted.

3. You have tagged some of the pictures which I have uploaded as not compliant with the licensing rules.\

a.- Some of them are family photographs of my father, my grandfather, my brother or other relatives. As copyright holder, I released them to the public domain. What do you have against that. They are not taken from any site and have not been published.

b.- One of the pictures has been uploaded from another Wikipedia, where the author had released the picture for public domain. The source has been clearly indicated as well as the fact that the picture was released by its author. Why do you want to delete it.

c. For another picture, Anna Timiriova's grave, I contacted the author and requested his approval for the publication of the picture, which he granted and the correspondence is attached. What do you have against that.

d. Some pictures are old, significantly above the 70 years required by copyright law. Why do you require and authorization for these images.

I really think that you are exagerating and that you are overstepping your authority. We are part of the same team and we can exchange ideas but not start retaliating if we have different views. I would kindly request an explanation for the tagging of all these pictures.

Hochachtungvoll, Afil (talk) 20:00, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

I'll upload the maps in the morning.

To 2: That's a different case & should be fine. If I should have understood that earlier, I'm sorry. Could you add a link at the deletion request to this section, I think it would clear things up.

3. While the copyright might be fine in most cases, you have to tag them accordingly to avoid confusion. For the family photographs please use {{PD-heirs}}. {{PD-ineligible}} should only be used for very simple geometric shapes etc. not for old photos.

According to the {{PD-Russia-2008}} template works are only free when published before 1943 & their creator is anonymous. I don't think the anonymity applies for all files.

And for PD-old, not the picture has to be 70 years old, but the author has to be dead for 70 years. This is an important difference.

About File:CNCodreanu.jpg: The original uploader claimed PD-art, which is for replication of old 2D art, eg. paintings. The picture is recent, an even if the building is old, the picture itself is still copyrightable. Its the same for File:Guillaume Repin.jpg & File:Raison.jpg. While the art is PD-old, the picture is not, and is not solely a 2D reproduction of the glass pane art. Thus PD-art doesn't apply here

For the picture of Anna Timiriova's grave please see Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Email_thread_-.3E_OTRS

If i missed something please say so. Kindly --DieBuche (talk) 01:54, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Here's the map. --DieBuche (talk) 16:34, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Liebe Buche,

Da wir uns nicht mehr streiten, finde ich es höflich Ihnen auf Deutsch zu antworten, auch wenn mein Deutsch nicht fehlerloss ist und wahrscheinlich auch altmodisch lautet. Aber das letzte Mal ich Berlin besuchte, war noch Hindenburg Reichspräsident und Brüning Reichkanzler (ich war zwar noch ein Kind, aber dennoch). Es freut mich daß wir endlich unsere Probleme besprechen können. Heutzutage scheint es weltweit Monologieren die Mode zu sein, wo jeder eine Meinung hat und ausschreit, aber niemand zuhört.

Ich will mich erst für die Karten bedanken. Ich werde die Karten benutzen so daß das Urheberrecht respektiert wird. Leider habe ich die Karte nicht empfangen. Ich erhalte nur die Mitteilung „Invalid thumbnail parameters or PNG file with more than 12.5 million pixels.“ Könnten Sie mir dabei helfen?

Auch für Ihre Erläuterungen will ich Ihnen Danken, da ich endlich Ihre Meinung verstanden habe, auch wenn ich nicht Hundert prozent enverstanden bin.

Ich hoffe wir können unseren Dialog weiterführen, aber momentan möchte ich zwei Probleme mit Ihnen besprechen.

a. Erstens handelt es sich um ein Bild einer Lyzeums in Rumänien, welches nicht von mir aufgeladen war, aber von der rumänischen Wikipedia genommen habe. Sie haben natürlich recht, für solche Bilder müßen zwei Uhrheberrechtebedingungen entsprechen: das Landschaftuhrheberrecht (das Recht des Architekten des Gebäudes) und dar Recht des Photographen. Diese Dualität ist leiden nich Allen Benutzer klar und in diesem Fall hat der Benutzer einfach bestätigt es handelte sich um ein altes Gebäude. Aber das Bild einfach auszulöschen scheint mir nicht seht freundlich. Ich werde deßhalb versuchen den Autor in ro:wiki zu kontaktieren um festzustellen ob es sein eigenes Lichtbild ist oder nicht. Nach der Antwort, kann die nötige Information eingeschrieben sein. Wenigstens wird in diesem Fall, einer unserer Kollegen verstehen was von ihm erwartet ist.

b. In einer Ihrer Aufmerkungen erwähnen Sie das dem Russischen Urhebergesetzes zufolge, dar Uhrheberrecht würde im Moment der Veröffenlichung anfangen. Das ist jedenfalls so geschrieben im Russischen Zivilgesetzbuch. Was sie aber vergessen, ist das es ein zweites Gesetz gibt, Russian Federation, Federal law no. 231-ФЗ of 2006: Федеральный закон Российской Федерации от 18 декабря 2006 г. N 231-Ф3 О введении в действие части четвертой Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации. Law 231-FL of December 18, 2006: implementation act for part IV of the Civil Code. Dieses Gesetz zeigt wie man den Zivilgesetz anwenden soll. Ich habe leider keine Deutsche oder Englische Übersetzung gefunden, aber hier ist der Russische Text.

Федеральный закон Российской Федерации от 18 декабря 2006 г. N 231-Ф3 О введении в действие части четвертой Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации

Статья 6 Сроки охраны прав, предусмотренные статьями 1281, 1318, 1327 и 1331 Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации, применяются в случаях, когда пятидесятилетний срок действия авторского права или смежных прав не истек к 1 января 1993 года. Авторское право юридических лиц, возникшее до 3 августа 1993 года, то есть до вступления в силу Закона Российской Федерации от 9 июля 1993 года N5351-1 "Об авторском праве и смежных правах", прекращается по истечении семидесяти лет со дня правомерного обнародования произведения, а если оно не было обнародовано, - со дня создания произведения. К соответствующим правоотношениям по аналогии применяются правила части четвертой Кодекса. Для целей их применения такие юридические лица считаются авторами произведений.

Wesentlich sagt der Text daß für Werke die vor dem 3 August 1993 erarbeitet sind, das Uhrheberrecht am Datum der Erarbeitung des Werkes anfängt. Es sagt auch daß die Länge des Urheberrechts von 50 auf 70 Jahre verlängert wird nur für Werke für welche das alte 50 Jahre Recht am 3 August 1993 nicht abgelaufen war. Sie können selbsverständlich eine offizielle Übersetzung verlangen, aber es ist nicht korrekt ein Gesetz anders als es geschrieben ist anzuwenden.

c. Ich würde auch Ihre Hilfe verlangen in einem anderem Fall, was eines meiner Bilder betrifft. Es handelt sich um ein Bild (auch Russisch) welches ausgelöscht war. Jedoch war dieses Bild aus einem offiziellen Polizeidokument genommen, und das Russische Gesetz sagt sehr klar amtliche Dokumente seien nicht vom Uhrheberrecht bedeckt. Es gelingt mir aber nicht das Bild wieder zu bekomment und die Forderung dazu blieb ohne Antwort. Ich werde mich über Ihre anderen Ratschläge kümmern. Hoffentlich was dieser Brief nicht zu lang und gelingt es mir die meisten Unverständnisse zu erklären.Afil (talk) 01:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Ok, erstmal eine kurze Antwort, weil ich gleich los muss: Bei der Karte steht unter der Warnung etwas wie "Full resolution‎ (12,001 × 12,001 pixels, file size: 92.4 MB, MIME type: image/png)". Da musst du rechts klicken und speichern unter auswählen.

Kannst du mir sagen welchen Namen das Polizeidokument hatte? Als amtliches Dokument aus Russland ist es klar gemeinfrei. --DieBuche (talk) 07:41, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Edit: hier hab ichs nochmal als jpg hochgeladen.--DieBuche (talk) 08:01, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Kannst du bei den folgenden Bildern noch angeben, dass du sie als Erbe als GFDL (oder einer anderen Lizenz) veröffentlichst? Die Schallplatten Bilder habe ich alle mit den entsprechenden Lizenzen getaggt:

• File:Eugen Filotti 1.jpg‎
• File:Gheorghe Tasca.jpg‎
• File:Gheorghe Tasca 1913.jpg‎
• File:Eugen Filotti at Sofia.jpg‎

--DieBuche (talk) 18:44, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Danke vielmals für die Karte. Ich habe sie jetzt gut erhalten. Danke auch für die Schallplattenbildertaggung - ich hätte nie erraten wie ich Gründe der Lizenz erklären muss, eigenlich auch nicht eíne solche Erklärung wäre Notwendig. Hoffentlich mach ich es nächstes Mal besser. Die Bilder habe ich mit den Lizenzen getagt, einige als Erbe, und einige auch als Autor.

Das Dokument der Anna Timriowa sei vom Yenissey Regionalen Bureau des Sovietischen Innenministeriums MWD ausgestellt als sie aus ihrer Verhaftung in 1954 freigellassen wurde.

Danke wieder für Ihre Hilfe. Afil (talk) 01:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Mexico-Popocatepetl.jpg

Hallo!

Bei folgendem Bild passt einiges nicht: File:Mexico-Popocatepetl.jpg.

Du hast offensichtlich dieses Bild hochgeladen, bist aber nicht der Urheber, sprich der Fotograph dieses Werks - das ist ein gewisser "Jakub Hejtmánek". Trotzdem hast du eine Self-GFDL bzw. Cc-migration-Lizenz verwendet, die ja nur dann verwendet werden kann, sofern du der Urheber, sprich Fotograph des Bildes bist. Die Quellenangabe "Digital Camara" muss auch überarbeitet werden, da "Digital Camara" wertlos hinsichtlich Urheberschaft ist. Ich bitte dich, diesen Umstand zu klären. --High Contrast (talk) 19:17, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Das Bild kommt von der tschechischen wikipedia, ist dor aber schon gelöscht. Ich hab damals anscheinen einfach die Bildbeschreibung ge-copy&pasted (siehe die erste rev. [3] dort steht noch "popis"). besser wäre natürlich commons-helper gewesen, gabs den da schon?

Ich reparier erst mal die tags.--DieBuche (talk) 19:34, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Der Commons-Helper war damals schon verfügbar. Wie löst du das Problem mit der Quelle "Digital Camara". Hast du schon versucht den Autor auf der cz.wiki diesbzgl. anzusprechen? {{own}} wäre das Ziel. --High Contrast (talk) 19:41, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

das Original muss hier gewesen sein. Merkwürdigerweise sind die logs für die datei aber leer? --DieBuche (talk) 19:43, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Das gleiche gilt übrigens auch für File:Mexico-Iztaccihuatl.jpg--DieBuche (talk) 19:45, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Das Bild kommt von hier; [4]. Dort ist es allerding mit Wasserzeichen & schlechter aufgelößt. Ich werd ihm mal in den nächsten tagen eine email schicken--DieBuche (talk) 19:56, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Gemäß des Links, den du angeführt hast, kann ich mir nur schwer vorstellen, dass dieses Bild nicht von "Jakub Hejtmánek" stammt. --High Contrast (talk) 20:09, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Church of Saints Cyril and Methodius (Khimki).jpg

Hello. Please do not do this anymore! The license is Creative Commons Attribution 2.0. It means I can do with this picture all I want. Thank you for your understanding. --Lodo27 (talk) 19:18, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

But why would u upload a badly compressed jpg instead of the original from flickr. It doesn't make sense--DieBuche (talk) 19:30, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Ich habe mich dieses Falles angenommen und richtig gelöst. Bei Fragen diesbezüglich an mich wenden. Wichtig wäre, dass du den Beitrag eins darüber liest. --High Contrast (talk) 19:33, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Convert to SVG template

Regarding your (semi-)recent edit on that template. Previously the text would read »This foo image should be ...« which worked fine for all the allowed values of the first param. Since your edit the template instead links to a category which usually has nothing to do with the image (remember that the first param was pretty generic, such as »biology«, »map«, »diagram«, &c.). In its current form I find the template text to be misleading. Furthermore, encouraging more accurate values for the first parameter is probably futile since (a) there are thousands of pictures already tagged, (b) it would only mirror one category of the image itself (for which there is no actual need to be mentioned twice) and (c) the maintenance categories (»Flag images that should use vector graphics«, &c.) are built around the allowed values for the first parameter so any other value is actually counterproductive as the images are then put in the most generic (and way overcrowded) category »Images that should use vector graphics«.

While there may be value to a more refined categorization (at least for currently overcrowded areas such as flags and CoA) it needs much more work in other places before, I think. The current variant of the SVG template doesn't add much value or helps in categorization. In my opinion it merely confuses. —Johannes Rössel (talk) 23:58, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Ja, du hast recht, darüber, dass Leute dann andere Parameter angeben als die erlaubten, hab ich nicht nachgedacht. Ist auf /en und /de revertiert. Grüße --DieBuche (talk) 16:11, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Staatsaufbau Nordrhein-Westfalen.svg

Danke--TUBS 19:34, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Py update

Hi DieBuche, I noticed you used this. I updated it today. -- User:Docu at 11:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

cheers, i'll update the code before i run it the next time--DieBuche (talk) 11:47, 13 May 2010 (UTC)