User talk:Danny-w
_-_03.JPG){kind=link}
_-_02.JPG){kind=link}
Using your picture Tom's restaurant[edit]
Hello Danny-w, am i allowed to use your picture as header for my twitter account? because i found no way to create a link from twitter to the wikicommons page... best regards ducky
Spider monkey[edit]
WikiCommons only allows photos published under GFDL, Creative Commons or similar licenses. Please do not upload fair use photos from English Wikipedia. Those photos will have to be deleted. Thuresson 22:26, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
Jeanne Moreau[edit]
For continuing to upload fair use photos, you have been blocked for 7 days. Also, please stop uploading thumbnails, images without copyright tags or images without a source. Thuresson 23:55, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
Sorry. I thought a 50 years old film poster, of Jeanne Moreauis herself, is allowed for use in the spcific title of Jeanne Moreau. I won't do it again. Danny-w 06:04, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
- "The Bride Wore Black" is a film from 1968 [1]. See Commons:Criteria for inclusion to read about which kind of images you can upload. Thuresson 13:00, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
City of God poster =[edit]
You've been warned before - don't upload copyright images, or you'll get blocked. Again. ed g2s • talk 15:07, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Argentinian Stamp[edit]
I uploaded the argentinian stamp File:Stamp Tabac or Life.gif.
If it's not legal becouse of any reason - please erease it. Thanks Danny-w 20:26, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
]]
Image Tagging Image:Stamp Tabac or Life.gif[edit]
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Stamp Tabac or Life.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ALE! 07:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:James Dean stamp.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Davepape 03:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Madox_Brown_last_of_Eng.jpg[edit]
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Madox_Brown_last_of_Eng.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Code·is·poetry 09:09, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- I saw this message just now. Ford Madox Brown (1821 – 1893) was an English painter who past away 120 years ago. The deleted paint was painted about 150 years ago. I do have a source in the net, but since the picture was deleted - there's no point to point at it now. It's the Wikipedia's loss. Danny-w 03:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Image:Sagol Jerusalem 08.jpg[edit]
דני, הורדתי את ר. מהתמונה לגמרי מקווה שזה בסדר Amirki (talk) 01:07, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- נו, טוב. אתה צודק. זה היה מתלהב, נמהר וטפשי מצידי. סליחה. Amirki (talk) 23:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 17:03, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. The mistake was corrected. Danny-w (talk) 07:33, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Midreshet Ein HaNatziv college-02.jpg was uncategorized on 12 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Midreshet Ein HaNatziv college-01.jpg was uncategorized on 12 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stage2.jpg[edit]
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stage2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Blond (talk) 13:12, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
an answer:
This image is a screen shot of a patient during Slow Wave Sleep (stage 4).
The high amplitude EEG is highlighted in red. This screen shot represents a 30 second epoch (30 seconds of data). Public domain from the English Wikipedia [2]
The file was upload to the English wikipedia by User:S. Jähnichen (who is not exist anymore) in 16:26, 9 December 2005. [see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sleep_EEG_Stage_4.jpg].
I uploaded the file to "commons" a bit later. It was in 2005. Today I guess I would not do that. The creator of the photo, who is not in the English wikipedia anymore, explicitly stated, in the English wikipedia, he waives his rights. Indeed he did not write it in the usual format of "Commons". [see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sleep_EEG_Stage_4.jpg]
You are welcome to act in this case according to your discretion, and in accordance with the logic. :-) .
Regards, Danny-w (talk) 16:34, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply, Danny. The problem is that you didn't mentioned a license tag for the image before. Every file has to have a source and a license, and it was missing a license at this file. Since you mention that the file was released into public domain by a user, the problem can be solved by adding public domain tag, like {{PD-user|name of the user}}. With base on the information that you provided now, S. Jähnichen wasn't the original uploader, it was MrSandman at the English Wikipedia, and the same file (File:Sleep EEG Stage 2.jpg) was transferred to Commons by S. Jähnichen. The copyright problem is solved now. Blond (talk) 17:39, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
_-_03.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
|
File:Gay Liberation Monument (Manhattan) - 03.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
_-_03.JPG){kind=link}
Leoboudv (talk) 19:04, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
_-_03.JPG){kind=link}
_-_02.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
|
|
File:Gay Liberation Monument (Manhattan) - 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
_-_02.JPG){kind=link}
Leoboudv (talk) 19:06, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
_-_02.JPG){kind=link}
Copyright status: File:Pride Tel Aviv 2014 - 10.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Pride Tel Aviv 2014 - 10.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:04, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- I myself asked to delate it. And I wrote it clearly. Thanks anyway. Danny-w (talk) 14:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 | File:Esino Lario 811 2.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 02:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
התמונה צולמה במצלמה של הסמרטפון הפרטי שלי. אני מסכים שהיא יפה מאוד. תודה, אני צלם מוכשר. תרמתי את התמונה לוויקיפדיה, ואני לא מבין מה הבעיה כאן. בברכה, דני Danny-w (talk) 12:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- The photo was taken with the camera of my private smartphone. I agree that she is an amazing picture. Thanks, I'm a talented photographer.
I contributed the image to Wikipedia, and I don't understand what is the problem here. Regards, Danny-w (talk) 12:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
| File:Esino Lario 811.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 02:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
התמונה צולמה במצלמה של הסמרטפון הפרטי שלי. אני מסכים שהיא יפה מאוד. תודה, אני צלם מוכשר.
תרמתי את התמונה לוויקיפדיה, ואני לא מבין מה הבעיה כאן.
בברכה, דני Danny-w (talk) 12:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- The photo was taken with the camera of my private smartphone. I agree that she is an amazing picture. Thanks, I'm a talented photographer.
I contributed the image to Wikipedia, and I don't understand what is the problem here. Regards, Danny-w (talk) 12:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
_-_01.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yours sincerely, Storkk (talk) 13:47, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 |
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Enthusiastic audience perorm "Toy", the Eurovision 2018, Pride House, Be'er Sheva.webm. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
--Túrelio (talk) 20:57, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
|
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Yaakov Terner.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
Vera (talk) 12:42, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Yaakov Terner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— billinghurst sDrewth 12:56, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
|
|
File:Gay village of Montreal 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
r talk:Ikan Kekek|talk]]) 06:04, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I don't think that a dummy, painted with the pride colors, is considered as a copyrighted work. The colors of pride flag do symbolize pride and therefore presented during Montreal Pride Week, a lot of times, in many ways. This is one of these ways. There are no copyrights in the colors of the pride, painted on a dummy, in the pride week. This photo is an example of the richness of colors, especially the colors of Pride, in lovely Montreal, during the Pride Week. This is what the picture represents. Since there is no exclusivity on the pride colors and these colors have no copyright, and since this is done within the broader context of Pride Week, in my opinion this is not included among the definitions of a personal copyrighted creation. Danny-w (talk) 13:56, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
