User talk:DenesFeri/Archív01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, DenesFeri!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
  • You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
  • There are several tools to upload files.
  • Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.
Made a mistake?
  • Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
  • Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

pictures[edit]

Hi DenesFeri

thanks for uploading all those pictures. Do you have them in a higher resolution by chance? Most of your pictures are so small that they can hardly be used. --Amada44 (talk) 10:23, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Magyar: Feri, ezek a képek tényleg túl kicsik ahhoz, hogy valóban használhatóak legyenek. Mobiltelefonnal készültek? Legalább akkora képek kellenének, amekkorákat a Magyar Wikipédiába töltöttél föl. Ezeken per pillanat alig látszik valami, úgy pedig tényleg nehéz felhasználni őket. Megvannak még az eredeti nagyságú képek, vagy ezek az eredeti felbontású képek? --Beroesz (talk) 12:04, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unidentified_plantKew32.jpg[edit]

File:Unidentified_plantKew32.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--TheDJ (talk) 13:12, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unidentified_plantKew9.jpg[edit]

File:Unidentified_plantKew9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Amada44  talk to me 09:44, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peterborough-i_sziklafigua.jpg[edit]

File:Peterborough-i_sziklafigua.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ez esetben már tárgytalan, de egyébként a {{rename|új név|indok}} sablonnal kérhetsz átnevezést, és a Commons:File renaming lapon olvashatsz a procedúráról részletesen. --Tgr (talk) 14:42, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

plant vs butterfly[edit]

Pieris.... just a slip. The plant is named Pieris. Uleli (talk) 07:23, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Fuchsia[edit]

Misread the first time, File:1F5.jpg is a Fuchsia in the section Quelusia or a hybrid. Where did you take the photo? The most common species in cultivation is Fuchsia magellanica, but hybrids of unknown ancestry are even more common. Uleli (talk) 18:44, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fuchsia campos-portoi is readily distinguished from other fuchsias by its small and very narrow, gland-serrulate leaves. It also has unusual, small flowers; the floral tube is nearly rhombic and very short, whereas the sepals are up to four times as long and are noticeably inflated in bud. Your plant looks more similar to F. magellanica or a hybrid, but I'm defently not sure about that. Compare with brincos.de.princesa's photostream Uleli (talk) 18:54, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siklo1.jpg[edit]

File:Siklo1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ANRH (talk) 18:42, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Date[edit]

Can you please use the international date format: Date= 2011-07-18. It will show the correct date in the different languages. Thank you. --Kürschner (talk) 10:23, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now is ok? Look File:Ha - Latimeria chalumnae 1.jpg DenesFeri (talk) 11:44, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Look now, I corrected it. And I put them into the Category:Collections of the Natural History Museum, London. --Kürschner (talk) 11:50, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The date format is 2010-07-27 (year-month-day), this shows the correct, convertibled date in many languages (for example in German: 18. Juli 2011).--Kürschner (talk) 11:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Now it is fine :-) - By the way, normally you can answer here on your own page, expert users are looking here for your answer. Thank you, very good pictures! --Kürschner (talk) 12:11, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:1 - Hernyó 1.jpg[edit]

Hi Denes Feri,

I'm not sure even if it is of genus Morpho. They look a lot like Caligo caterpillars, but they could also be Morpho, I'm not sure.

Regards, Leonardo (talk) 18:22, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, between these, it certainly is Caligo mennon. Regards, 189.102.220.41 14:47, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I need to be 100% sure. DenesFeri (talk) 08:16, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I can't give you 100% certainty. What I can tell is that it is a Morphinae caterpillar, and that's what I categorized it. Maybe you can ask on bugguide.net... there are very good people there. Regards, Leonardo (talk) 20:38, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK! Thanks! DenesFeri (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I know UK Butterflies, which help identifying butterflies from the United Kingdom. For other places in Europe, unfortunately I don't know. Regards, Leonardo (talk) 15:24, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've never heard about it, but it doesn't mean it's bad... actually, looking at the IDs he gave on some species I have some knowledge, he looks very honest and acurate. Regards, Leonardo (talk) 17:00, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caligo memnon 6.jpg[edit]

Hi,

I don't know what species is that, but it wasn't me who categorized. I've just removed Unidentified Lepidoptera from the image, as it had a photo of two butterfles, and two species categories on it. If you have good reasons to believe it is not this species, please remove this category and add a category that fits. Either the real species, or the most specific Unidentified ... you are able to.

Thanks,

Leonardo (talk) 16:48, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm unable to give any secure ID to this butterfly. If you have doubt enough, move it to Unidentified Papilio, or Unidentified Papilionidae.

Regards, Leonardo (talk) 03:04, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Régi menü[edit]

Helló! Valakinek megint elsült az agya és alkotott egy olyan dolgot, ami tök jó az új szerkesztőknek, viszont az régieknek bosszantó. Most már eldönthetné a Wikimedia, hogy mi a búbánatot akar: megtartani a régi szerkesztőket, vagy vonzani az újakat.

Itt a régi feltöltő lap. Beroesz (talk) 08:38, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Én kiraknám a személyes lapomra hivatkozásként, akkor a legkönnyebben elérhető. Ha megnézed akkor a Wizardnak nevezett felület tetején van egy kis kék link "Vissza a régi felülethez" címmel. Arra is lehet kattintani.

Lehet még használni egy Commonist nevű programot is, ez főként akkor hasznos, ha tömegesen szeretnél képeket föltölteni. Én általában ezzel töltöm föl a képeket, mert nem kell 200-szor kitölteni ugyanazt az űrlapot, a dokumentáció másolható. --Beroesz (talk) 09:05, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

:Botany Bay - Syrphus ribesii and Calystegia sepium 2.jpg[edit]

Syrphidae is Episyrphus balteatus Nice photo! Regards Notafly (talk) 11:01, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Second fly[edit]

95% sure Sapromyza Cheers Notafly (talk) 11:24, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One more[edit]

It is a pleasure Now for File:L126.jpg Aceria macrorhynchus a miteNotafly (talk) 11:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

VadalmaKew.jpg[edit]

Szia Feri!

Ez a kép nem vadalmát ábrázol, hanem a japánbirs Chaenomeles japonica termését. Pipi69e (talk) 17:14, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Olive and Senecio[edit]

The "olive" is Prunus laurocerasus. Do you have a link to your Senecio? Uleli (talk) 14:20, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

g[edit]

Hello, DenesFeri. You have new messages at grin's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

File:Asparagales - Agave colorata 1.jpg[edit]

Hi Tangopaso,

You have taken out/away the unidentified cactaceae category from this picture. Why? Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 09:07, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
1. Because if this plant is Agave colorata (I agree), it is not an unidentified plant (and I try to put some unidentified plants into the category of their genus or species)
2. Agave are not cactaceae, but Asparagaceae. They are succulent such as Cactaceae, they look like Cactus, but they are not Cactaceae.
Best regards. --Tangopaso (talk) 11:27, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know that the main plant is Agave colorata, but the unidentified cactaceae category was for the other plants next to it. If you look at the picture, you will see that there are some cactaceae sp. as well. For them was that category there. Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 09:52, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
In my opinion, Category:Unidentified Cactaceae is useful when the plants may be identified in the future, by amators or specialists. But here, the other plants are a little too far, and the definition of the photo is not enough to magnify it and see the plants well. And some of them are cut on the photo (we dont see the entire plant).
When you take photos, you should notice the identification signs. It makes identification obvious.
 Question Are you sure about Agave colorata ? When I try to read the identification sign, I read Agave ....asana. Is it not Agave parrasana ? The two species are similar... The label on the left seems to be Rebutia pygmaea. --Tangopaso (talk) 20:19, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
The true is, that I'm not sure. I compared that plant with this one File:Agave3.jpg, and for me they look the same, but I'm not an expert. The plant on the second picture is Agave colorata. DenesFeri (talk) 08:29, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
It is not simple ! I have at home 50 cactus or succulents. And I have several books about that, but there are not enough species of agave. And I am not a specialist... I have the feeling that the identification of the two species are wrong. Even botanical gardens make some times mistakes ! I think that Agave colorata looks like this : File:Agave colorata 1.jpg : not many leaves, strong spines. And Agave parrasana like this : File:Agava parrasana kiev.jpg : more leaves, small spines (I have one of them, I did not know the species, now I know, I will upload a photo). In this condition, your agave is A. colorata (the label is wrong, or perhaps another plant behind ?). I propose to keep A. colorata, to add Category:Rebutia pygmaea (seems OK). And to fix File:Agave parrasana.jpg as A. colorata. But I will keep the mention A. parrasana as "probable error". --Tangopaso (talk) 21:00, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
I identified only one, Cleistocactus strausii. I added Category:Plants in Kew Gardens on some of them. Perhaps, a guy well knowing Kew will identify some of the images. For the 3 images such as File:Asparagales - Agave sp. 1.jpg, they are Echeveria, not Agave. I changed category for Unidentified Echeveria. But I dont know the species. I did not rename the photos, because I dont know what file name is suitable for you. Best regards. --Tangopaso (talk) 21:46, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ancistrus_stigmaticus_-_NHM_1.jpg[edit]

Hallo DenesFeri, I have renamed your picture. Please change the file description and have a look to the category "Ancistrus stigmaticus" (not existing still yet). Regards, --Pristurus (talk) 15:05, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Grant Museum of Zoology[edit]

Thankyou for those excellent and very interesting pics.I would like to link to them from the Robert Edward Grant [1] page so can you (or I) add the Category Grant Museum of Zoology. I will also write something on the museum. Best regards and thanks again Notafly (talk) 12:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC) Yes There is now a short account here[[2] at bottom of the page and the commons link. I will fix the rest tommorow. If you liked this museum you must visit the Dublin Museum.You may stay with me in Belfast if you wish and we could travel to Dublin by rail. I will speak to my wife e-mail robertnash1945@yahoo.co.uk Notafly (talk) 22:05, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Christmas[edit]

And for you too.Open here [3]Notafly (talk) 12:08, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Best wishes for you too! Greetings, --Pristurus (Diskussion) 20:29, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

File renaming[edit]

Hi DenesFeri; To correct the name of a file, please use {{Rename}} (Commons:File renaming), e.g., File:Anser albifrons W28.jpg, now File:Anser brachyrhynchus W28.jpg. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi as well. Thank you for all of your pictures. Please note the new syntax for {{Rename}} - numeric parameter 2 is required and lack of it will delay renames, so please use it. For renaming pictures you uploaded, "1" without quotes is good.   — Jeff G. ツ 12:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Parthenocissus vel Vitis[edit]

Parthenocissus quinquefolia has leaves palmately compound, composed of five leaflets. On the picture you can see leaves palmately lobed. Very different, probably belong to Vitis. The fruit is also very different. Parthenocissus quinquefolia has leaves and fruit wchich looks like these:

Best regards. Kenraiz (talk) 12:23, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:W15ULOMADAR.jpg[edit]

File:W15ULOMADAR.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jimfbleak (talk) 18:14, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Hello, DenesFeri. You have new messages at Alpha Quadrant's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

about my pictures[edit]

Hi Materialscientist,

I see that you are renameing my pictures, and thank you for that. Some of them, were in some articles. After the renameing, those pictures will show in the articles? Or some bot will delete them from there? Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 11:01, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The renaming script does this: move the file and its page, set a redirect to the new page (so that the new file can be found if needed), send a command to a bot to substitute the file in all wikiprojects. The substitution may be delayed by server problems (up to hours, maybe a day). Thus if you are worried that some file isn't showing for too long in an article, you can click on the file link and substitute the file manually. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 11:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you show me, please? DenesFeri (talk) 11:09, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Say, File:1 Plant sp. - Kew 44.jpg was moved to File:Proteales - Platanus orientalis - kew 1.jpg, and a command was sent to the bot talk here to replace the file in User_talk:DenesFeri/Archív03. This command will be sent to the bot by an administrator some time soon. Meanwhile, the image is invisible in User_talk:DenesFeri/Archív03 - this because of the <gallery> layout; in regular articles you would see a link instead of image, like VodopadVodopad.JPG here [4]. Materialscientist (talk) 11:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So this is done automatically? When the file is renamed? DenesFeri (talk) 11:27, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, within seconds, only the file substitution is delayed. Materialscientist (talk) 11:35, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Commons Delinker got its commands now. You find the logs there. Yes, most image usages are replaced automatically. -- RE rillke questions? 11:36, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In other words, Rillke was kind enough to send your/my renaming requests to the bot here [5] [6]. Here [7] you see my signature, but this edit was actually done by a script because I clicked a button in your renaming template. Materialscientist (talk) 11:43, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK than, thank you! Cheers. DenesFeri (talk) 12:05, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Easter[edit]

And a very Happy Easter to you to. Will you consider taking photographs of butterfly habitats in Hungary this year? There are not so many around and yet they illustrate a very important part of butterfly biology. Here is one by Ettore in Genoa http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zerynthia_polyxena (at the bottom of the page.Warm regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 19:45, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I to go along with Notafly: Happy Easter to you too. Greetings from (cold) Germany, --Pristurus (talk) 21:01, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: plant picture[edit]

Hello, DenesFeri. You have new messages at FleetCommand's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Re: plant picture[edit]

Hello, DenesFeri. You have new messages at FleetCommand's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

about renameing[edit]

Hi Jeff G.,

Sorry, but I do not understand what do you want. If you give me an example, perhaps I will understand. Regards DenesFeri (talk) 12:48, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, let us consider the case of File:Pecten albicans - London 2.jpg. In this edit, you wrote in part "{{rename|Pecten albicans - London 2.jpg|The mollusca has been identified}}". It would have been far better if you had inserted "1" as the second parameter to form "{{rename|Pecten albicans - London 2.jpg|1|The mollusca has been identified}}".   — Jeff G. ツ 13:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So you want me to put there "1"? For example if there are 5 pictures with Pecten albicans, to all I write "1", or "2", "3" etc.? DenesFeri (talk) 08:12, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"1" is for your own uploads. All the rename requests you made that I can remember were for your own uploads. Please see Template:Rename/doc and File renaming criterion #1 for details.   — Jeff G. ツ 10:55, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iz - Limenitis archippus and Danaus plexippus.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Iz - Limenitis archippus and Danaus plexippus.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Vera (talk) 13:06, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

-Sorry, I thought it was a drawing of a butterfly --Vera (talk) 13:07, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hibiscus[edit]

Hi DenesFeri,

I didn't say they misidentified their plants. I was using Cat-a-lot to sort pictures of Hibiscus species into categories of their own and maybe I did miss your images as I couldn't look at all the names. That's my bad, and sorry for any inconvenience I've made.

However I think we should put images of plants to categories of their own when possible, we shouldn't put them into categories of their genus if the category of the species is available. Prenn ⁞ Talk 09:39, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, the category can be created, just tell me the species' name. Prenn ⁞ Talk 12:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Natural History Museum in London[edit]

Hello, I think you switched title and legend between these two photos :

  • Pu - Lycoteuthis lorigera; syn. Lycoteuthis diadema.jpg
    Pu - Lycoteuthis lorigera; syn. Lycoteuthis diadema.jpg
  • Pu - Cranchia scabra.jpg
    Pu - Cranchia scabra.jpg

see:

  • :Lycoteuthis lorigera.jpg
    :Lycoteuthis lorigera.jpg
  • Cranchia scabra.jpg
    Cranchia scabra.jpg

- Goudron92 (talk) 21:21, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Identification?[edit]

Hi and thanks for uploading photos of your garden. Since identifying rose cultivars by the looks of the plant is pretty much impossible, it'd be of great help if you could tell us the cultivar names of these roses:

Best regards, -- Pitke (talk) 21:10, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For you too[edit]

Have a happy day.

Notafly (talk) 14:31, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year[edit]

Too late for Merry Cristmas from me. I have been on vacation on Teneriffe. But I wish you the best 2013! Uleli (talk) 21:25, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year![edit]

FunkMonk (talk) 10:56, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:1 Plant sp. - Kew 117.jpg[edit]

Nem tudom, hogy még kell-e, de mivel nekem egyik kis kedvencem: Osteospermum. :o))) Fauvirt (talk) 22:36, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Easter[edit]

A very Happy Easter to you too. Can you take habitat pictures this year? They would be very useful.I am using what I can find on European moth pages Cheers Robert aka Notafly (talk) 19:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou[edit]

Yes.Those are excellent. I will use several soon.Please take more in Hungary, especially of nature reserves if this is possible.Talk to you soon Robert aka Notafly (talk) 18:36, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DenesFeri/Archív01&oldid=93850647"