User talk:Der Wolf im Wald/2010

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenzollernbrücke Köln.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --High Contrast 17:10, 16 January 2010 (UTC) very nice, excellent. It is FP IMO --George Chernilevsky 17:17, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gewöhnlicher Löwenzahn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --MattiPaavola 16:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hohenzollernbrücke Köln.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hohenzollernbrücke Köln.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viktoria Siegessäule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very sharp and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 14:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Audi e-tron.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Audi e-tron.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

QI

Guten Tag, Thomas!
Ihre Nominationen sind schon belohnt QI.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Das tut mir leid, muss ich wohl übersehen haben... Viele Grüße -- Der Wolf (talk) 11:37, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baureihe 140 866-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please add EN description and geolocation. --Iotatau 08:49, 29 January 2010 (UTC)  Comment Added -- Der Wolf im Wald 11:45, 29 January 2010 (UTC) Now QI. Good composition. --Iotatau 11:57, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Internationalisation of User:Der Wolf im Wald/Credits

Hello Thomas,

I noticed your custom credit template, User:Der Wolf im Wald/Credits. I believe it would be nice if this template was internationalised, so your message would be displayed using the language of the user. Would you mind if I enable this ?

The design and texts would be the same. English and German users would see the existing credit lines. I will add a French version, as faithful to the original as possible. For unregistered users, and users for whom no translation is available, a default version would be displayed (generally, it is the English version, but if you want you can have a specific one).

What do you think ? Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello, this is a good idea, but I have no idea how to enable this, may you please try it?

Thank you!

Cheers -- Der Wolf (talk) 15:07, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

 Done. Your template now exists in three languages : German, English and French. The design for all three is defined in User:Der Wolf im Wald/Credits/layout, which you can change at will. And you can also add more languages later, by having more subpages added (such as User:Der Wolf im Wald/Credits/es, etc.)

The english version is displayed by default (that can be changed if you want).

Just leave me a note if you have any problems with this later, I would be glad to help!

Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 18:24, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Greetings -- Der Wolf (talk) 22:32, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cityscape Frankfurt 2009 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 16:36, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Zug Langzeitbelichtung.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zug Langzeitbelichtung.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Rathaus Bonn

Hallo, das Rathaus Bonn ist ansonsten zu schön, als dass es wegen der minimalen "perspective distortion" durchfallen sollte. Dürfte ich eine korrigierte Version hochladen? Ansonsten wird es bei mir in Adobe Photoshop mit "Lens Correction"-Parametern von -0,1° und -5 vertikaler Transformation perfekt. Gruß aus Berlin, Jochen --Iotatau (talk) 17:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Danke, aber ich nehm mir das Bild jetzt mal vor;). Viele Grüße -- Der Wolf (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Rathaus Bonn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Auf der linken Seite leicht nach rechts verzerrt. --Mbdortmund 00:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC) Das ist aber ein ganz normaler Verzerrungseffekt, ihn zu beheben würde das Bild unnatürlich wirken lassen. Außerdem finde ich die Auflösung (34,5 MP) so beeindruckend, dass es allein schon deshalb ein Qualitätsbild ist. -- Der Wolf im Wald 14:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)  Question Excellent amount of details, excellent light, but lacks perspective correction: the left side of the house is leaning towards right. Would you be willing to fix that? (Sorry if I duplicated any review comments, but I don't understand a word about the German above. :-)) --MattiPaavola 13:19, 3 February 2010 (UTC)  CommentLook at the QI rules, perspective correction is wanted. Size alone is not a reason for promotion. --MichaelBueker 11:49, 6 February 2010 (UTC)  CommentPerspective correction done! -- Der Wolf im Wald 18:07, 11 February 2010 (UTC) Thanks, now QI. --Iotatau 18:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Anfrage

Hallo, ich bin Autor des Bonner Personenlexikon, erschienen in der 2. Auflage beim Bouvier-Verlag und würde gerne zwei Aufnahmen (Poppelsdorfer Schloss und Universitäts-Hauptgebäude) in der demnächst erscheinenden dritten Auflage abdrucken. Willst du tatsächlich, wie bei Wiki-Commons steht, als "Wolf im Wald genannt" werden? Ich finde das etwas albern und würde dich lieber mit deinem korrekten vollständigen Namen nennen. Geht das in Ordnung? 95.223.246.203 15:55, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Hallo, ja freut mich dass du meine Bilder verwenden möchtest. Du kannst mich einfach als Thomas Wolf erwähnen, Wolf im Wald wäre in diesem Falle wirklich recht albern;) Viele Grüße -- Der Wolf (talk) 23:34, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Danke für deine rasche und positive Antwort. Liebe Grüße -- Jupp (übrigens bei Wikipedia findest du mich als Juppartist) 95.223.246.203 15:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Frankfurter Panorama

Deine Panoramas vom Geotheturm auf FFM blickend sind wirklich ausgesprochen gut! Ich hoffe diesen Sommer bot sich auch wieder die Gelegenheit dazu, denn die 2009er Aufnahme leidet im Vergleich zur 2008er unter einer sehr starken Verblauung. Auf letzterer sind jedoch Opernturm und das Palais Quartier noch im Bau. Wie dem auch sei, setzen deine Bilder hier den Qualitatsstandard! --36ophiuchi (talk) 08:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Hallo, freut mich dass sie dir so gefallen! Ich habe eine gute Nachricht für dich: Ich werde in etwa einer Woche wieder in Frankfurt sein und jeden Tag zum Goetheturm fahren, bis ich ein geniales Foto habe. Diesmal mit neuer Fotoausrüstung, die die Qualität der alten noch weit übertrifft und ich werde mir mehr Mühe geben mit dem Stitchen (mehr Einzelaufnahmen), sodass die Auflösug und Schärfe noch wesentlich besser werden als bei den alten Bildern. ;) Viele Grüße -- Der Wolf (talk) 09:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opernturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --kallerna 08:18, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsehturm Hamburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 16:27, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cityscape Frankfurt 2010 panorama crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 19:59, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westarkade Frankfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and good. --Cayambe 19:10, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainfest Frankfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 14:13, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T185 facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments interesting --Mbdortmund 09:18, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

FPC

Hello, although the history says it's been removed, I can still see the ghost sleeve of the lady at the leftmost edge of this superb picture, even after clearing my cache, purging, hitting Ctrl-Shift-R numerous times... is it possible that you mistakenly reuploaded just the exact same picture ? Kindest regards, --MAURILBERT (discuter) 00:52, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

I only fixed the red artifact in the tree. Do you mean the bright point between the womans shoulder an the lamp? I checked all single images on which vou can see this part an this is definitely no artifact. It's the sun shineing on the ground;) Greatings, -- Der Wolf (talk) 16:00, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

No, i mean the thing circled in green... --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:24, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Oh sorry, now I understand you. I tried to fix it, but sadly it was unpossilbe for me to eliminate the artifact... greatings -- Der Wolf (talk) 00:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opernturm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:45, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:26, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frankfurt am Main.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Request To compete with the present VI, you have to open a Most Valued Review. For the existing VI, "the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR." All details on Commons:Valued image candidates#How to open a Most Valued Review. --Myrabella (talk) 20:36, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

• Thank you for the advice! -- Der Wolf (talk) 20:59, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

•  Support I still guess that it would be appropriate to have an image including the Main river for that scope. However, compared with the present VI, I support this challenger because it depicts a larger part of the town, carefully documented with annotations. At the review size, this geocoded QI looks good on-screen (although I tend to prefer the rendering of the other image). Last point, it is well categorized => OK to me, all criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 08:31, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

MVR Scores:
1. Cityscape Frankfurt 2010 panorama crop.jpg: +1 <--
2. Cityscape Frankfurt.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) 
=>
File:Cityscape Frankfurt 2010 panorama crop.jpg: Promoted.<--
File:Cityscape Frankfurt.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. 

--Myrabella (talk) 17:24, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower 185 during construction phase on a sunny afternoon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great! --kallerna 06:59, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Grashalme crop.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:56, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grashalme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment - I like it, but it needs taxonomical categorisation. Mattbuck 14:57, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fama Kunstakademie Dresden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}