User talk:Calak

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Calak!

Commons:Bureaucrats/Requests/Odder (de-bureaucrat)[edit]

In the discussion at Commons:Bureaucrats/Requests/Odder (de-bureaucrat) you have expressed an opinion that Odder's bureaucrat status should be kept or removed, but you did not express the reasoning behind that opinion. I would appreciate it if you would return to the discussion and share why you believe Odder's actions were or were not appropriate for a bureaucrat. This will help avoid future drama by making it clear why (or why not) the community believes bureaucrats should be free to act in this way. Thank you. Thryduulf (talk) 17:24, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maps of Kurdistan[edit]

Hi. Yes, I can make new versions of these maps related to new Halabja governorate. However, there might be one problem. I am usually using reliable references as a base for my maps. I am aware that Halabja governorate was recently created, but I have not yet seen some reliable reference which stating what are borders of this new governorate. Perhaps you have such reference which saying that Halabja governorate is made of districts Pencwin, Said sadiq, Sharazur and Halabja? In fact, this source claims that it have 5 districts (with Derbendixan district) included: http://z5.ifrm.com/30192/69/0/p1169408/58.jpg Anyway, both these sources, wikipedia article and map from forum are not considered reliable. Therefore, we have to find some more reliable source which can clarify does new Halabja governorate have 4 or 5 districts. So, can you provide some reference about this to me or I have to search it on google?

As for new maps which will show sub-districts, I can make them, but it would be little bigger job, so I cannot promise that I can make them soon. Contrary to this, maps related to new Halabja governorate are very easy to be made, so I can made them in few days after I find reliable source about number of districts in Halabja governorate. PANONIAN (talk) 21:52, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I just read this: http://rudaw.net/english/kurdistan/140320142?keyword=Halabja It says: "Barzani said the province would have the same administrative borders as the District of Halabja" and "The new province is composed of sub-districts and villages within Halabja’s current jurisdiction. A referendum is expected to be held in the nearby districts of Sharazur, Said Sadiq and Penjwin to decide if they want to be incorporated into the province." So, it looks to me that final borders of Halabja governorate are not defined yet and, thus, we should wait for results of this referendum before I make modifications in these maps. Or perhaps you have some new info about this referendum? This news article that I read is from March, 2014. PANONIAN (talk) 22:30, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@PANONIAN: Thank you! Derbendixan is a part of Silêmanî governorate. Here is a reliable source from Kurdish News Network too: Halabja to Become 19th Province in Iraq.
I'm not sure about this referendum, but I'm sure that Halabja governorate is made of Pencwin, Said sadiq, Sharazur and Halabja districts. I hope that gives you enough information to get you started. Regards. --Çalak talk 22:57, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but I still want to find some official confirmation that all these districts are included into Halabja governorate (with or without referendum). As soon as I find some source that saying this, I will make these maps. PANONIAN (talk) 06:25, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, this news story is from January 2014: http://knnc.net/EN/full-story-14836-28-False#.VGBa_jSG-NA While this one is from March 2014: http://rudaw.net/english/kurdistan/140320142?keyword=Halabja So, it looks to me that first news (from January) speaks only about intention of Halabja governorate to be created from the territory of these 4 districts. However, the news from March says that decision about formation of new Halabja governorate was signed in that time (meaning that it did not existed in January) and it also says that new governorate is made only from Halabja district, and that other 3 districts might be included after referendum. So, we should find some newer news to see how this issue developed until now. PANONIAN (talk) 06:37, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@PANONIAN: Thank you tovarish!--Çalak talk 20:06, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I actually live in Serbia, but I am kind of pro-Russian, so that is why I am using Russian flag on my page. :) PANONIAN (talk) 21:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@PANONIAN: Yes, I know! I am interested in Yugoslavia (Serbia) and Soviet (Russia) too :) --Çalak talk 21:26, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Hamid Hassani.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Dinosaur918 (talk) 23:03, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarchia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

INeverCry 07:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A small request :)[edit]

Hi. I noticed a Wikipedia patroller file (c:File:Wikipedia Patroller-ckb.png) you created. If it's not a hard work, can you make a silver version of the file, with the word Patrulator instead of the original text? Thanks. --Wintereu 08:07, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Margaret George.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 06:57, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Margaret George.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 18:28, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mela-soori.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 18:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:بارستای ئەلیکترۆن.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 13:06, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Genericusername57 (talk) 19:06, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]