User talk:Christophe.Finot

Rimini[edit]

Hi christofe!

I see the nice shots you've uploaded and I've put it in the rimini's page.

Do you have some special reason to have these photos categorized twice under the same category (one as a page and one as a photo)?

Please note that yuor categorization and your information are preserved and that in the italian cities pages we're trying to put all the photos in a page.

Thans for your comprehension, --mac 10:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi christ.

Thanks for your reply; we don't agree on the browsing functionallity. I've preserved it. What sense is to have a category nwith tonns of files with dummy names or wrong names? Insetead we check the photos, we put them under the right cat, ant we describe them. Why do you want to duplicate the photos under the same cat? It's confusing. Please have a look on how the category Cities in italy is strucutred and please consider to respect others work. Thaks for your comprenhsion, --mac 11:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For exaple see category:Roma; would you substain that putting all the photos under a cat is a better way for browsing? Please consider that this is a standard and a consistent way we're organizing italian citis photos; could this be a good reason for you? --mac 11:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't intend to hurt you. As I know there is a final decision in wiki; there is a still running discussion on that. Two different ways of thinking. I'm not the only one archiving photos of italian cities, and the fact that the great part of them are organized this way is just the power of standards (or templates). A newcomers arrives, looks at others work, and follow them because it has a sense. For example, at the beginning cat itay was containing tousends of photos with no other browsing info and they were not linked to the wiki pages. Just trown there like in a basket. With this organization we ( I repet I'm not the only one) organized in a browsing way all the photos ( also 2 or 3 browsing path) and we linked them to the italian wiki ( and you can do the same with the french one ); this way, now, we can find any new image, categorize it, link to the enciclopedia. It ha sense. So, you can still reach the photos by browinsg cat rimini; why it's soo urgent for you to have it also under the same category? --mac 11:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC) Could you please levae your signature when you post, in order to make me esier to reach your page?[reply]

Image:Chateau de Dree 20.jpg[edit]

Je parcourais les nouveaux fichiers mardi dernier et j'ai beaucoup aimé la composition de cette photo.Je me suis permis de la proposer dans les Images de bonne qualité technique et elle a très rapidement été promue.En espérant que vous serez d'accord avec ma démarche, et avec mes meilleurs sentiments. Vassil 15:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau de Dree 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Musée des Beaux Arts de Dole[edit]

Bonjour Christophe, J'ai vu que vous avez contribué par des photos de Dole sur wikimedia. Connaissez vous une vue du Musée des Beaux Arts de Dole (Pavillon des Officiers, 85, rue des Arènes, 39100 Dole)? En vous remerciant, --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 18:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panorama des quatre lacs.jpg[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai utilisé ta photo (File:Panorama des quatre lacs.jpg) pour illustrer des articles sur le lac d'Ilay et les Lacs de Maclu dans le Jura, sur fr:Wikipedia. J'ai commenté l'image pour identifier les lacs mais j'ai un doute pour le Petit Maclu : est-il visible à droite ou s'agit-il du lac de Narlay ? Le panoramique me perturbe et je ne sais plus. Peux-tu m'éclairer ? J'ai cru bien faire en complétant aussi la description sur Commons mais il faut corriger si je me suis trompé. Merci de ton aide. PRA (talk) 14:54, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Je m'étais bien trompé : j'ai découvert le lac de Narlay au fond à droite en passant en full resolution. J'ai corrigé.PRA (talk) 08:08, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Steinbeisser and his barracks[edit]

Hello, I saw your remarks on the talk page of User:Steinbeisser.

I've encountered some of his edits, and I've reviewed some more of them later on. All I can say: damn, he seriously messed things up. If you have time, I hope you can keep an eye on what he's doing, because he surely isn't making things better for commons. When reviewing his changes, most of his edits have to be reverted unfortunately, and there's a lot more to undo, I'm afraid. Regards --LimoWreck (talk) 15:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photo de Dole 013[edit]

Bonjour,

stagiaire en communication, je suis à la recherche d'une photo de la ville de Dole pour illustrer une fiche de référence de projet que ma société a fait dans cette ville. J'aimerais proposer votre photo Dole013 en illustration de cette "fiche projet" à mon tuteur de stage, m'en donnez-vous l'autorisation ? A savoir que cette photo aura une utilisation commerciale, puisque la fiche sera envoyée à nos clients potentiels, conjointement à nos propositions commerciales. Elle ne sera néanmoins pas revendue et ne sera pas inclue sur des documents ayant vocation à être vendus en tant que tels (nous sommes une société de consulting et d'ingénierie, nous ne vendons donc que des services). A savoir que votre nom apparaîtra en bas à droite de la photo si vous m'accordez l'autorisation de l'utiliser(elle ne sera, d'ailleurs, peut être jamais retenue par mon tuteur, le cas échéant je vous préviendrais).

Merci d'avance pour votre réponse

Maïna Leroux

Vierge à l'enfant[edit]

Bonjour, I am sorry, mais je n'avais jamais vu nulle part que les catégories devaient être obligatoirement en anglais, et j'ai envie de demander pourquoi en anglais ? et pas en français, en mandarin, en swahili ? Et je ne m'en sors jamais, avec le principe des catégories et sous-catégories (même en français), qu'il est impossible de trouver autrement qu'en tâtonnant, au hasard, et on s'aperçoit après qu'il y a une autre catégorie qui existe et que c'est la bonne, ou peut-être pas... Bref, je vais laisser faire les amateurs de catégories, et soigneusement éviter de m'en occuper. Morburre (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dijon - Eglise Notre-Dame - Gargouilles 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Cool! -- Smial 21:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retouches d'images[edit]

Bonjour,

Je me suis permis d'éclaircir plusieurs de tes images concernant le Fort de Beauregard à Fénay. Il s'agit d'éclaircir les parties sombres de l'image afin d'en améliorer le rendu. Si cela ne te convient pas, ce n'est pas grave, je ferai une œuvre dérivée. Dis-moi si cela te convient. Amicalement.--Bertrand GRONDIN (talk) 15:31, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. Je préférais personnellement les images initiales. En effet, elles étaient peut être légèrement trop sombres, mais en éclaircissant, les contrastes sont dégradés. Je me suis donc permis de revenir à la version initiale des photos, mais libre à toi si tu le désires de faire une oeuvre dérivée. Bien cordialement. Christophe.Finot (talk) 18:31, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

J'en prends note. En outre, il faut éviter l'utilisation des écrans plasma qui faussent la luminosité des images. Si tel était le cas, l'image peut paraître claire.--Bertrand GRONDIN (talk) 20:23, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai retiré certaines catégories que tu avais ajoutées par rapport au fichier initial. En effet, cela constituait une surcatégorisation, la catégorie fort de beauregard étant déjà une catégorie fille de côte d'or. Pour une meilleur navigation, l est fortement conseillé de se limiter à la catégorisation la plus précise et d'éliminer toutes les catégories mères. Bien cordialement. Christophe.Finot (talk) 20:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't blank pages[edit]

Hi Christophe.Finot,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked Category:Hôtel Aubriot on Commons. If you meant for the page to be deleted, blanking the page is not the right way to do this. A simple real-world comparison to illustrate: You removed the entire text of a page from a thick folder, but the then empty, useless page itself remained in the folder.

Please use {{speedy| type reason here }} and add it on top of the page you would like to have deleted; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regularly for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed.

For redirects use #REDIRECT[[Target]] or {{category redirect|Targetcategoryname}}. For more information please read Blanking. Thanks again. –Krinkle^talk 22:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

/Classification des images/[edit]

Salut, ok pour l'info : je ne dois donc catégoriser qu'avec "monuments historiques in France". Merci pour vos photos car je vois que vous en êtes souvent l'auteur. Je mets à jour la liste des MH de Cote-d'Or en ajoutant les images disponibles puis, étant du département, je ferai des clichés des MH manquants. Cordialement, et merci de ta surveillance. prosopee (talk) 06:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Dear Christophe.Finot,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:49, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Identification plus précise à Bordeaux[edit]

Christophe : Es-tu d'accord avec ceci ? Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 05:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Lille Mairie.jpg

English: As there is no Freedom of panorama in France.

Français : Pas de liberté de panorama en France (plus d’informations en Français).

Sincerely, Jean-Fred (talk) 00:16, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Grenoble 48.jpg

Léna (talk) 18:24, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rimini Grafiti.jpg[edit]

File:Rimini Grafiti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarlat - Place du marché aux oies.jpg[edit]

File:Sarlat - Place du marché aux oies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Thesupermat (talk) 08:40, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Remiremont - Abbatiale Saint-Pierre 11.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Remiremont - Abbatiale Saint-Pierre 11.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:04, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint-Jean de Losne - Saone.jpg[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai remodelé ta photographie avec Exposure Blend de Gimp et l'ai sauvegardée avec le minimum de perte jpeg. J'ai remanié aussi la netteté. J'ai pris sur moi d'inclure des métadonnées t'attribuant la parternité de l'image ainsi que la licence. J'ai ajouté les données de géolocalisation. Je pense que cette nouvelle version te plaira.-- Bertrand GRONDIN → ^(Talk) 15:18, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Commons Photo Challenge January 2014[edit]

Thank-you for participating in Commons:Photo challenge! Come to the talk page to discuss and help organise this new project.

The December 2013 themes will close for submissions this weekend and be ready for voting from Monday 6th January: Coloured light and Silhouette.

For January 2014 there are two themes: A bunch of stuff and January. I hope you are keen to participate. Please read the theme descriptions for full submission rules on each theme. -- Colin (talk)

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Pour la photo de l'église Saint-Fleuret d'Estaing! Aarp65 (talk) 07:18, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:International Year of Light 2015 - color logo.png[edit]

File:International Year of Light 2015 - color logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

– Danmichaelo (δ) 12:14, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Villefranche-de-Rouerge 3.jpg[edit]

File:Villefranche-de-Rouerge 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sammyday (talk) 16:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Dijon - Notre-Dame - Tapisserie Teriblis.jpg

And also:

File:Dijon - Notre-Dame 10.jpg

Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 12:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th[edit]

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th.
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).

#WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roger de Bussy-Rabutin.JPG[edit]

File:Roger de Bussy-Rabutin.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Marie Adelaide (talk) 09:30, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Pontarlier - Église Saint-Bénigne 13.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:07, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Pontarlier - Église Saint-Bénigne 13.jpg

And also:

File:Pontarlier - Église Saint-Bénigne - font baptismal.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Cannes - hotel MARTINEZ.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pontarlier_-_Mairie_5.jpg[edit]

Salut, ta photo est republiée ici sans Que ta paternité est notée. Pour te renseigner, si tu veux faire quelque chose à ce sujet. – Amitiés, Mussklprozz (talk) 12:51, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Christophe.Finot

Contents

Rimini[edit]

Image:Chateau de Dree 20.jpg[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Musée des Beaux Arts de Dole[edit]

File:Panorama des quatre lacs.jpg[edit]

User:Steinbeisser and his barracks[edit]

Photo de Dole 013[edit]

Vierge à l'enfant[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Retouches d'images[edit]

Please don't blank pages[edit]

/Classification des images/[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Identification plus précise à Bordeaux[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Rimini Grafiti.jpg[edit]

File:Sarlat - Place du marché aux oies.jpg[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Remiremont - Abbatiale Saint-Pierre 11.JPG[edit]

File:Saint-Jean de Losne - Saone.jpg[edit]

Commons Photo Challenge January 2014[edit]

A barnstar for you![edit]

File:International Year of Light 2015 - color logo.png[edit]

File:Villefranche-de-Rouerge 3.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th[edit]

File:Roger de Bussy-Rabutin.JPG[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Pontarlier_-_Mairie_5.jpg[edit]

Navigation menu

User talk:Christophe.Finot

Rimini[edit]

Image:Chateau de Dree 20.jpg[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Musée des Beaux Arts de Dole[edit]

File:Panorama des quatre lacs.jpg[edit]

User:Steinbeisser and his barracks[edit]

Photo de Dole 013[edit]

Vierge à l'enfant[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Retouches d'images[edit]

Please don't blank pages[edit]

*/Classification des images/*[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Identification plus précise à Bordeaux[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Rimini Grafiti.jpg[edit]

File:Sarlat - Place du marché aux oies.jpg[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Remiremont - Abbatiale Saint-Pierre 11.JPG[edit]

File:Saint-Jean de Losne - Saone.jpg[edit]

Commons Photo Challenge January 2014[edit]

A barnstar for you![edit]

File:International Year of Light 2015 - color logo.png[edit]

File:Villefranche-de-Rouerge 3.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th[edit]

File:Roger de Bussy-Rabutin.JPG[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Pontarlier_-_Mairie_5.jpg[edit]

Navigation menu

Search

/Classification des images/[edit]