User talk:Brackenheim/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Frauenstein Stadtkirche.jpg

Hallo! „Jorgito“ hat doch explizit folgendes bei seinem Upload angegeben: „Frauenstein, Stadtkirche, Foto: Jorgito 2005, Public Domain“. Übersehe ich was? Grüße, --Polarlys (talk) 14:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Nein, war mein Fehler - habe ich irgendwie übersehen. Komisch, im Logbuch auf de.wiki steht nur eine Datei, in der Versionsgeschichte wiederum nur die andere Datei. Stimmt jetzt wohl doch so... Grüße --Brackenheim (talk) 14:54, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Danke! Dir dann schönes Wochenende! --Polarlys (talk) 13:20, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Dir auch! ;-) --Brackenheim (talk) 13:34, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Importspezialist gesucht

Ich bräuchte bei http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Institution_talk:Datei:Weltreligionen.png&action=history mal Hilfe. I always get a version duplication. but I for sure only have clicked once... however, the file history is understandable also with this problem.. isn't it? Vielleicht kannst du mal morgen/heute nachmittag abend oder so im IRC anklopfen (/query Saibo), wenn du Zeit hast - dank dir! Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 02:17, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Ok, ich schau mal kurz vorbei - bis gleich ;-) Grüße --Brackenheim (talk) 20:08, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geburtshaus von Henry Miller I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fix the tilt and it might pass. Mattbuck 01:07, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Now fixed and promoted. --Alchemist-hp 19:20, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Sergey zagraevsky official7.jpg

Dear Brackenheim, there is an author's permission on the source page of this photo: [1]. It is in Russian, but I think that it is no difference, it is still CreativeCommons Attribution ShareAlike:

Разрешается свободное воспроизведение всех приведенных на этой странице фотографий. Настоящим я заявляю, что являюсь единственным обладателем исключительных авторских прав на все фотографии, размещенные на данной странице. Я согласен опубликовать все эти произведения на условиях свободной лицензии CreativeCommons Attribution ShareAlike, версии 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 и выше. Я понимаю, что тем самым даю право любому лицу распространять, изменять и использовать эти произведения с любыми не нарушающими закона целями (в том числе связанными с извлечением коммерческой выгоды) при условии соблюдения указанной лицензии. Я уведомлен, что я сохраняю исключительные авторские права на эти произведения вне условий указанной лицензии, и что я всегда сохраняю право на упоминание меня как автора в соответствии с выбранной лицензией. Модификации, которые сделают другие люди, не будут приписаны мне. Данное разрешение затрагивает только мои исключительные авторские права, и я оставляю за собой право предпринимать действия против использования моих работ с нарушением закона – в частности, для клеветы, унижения чести и достоинства, нарушения правил использования торговых марок, нарушения права на охрану изображения гражданина и т. д.

Is it enough? --Ozolina (talk) 14:33, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh, it's my fault: I didn't see it. Unfortunately I don't understand Russian, but it seems to be all right. Sorry for that trouble. Regards, --Brackenheim (talk) 15:32, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
No problem, thanks for your contribution to WP! Good luck! --Ozolina (talk) 18:46, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Quelle Conow.jpg

Hallo! Mich würde mal interessieren, wie der dargestellte Kartenausschnitt lizenzfrei bzw. sein kann, wenn oben rechts im Kasten für die Vervielfältigung eine Erlaubnis verlangt wird? Soweit mir bekannt ist, sind die Kartendaten von GAIA-MV zwar für jedermann frei zugänglich, aber jedenfalls nicht gemeinfrei ([http://www.geoportal-mv.de/land-mv/GeoPortalMV_prod/de/Geodatenviewer/Nutzungsbedingungen/index.jsp Link). Hätte durch das OTRS-Ticket nicht die Freigabe nach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de (durch geodatenservice@laiv-mv.de?) erfolgen müssen? Gruß --Erell (talk) 07:57, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Hallo, in der Tat scheint da ein Fehler bei der Freigabe unterlaufen zu sein. Das Landesamt für innere Verwaltung Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Amt für Geoinformation, Vermessungs- und Katasterwesen Fachbereich Geodatenbereitstellung hat die Karte zwar für die Veröffentlichung in Wikipedia freigegeben, allerdings wurde keine ausdrückliche Zustimmung zur Veröffentlichung unter der der creative-commons-Lizenz und der damit verbundenen Nachnutzung erteilt. Wenn dies von der zuständigen Stelle nicht nachgeholt wird, muss die Karte gelöscht werden. --Wvk (talk) 07:29, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St.Georg-Kirche Jeinsen IMG 3965.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:31, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle Gümmer (Seelze)IMG 9179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 23:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Vitus-Kirche in Wilkenburg (Hemmingen) IMG 6146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Schloß Ricklingen IMG 1882.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Removed some dust spots, corrected tilt&shift, somewhat higher resolution would be nice, but 2 MPix meets QI criteria. --Smial 13:46, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

File:KlaksvíkRelief.jpg

You moved this file to Commons, but are you really sure that it is allowed here? COM:FOP#Denmark only applies to buildings and not to artworks, but I'm not sure what happens if an artwork is part of a building as in this case. fo:Fridtjof Joensen died quite recently. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:24, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Well, me too. I have never seen an example like this, so I requested the deletion - maybe an admin has an idea, how to handle in this case... Regards and thank you for that notice, --Brackenheim (talk) 16:09, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zuettlingen-otto-v-ellrichshausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:42, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Deutsch Wikipedia

Hallo, habe gerade ein paar Bilder von mit, die nun auf Commons verschoben wurden, mir angeschaut. Da steht jetzt in der Bildbeschreibung: Commander-pirx at German Wikipedia sollte das nicht eher Deutsche oder Deutschen Wikipedia heißen. MfG --Commander-pirx (talk) 08:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Ich mag Template:User at project sowieso nicht und vermeide die Vorlage wann immer möglich. --Leyo 08:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
So wie die Vorlage zur Zeit noch aussieht finde ich sie auch nicht wirklich gut. Ich hoffe immer noch, dass mein Vorschlag bald umgesetzt werden kann und es dann wenigstens "aus der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia" heißt. Ehrlich gesagt habe ich die Diskussion dort nicht mehr so ganz verfolgt... Grüße --Brackenheim (talk) 09:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Neue Idee: Wie wäre es mit "Benutzer:XYZ aus de.wikipedia"? Dann hätte man das "-sprachigen"-Problem nicht mehr, da man nur noch das Sprachkürzel erscheint. Was haltet ihr davon? Gruß, --Brackenheim (talk) 17:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Wenn in der de-WP [[Benutzer:XYZ|XYZ]] stand, so sollte dies auf Commons IMO genau so stehen (mit korrektem Link natürlich). Die Angabe der Wikipedia-Sprachversion ist unnötig (steht ja im Original upload log) und wohl oft nicht gewünscht. Ich spiele schon länger mit dem Gedanken, einen DR auf die Vorlage zu stellen, möchte aber Magog nicht brüskieren. --Leyo 22:16, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Stimmt, es ist ja eigentlich (fast) egal, aus welchem Projekt das Bild stammt. Soll dann auf die Commons-Benutzerseite verlinkt werden oder besser auf die Benutzerseite aus dem Projekt, von dem das Bild verschoben wurde? Gruß, --Brackenheim (talk) 22:21, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Als Standard IMO eher die Benutzerseite des „Quellprojekts“. --Leyo 22:10, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Meinst Du, man könnte Magog auch igrendwie davon überzeugen? --Brackenheim (talk) 23:08, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Ich hab's unter COM:VP#Removal of original uploader information versucht. --Leyo 06:47, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Danke für den Hinweis! Wie ich sehe, hast Du ja bereits alles genannt ;-) Gruß, --Brackenheim (talk) 08:37, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Fox de hd.svg

File:Fox de hd.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fry1989 eh? 19:54, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Ronchamp, Minenarbeiter-Denkmal.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ronchamp, Minenarbeiter-Denkmal.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

ComputerHotline (talk) 07:10, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

File:DPAG2002 Lyonel Feininger.jpg

File:DPAG2002 Lyonel Feininger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Correlatio (talk) 21:18, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Publikation Foto Heckpferd Tripsdrill

Sehr gehhrter Herr Müller,

ich möchte hiermit höflich anfragen ob wir (Zeitschrift Pferderevue) Ihr Foto von einem Heckpoferd mit Fohlen bei Fuß in einem Artikel (Fotocredit vermerkt als : Foto Robin Müller) benutzen können. Ein pdf des Artikels kann ich Ihnen dann zukommen lassen. Meine Mail Adresse lautet: [2]

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Dr. Thomas Druml — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.191.118.169 (talk • contribs) 10:35, 30. Nov. 2012‎ (UTC)

Danke für die Anfrage! Habe gerade per Mail geantwortet. Grüße --Brackenheim (talk) 20:34, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johanniskirche in Brackenheim VI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Fluessiger_Stickstoff.jpg

Robin Müller,

We will be using this image, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fluessiger_Stickstoff.jpg, on this website: http://www.research.umn.edu/techcomm/.

Thank you for the image!

Carol grut004@umn.edu

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9005 6 7ri-Prinz-Carl-Palais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:00, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brackenheim/Archive_4&oldid=115182691"