User talk:Cobber17

English: Welcome to the Commons, Cobber17!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 04:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Cobber17!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichill (talk) 12:41, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 774617ffa416a73fe8f22c1d77e42708[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Image:Ruines_de_Royan.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Ruines_de_Royan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Cobber17 (talk) 04:43, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Cobber17!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BRL50.jpg is uncategorized since 11 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:PACronje CHM VA2863.jpg is uncategorized since 8 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Place centrale.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Chateau d'Oléron.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Cobber17,

Ta page de discussion est protégée, donc je crée une nouvelle section. J'ai créé une catégorie Architecture of Royan 1950s, j'y mets mes photos. Ce n'est pas la peine de mettre "Monuments historiques" aux photos de l'église de Royan, puisque la catégorie "église de Royan" est "monument historique" (simplification de l'affichage). J'ai mis l'église du Parc à moi, c'est moi qui l'avais faite ;-) (mon vrai nom); tu m'avais peut-être envoyé un mail, mais je ne me souviens plus; c'est pas grave. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 06:35, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Catégories et sous-catégories[edit]

(voir aussi mon message ci-dessus)

Pareil pour les arènes de Saintes, elles sont classées en monument historique (en fait non, mais heureusement Myrabella vient de corriger, oubli de ma part ;-) , donc pas la peine d'ajouter "monuments historiques of Saintes" à chacune de ses photos. Arrête tout ! . J'ai ajouté le marché de Royan aux monuments historiques (la catégorie suffit), et je vais ajouter Category:Palais des congrès de Royan. Tu as bien fait de créer une catégorie spécifique Category:Monuments historiques in Royan. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 06:42, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jack ma me semble proposer la bonne méthode pour classer ces images : ajouter la catégorie "Monuments historiques in Saintes" à la catégorie-mère et non pas à chaque photo individuelle. Quand la catégorie-mère se réfère déjà à la catégorie "Monuments historiques in Charente-Maritime", il faudrait enlever cette dernière pour la remplacer par "Monuments historiques in Saintes". Ceci pour ne pas "sur-catégoriser" : en effet, "Monuments historiques in Saintes" fait partie de "Monuments historiques in Charente-Maritime". Ex de catégorie à traiter : Category:Basilique Saint-Eutrope de Saintes et toutes les images qu'elle contient. Cordialement, --Myrabella (talk) 08:59, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

C'est fait ! Jack ma (talk) 11:36, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai aussi créé Category:Port of Royan, Category:Temple de Royan, Category:Pontaillac (partie de Royan), Category:Beaches of Royan. Pas évident de choisir l'anglais ou le français lors de la création d'une nouvelle catégorie (plusieurs facteurs entrent en compte). Sinon la règle (implicite) est de ne pas répéter une catégorie et sa catégorie mère dans une même photo, mais là non plus ce n'est pas évident; par exemple une photo de plage de Royan peut ne pas montrer que Category:Beaches of Royan, mais aussi autre chose caractéristique de Category:Royan en général. Il reste encore beaucoup à faire (rien que tous les monuments historiques; théoriquement c'est une catégorie par monument historique, par exemple chaque villa classée). J'ai été un peu embêté pour trouver les catégories correspondantes pour Category:Architecture of Royan 1950s: mélange d'Art Déco, Le Corbusier et école brésilienne. Si tu peux améliorer n'hésite pas. A+, Jack ma (talk) 08:33, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Jack ma et Myrabella,

Merci à vous deux pour votre aide et toutes mes excuses pour vous avoir encore plus donné de travail qu'autre chose en devant repasser derrière moi pour corriger mes bêtises ! Je me rends compte de mon étourderie de ce matin, vous avez évidemment raison. Je vais prochainement essayer de faire avancer un peu les choses pour ce qui est des MH (en faisant attention c'est promis

). Cordialement, Cobber17 (talk) 22:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

De rien, ce n'est pas grave; j'ai mis longtemps à comprendre aussi. Si le nom n'est pas un nom propre ou usité couramment, il vaut mieux employer des noms anglais dans les désignations des MH. Exemple: gare routière (on va tâcher de renommer). Mais d'autres sont moins évidents (ex: "Hôtel de ville de ...", ..., ou entre "Royan Market hall" et "Marché couvert de Royan", ou "Marché de Royan"). Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 06:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MH et églises[edit]

Salut Cobber. Bravo pour ton travail de classification des églises en Monuments historiques. En ce moment, j'essaie de classifier les détails des églises, et j'ai fait refléter l'arborescence nationale suivante à nos départements:

art
- frescos
- museums
- statues
- romanesque art
  - romanesque architecture
    - romanesque apses
    - romanesque churches
  - romanesque sculptures
    - romanesque tympanus
    - romanesque capitals
    - romanesque corbels

Pour les détails architecturaux peu nombreux, je les renseigne directement dans la catégorie nationale.
On peut aussi classer les églises anciennes en 3:

romanes (Romanesque churches in...)
gothiques (Gothic churches in ...)
les 2 (aucun style évident): (Churches in...)

Mais cette dernière classification est discutable:

presque toutes les églises sont romanes en Charentes
celles qui ont des arcs gothiques ne sont pas vraiment gothiques (ni vraiment romanes)
peut nuire à la lisibilité: voir Category:Churches in Dordogne où il n'y a pas cette distinction, et ça passe très bien. D'un autre côté, la classe Category:Romanesque churches in Aquitaine devient surpeuplée me semble-t-il, donc "Romanesque churches" par département s'impose peut-être finalement...

Et encore j'essaie de ne pas trop me prendre la tête ;-)
Bonne continuation, Jack ma (talk) 04:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Monuments religieux et classification[edit]

Salut Cobber17. En toute rigueur tu as raison. Une grande majorité des églises qui sont dans Category:Gothic churches in Charente-Maritime devrait être dans Category:Gothic revival churches in Charente-Maritime. Si on la crée, il faudra presque tout transvaser. Le "Gothic" actuel est un abus de langage et désigne plus le style que l'époque (il est peut-être couramment admis).
Voir Category:Gothic revival churches in France et plus généralement Category:Churches by architectural style pour avoir tous les styles possibles et éventuellement créer des descendants pour Category:Churches in Charente-Maritime. Pour le néo-roman ("romanesque revival"), as-tu des exemples ?

Dans un premier temps, je vais m'efforcer de continuer à classer toutes les églises de Charente (entre 350 et 400 photos, il en reste encore 250). Ensuite, je me pencherai sur les styles. Je ne laisserai dans les églises romanes que celles antérieures au XIIè siècle inclus qui n'ont pas été trop remaniées; la catégorie "Churches in..." tout court a encore de beaux jours devant elle ;-). Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 07:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir Cobber17. J'ai supprimé Category:Campenards in France et créé Category:Bell gables in Charente-Maritime (synonyme, après longue enquête, voir bistro). Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 21:54, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Date internationale[edit]

Bonjour Cobber17, rebienvenue parmi nous; merci pour tes nouvelles photos de Broue ! Juste un petit détail: pour la date, peux-tu prendre l'habitude de la mettre au format AAAA-MM ou AAAA-MM-JJ; de cette façon, elle apparaîtra dans la langue du lecteur (ex: 2009-08 affichera "août 2009" en français, ou "August 2009" en anglais, selon la langue dans ses Préférences). (celles de Barzan, pardon, je me suis trompé d'un an, ce sont celles de 2008 ;-). Cdlt, Jack ma (talk) 07:43, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Format date et Cognac[edit]

Re-bonjour Cobber17, J'ai vu que tu avais ramené une moisson de photos sur Cognac . J'insiste pour les dates: il vaut mieux mettre 2009-09-04 que 2009/09/04: l'affichage change totalement, essaie. D'autre part (je le rappelle mais tu as compris), quand une photo appartient à une sous-catégorie, on ne répète pas les catégories ancêtres (j'ai corrigé dans ce que j'ai vu, ex: Thaims. Je vois que Cognac commence à être bien peuplée, on va répartir... Bonne continuation, Jack ma (talk) 05:57, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eglise Parc Royan.jpg[edit]

File:Eglise Parc Royan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Coyau (talk) 23:21, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Howard_Zinn_bombardier_England_1945.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Howard_Zinn_bombardier_England_1945.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Howard_Zinn_bombardier_England_1945.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 01:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vue_Aubeterre_sur_Dronne.JPG[edit]

File:Vue_Aubeterre_sur_Dronne.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jack ma (talk) 07:26, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File "This retaining wall and balustrade is the last remnant of Brisbane's Holy Name Cathedral"[edit]

I see that you managed to locate this photo of mine. I have none others from that long-disused computer. Were others of mine also placed in Wikimedia Commons? masalai

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Gypjak mosque construction 2003-2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Яй (talk) 18:31, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ashprehotel.JPG[edit]

File:Ashprehotel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:50, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Mausoleul din Parcul Carol.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Cobber17

Contents

Please link images[edit]

TUSC token 774617ffa416a73fe8f22c1d77e42708[edit]

Image:Ruines_de_Royan.jpg[edit]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Catégories et sous-catégories[edit]

MH et églises[edit]

Monuments religieux et classification[edit]

Date internationale[edit]

Format date et Cognac[edit]

File:Eglise Parc Royan.jpg[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Howard_Zinn_bombardier_England_1945.jpg[edit]

File:Vue_Aubeterre_sur_Dronne.JPG[edit]

File "This retaining wall and balustrade is the last remnant of Brisbane's Holy Name Cathedral"[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Ashprehotel.JPG[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Navigation menu

User talk:Cobber17

Please link images[edit]

TUSC token 774617ffa416a73fe8f22c1d77e42708[edit]

Image:Ruines_de_Royan.jpg[edit]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Catégories et sous-catégories[edit]

MH et églises[edit]

Monuments religieux et classification[edit]

Date internationale[edit]

Format date et Cognac[edit]

File:Eglise Parc Royan.jpg[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Howard_Zinn_bombardier_England_1945.jpg[edit]

File:Vue_Aubeterre_sur_Dronne.JPG[edit]

File "This retaining wall and balustrade is the last remnant of Brisbane's Holy Name Cathedral"[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Ashprehotel.JPG[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Navigation menu

Search