User talk:Balbo

User talk:Balbo/archive 2006

User talk:Balbo/archive 2007

Category:Bab al-Mardum

Hi! thanks for your good words. You're definitely right in your edits. I think about empty category... maybe you can search a foto in flikr and upload it here? Some of lisenses at flickr are free, and I've seen a lot of flickr's photos reuploaded at commons. --Shakko 19:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

or I can shoot it my next time in Toledo :) Yo quiero visitar lo una vez mas - muy hermoso...eh... aqui in Rusia todavía nieve :( Good luck )--Shakko 20:14, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Recategorizaciones altares

Hola, Balbo: ciertamente, decidí trasladar las fotos de retablos de edificios religiosos españoles a las subcategorías específicas :Altars in Spain y, dentro de ésta, en el caso de ser identificable el estilo-período artístico del retablo, a las subcategorías :Gothic altars, :Renaissance altarpieces y :Baroque altarpieces in Spain. Mi criterio, reconozco que algo subjetivo y discutible, fue el de considerar "altars" (altares) sólo las cabeceras de iglesias con algún tipo de retablo. En puridad, los retablos son "altarpieces", no "altars". Las fotos de altares SIN retablo (sólo, la mesa del altar y los ornatos litúrgicos básicos), que dejan al descubierto el ábside de la cabecera, las trasladé a :Church interiors, de la que :Altars in Spain es subcategoría. Fotos en las que aparecen retablos mayores, pero como panorámica, mostrando ya elementos de las naves y bóvedas, las dejé en o trasladé a :Church interiors. Idem para fotos de mobiliario religioso que no puede considerarse retablo o altar (cuadros, relieves, tallas, sepulcros púlpitos, etc).

Mi concepto es que no deben inflarse innecesariamente las categorías con la aparición repetida de una foto, tratando ubicar la misma en la subcategoría precisa. De nuevo, esto podrá ser discutible.

También retiré de las subcategorías relacionadas con el interior de templos aquellas piezas escultóricas que, aun habiendo formado en su momento parte de retablos, ahora son piezas de museo.

El asunto de los altares no cristianos, en el que no había reparado, complica las cosas. Quizá haya que acometer una correccion en la recategorizacion.

Con todo, estoy dispuesto a volver a trasladar a :Altars in Spain y sus subcategorias las fotos que muestren, en efecto, mesas de altar.

Categorización cúpulas

Tienes toda la razón sobre lo improcedente de convertir :Domes in Spain en una subcategoría de :Church interiors in Spain. La he suprimido. Una solución para dar cuenta a los usuarios interesados en interiores de iglesias españolas podría ser crear, dentro de :Domes in Spain, la subcategoría :Church domes in Spain, y editar las imágenes afectadas.--Zarateman 14:34, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Two things

Hello Balbo, firstly, I hope you don't mind my revert, if you look at the history, you'll see that there is an anon. who repeatedly changes "Ca" for "va" but also insists on a whole new wording without justifying it. In doing this, he or she eliminates the german version (I don't know why) and you correctly put it back. in order to revert to the previous word order I had to revert your edition, but as you can see, the german version is present.

As regards the various debates on names (català/valencià, país valencià/comunitat valenciana) the only consensus reached is within the various languages of the wikipedia. they can be found in the discussion pages of those articles. Nonetheless generally it can be seen that word-usage obeys the most common usage in the language as a whole, therefore in spanish it is always "Comunidad Valenciana", even if "pais valenciano" exists. Vice versa, the consensus is that "País Valencià" is more common in Catalan than "Comunitat" (although it has been challenged on legalistic grounds, and generally is prefered when talking about the political entity itself and related issues). In English the catalan community has decided on "Land of Valencia" although as a british person I can say it's definitely not in common usage ("Valencia" on it own, or "Region of Valencia" are inexact but more often used in English.) ...Now, Català/Valencià has not really been settled in any of the thre languages, though the Spanish-, French- and English-speaking editors seem to be more consistent in using "Catalan".

Therefore as far as I know there is no consensus or debate about names in Commons (well, a few fights about Category:Alicante). For me the main problem is that quite often names are made up in English, and then insisted upon!

I'm sure it's not much help but I hope I've explained a little. --Espencat (talk) 10:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

• País Valencià: ca:Viquipèdia:Temes controvertits/País Valencià --Espencat (talk) 12:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I agree, it wouldn't be a bad idea, and after a good debate and vote, we can block these pages and stop wasting time with edit wars, but there seems to be two problems. I think its obvious that in Wikimedia and other common pages, the lingua franca is english, and if other languages are present the debate on those names should be held at that language's wikipedia (I am against the English deciding how to describe things in Spanish, and vice-versa, which often creates horrible transliterations). Now I think thats quite hard because we can't block individual lines of text, only whole pages. The second problem is that we could end up blocking almost any page with a political or culturally contentious angle.

I don't know how to proceed either, but I imagine that you'd have to talk with a commons administrator. It sounds like a big job. Thanks for the interest, anyway. If you can make it work (I see you have more experience here than I, especially with vandalism), I'll contribute. Take care--Espencat (talk) 11:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Basque Country

Hola. ¿Me harías el favor de indicarme dónde se ha consensuado que la denominación Basque Country hace referencia a la comunidad autónoma española de País Vasco? Gracias. --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 13:07, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

En mi opinión, el historial de Category:Basque Country demuestra que no es <<un hecho asumido desde hace años>>. ¿Me harías el favor de explicarme qué significa Basque Country (historical territory)? ¿De dónde a dónde va? ¿Si es un territorio histórico, en qué época existió? ¿Existe algún plano de esa época con los límites del mismo? Gracias. --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 13:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Basque Country significa País Vasco en español, Pays Basque en francés y Euskal Herria en euskara. Si introduces la búsqueda en la Enciclopedia Británica (te ahorraré el esfuerzo), verás que existen dos entradas, es decir, País Vasco español y País Vasco francés. Siendo esto así, ¿por qué defiendes que Category:Basque Country haga referencia tan sólo a la comunidad autónoma española llamada País Vasco? --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 14:42, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Me pones la Wikipedia inglesa como ejemplo a seguir... perfecto. Ahí se ve la raíz de esta discusión: Basque Country es una página de desambiguación. Sin embargo, defiendes que en Wikimedia Commons Basque Country sea la comunidad autónoma española llamada País Vasco. En la Wikipedia inglesa, el artículo que se refiere a dicha comunidad se llama Basque Country (autonomous community). En consecuencia, propongo que la categoría Basque Country esté dentro de las categorías Autonomous communities of Spain, Provinces of France y Disputed territories, y que englobe a las categorías Northern Basque Country (enlace en la wikipedia en inglés, que usas como referencia) y Southern Basque Country (en la wikipedia en inglés). Dentro de esta segunda categoría estarían las categorías de Basque Country (autonomous community) y de Navarre (con e, por supuesto, ya que ponemos todo en inglés). --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 17:26, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Antes de proponer ninguna votación, ¿te has fijado en que la categoría Basque Country (historical territory) se creo el 29 de diciembre de 2007? --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 18:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Cito: <<Si tú también consideras que Euskal Herria como unión de esas regiones francesas y españolas no tiene ninguna base histórica y no existió en ninguna época, ni hay planos políticos que las agrupe...>>. Yo no he afirmado eso. Tan sólo te he hecho cuatro preguntas al respecto para saber en qué basas la necesidad de la existencia de la categoría Basque Country (historical territory), que se creó sin previa discusión hace 8 meses. --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 19:45, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

• Hola Balbo. Disculpa que no pueda leer con demasiada atención lo escrito, se debe a que no tengo internet en casa y que me conecto en un bar a varios kilómetros durante el tiempo que me dura la batería. Por este motivo, no soy el usuario más adecuado en este momento para mediar en una discusión.

El problema con ql que me encuentro es que no acabo de entender la estrutura que hay. Debería haber una categoría Category:Basque Country (véase fr:Pays basque espagnol) relativa al país vasco español y otra relativa al país vasco francés (vease fr:Pays basque français). Las dos categorías podrían estar recogidas, además de en otras, en una única categoría Category:Basque Country (para mí preferible a Category:Basque Country (historical territory) por no entrar en disputas sobre el carácter histórico).

Lo que a mi modo de ver no tiene ningún sentido es incorporar fotos del territorio del país vasco que actualmente está en España dentro de una subcategoría de Francia. Por este motivo, procedo personalmente a eliminar la categoría Provinces of France de Category:Basque Country, pues no procede ya que en este momento esa categoría se refiere al territorio español. Si se desea hacer otra categoría sobre el territorio francés (¿Category:Basque Country (France)?), sería conveniente renombrar la categoría Category:Basque Country y denominarla, por ejemplo Category:Basque Country (Spain). Lo que si es cierto es que no procede que haya fotos de Francia en una subcategoría de España, o fotos de España en un subcategoría de Francia.

Coméntame que te parece.

Por otro lado, en un inicio, yo abriría una discusión siempre en la página de discusión de la página en cuestión (Category talk:Basque Country). Si la disputa fuese a más, podría convenir solicitar ayuda en Commons:Café ya que yo no estoy en condiciones físicas y técnicas de mediar.

Precisamente por no estar en condiciones, pues me conecto a Internet escasas veces y por escaso tiempo, procedo a abrir la página de discusión Category talk:Basque Country.

Coméntame lo que desees, espero poder serte de ayuda, aunque estoya medias últimamente en el proyecto. Un cordial saludo--Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 17:31, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

• Me he puesto en contacto con el usuario que me indicaste aquí--Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 17:37, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Borrado de categorías

Ha sido un error. No lo volveré a hacer.--Assar (talk) 21:21, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Municipios gallegos

Vale, muy bien. Una duda: ¿estás de acuerdo conmigo en los cambios que he realizado (y voy a seguir realizando) en las categorías de los municipios gallegos? Es un auténtico despropósito cómo estaba todo etiquetado (el resto de provincias españolas está en "province of (y lo que sea)", menos esas provincias (con la excepción de las provincias vascas). Los municipios deben estar todos en "Municipalities of A Coruña", no en "A Coruña" (que es la categoría de la ciudad). Lo mismo hay que hacer en Ourense, Lugo y Pontevedra. A ver si conseguimos sanear y homogeneizar las categorías de los municipios y provincias españolas. Patricia Rios (talk) 18:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

PD: Decir que el Condado de Treviño está en "the Basque Country" sí que es vandalismo, y severo. Patricia Rios (talk) 18:09, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

No me parece bonito lo de la votación. Yo, si lo hubiese sabido, también hubiera votado en contra. ¿Sabes lo que pasó? Pues que los usuarios habituales de la Wikipedia en euskera "movilizaron a las tropas", y todos votaron a favor, mientras que el resto ni nos enteramos. Lo que no es normal es que se insista una y otra vez en quitar a Navarra la categoría "comunidad autónoma de España", y se le intente añadir en el "País Vasco", pese a que la mayoría de los navarros no se sientan vascos, ni tengan instituciones en común, ni nada, más allá de que forman parte del la misma nación: España.

Sobre lo de las categorías de los municipios gallegos, borré esa información porque no me parece que sea el sitio adecuado para poner esa información. El resto de categorías no llevan ningún dato. Yo sólo estoy añadiendo datos en las categorías de las capitales de provincia. En fin, creo que la gente se complica mucho la vida. Yo apuesto por la homogeneización y el saneo de las categorías, para que estén bien ordenadas y limpias (aunque Foroa me malinterpretara al principio...) Patricia Rios (talk) 19:02, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

your message

hi there Balbo,

the naming follows the scheme of the Yorck project. In this case the image is another version that already exists Image:Alonso Sánchez Coello 002.jpg, so it makes sense to streamline them so that they can appear next to each other in the category Category:Paintings in the Prado Museum if you take a look. Sincerely Gryffindor (talk) 13:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Yes I know that there is discussion about this topic. Don't worry, the cleanup I am doing at the moment only affects few paintings. Sincerely Gryffindor (talk) 13:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Gracias por orientar...

...a este pobrecico novato. Lo que pase es que hay algunas de calidad espantosa y he decidido mejorarlas a base de las que existen en las webs oficiales de los museos, de Goya en Unizat y de WGA. Pero bueno, gracias por el consejo. Saludo cordial. Riuks (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

• Gracias. Borrada Category:Regions of Galicia por duplicado de Category:Regions of Galicia (Spain). Un cordial saúdo--Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 14:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Translation

Thank you for translating Lmbuga's message to me, though the message itself upsets me.  — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 13:40, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

May I add my thanks to Mike's for your translation work - it is appreciated & benefits the community. Like Mike I would hate to see a good contributor leave the project because of misunderstandings. Regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:25, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Is it possible if Lmbuga could e-mail me? I'd like to explain this matter, if it's fine for Lmbuga. Best regards, --Kanonkas_(talk) 12:59, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh no problem, thanks for the help. Best regards, --Kanonkas_(talk) 13:17, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Gracias por la traducción.

Estoy de acuerdo en que no fuy elegante. Siento no haber podido serlo. Probablemnte nadie -pienso yo- se ha dado realmente cuenta de cuando dejé de serlo. Dejé de serlo cuando en la página de discusión de Anna nombré a dos usuarios. Era necesario. Era necesario para demostrar que estaba siendo seguido pormenorizadamente, casi con seguridad nadie se ha dado cuenta de eso (si hablasen de mí en una pagina de usuario cualquiera, yo no lo sabría, pues no hacía un seguimiento pormenorizado de nadie). Siento no tener ganas de editar sabiéndome seguido y, al mínimo error, sabiendome perseguido. Por cierto, tus palabras me parecieron muy correctas... me gustaron (gracias también por ellas). Encando de haber colaborado contigo (Creo que lo que he hecho, además, no es malo para el proyecto si ayuda a reflexionar. Lmbuga era prescindible)--88.24.115.134 16:55, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

New category: Romanesque porches in Castile and León?

Porch of San Pedro de Caracena

Hi,

Before I start a new category with a wrong name, I ask you if you know a specific term about this phenomen. There should be a clear distinction to the west porch (narthex). I saw such porches at many romanesque churches esp. in Castile and Leon, but of course there are similar buildings as well in other regions of Spain and beyond... --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendam (talk) 23:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Category:Romanesque apses in Spain

Hola, que tal?

Now I reached the romanesque apses. I will put off images where you just see a window or a corbel, we already have special categories for them. I will distinguish into regions and as well apse interiors. Btw. an apse is a phenomen of romanesque and pre-romanesque architecture and it's round. A rectangular choir of a romanesque church is not an apse. We have again round apses at some renaissance and baroque churches. But polygonal "apses" of gothic churches you don't tell apses but choirs. So new categories like "Romanesque choirs in Spain" and "Gothic choirs in Spain" might be sensible. --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 22:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Category:Romanesque architecture in the Basque Country

Actually I have just one image for 4 categories but I am sure, there are more for each category in the Basque Country... --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 23:52, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Category:Choirs (architecture) in Spain

Here is a lot of work to do because most of the images do not show choirs but the west galleies of churches which is in fact the contrary. I think this wrong categorization was made by User:Zarateman, but looking on his discussion page he never has used it (the same at the spanish discussion page), so I will not waste the time to write there. ... --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk)

Category:Romanesque churches and monasteries in Burgos province

Hi

I have a book "El Arte Romanico Burgales". In its end there is a list of romanesque churches in the province of Burgos - about 350 (!) - so even this regional category will be splitted sooner or later into subcategories (I guess in other provinces of Castile and Leon the amount is similar). If you like I can scan this list and send it to you. Btw. I have a question to you. When you have maps of the distribution of romanesque churches in Spain (for example: romanesque churches in the Province of Burgos), I can use them to create maps for wiki (by drawing them by myself, see my selfmade maps: 1, 2, 3). ... --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 23:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

I have started the page Iglesias, ermitas y monasterios románicos en la Provincia de Burgos following to the list of the book I mentioned above. Tell me please, if the title is correct Hispanic spelling. Beyond you may add a sentence in Hispanic at the top of this page that this list is trying to cover all romanesque churches in the province of Burgos, including churches with romanesque remains (portal, tower etc.)... --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 01:15, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

I have moved this category to Category:Romanesque churches and monasteries in the province of Burgos (better spelling) --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 16:41, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Iglesias, ermitas y monasterios románicos en la provincia de Burgos

The list is already counting more than 200 churches. Please check my spelling errors in the table at the top ("Lugares de interés major" etc.) and feel free to correct 'em by yourself. First I have added to many churches the names following es.wikipedia (below "Parroquia", for example here) but I have reduced 'em again, because this information is not always referring to the romanesque churches, which are in many cases not the parish churches but ermitas outside of the village. Btw. I have ordered via internet the Book "Castille Romane" (Edition Zodiaque, in French) I hope I'll recive it until christmas. I have already some books from Zodiaque (from Spain: Galicia and Navarra), but unfortunately the publisher does not exist anymore so you have to look for offers in Internet... These books have always good maps covering almost all romanesque buildings, so I may create a map of romanesque churches in Castilla & Leon by myself when i have (hopefully) recived my order --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 01:18, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Now the list is completed (more than 450 churches). Now I'm looking for Info beyond wiki. I give links to www.1romanico.com and other sources when there are relevant infos, esp. when there are no images at commons. Btw. I've already recievd the book "Castille Romane" I can use to classify the churches. The map in this book is less comprehensive than I have thought, just the main buildings are in this map, so it would be fine, if you can find a more detailed map --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 23:30, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Category:Churches in Spain by province

I have a new proposal for this category: Dissolve it into "Churches in Autonomous Community xyz" as I have already done for Catalonia and Castile-Leon --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 22:45, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Izartxoa

		Arkitektura izarra
		Zure lan eskerga arkitekturaren alorrean eskertzekoa da. Segi horrela! · Es de agradecer tu enorme labor en el campo de la arquitectura. Sigue así! --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 22:31, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Coro carolingio - Coro

Hola. He seguido la conversación que teneis sobre el tema y me pareció entender que hablabas que en España sólo son llamados ábsides aquellos que tienen forma semicircular. En la provincia de Pontevedra por ejemplo la gran mayoría de los ábsides son rectangulares, se supone por herencia del estilo ramiriense. La equivalencia ábside románico igual a semicircular ya no se sostiene en la actualidad.

• Otra cosa, la cabecera es el conjunto de ábside principal más absidiolos o capillas adyacentes, pero no es sinónimo de ábside, aunque es utilizado como tal por algunos autores cuando describen el exterior de un ábside. En inglés parece que apses si engloba ambas acepciones no?

• El coro: El coro como elemento de la cabecera románica se utiliza en el románico español con mucha asiduidad tanto en el románico francés como en el internacional. En el internacional es de mayores dimensiones, en la zona de Cataluña hay coros con silleria incluida sin haberse producido el traslado a la nave. En el románico gallego, como en otros de la península, el coro como tal, silleria..., se traslada a la nave, centro, pies, bajo o alto, pero el ábside mayor se une a la nave por medio de un tramo recto que es el elemento arquitectónico que se sigue llamado coro. Claro es, que no creo que tenga mucha utilidad para categorizar imágenes.

• Corbels, son ménsulas en general no? No existe un equivalente para canzorro (gl)- can (es)- cachorro (pt)?

Enhorabuena por tu trabajo con la arquitectura española. Intento seguir vuestro trabajo y comentarios y si no participo es por mi falta de conocimiento de inglés. Disculpa si parece una exposición fuera de lugar. --Lansbricae ^{(Ti dirás)} 19:00, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Catedral de Santa María de Tudela

I am sure you have already seen that I've started to categorize Gothic architecture in Spain very sophisticated (by elements, by century, by region etc.). No opposition has arisen since I've begun to create dozens of subcateg. so I assume that my framework of Gothic categorization in Spain has been accepted by the Hispanic wikipedians, even though many categories actually have just very few images, sometimes just 1. Now I have found one of the very first Gothic churches in Spain, the Catedral de Santa María de Tudela, which was built on a Romanesque plan but the elevations are already Gothic so I added it to both: Romanesque and Gothic churches in Navarre. It was built in the 12th century and I wonder, if you know more Gothic buildings in Spain from the 12th century. I know the collegiate church of Roncesvalles, but there are no Images showing the early Gothic parts except of the Capilla de San Agustín (I have some old photos taken by myself but they are diapositivas and actually I am not yet able to scan them). Saludillos --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 00:59, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Can you identify this image?

Salud, this image shows a romanesque archivolted window (obviously in Spain) but there are no references concerning the locality. --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 23:14, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

• Gracias, ahora lo entiendo mejor. Estos días son poco propicios para tener continuidad. Hablamos. --Lansbricae ^{(Ti dirás)} 09:00, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Category:Architecture_by_date and subcats

Please have a look at this. Thanks! TomAlt (talk) 11:33, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

El carro de heno

Hello Balbo, Although I don't speak Spanish, I tried to write a Spanish intro for Category:The Haywain Triptych. Could you check if I did ok? Thank you. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 22:55, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Category:Regions of Spain

Category discussion notification

Category:Regions of Spain has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Jmabel ! talk 18:40, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Carnaval_de_Cádiz.jpg

File:Carnaval_de_Cádiz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.9.31.174 19:57, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Category:Paintings by Jheronimus Bosch in the Prado Museum

Hi there, The category you just created is a bit unfortunate. Earlier this year a similar category (click on Category:Paintings by Hieronymus Bosch in the Prado Museum) was deleted. See Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Paintings by Hieronymus Bosch by location for the deletion debate. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Category:Islamic_secular_architecture

Category discussion notification

Category:Islamic_secular_architecture has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

ELEKHH^T 15:50, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Toros de Osborne

Reabierta Commons:Deletion requests/Toros de Osborne. Salud. --Javier ME (talk) 09:39, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Category:Panoramics_by_country

Panoramics by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Josh (talk) 21:44, 11 December 2022 (UTC)