User talk:Coyau/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 36 - Panhard 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 36 - Panhard 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Announcement of the selected Rosetta primary landing site and a backup (15061882080).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 22:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Alvaro Giménez, ESA's Director of Science and Robotic Exploration (15248192752).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 22:26, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Announcement of the selected Rosetta primary landing site and a backup (15062002968).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mtrova (talk) 14:20, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Fred Jansen during the announcement of the selected Rosetta landing site (15061988207).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mtrova (talk) 14:25, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Holger Sierks during the announcement of the selected Rosetta landing site (15245467651).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mtrova (talk) 14:26, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Prof. Jean Pierre Bibring (15061798369).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mtrova (talk) 14:28, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Stephan Ulamec during the announcement of the selected Rosetta landing site (15225575346).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mtrova (talk) 14:51, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - chemin de la Guérite 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 31 - Dubel et Guillard 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 36 - Lavalette 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 36 - Lavalette 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Laurent Gouvion Saint Cyr 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Laurent Gouvion Saint Cyr 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hello, Coyau. You have new messages at EoRdE6's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 36 - Panhard 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Happy holidays! 2015!
* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * * | ||
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:31, 24 December 2014 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! L'Histoire by Antoine-François Gérard 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! La France Victorieuse by Antoine-François Gérard 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Les Trois Grâces by Aristide Maillol (Tuileries) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! La Montagne by Aristide Maillol (Tuileries) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Great work with your accurate descriptions!
thank you!--Hubertl (talk) 16:31, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. That was yesterday's work. :) --Coyau (talk) 16:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Bonjour,
Dans cette category tu as chargé des photos de Provins certes très intéressantes et avec une haute définition, mais qui à mon sens ne sont pas des panoramiques. C'est à dire des photos avec un champ de prise de vue très large. La place du Châtel se prêterait bien par exemple à un panoramique. Il me semble qu'il faudrait enlever ces photos de Category:Panoramics in Seine-et-Marne.
Qu'en penses-tu ? Je te laisse juge. --Tangopaso (talk) 18:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Je n'en pense pas grand chose, j'ai tout déplacé. C'est mieux comme ça ? --Coyau (talk) 00:16, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, Bosquet des Dômes, Nymphe de Diane, Anselme Flamen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pomone by Aristide Maillol (Tuileries) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, Bosquet des Dômes, Amphitrite, d'ap. Michel Anguier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, Bosquet des Dômes, Nymphe de Diane, Anselme Flamen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, Bosquet des Dômes, Galatée, Jean-Baptiste Tuby 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! L'Hommage à Cézanne by Aristide Maillol (Tuileries) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fourme d'Ambert 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blue Stilton 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blue Stilton 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fourme d'Ambert 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Livarot (fromage) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Livarot (fromage) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
WikiCheese
hi, Coyau, I´m really glad, that we can participate in this wonderful french GLAM-project. I hope, we can learn a lot about cheese, whereever we can find some. And shops, which allows us to make pictures directly there. Its funny, but we started here in Austria with swiss cheese. But first we take switzerland, than we take Austria. Greetings from Vienna! --Hubertl (talk) 13:36, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Score
Hi, is that normal? I removed something that was obviously wrong, lots of error messages, page in error tracking category. After that it was okay. You reverted it, and now the old state as it was is suddenly also okay. –Be..anyone (talk) 00:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Moka Nova Espress fondo elettrico 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Obviously, you don´t wanna talk with collegues.
So, the second time: If you don´t use a grey card or - if you have Lightroom - trying the automatically white-balance check, the results will always change within the same series of picture (also because you use the Time-Automatic instead of the manual program). The Pélardon is pretty ok, but for example, the series of the Camembert de Normandie or the Salers is completely failed.
If you miss light, especially, when you take a picture from inside after cutting a piece, use a additional flash light. It makes your work easier and much quicker, you don´t have to care about the permanent lights.
On the other hand I am pretty sure, that some of your soft cheeses have obviously poor quality too. They are simply stored incorrectly and not fresh from the producer. --Hubertl (talk) 15:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bleu d'Auvergne 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chaource (fromage) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cœur de Neufchâtel 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - entrée principale 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Camembert de Normandie (AOP) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pélardon 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Pierre Bonnard - The Poppies (11455891485).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:13, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Pierre Bonnard - Poppies in a Vase (13631685725).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:15, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Pierre Bonnard - Pot of Flowers (11196445206).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:15, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Transfert de photographies de bâtiments récents vers fr.wikipedia
Bonjour,
Pourrais-tu transférer les fichiers suivants ?
- File:Anglais-455-prom-porte-de-l-arenas-5-3.jpg (unknown architect)
- File:Bibliotheque-nucera-3-2.jpg (architect dead in 2008, to restore in 2079)
- File:Bieckert-15-av-1-2.jpg (unknown architect)
- File:Californie-av-de-la-lenval-3-2.jpg (architect still alive)
- File:Dubouchage-27-bd-l-artistique-4-3-images.jpg (unknown architect)
- File:Photos-nice-gambetta-41-bd-la-rotonde-7-2.jpg (architect dead in 1963, to restore in 2034)
- File:Photos-nice-ile-de-beaute-place-palis-jumeaux-gauche-3-2.jpg (unknown architect)
- File:Anglais-113-Promenade-des-societe generale d'agriculture-3.JPG (unknown architect)
Article cible : fr:Liste de bâtiments et édifices remarquables de Nice
--Dereckson (talk) 12:33, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Emil Nolde - Blue Sky and Sunflowers (15312980422).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Alinea (talk) 14:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Александр Дейнека - Гладиолусы и рябина (15315827880).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Andrey Korzun (talk) 16:23, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Addition of non-existing parameter
Hi Coyau. As you see there your addition of a non-existing parameter yields an error. --Leyo 11:25, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- It's a wiki, so fix it. --Coyau (talk) 12:36, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- It would be a full revert in each case. --Leyo 13:54, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- You get your edit count as you can. But that is rather lame for a sysop. --Coyau (talk) 13:57, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- What the heck are you talking about? --Leyo 14:03, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Dummy edits, easy reverts (and deleting informations) instead of fixing things. --Coyau (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Well, you made the erroneous addition and I asked you to fix it (however you would like to). You did not even bother reacting to my request. --Leyo 14:19, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Good for you. Keep at it. Good work. --Coyau (talk) 14:32, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Well, you made the erroneous addition and I asked you to fix it (however you would like to). You did not even bother reacting to my request. --Leyo 14:19, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Dummy edits, easy reverts (and deleting informations) instead of fixing things. --Coyau (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- What the heck are you talking about? --Leyo 14:03, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- You get your edit count as you can. But that is rather lame for a sysop. --Coyau (talk) 13:57, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- It would be a full revert in each case. --Leyo 13:54, 28 May 2015 (UTC)