User talk:Crisco 1492/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1 Archive 2

File:Peta-sleman.png

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Crisco 1492!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
  • You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
  • There are several tools to upload files.
  • Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.
Made a mistake?
  • Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
  • Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

I guess you didn't see my reply on en:wp. The page you got this from says it's copyrighted, so it's not going to last here. Sorry. Go follow my link to Dr. B. and get him on this; say I sent you. He'll pour sources into pages. Cheers, Jack Merridew 04:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did, I was just going to ask for help on the Village Pump because (to me) it is unclear what exactly is copyrighted: is it the site, or the map? Article 14, letter b of the Indonesian copyright law states: "publication and/or reproduction of anything which is published by or on behalf of the Government, except if the Copyright is declared to be protected by law or regulation or by a statement on the work itself or at the time the work is published", so I think legally it may be public domain. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Crisco 1492!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:50, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dewi Sandra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:The Mummy 1932 film poster.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Mummy 1932 film poster.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:09, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion in the EnWP

Many thanks for "my" african buffalo !--Jebulon (talk) 00:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paul Gauguin - Deux Tahitiennes.jpg

File:Paul Gauguin - Deux Tahitiennes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:55, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded a video, please check

I have uploaded File:Will Success Spoil Rock Hunter trailer.ogv. Please check if it is in accordance with policies and guidelines. Aditya (talk) 03:49, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to provide that information. I know for sure that I am pretty lousy with image copyrights. But, I still can take an instruction (hence the video, after discussing with you). Can you guide me about this? Aditya (talk) 03:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I also have a question posted here. Unfamiliar with commons processes, I don't know how to check that. Can you help? Aditya (talk) 03:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marrus orthocanna.jpg

Please see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Marrus orthocanna NOAA.jpg--Citron (talk) 09:58, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you READ Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Marrus orthocanna NOAA.jpg--Citron

File:Pony Express Map William Henry Jackson.jpg

Re this map, I'm pretty sure from the forensic evidence that it was crated in 1861, or at least within the lifetime of w:William Henry Jackson, and that the commemorative reissue only added the red text and the Union pacific logo at the center bottom. As such the copyright-relevant work should fall under PD-70, as Jackson died in 1942. If necessary we can stamp out the commemorative text, but in my opinion it is below the threshold of originality. What do you think? ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 12:08, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • The text is still PD in the US no matter what as there is no copyright notice. I agree that it was certainly created before 1942, but without any proof of earlier publication we have to base our templates on what is certain.Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Null modems.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Appropriately Licensed

You participated at the earlier discussion on licence choice for Featured Pictures. A number of users felt that such restrictions should be made at policy level. Please comment at Commons:Requests for comment/AppropriatelyLicensed. This is a proposal to amend this licence policy to disallow future uploads where the sole licence is inappropriate for the media (e.g., GFDL for images). In earlier discussions there were a number of comments that, while reasonable opinions, did not align with Wikimedia's mission for free content. Please read the FAQ before commenting. Thanks -- Colin (talk) 22:55, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unlabeled Renatto Luschan Skin color map.svg

File:Unlabeled Renatto Luschan Skin color map.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kreuzkümmel (talk) 06:29, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cristo crucificado.jpg

Hi Crisco, happened to notice on my watchlist that your higher resolution version of this image has been reverted. I didn't want to just revert the editor without finding out first if there has been a discussion about it, or if you know of some reason why the original might be preferred? Thanks! Julia\talk 11:45, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pickaninnies feast on watermelon.jpg

File:Pickaninnies feast on watermelon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fæ (talk) 09:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pickaninnies feast on watermelon.jpg. Jee 16:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Joseph Ducreux (French - Self-Portrait, Yawning - Google Art Project.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Joseph Ducreux (French - Self-Portrait, Yawning - Google Art Project.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Chaplin The Kid edit.jpg, which was nominated by Tomer T at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chaplin The Kid.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Halftoning?

Did you accidentally use the wrong edit summary for the Dog Dancer image? Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:44, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you are OK

Hi Chris, I hope you are fine and are not affected by the Java volcano eruption recently. All the best. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 14:53, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Ash in Yogyakarta during the 2014 eruption of Kelud 01.jpg, which was nominated by Jkadavoor at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ash in Yogyakarta during the 2014 eruption of Kelud 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/ Congratulations. Our bot script is a bit out of date and Daniel seems to have not much time to update it. But we manually cover the limitations. Sorry for the late message; I was away in the last evening. Jee 03:18, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just added it at Template:Potd/2014-03-13, a slot free now as the image already there was deleted. See Template:Potd/2014-03-13 (en) and do make any improvement if necessary. I tried to update Template:Potd/2014-03-13 (zh-hans); hope a translator will handle it later. :) Jee 03:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pong Tiku

Sorry Mas Chris, I didn't really know Indonesia has no freedom of panorama and such regulations. Will it affect all photos I've uploaded? :( NoiX180 (talk) 14:27, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • NoiX180, it will affect any in which the depicted statue or structure is not de minimis and not in the public domain in Indonesia (and in the US, for statues). That's why many skyscraper photos have been deleted here as well. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
De minimis? I don't understand. NoiX180 (talk) 15:31, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alitta succinea (epitoke form).jpg. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 11:09, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two of something-Vote

Hello,
just wanted to notify you that one of the pictures you voted for in the photo challenge 'Two of something' unfortunately was deleted, freeing one of your votes...
Regards, --Anna reg (talk) 16:52, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aularches miliaris at Mangunan Orchard, Dlingo, Bantul, Yogyakarta 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 13:21, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge Silver

Photo Challenge – Second Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Ash in Yogyakarta during the 2014 eruption of Kelud 07.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Newsworthy, in February 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here.

voting

diff -- you appear to have voted 3/3 without signing. -- Colin (talk) 10:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Approach to Ratu Boko, 2014-03-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:39, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eastern face of west gate, Taman Sari, Yogyakarta, 2014-04-24 (from 19 images).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Cccefalon 09:42, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potamarcha congener, Sambisari Temple complex 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Cccefalon 16:36, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ash in Yogyakarta during the 2014 eruption of Kelud 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support File on the smaller side, but great image--Godot13 05:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Neutral density filter demonstration.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neutral density filter demonstration.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help wanted

Would you be willing to help with the on-wiki side of Cameras for Commons photographers grants? --Pine✉ 23:43, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For QIC

The blown highlights (or, rather, extreme lack of them) in the Taman Sari tower. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:24, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eastern face of Eastern Gate, Taman Sari, Yogyakarta, 2014-05-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge Bronze

Photo Challenge – Third Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Mount Merapi in 2014.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Four Elements, in April 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here.

File:Unidentified fly, Umbulharjo, 2014-04-16 01.jpg, File:Unidentified fly, Umbulharjo, 2014-04-16 02.jpg

Hi Crisco 1492, I think it is one of the family Tephritidae. You may contact en:User:Nosferatumyia who is a specialist for this family. Regards, --Pristurus (talk) 16:02, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exterior of Blenduk Church, Semarang, 2014-06-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained glass window, Blenduk Church, Semarang, 2014-06-24 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pulpit of Blenduk Church, Semarang, 2014-06-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some magenta CA in the right window yet to be reduced. --Cccefalon 07:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done.Crisco 1492 09:17, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Better now and QI for me. --Cccefalon 10:24, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:C.R. Swart.jpg

Just noticed this image still exists. Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Government of South Africa (1948).jpg I guess it should be deleted too. I would do it myself, but (a) I'm not really that Commons savvy to know how to do it easily, and (b) I'm not really around these days to spend that much time doing something! Harrias (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f3.5-5.6G ED VR 30062014.jpg

Hi Crisco 1492, thanks for helping in spotting abnormalities in my lens image. They were very difficult to see. I have also corrected the spots in the zoom viewer's left. Thanks again for spotting. Regards. --Joydeep Talk 07:07, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rice mill, Kampung Rawa 2014-06-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Cccefalon 09:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farmer harvesting rice, Kampung Rawa 2014-06-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments What about avoiding the half cut "sulap" by another crop? --Cccefalon 09:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Cropped tighter (prefer all yellow to the green band cropping above the structure would have left). You may have to purge your cache.Crisco 1492 10:05, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Works well for me now. --Cccefalon 10:17, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of dock at Kampung Rawa, 2014-06-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Cccefalon 07:01, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photo Challenge December 2013

Commons:Photo challenge has been created and needs you! Come to the talk page to discuss and help organise this new project.

December 2013 has two themes: Coloured light and Silhouette. I hope you are able to participate. -- Colin (talk)

01:08, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Jill Kelley

This image is NOT Copyright protected it is freely available on Facebook- https://m.facebook.com/jill.kelley.1865?__user=10000502305279501:08, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Dayak Basket makers

As you can see my knowledge of Indonesian ethnic groups is quite limited.Thanks for the tip.01:08, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clean-up of the volcanic ash in Yogyakarta during the 2014 eruption of Kelud..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

01:08, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Identification of insects

Hi Chris,

Greetings from Germany, --Pristurus (talk) 18:58, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Candi Kalasan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

07:43, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10000 rupiah banknote of Indonesia, 2010 revision.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peter Carey at the 7th International Indonesia Forum (19 August 2014).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 19:57, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boats at Situ Patenggang Lake, 2014-08-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:52, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Row of Shops in Cibaduyut, Bandung, 2014-08-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --JLPC 17:16, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Merapi in 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:11, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2000 rupiah banknotes of Indonesia, 2009 series.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1000 rupiah banknotes of Indonesia, 2000 series.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
USS Macon (ZRS-5), in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
100000 rupiah banknotes of Indonesia, 2011 revision.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5000 rupiah banknotes of Indonesia, 2001 series.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurema blanda, Bandungan, Semarang Regency, 2014-09-03 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:07, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Man paddling near the dock, Kampoeng Rawa, 2014-10-01 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:50, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atractomorpha crenulata at Sambisari Temple Complex, 2014-09-28 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice --Poco a poco 14:47, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meisje met de parel.jpg

Hi Crisco 1492, please disclose the true source of this upload. Under the current source-entries, which were copied over from File:Johannes Vermeer -Girl with a Pearl Earring - Mauritshuis 670.jpg, I didn't find the image in the resolution of 4.095 × 4.794 Pixel. --Túrelio (talk) 21:06, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright tagging

Thanks for your remark, you're welcome, any time.--Szilas (talk) 10:26, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Girl with a Pearl Earring by Johannes Vermeer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:03, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and QI -- Spurzem 16:04, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, very nice -- Spurzem 16:04, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 16:04, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:43, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also high quality. Have you have you considered FP?--ArildV 10:14, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Could give it a shot, thanks.Crisco 1492 10:28, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good.--ArildV 09:44, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Ram-Man 19:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Ram-Man 19:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frank Dhont of the International Indonesia Forum at the 7th IFF Conference, 2014-08-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

11:40, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:21, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:21, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Sometime good comment can make you a day. Thanx. ;) --Mile (talk) 13:08, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unidentified fly, Bandungan, Semarang Regency, 2014-09-30 02.jpg etc.

Hi Crisco 1492, I think it is a member of the family Dolichopodiae. For a closer determination try to contact Igor Grichanov at the Russian wikipedia. He is specialized on this flies.. Greetings from cold Germany, --Pristurus (talk) 21:46, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:31, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:41, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentNice image, but I would choose another crop. Do you agree?--XRay 12:07, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly were you thinking? Crisco 1492 12:13, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not going to go that tight, but I've cropped a bit from the one side.Crisco 1492 12:35, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment It was a proposed crop ... your new crop is OK.--XRay 12:44, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I agree, this new crop is better.Crisco 1492 12:50, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, like the others in this series. --Ram-Man 12:57, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I would suggest a tighter crop for this photo (see my note) --Cccefalon 06:57, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Crisco 1492 08:16, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nice now. --Cccefalon 10:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mealybugs of flower stem, Yogyakarta, 2014-10-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

File:A push-up bra for hamburgers.jpg

File:A push-up bra for hamburgers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Animalparty (talk) 02:16, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 14:03, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. However, I don't really understand why you love the light spot so much. The photo could be even better when cropped or cloned out the light. --Cccefalon 18:37, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thought it would be "misrepresentation". But I agree. Will clone.Crisco 1492 00:43, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 72.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 72.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Featured

Hallo Crisco, Can give a look at this [1] photo on Featured? You have given a first judgment but after I changed I do not have more like you said seemed Clin Merci --LivioAndronico talk 09:17, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Christus carthusian.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Christus carthusian.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:05, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Detail of Knights of Columbus Peace Monument, Windsor, Ontario, 2014-12-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan from S 2014-12-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Agree :) --Poco a poco 20:02, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower viewer, Windsor city waterfront, 2014-12-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:51, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ring-billed gull (Larus delawarensis), Windsor, Ontario, 2014-12-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:46, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque regarding French Settlement on South Shore, Windsor, Ontario, 2014-12-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:56, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portrait of ring-billed gull (Larus delawarensis), Windsor, Ontario, 2014-12-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:08, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skyline of Detroit, Michigan from S 2014-12-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent. --Cayambe 21:44, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Herb Gray, Windsor, Ontario, Canada 2014-12-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Portrait of ring-billed gull (Larus delawarensis), Windsor, Ontario, 2014-12-07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Portrait of ring-billed gull (Larus delawarensis), Windsor, Ontario, 2014-12-07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:09, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 64 edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 64 edit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

figure deletion

Hello Crisco 1492, I noticed that you recently remove two of my own figure on my Wiki page "Tectonic of South China Sea", I made those figure and they are my own work. I saw your mentioned some licence code stuff. Do you mind telling me why there is a possible copyright problem with those two figures. Thank you very much! Chang21liu (talk) 04:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Chang21liu[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fields, Frankenmuth, Michigan, 2015-01-11 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riverside shops, Frankenmuth, Michigan, 2015-01-11 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 18:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Covered bridge entrance, Frankenmuth, Michigan, 2015-01-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bavarian Inn Lodge, Frankenmuth, Michigan, 2015-01-11 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:56, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zehnder's Chicken Restaurant, Frankenmuth, Michigan, 2015-01-11 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Covered bridge, Frankenmuth, Michigan, 2015-01-11 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:18, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frankenmuth Visitors' Center, Frankenmuth, Michigan, 2015-01-11 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Image needs perspective correction. See the note. --Halavar 19:10, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done. It had corrected for the wrong line.Crisco 1492 07:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now. --Halavar 21:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lager Mill, Frankenmuth, Michigan, 2014-01-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 21:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frozen river, Frankenmuth, Michigan, 2015-01-11 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:10, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fudge and kite store, Frankenmuth, Michigan, 2015-01-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:33, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Pillars of creation 2014 HST WFC3-UVIS full-res.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pillars of creation 2014 HST WFC3-UVIS full-res.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Crisco 1492, we have a problem with this image. After you edited the image to reduce noise (a big improvement in my view), the versions of the image produced by the zoom viewers were left in their original form. This is unfortunate, since the zoom viewers are means many people will end up using to look at the image. As I understand, this is a fault with the way the viewers are currently set up (see discussion at 2nd-to-last topic here). The only way I know to solve the problem is to revert the image to its original form, then upload the denoised version as a new image. That would require transferring the featured picture status to the new file. WolfmanSF (talk) 05:45, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've done the revert. Why don't you go ahead and upload the denoised version as a new file, and mention its name here. Thanks, WolfmanSF (talk) 23:15, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it is necessary as ZoomViewer is just a feature which can be improved later. Anyway, better discuss at COM:FPC or with Dschwen first. Jee 02:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, it could be improved later. But when? This procedure allows us to solve the problem now. And it's a major problem, since a lot of people can't view an image of that size in their browsers. However, I'll notify Dschwen of what's going on. WolfmanSF (talk) 04:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It seems file is not fully uploaded; 30.1 MP instead of 44.76 MP? Jee 11:24, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done by Steinsplitter. Jee 12:29, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the fp galleries in Commons; EN use need to be updated. Jee 12:42, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just revert to the denoised version and let me know. I can flush the zoomviewer cache for that image. --Dschwen (talk) 17:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dschwen, now it is split into two files. Next time, we will ping you and wait. :) Jee 17:41, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't understand your question. Dschwen is the developer and operator of Zoom Viewer. Jee 02:45, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, you need a shell account and zoomviewer tool access :-). Then you need to run a few shell commands (after you figure out the has name for the image). I could and should probably add a purge option to the script, or - even better - automatically update the cache. --Dschwen (talk) 16:11, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apse, Assumption Church, Windsor 2015-01-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 20:10, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:BettyWilson.jpg

Hello, my friendly person who knows about images! I was looking at this image (File:BettyWilson.jpg) for a list I'm working towards FL, but I'm dubious about this licence. The picture is from 1951, but with an unknown creator, the date of first publication seems to be pertinent, rather than the date taken, and the source provided is 2010, with no evidence of it being published earlier (although I expect it was). Thoughts? Harrias (talk) 17:03, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Harrias. To the best of my knowledge, publication is not considered for photographs under Australian copyright law, except if the year the photograph was taken is not certain or unknown. As such, the Australian copyright tag is correct. However, we also need this to be free in the US (as that's where the servers are), which it is not (extended by the URAA). I'm not sure how Commons is treating URAA files now. Commons:URAA has some info. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:19, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Chinese New Year Fashion Show, Sudirman Street, Yogyakarta, 2015-02-15 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lathrecista asiatica, Taman Sari, Yogyakarta, 2014-05-07 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurema blanda, Bandungan, Semarang Regency, 2014-09-03 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice --ArildV 11:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurema blanda, Bandungan, Semarang Regency, 2014-09-03 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:48, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Chinese New Year Fashion Show, Sudirman Street, Yogyakarta, 2015-02-15 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Chinese New Year Fashion Show, Sudirman Street, Yogyakarta, 2015-02-15 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments the top of the image is blurred, the panel is out of focus ,.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The traffic sign? That's not what the focus of the image is.Crisco 1492 23:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC) Supportthe picture is good , I think if it was cropped it would be better! --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:37, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro I

Pedro, Duke of Bragança. 76 x 66 cm. Print after the painting by John Simpson

Hello. I'm afraid I'm here to crave a favor. Do you have the technical ability to download pictures from the Google Art Project? I'd like to upload https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/pedro-duke-of-bragan%C3%A7a/9AGSwGL-RuUKqw?projectId=art-project but I can't find a way of dragging it off the website. Thanks, if you can. DrKiernan (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. By searching how to download images from Cultural Institute all I found was this talk page. So I would appreciate if you could upload those or maybe explain how you do it...

--Sporti (talk) 16:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    • Sporti , I've done all but Marija. The portrait of her appears to be on a 3D background, so it needs to be cut-out, but I was not satisfied with any of my attempts. I can upload the image separately to Flickr if you know someone who wants to give it a go. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:25, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, you can upload Marija here aswell, just with {{Non-free frame}}. --Sporti (talk) 09:40, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so Flickr it is. --Sporti (talk) 09:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, you can delete it. --Sporti (talk) 11:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Here it is - File:Marija Ana Elizabeta Baroness Raigersfeld.jpg, it is not a perfect oval, so you can't cut it perfectly aswell... --Sporti (talk) 12:14, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind, but I've found some more (that is it for now):

That's OK, there's no hurry. --Sporti (talk) 08:08, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Chinese New Year Fashion Show, Sudirman Street, Yogyakarta, 2015-02-15 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok but is it possible to have a category for the place where the image is taken (for this image and for the others in this series too)? --Christian Ferrer 19:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean geotag? Done.Crisco 1492 23:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I added two categories; probably Christian was thinking of more specific categories. --Cccefalon 15:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Could have sworn I read "Location". Done on all five images in the series now. Thanks.Crisco 1492 23:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)  Support thanks you both --Christian Ferrer 07:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jee's campaign

Do you think it would be appropriate to mention the Indiegogo campaign on the English Featured Picture talk page? Would you consider doing so (rather than coming from one of the campaign team)?

Colin (talk) 19:43, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:La Barbarina by Antoine Pesne

Hi, Crisco 1492, I would like your opinion on the images in that category: All but one are the same picture, different lighting etc. is it necessary/mandatory to keep all of them? Sagaciousphil thought you might know the answer to this. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 06:07, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yuk

What does this blasted pedro doing here? [47], [48], [49], [50], [51].. Do you remember Bonnard? Maybe some is free? --Hafspajen 00:26, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Pödro I

Pedro, Duke of Bragança. 76 x 66 cm. Print after the painting by John Simpson

Hello. I'm afraid I'm here to crave a favor. Do you have the technical ability to download pictures from the Google Art Project? I'd like to upload https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/pedro-duke-of-bragan%C3%A7a/9AGSwGL-RuUKqw?projectId=art-project but I can't find a way of dragging it off the website. Thanks, if you can. DrKiernan (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. By searching how to download images from Cultural Institute all I found was this talk page. So I would appreciate if you could upload those or maybe explain how you do it...

--Sporti (talk) 16:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    • Sporti , I've done all but Marija. The portrait of her appears to be on a 3D background, so it needs to be cut-out, but I was not satisfied with any of my attempts. I can upload the image separately to Flickr if you know someone who wants to give it a go. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:25, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, you can upload Marija here aswell, just with {{Non-free frame}}. --Sporti (talk) 09:40, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so Flickr it is. --Sporti (talk) 09:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, you can delete it. --Sporti (talk) 11:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Here it is - File:Marija Ana Elizabeta Baroness Raigersfeld.jpg, it is not a perfect oval, so you can't cut it perfectly aswell... --Sporti (talk) 12:14, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind, but I've found some more (that is it for now):

That's OK, there's no hurry. --Sporti (talk) 08:08, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, nice work. Looks like my list might be opening a Pandora's box of requests though...--Sporti (talk) 07:07, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just wonder if you could snatch any of these just for everyday-uses. --Hafspajen 00:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

All four, of course... if it is possible. (?) --Hafspajen 14:00, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
' Add one more, Crisco. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Abbey_-_Cordelia%27s_Farewell.jpg. Gogious painting but crap with the file ....--Hafspajen 15:30, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Restoration of File:Macaca nigra self-portrait large.jpg

Why'd you revert and restore the metadata? That seems inconsistent, we already stripped the metadata of File:Macaca nigra self-portrait.jpg, which helped both 1) filesize and 2) removing incorrect/disputed copyright info. AJF (talk) 03:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • There are ways to remove the disputed copyright holder information without nixing all of the other (much more useful) metadata. Furthermore, it is not usually a good idea to overwrite a featured picture, for whatever reason. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:36, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, as I said, a hundred kilobytes either way will not matter for most users. Even on my relatively poor connection, it downloads fairly quickly. The file is already much smaller than it would have been had it been developed directly from the Raw file. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:37, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Other

theses we have but no goods

bad, this better

Good question. Looks like the frame is fake ...or not?? It doesn't really matter that one. We do have something similar. --Hafspajen 17:29, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

is this better? ✓ Done, at File:Still-Life with Hunting Equipment and Dead Birds - Willem van Aelst - Google Cultural Institute.jpg  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, scratching heads, I don't know anymore. Might have been something I copied twice or copied the main link.

this we DON*T HAVE


________________________________________________________________


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Neuhuys

this is nice, but we don't have a good file

[126]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Chinese New Year Fashion Show, Sudirman Street, Yogyakarta, 2015-02-15 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and QI -- Spurzem 23:20, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Transfer to commons?

File:George Stubbs - A Monkey - Google Art Project.jpg

Would this picture be possible to transfer to commons? It is only on the German Wiki. It is not FP quality, but it would do in a gallery. We don't have many works from him. --Hafspajen 14:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

You did transfer it already? --Hafspajen 15:16, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

No such dog breed. This photo was created to make a hoax article, Australian Roohound, on English Wiki. File:Australian Roohound in Park.jpg. it should be deleted, or if not renamed. --Hafspajen 23:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Last Judgment - Leandro dal Ponte, called Leandro Bassano - Google Cultural Institute.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Last Judgment - Leandro dal Ponte, called Leandro Bassano - Google Cultural Institute.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:50, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus), Gembira Loka Zoo, 2015-03-15 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me. --Ximonic 04:45, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus), Gembira Loka Zoo, 2015-03-15 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me. --Ximonic 04:45, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iguana iguana, Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:59, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Greater Sand Plover, Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I'm a bit on the edge when it comes to scharpness, but I'm ok with it. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 15:35, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Greater Sand Plover, Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 15:35, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MMoA

Hi, I uploaded some files from the MMoA, and I noticed that you uploaded File:Cosmological Mandala with Mount Meru.jpg. I am curious, how did you get this file? The file available at [127] is much smaller. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Green peafowl (Pavo muticus), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Charlesjsharp 15:25, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! False gharial (Tomistoma schlegelii), Gembira Loka Zoo, 2015-01-15 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dusky lory (Pseudeos fuscata), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:27, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dusky lory (Pseudeos fuscata), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:21, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dusky lory (Pseudeos fuscata), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iguana iguana, Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 04:46, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
the other almost identical image is sharper than this one --Charlesjsharp 13:41, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Last I checked, QIC doesn't have us comparing one image to another, but judging it based on its own merits. Crisco 1492 09:14, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:The Kiss - Gustav Klimt - Google Cultural Institute.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Kiss - Gustav Klimt - Google Cultural Institute.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portrait of crested serpent eagle (Spilornis cheela), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice catch, good quality in my opinion. --0x010C 01:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:47, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vulturine guineafowl (Acryllium vulturinum), Gembira Loka Zoo, 2015-03-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Would be even better with a small crop on the right side. --Hubertl 09:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the input, but I kinda prefer it with a bit more space. As if the bird's looking at freedom, just on the other side of this mesh. Crisco 1492 11:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! African spurred tortoise (Centrochelys sulcata), Gembira Loka Zoo, 2015-03-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gold tegu (Tupinambis teguixin), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta 2015-03-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portrait of changeable hawk-eagle (Nisaetus cirrhatus), Gembira Loka Zoo, 2015-03-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. Although there is a bit unsharpness in sharp end of beak, good quality in general. --Zcebeci 07:27, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Python skin wallet, closed, 2015-03-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:36, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! African hippopotamus greeting guests, Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:45, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! African hippopotamus greeting guests, Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality.--ArildV 10:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

VIC

Hi, FYI, Commons:Valued image candidates/Ntozake Shange, Reid Lecture, Women Issues Luncheon, Women's Center, November 1978 Crisco edit.jpg. Best regards, Yann (talk) 10:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Greater Sand Plover, Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 19:23, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little corella (Cacatua sanguinea), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:38, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lesser adjutant (Leptoptilos javanicus), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black lory (Chalcopsitta atra), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta 2015-03-15 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:18, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little corella (Cacatua sanguinea), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:16, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Visit Brazil someday!

Hello, Crisco 1492! I recommend you visit Brazil. This vast country is home to unique natural life. It is abundant in splendid landscapes. Visit Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Brasília and many other cities! Visit Brazil someday! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:16, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eclectus parrot (Eclectus roratus) female, Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 04:27, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eclectus parrot (Eclectus roratus) female, Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 04:27, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eclectus parrot (Eclectus roratus) female, Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 03:27, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black lory (Chalcopsitta atra), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta 2015-03-15 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black lory (Chalcopsitta atra), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta 2015-03-15 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little corella (Cacatua sanguinea), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eclectus parrot (Eclectus roratus) female, Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:38, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pancuran Tujuh, near Baturraden, Purwokerto 2015-03-23 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Swell. Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 02:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barracks, Benteng Pendem, Cilacap 2015-03-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dock, Teluk Penyu Beach, Cilacap 2015-03-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMO better with one third sky, two thirds water (and pier).--XRay 05:58, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, done.Crisco 1492 07:03, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK. That's much better.--XRay 10:33, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transport to Karang Bolong Beach, Cilacap 2015-03-21 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:47, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transport to Karang Bolong Beach, Cilacap 2015-03-21 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:17, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Path to Karang Bolong Beach, Cilacap 2015-03-21 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petilasan Carangandul, Purwokerto, 2015-03-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

House in Bolinas

Hey Crisco 1492, thanks for your comment. That was the only point I could shoot from without entering the property. By the way – if you're ever up in or around San Francisco, please let me know. I always enjoy going on photo trips with fellow Commons photographers :-) --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lumpia at Teh Jawa, Purwokerto Station, Purwokerto 2015-03-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Frank Schulenburg 02:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! West end of Karang Bolong, Nusakembangan, Cilacap 2015-03-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great shot. --Frank Schulenburg 02:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water recreation area, Benteng Pendem, Cilacap 2015-03-21 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:06, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

antoine-vollon

http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/paintings/antoine-vollon-still-life-of-kitchen-utensils-5074446-details.aspx http://www.liveauctioneers.com/item/12046856_painting-antoine-vollon wE HAVE VIRTUALLY NOTHING USEFUL FROM HIM. Just everyday thumb quality would be fine...

  1. http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/paintings/antoine-vollon-scene-de-rue-5019999-details.aspx
  2. http://www.oceansbridge.com/oil-paintings/product/5305/astilllifewithabowloffruit
  3. http://pictify.com/37319/antoine-vollon-still-life-with-eggs-a-pan-and-a-jug
  4. http://www.paintgallery.net/antoine_vollon/nature_morte.htm?pos=a
  5. http://stilllifequickheart.tumblr.com/post/5981987637/antoine-vollon-still-life-with-imari-vase
  6. http://www.chinaoilpaintinggallery.com/a-antoine-vollon-c-58_375_456/interior-scene-p-15836

--Hafspajen 14:49, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

What.. just no sex...

http://stilllifequickheart.tumblr.com/post/1723020336/antoine-vollon-posy-of-violets-and-roses-1875-80

QI rewiew

Hi Crisco, I don't understand very well that you wrote in the QIC page : "That stitching error could probably be fixed, but I'm sure you'll find something else afterwards". I assume from your good faith and I'm sorry if I'm wrong but is it a sarcasm?
For my part I am sorry if I was too fast to take back my oppose vote and if I give you false hope. Please don't use any sarcasm with me or with anybody esle. Thanks. -- Christian Ferrer 11:19, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • That was not sarcasm, but an observation on the fact that I was unable to both get the horizon completely flat and the water to look natural (trust me, I tried; the frames I had simply would not allow it). I'm on a very limited-speed connection right now (problems with the provider, and they're doing jack all), and so uploading 30mb files is not something I can do regularly. If you'd mentioned all these things up front (well... I can understand missing the stitching error, as it was quite small, but your opinion of the sand could have been mentioned from the get-go), I'd have been able to minimize the amount of time and uploading capabilities wasted, and thus use my connection more productively. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:25, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, there is no problem, you can forget it. The light condition were hard to manage : harsh sun light + shadows of the trees, it's not easy. For the stitching error, myself I even never managed to assemble photos. I did not want to attack you, see you soon.... -- Christian Ferrer 17:16, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw

I did this for you,if I'm wrong .... cancel, ciao --LivioAndronico talk 11:55, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baturraden overview from ridge, Purwokerto, 2015-03-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fishing boat, Karang Bolong Beach, Cilacap 2015-03-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:09, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mineral deposits from Pancuran Tujuh (panorama), near Baturraden, Purwokerto 2015-03-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very unsharp area(see note) --Christian Ferrer 10:59, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Out of focus frame; fixable (though I'll have to crop). To save bandwidth (per my comment on the talk page) do you see any other issues (lighting, framing, etc.)? I don't see any further OOF frames. Crisco 1492 13:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC) I found one at the little house at right whitch is leaning too (maybe also in reality?) (see note) --Christian Ferrer 17:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
New version uploaded; lean was a bit much, so I've fixed it, though I doubt any of the buildings there are absolutely straight. Crisco 1492 01:26, 1 April 2015 (UTC) Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mineral deposits from Pancuran Tujuh, near Baturraden, Purwokerto 2015-03-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 05:00, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moat, Benteng Pendem, Cilacap 2015-03-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Small overexposed areas on the clouds. Minor enough for me to support. --Ximonic 05:06, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Australian pelican (Pelecanus conspicillatus), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 17:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruined lighthouse, Teluk Penyu Beach, Cilacap 2015-03-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Thanks --Charlesjsharp 14:22, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Curug Cipendok, Purwokerto, 2015-03-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sufficient for QI. Other opinions? --Hubertl 15:49, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - February - Dressing up/Winners

Photo Challenge Winner
Congratulations!

Your picture 2015 Chinese New Year Fashion Show, Sudirman Street, Yogyakarta, 2015-02-15 02.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Dressing up, in February 2015. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Photo Challenge – Third Place
Congratulations!

Your picture 2015 Chinese New Year Fashion Show, Sudirman Street, Yogyakarta, 2015-02-15 01.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Dressing up, in February 2015. You can find the results of the challenge here.

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Pancuran Tujuh, near Baturraden, Purwokerto 2015-03-23 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pancuran Tujuh, near Baturraden, Purwokerto 2015-03-23 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance to fortifications, Benteng Pendem, Cilacap 2015-03-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 13:43, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drainage tunnel, Benteng Pendem, Cilacap 2015-03-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:36, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Telaga Sunyi (pool), Purwokerto, 2015-03-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good, but I would suggest another crop. --XRay 05:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea. Crisco 1492 05:43, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Telaga Sunyi (waterfall), Purwokerto, 2015-03-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Telaga Sunyi (stream), near Baturraden, Purwokerto 2015-03-23 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:01, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Google Art Project

Hello! Much to ask, if possible, to download Wikimedia these high-quality images:

National Palace of Queluz

https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/collection/national-palace-of-queluz

1) Maria I Queen of Portugal 1790-1807

2) Miguel I King of Portugal 1828

3) Carlota Joaquina, Queen…. 1824

4) Portrait of Infante Pedro (future King Pedro III)

5) Pedro Duke of Braganza 1834

6) Carlota Joaquina, Queen … 1820

Thanks in advance--IgorSokol (talk) 21:02, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boat passing ruined lighthouse, Teluk Penyu Beach, Cilacap 2015-03-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

06:06, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge

Hello Crisco 1492,
we decided some months ago to ask the challenge winners if they could help to decide the themes for the next month needing themes - in this case May.
If you are ready to help us, just start a section on commons talk:Photo challenge (e.g. May themes), where you post your suggestion / decide which of the posted suggestions (e.g. from the other winner) you like best. If you are looking for ideas, here's a list of suggestions that are waiting to be chosen - but you are welcome to propose another theme.
Best wishes, Anna reg (talk) 07:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File.

https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-marchesa-veronica-spinola-doria/mQGGbDKshyKwWg?hl=en


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rubens-veronica-spinola.jpg

--Hafspajen 11:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Apse, Assumption Church, Windsor 2015-01-17.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Apse, Assumption Church, Windsor 2015-01-17.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Google Art Project

Hello! I want to remind my request. Please inform possible or not.

National Palace of Queluz https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/collection/national-palace-of-queluz

1) Maria I Queen of Portugal 1790-1807

2) Miguel I King of Portugal 1828

3) Carlota Joaquina, Queen…. 1824

4) Portrait of Infante Pedro (future King Pedro III)

5) Pedro Duke of Braganza 1834

6) Carlota Joaquina, Queen … 1820 --IgorSokol (talk) 13:24, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK--IgorSokol (talk) 15:16, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Maria I Queen of Portugal 1790-1807: https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/maria-i-queen-of-portugal/lgH9nFba0Ffgng (done, at File:Maria I, Queen of Portugal - Giuseppe Troni, atribuído (Turim, 1739-Lisboa, 1810) - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  2. Miguel I King of Portugal 1828: https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/miguel-i-king-of-portugal/8AHyIFvroFlMDQ (done, at File:Miguel I, King of Portugal - Anonymous - Google Cultural Center.jpg)
  3. Carlota Joaquina, Queen…. 1824: https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/carlota-joaquina-queen-of-portugal/5gG5hljIRW1q7A (done, at File:Carlota Joaquina, Queen of Portugal - João Baptista Ribeiro (Vila Real, 1790-Porto, 1868) - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  4. Portrait of Infante Pedro (future King Pedro III): https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-infante-pedro-future-king-pedro-iii/qQHwPhnOwPQDlA (done, at File:Portrait of Infante Pedro (future King Pedro III) - Attributed to Vieira Lusitano - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  5. Pedro Duke of Braganza 1834: https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/pedro-duke-of-bragança/_AEhTyEcRzJtzg (done, at File:Pedro, Duke of Bragança - John Simpson - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  6. Pedro Duke of Braganza 1834: https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/pedro-duke-of-bragança/9AGSwGL-RuUKqw (online for ages, at File:Pedro, Duke of Bragança - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  7. Carlota Joaquina, Queen …1820: https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/carlota-joaquina-queen-of-the-united-kingdom-of-portugal-and-brazil-and-the-algarves/tQFUzKFR8hyKdA (done, at File:Carlota Joaquina, Queen of the United Kingdom of Portugal and Brazil and the Algarves - Henrique José da Silva - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  8. João VI 1821: https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/joão-vi/6gFB6bKdkVm3ww (done, at File:João VI - Jean Philippe Goulu - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)

Okay. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Many thanks for your help. I hope that my future similar requests will not be left without your attention. I wish you all the best--IgorSokol (talk) 14:54, 17 April 2015 (UTC) P.S. You're not loaded image number 6.[reply]

Chardin Google Cultural Institute

Hello there Crisco,

could you kindly provide those paintings to commons?

https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/still-life-with-dead-pheasant/mAFb6M9mG16yuQ?hl=pl&projectId=art-project (done, at File:Still Life with Dead Pheasant - Jean-Baptiste-Siméon Chardin - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/still-life-with-tin-pitcher-and-peaches/owEaRtu7bNxUng?hl=pl&projectId=art-project (done, at File:Still Life with Tin Pitcher and Peaches - Jean-Baptiste-Siméon Chardin - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)

thanks in advice, Pietja

  • I'll have to see how my connection is acting. I've been trying to upload the first one from the above request, and it's not going anywhere (I've waited 15 minutes already for a 5mb file). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:32, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply i hope you'll manage to complete it!

Hi there Crisco,

Have you started working on those paintings, if not, i would like to ask you for one more if you don't mind:

https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-the-landscape-painter-frederik-s%C3%B8dring/3wHcvpxYjVz0Xw?hl=pl&projectId=art-project (done, at File:Portrait of the landscape painter Frederik Sødring - Christen Købke - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) Thanks in advice, Pietja

Thank you Sir, you're amazing!

How do you do it btw i found it impossible to srap those images?

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cannon and Lamp at Fort Marlborough, 2015-04-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cannon at Fort Marlborough, Bengkulu 2015-04-19 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Interior of north-east gate, Fort Marlborough, 2015-04-19 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Night of the Living Dead (1968 film).webm

File:Night of the Living Dead (1968 film).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:08, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:30, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I linked a version IA has in the DR. It may be an alternative print/ edit. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:24, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Alternatively, another (downsampled) rip. I tried uploading the original torrent's file to Archive, but it kept crashing at 100mb or so. Guess it was timing out. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cannon at Fort Marlborough, Bengkulu 2015-04-19 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. OK for QI --Hubertl 15:35, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello! The big request, to download these high-quality images. Thank you and good luck!--IgorSokol (talk) 09:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Портрет императрицы Анны Иоанновны (Portrait of the Empress Anna Ioannovna); https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/портрет-императрицы-анны-иоанновны/EAHLKTl4NBzDFQ (done, at File:Портрет императрицы Анны Иоанновны - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  2. Портрет Петра I, 1703-1706 (Portrait of Peter I); https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/портрет-петра-i-г-схалкен-1703-1706/6AEDPNCjyWGLfA (done, at File:Портрет Петра I. Г. Схалкен. 1703-1706 - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  3. Портрет императора Павла I Петровича (Portrait of Emperor Paul I Petrovich); https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/портрет-императора-павла-i-петровича/zgGgvAWk5H5EIg (done, at File:Portrait of Emperor Paul I Petrovich - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  4. Портрет императрицы Марии Федоровны (Portrait of Empress Maria Fyodorovna); https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/портрет-императрицы-марии-федоровны/hgHW3oeSSbo4lA (done, at File:Portrait of Empress Maria Fyodorovna - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  5. Портрет великого князя Петра Федоровича (Portrait of Grand Duke Peter Fedorovich, the future Peter III); https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/портрет-великого-князя-петра-федоровича/YQEAqcouJQgFww (done, at File:Portrait of Grand Duke Peter Fedorovich - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  6. Портрет императора Петра III (Portrait of Emperor Peter III); https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/портрет-императора-петра-iii/YQEY5OPq43NHpw (done, at File:Portrait of Emperor Peter III - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  7. Портрет императора Петра II Алексеевича (Portrait of Emperor Peter II Alexeyevich); https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/портрет-императора-петра-ii-алексеевича/UgGN85ztq2lgBg (done, at File:Portrait of Emperor Peter II Alexeyevich - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  8. Портрет царицы Натальи Кирилловны Нарышкиной (Portrait of Tsaritsa Natalya Kirillovna Naryshkina); https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/портрет-царицы-натальи-кирилловны-нарышкиной/dgFh9ouU07q0Yw (done, at File:Portrait of Tsaritsa Natalya Kirillovna Naryshkina - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  9. Конный портрет царя Михаила Федоровича (Equestrian portrait of Tsar Mikhail Fedorovich); https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/конный-портрет-царя-михаила-федоровича/tAGCjYjMV-bTOg (done, at File:Equestrian portrait of Tsar Mikhail Fedorovich - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  10. Царь Михаил Федорович (Tsar Mikhail Fedorovich); https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/царь-михаил-федорович-москва-xix-в/cAGYZ86BJ18BIw (done, at File:Tsar Mikhail Fedorovich - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  11. Портрет императрицы Елизаветы Алексеевны (Portrait of Empress Elizabeth Alexeevna); https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/портрет-императрицы-елизаветы-алексеевны/XwGO3xJwa9j-xA (done, at File:Portrait of Empress Elizabeth Alexeevna - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  12. Портрет императора Николая I в австрийском мундире (Portrait of Emperor Nicholas I in the Austrian uniform); https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/портрет-императора-николая-i-в-австрийском-мундире/dAGso0oP6Qfqzg (done, at File:Portrait of Emperor Nicholas I in Austrian Uniform - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  13. Портрет императрицы Елизаветы Петровны (Portrait of Empress Elizabeth Petrovna); https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/портрет-императрицы-елизаветы-петровны/lwF7BilpC9pUjA (done, at File:Portrait of Empress Elizabeth Petrovna - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  14. Портрет императора Александра I (Portrait of Emperor Alexander I); https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/портрет-императора-александра-i/9AHTYY1q7ntPjg (done, at File:Portrait of Emperor Alexander I - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)

These are portraits of Russian monarchs, the Romanov dynasty. Next write in English--IgorSokol (talk) 15:14, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help and all the best.--IgorSokol (talk) 08:39, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cepot in wayang golek form, 2015-05-14 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 00:42, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cepot in wayang golek form, 2015-05-14 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cepot in wayang golek form, 2015-05-14 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:13, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cepot in wayang golek form, 2015-05-14 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cepot in wayang golek form, 2015-05-14 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:13, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit

I see your edit. It was challenged by many (see closed talk page discussion) and so a new RfC was opened. There is no progress after that. I think the result was not controversial; but there seems a lot of disagreements. (I'm neutral in this case and not interested to participate in the voting.) Jee 02:21, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chris,

I really don´t want to annoy you at all! Really - there is absolutely no reason. I know the problem with the lighting in tents, mostly, you have a lack of light in the front. Thats normal. I stopped working with tents, because of not getting sufficient control with the lights. See here: here

That doesn´t mean, that you won´t get good pictures, I always recommend in this case a additional, separated flash from the front (fixed, but not directly from the camera, if possible, with manual settings).

The other problem I experienced by myself, are stacking problems with Photoshop, especially with textiles. So I changed to helicon focus. What software do you use for focus bracketing? I use the DSLR controller (until Helicon remote will be installed).

I do have a calibrated monitor, I work with two different ones. One is warmer, one is colder (you never get two different monitors even hardware calibrated to the same balance). --Hubertl (talk) 05:43, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Alright. I do see the texture in that folded area, though it is a bit light in places. I've redone File:Ngayogyakarta-style blangkon, 2015-05-17 04.jpg, so there should be more texture there, and I've added a bit more sharpness/detail to the edge in File:Ngayogyakarta-style blangkon, 2015-05-17 01.jpg. I don't have a front light yet. I should probably do that, but I'd need to use a different system to dissipate the light... the ones I use are really hot (after 20 minutes of shooting, I'm sweating), and I don't want to get them too close to the flammable fabric of the tent. I did try to use the flash, once, but it and my continuous lights have very different warmths, and so the results were ... not good, to say the least. (There were LED lights with dissipators available at the shop, but I was worried that those wouldn't give out enough light). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:52, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As you say, you never will have enough light. I use something like this one (four of them) as permanent light, this was the cheapest I could get. All in all I have more than 2000 W. it´s cold light with 5.500K. And even with this construction I have to add one or two additional studio flashes sometimes. Really good LED-lamps are too expensive right now, IMO. But it will change dramatically in the next years. --Hubertl (talk) 06:11, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • 2000W... my house's electricity wouldn't support that. Right now we have to make do with a maximum of 900W (my lights being 300w each), though we're upgrading to 1300W this week because we want to install an AC for the baby.
I agree about the LEDs. But I suspect that I'll have to wait longer than you... a lot of the really good technology doesn't reach Indonesia until a year or two after Europe and NA, and the prices don't drop until even later. I ended up buying a 2TB external hard drive during my last trip back to Canada, because the largest available in Yogyakarta (where I'm based) is 1TB.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ngayogyakarta-style blangkon, 2015-05-17 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
*  weak this on is better --Hubertl 04:49, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salak (Salacca zalacca), 2015-05-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notocactus

Dear Crisco, I ask you to explain a little more about what I need to do with the file? Alas, I am not very well understood. -- ( FinitoR ) 11:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, Crisco, I apologize for the question. I first exhibited picture evaluation. I ask a question to the administrator. She gave me the link. It read: no less than 1600 × 1250. I did a 2000 x 1699. This is a unique photo. Behind him are not clicking finger and 15 years. Selection. Flowers. Pollination. Sowing seeds. Years of cultivation. Tackling. Again seeding. ----> That's what gives the weight of the photograph. Mille pardon my english. -- ( FinitoR ) 14:17, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Salacca zalacca (salak pondoh cultivar; fruit).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Single note angklung ('G'), 2015-05-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:28, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daruma doll, cut out, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ngayogyakarta-style blangkon, 2015-05-17 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me now. --Hubertl 07:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amplang from Kotabaru, South Kalimantan 2015-05-23 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amplang from Kotabaru, South Kalimantan 2015-05-23 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christmas Starlight Candy from Dollarama, Canada 2015-05-24 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good photo -- George Chernilevsky 14:08, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Choco-Banana Flavor Pocky (Indonesia), 2015-05-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daruma doll, cut out, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daruma doll, cut out, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iman Budhi Santosa at book launch, 2015-05-30 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iman Budhi Santosa at book launch, 2015-05-30 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iman Budhi Santosa at book launch, 2015-05-30 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 21:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iman Budhi Santosa at book launch, 2015-05-30 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:59, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iman Budhi Santosa at book launch, 2015-05-30 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:59, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peanut butter and chocolate oreos, 2015-06-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. But please add scale. --Martin Falbisoner 13:11, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is a scale, in the information template. I deliberately don't write it on the image so that my images can be used on projects that don't use Arabic numerals or Latin script. Crisco 1492 13:38, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! "Roka" brand chocolate wafer balls, 2015-06-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. But please add scale. --Martin Falbisoner 13:11, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is a scale, in the information template. I deliberately don't write it on the image so that my images can be used on projects that don't use Arabic numerals or Latin script. Crisco 1492 13:38, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strawberry tart, 2015-06-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:07, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mango tart, 2015-06-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:14, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plastic comb, 2015-06-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments weak ok, the light reflections on the lower part are not absolutely convincing. Third opinion appreciated --Hubertl 20:05, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iman Budhi Santosa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Cranach Archive

Hello! Maybe it is not difficult for you to download these images in high resolution and with no watermarks? If so, it would be wonderful.

Portrait of King Ferdinand I, 1548 Staatliches Museum Schwerin http://www.lucascranach.org/object.php?&obj=DE_SMS_G2486_FR345A&uid=6860&page=15&fol=01_Overall&img=DE_SMS_G2486_FR345A_2013-07_Overall.tif

Emperor Charles V 1550 Wartburg-Stiftung, Eisenach http://www.lucascranach.org/object.php?&obj=DE_WSE_M0074_FR-none&uid=6828&page=3&fol=01_Overall&img=DE_WSE_M0074_FR-none_2013-02_Overall.tif

Margrave Georg the Pious of Brandenburg-Ansbach 1571 Inventory Number: DE_SPSG_GKI1048 Jagdschloss Grunewald http://www.lucascranach.org/object.php?&obj=DE_SPSG_GKI1048_FR-none&uid=6659&page=5&fol=01_Overall&img=DE_SPSG_GKI1048_FR-none_1999_Overall.tif

Margrave Georg Friedrich of Brandenburg-Ansbach-Bayreuth 1564 Jagdschloss Grunewald http://www.lucascranach.org/object.php?&obj=DE_SPSG_GKI1121_FR-none&uid=6692&page=5&fol=01_Overall&img=DE_SPSG_GKI1121_FR-none_Overall.tif

Portrait of Philipp von Hessen, Hans Krell (?) Wartburg-Stiftung, Eisenach http://www.lucascranach.org/object.php?&obj=DE_WSE_M0076_FR-none&uid=6830&page=4&fol=01_Overall&img=DE_WSE_M0076_FR-none_2013-02_Overall.tif


Elector Joachim II. of Brandenburg 1570 Jagdschloss Grunewald http://www.lucascranach.org/object.php?&obj=DE_SPSG_GKI1113_FR-none&uid=6690&page=5&fol=01_Overall&img=DE_SPSG_GKI1113_FR-none_2009_Overall.tif


Sincerely,--IgorSokol (talk) 19:06, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately, this is a really tough case. Thank you and good luck--IgorSokol (talk) 10:10, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

nonFoP of Indonesia

Hi Crisco, I didn't wanted to start a big fight in QIC, but I also will not just swallow my anger. If there is a clear indication, that one of my photos is against Indonesian Copyright Law, then I will agree that it cannot be in WikiCommons. However, in all democratic structures it is a principle, that the claimant has do prove the facts and not the defendant. What you are insinuating is, that every photo needs a detailed proof of the year of construction / the artist or whatever. This is not requested in WikiCommons. So if you have detailed findings about the elephant, then file a deletion request. But please never again decline a photo upon the simple fact, that I cannot prove, which year it was made. Thank you and cheers from Cologne, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 19:21, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I've gotten to understand Indonesian copyright better, I've stopped uploading images of buildings to Commons when I'm not sure they're free; instead, since the English Wikipedia only heeds US Copyright (which allows FOP for buildings), I put them there. This includes buildings where I've been unable to verify the year of construction (for instance). Sadly, this is not a possibility for the elephant, as there is no exception for statues under US law. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:37, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jim Morrison 1968.jpg

File:Jim Morrison 1968.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kaldari (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Korrie Layun Rampan at UNY, 2015-06-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:50, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evi Idawati at UNY, 2015-06-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{}} Excellent portrait, IMO.--Jebulon 16:58, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sale pisang (wet), 2015-06-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 16:07, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:A Meat Stall with the Holy Family Giving Alms - Pieter Aertsen - Google Cultural Institute.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A Meat Stall with the Holy Family Giving Alms - Pieter Aertsen - Google Cultural Institute.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 10:21, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kue gapit, 2015-06-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

VERY NICE FILES from North Carolina Art Museum, google files not covered

  1. [128] (done, as File:Madonna and Child - Guido Reni - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. [129] (done, as File:Portrait of a Gentleman - Thomas de Keyser - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:10, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. [130] (done, as File:The Baptism of Christ - Veronese (Paolo Caliari) - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:10, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. [131] (done, as File:Nude with Fan - George Wesley Bellows - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:10, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. a winter landscape of Joos de Momper (done, as File:Winter Landscape - Joose de Momper II (the Younger) - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:10, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. [132] (done, at File:Portrait of a Gentleman (Jan van Hellemont) - Govert Flinck - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:33, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. [133] (done, at File:Still Life with Ray and Basket of Onions - Jean Siméon Chardin - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:33, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. [134] (done, at File:The Gold Weigher - Willem de Poorter - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:33, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. [135] (done, at File:The Feast of Esther - Jan Lievens - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:33, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. [136] (done, at File:Still Life with Glass, Fruit, and Jar - Circle of Francisco de Zurbarán - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:36, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. [137] (done, at File:Still Life with Two Figures - Pieter Cornelisz. van Rijck - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. [138] (done, at File:Skating Carnival, Victoria Rink, Montreal, QC, painted composite - William Notman - Google Cultural Institute.jpg)
  13. [139] (done, at File:Madonna and Child - Pseudo-Pier Francesco Fiorentino - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. [140] (done, at File:Harbor Scene with St. Paul's Departure from Caesarea - Jan Brueghel the Elder - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. [141] (done, at File:Vanitas Flower Still Life - Willem van Aelst - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. [142] (done, at File:The Assumption of the Virgin - Lodovico Carracci - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 05:34, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. [143] (done, at File:The Armorer's Shop - David Teniers the Younger, and Attributed to Jan Brueghel the Younger - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 05:34, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. [144] (done, at File:St. Lawrence Distributing the Treasures of the Church - Bernardo Strozzi - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 05:34, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. [145] (done, at File:The Adoration of the Shepherds - Jacob Jordaens - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 05:34, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. [146] (done, at File:The Adoration of the Shepherds - Matthias Stom (Stomer) - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 05:34, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. [147] (Done, at File:Christ and the Woman of Samaria - Pierre Mignard - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. [148] (done, at File:Lotus Flowers- A Landscape Painting in the Background - Martin Johnson Heade - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. [149] (done, at File:The Denial of St. Peter - Gerard Seghers - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. [150] (done, at File:The Backgammon Players - Theodoor Rombouts - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. [151] (done, at File:Portrait of a Gentleman - Antonis Mor (Antonio Moro) - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. [152] (done, at File:Madonna and Child Enthroned with Saints and Donors - Bernardino Lanino - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. [153] (done, at File:Banquet Piece - Jan Jansz. den Uyl - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. [154] (done, at File:Market Scene on a Quay - Frans Snyders and Workshop - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. [155] (done, at File:St. Matthew and the Angel - Attributed to Karel van der Pluym - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:39, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. [156] (done, at File:Still Life with Basket of Fruit - Balthasar van der Ast - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:39, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. [157] (done, at File:Still Life with Fruits - Peeter Snyers (Snijers) - Google Cultural Institute.jpg) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:39, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some work for you! :)

--Hafspajen 13:50, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

You little genius. Indeed it was marked at "Treat signature as wikitext (without an automatic link)" by mistake. --Hafspajen (talk) 21:51, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kue gapit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
The Photographer's Barnstar for your outstanding contributions on Commons. ---Hafspajen (talk) 22:33, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stuffed mushrooms, 2015-06-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Excellent quality.--Jebulon 15:08, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jim Morrison 1968.jpg

File:Jim Morrison 1968.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kaldari (talk) 21:41, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Martin van Meytens

hi, I am writing to tell you that I saw her loading, elo I found really fascinating,, I could ask her to also load this file google project? entry of the Bridge, if they could have time,, I wish this file wind it up as a new version of this file --79.24.84.214 11:23, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, because there are images that really deserve to essre magnified,, those that are too small,, MB haha :) I hope to see her loading eheh--82.50.157.46 15:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
thank you thank you very much for his availability --79.6.92.50 16:14, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pacifier for newborn, 2015-07-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and refreshing topic. --Slaunger 17:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jim Morrison 1968.jpg

Dear Crisco 1492,

The discussion is escalating and I blocked two users for their rude comments. This is not how I prefer to handle things so I am asking you for help. You seem to be well respected by the participants in that discussion and you are familiar with Commons policy. Is there any change that you can help turning the tide by mediating? It would be great if a final conclusion can be reached without further rude comments and blocks. Natuur12 (talk) 20:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • As I've said by email, I've been working 14 hour days for the past 3 weeks and haven't had the time to dedicate to research the issue further. I do think that Kaldari has a point about derivative works (the old Mickey Mouse PD shorts, for instance, didn't make the character free) but I also trust We hope's research into possible copyright registration (not a requirement, but a possible sign that a copyright notice may not have been included) of the original image. However, without the time to consult the registration books directly, I don't dare !vote. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:11, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Verocchio

This we as per today don't have. Will you please upload it? --Hafspajen (talk) 12:16, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peanut butter cookies, 2015-07-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 16:09, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello! Please, if possible, download the images in high resolution. Thanks in advance--IgorSokol (talk) 14:12, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Wilhelm Landgraf von Hessen-Philippsthal (1726-1810) 1764 http://altemeister.museum-kassel.de/28308/35868/0/147/b1/0/0/objekt.html
    Done, at File:Wilhelm Landgraf von Hessen-Philippsthal (1726-1810).jpg — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:33, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Friedrich II. Landgraf von Hessen-Kassel 1773 http://altemeister.museum-kassel.de/28380/35891/0/147/b6/0/0/objekt.html
  3. Gustav III. König von Schweden 1779 http://altemeister.museum-kassel.de/28432/35909/0/147/b2/0/0/objekt.html
  4. Clemens August von Köln 1723 http://altemeister.museum-kassel.de/32666/0/0/147/s760/0/0/objekt.html
  5. Christine von Schweden 1660 http://altemeister.museum-kassel.de/32759/0/0/147/s1045/0/0/objekt.html
  6. Friedrich I. Landgraf von Hessen-Kassel, König von Schweden http://altemeister.museum-kassel.de/74898/0/0/147/s1432/0/0/objekt.html
  7. Wilhelm VIII. Landgraf von Hessen-Kassel (nach dem Porträt von 1755) http://altemeister.museum-kassel.de/30150/34135/0/147/b12/0/0/objekt.html
  8. Friedrich II. Landgraf von Hessen-Kassel 1760/1762 http://altemeister.museum-kassel.de/30085/34135/0/147/b28/0/0/objekt.html
  9. Friedrich II. Landgraf von Hessen-Kassel 1773 http://altemeister.museum-kassel.de/30088/34135/0/147/b30/0/0/objekt.html
  10. Wilhelm VIII. Landgraf von Hessen-Kassel 1755/1760 http://altemeister.museum-kassel.de/30152/34135/0/147/b32/0/0/objekt.html
  11. Landgraf Wilhelm VIII. in ganzer Figur, 1730e http://altemeister.museum-kassel.de/33834/0/0/147/s489/0/0/objekt.html

Hi! Yes or no?--IgorSokol (talk) 14:25, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The request is not urgent. The main thing that all appeared. Not to be forgotten. Good luck !!!--IgorSokol (talk) 18:01, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I did not understand your last sentence. When can see the images?--IgorSokol (talk) 18:10, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More

Yowowthanks!! You like this Napoleon? and the cow? Wonder if that is full resolution we have. On The cow. --Hafspajen (talk) 16:53, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This. is good too --Hafspajen (talk) 22:46, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[158]

Done:

  1. File:The Rape of Europa, about 1570, Paolo Veronese.jpg
  2. File:The Virgin and Child Embracing, 1660-85, Sassoferrato.jpg
  3. File:Saint Paul Writing, 1520s, Pier Francesco Sacchi.jpg
  4. File:The Emperor Napoleon I, 1815, Emile-Jean-Horace Vernet.jpg
  5. File:A Roman Triumph, about 1630, Peter Paul Rubens.jpg
     — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:14, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wonderful, WONDERFUL!--Hafspajen 23:16, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

This we don't have. Just look at his category, it's tragic.--Hafspajen (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/dominicans-in-feathers/jAEsbf_zbJCILQ
    Done, at File:Dominicans in Feathers - Henry Stacy Marks - Google Cultural Institute.jpg — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. this is nice. van Loo, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Danae_by_Van_Loo.jpg, https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/danae/AgGv9Jojwmc_uw
    Done, at File:Danae by Van Loo.jpg — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:43, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. This Leonello Spada could do with a better file too, --Hafspajen (talk) 20:13, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    -
  1. and Category:Donato Creti too
    Pardon? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:42, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Leonello Spada it's there, above, but it looks like I lost a file somewhere. SORRY. --Hafspajen 17:45, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
  1. Now this is beautiful, and I want it very much. We have nothing good from Fra Angelico, and he was a genius. He really was. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/the-death-and-the-assumption-of-the-virgin/dAEVkcrO7pfctg Category:Fra Angelico; Category:Google Art Project works by Fra Angelico --Hafspajen (talk) 20:44, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Done, at File:The Death and the Assumption of the Virgin - Fra Angelico - Google Cultural Institute.jpg — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/the-adoration-of-the-magi/_wFPekHefj84QQ
    Already online at File:Fra Angelico and Fra Filippo Lippi - The Adoration of the Magi - Google Art Project.jpg
  3. And this too. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/the-5-senses/jgGBBJPQ1X2yHw
    Done, at File:The 5 senses - Gregorius van Oosterlinck - Google Cultural Institute.jpg — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:42, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Very good, I lke it. --Hafspajen (talk) 23:52, 28 July 2015 (UTC) https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/the-virgin-with-the-sleeping-christ-child/wQGTKhsYVv037g[reply]
    Done, at File:The Virgin with the Sleeping Christ Child - Orazio Gentileschi - Google Cultural Institute.jpg. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:43, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/the-champion/XQGw79wofVO5yQ
    Done, at File:The Champion - Charles Lock Eastlake - Google Cultural Institute.jpg — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/annunciazione/9wHE0VRFWLOOrQ?projectId=art-project
    Done, at File:Annunciazione - Marchetti Marco detto Marco da Faenza - Google Cultural Institute.jpg — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:43, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/santa-caterina-d-alessandria-e-il-miracolo-della-ruota/LwFDs5Guz5xvsw?projectId=art-project
    Done, at File:Santa Caterina d'Alessandria e il miracolo della ruota - Calvaert Denys - Google Cultural Institute.jpg — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/medea/KgFfi1wPKa6Bmg
    Done, at File:Medea - Frederick Sandys - Google Cultural Institute.jpg — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/the-sheep-drive/2AGsfUexTkyq6g
    Done at File:The Sheep Drive - John Linnell - Google Cultural Institute.jpg — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/the-music-party/CgH3_pk35cjqXQ
  11. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/flagellazione-di-cristo/WAH_Wrz8Ds-ehA?projectId=art-project
    Done, at File:Flagellazione di Cristo - Maestro della Flagellazione di Cesena - Google Cultural Institute.jpg — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/mos%C3%A8-e-il-serpente-di-bronzo/4QFwbGP7gsw0dw?projectId=art-project
  13. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/the-delivery-of-israel-out-of-egypt/xAHPMaPC3Na2hw
  14. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/the-pass-of-st-gotthard-switzerland/bAH2QUvwry9R4w
  15. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/the-doubtful-coin/ygFycsEh4eKE-g
  16. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/an-audience-in-athens-during-the-representation-of-agamemnon-by-aeschylus/qAGPG-FrIdsF-A
  17. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/fowl-attacked-by-a-fox/fwEhnUtUWfv9pg
  18. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/the-thieving-monkey/0gFwPVCFXT4cMA
  19. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-a-man/9gGujG2zo901cA
  20. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/morning-after-rain/ygFSK9gCw419hw
  21. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/rabbits/6QGcV3tRujxmXw
  22. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/castor-fiber-americanus-linn-american-beaver-2-3-natural-size/sQGUo30uA5KcPQ
  23. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/alpine-pasture/vQEMF56ukWrNiA?projectId=art-project
  24. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/il-sacrificio-di-no%C3%A8/nQHDDLWPFOaY3Q?projectId=art-project
  25. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/ammon-e-tamar/UQFU-EPTlcqAZA?projectId=art-project
  26. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/a-condottiere/qAHNgLmBODRegg
  27. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/joseph-reveals-himself-to-his-brothers/7AHRu93WQk_rHg
  28. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/lady-helen-vincent-viscountess-d-abernon/UwFgXRxYRGun2w
  29. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/the-departure-of-the-israelites/mQEQucXswJX0bw
  30. And Edvin. Category:Edwin Booth Booth https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/edwin-booth/xAEenJYLvf_BGw
  31. Great fire of London, noo google on it. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/the-great-fire-of-london-with-ludgate-and-old-st-paul-s/5QFYrsXh6Llrpg
  32. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/el-jaleo/PQHv7QgAV-VL6w
  33. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/shearing-the-rams/lQEDjT-_MXaMJQ
  34. And his for Phil... https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/dominicans-in-feathers/jAEsbf_zbJCILQ
  35. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-a-s-pushkin/eAFbGyjqBRoU1g
  36. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/wi-j%C3%BAn-jon-pigeon-s-egg-head-the-light-going-to-and-returning-from-washington/EAGnviEIlM0qIA
  37. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-david-cox/SgETV8JAz5ciVg
  38. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/twas-a-famous-victory/YQFZu4GXkJzGlQ
  39. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/an-english-hayfield/YQFwziUrnLFo_Q
  40. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/the-departure-of-the-fishing-fleet-boulogne/bAGBAB9ECJuG9w
  41. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/remains-of-the-temple-of-olypian-jove-with-a-view-of-ortygia-syracuse/-gFSWlo08Ej7SQ
  42. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/christ-carrying-the-cross/hAEcE6kCOlcp-g
  43. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/defeat-of-the-cimbri-and-the-teutons-by-marius/qAFQnDgk4AV6lw
  44. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/fowl-attacked-by-a-fox/fwEhnUtUWfv9pg
  45. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/portrait-of-a-man/9gGujG2zo901cA
  46. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/la-trasfigurazione-di-cristo/swGB2Rkl7qzMjg
  47. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/two-macaws-a-cockatoo-and-a-jay-with-fruit/2QE_uImUhi35-g
  48. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/remains-of-the-temple-of-olypian-jove-with-a-view-of-ortygia-syracuse/-gFSWlo08Ej7SQ (? might added it already, in that case sorry)
  49. This we don't have, only something similar. But worse, bad quality. https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/cattle-on-a-bank/BwElRoWBQK-zLQ


Elijah, Edward and Charles in trouble

Eliah article has no pics


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elijah_Walton https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/alpine-climbers/FQF-2omV73pcXA


Edward has only one...

https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/twas-a-famous-victory/YQFZu4GXkJzGlQ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Edward_Richard_Taylor


  • And Charles, he lacks even an article, the poor thing, too...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/artists/charles-rossiter https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/to-brighton-and-back-for-3s-6d/9QEUMspZpkiAIA



Hm, maybe you should ask Yan to help out a bit .... --Hafspajen (talk) 19:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Crisco_1492/Archive_1&oldid=171262412"