User talk:B-noa

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: Welcome to the Commons, B-noa!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 17:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POTY2008 Finale[edit]

Salut, B-noa. Je vérifie le vote résultat de POTY2008. Avez-vous voté pour POTY2008 finale?

Il ya une IP vote avec votre Nom d'utilisateur (ineligible because we can't make sure it is really yours) dans ce votelist.

Si ce vote a été le vôtre, vous connecter (Afin d'obtenir SUL:cliquez ici - Special:MergeAccount) et à le confirmer dans ce votelist avant 2009-05-24T12:00(UTC)? Merci.--miya (talk) 17:48, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it's me and my vote. Sorry for my mistake. --B-noa (talk) 21:19, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scans[edit]

Salut,

Je suis d'accord avec la conclusion de Lomita : les sujets de ces images ne sont pas encore tombés dans le domaine public et donc ne devraient pas être sur Commons. Elfix 14:00, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oui : normalement, il y a un lien "Nominate for deletion" sur la barre latérale gauche, lorsque tu visionnes les fichiers. Elfix 09:35, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Carte Savoie[edit]

Bonjour, J'ai vu que tu sembles être l'auteur de cette carte : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CartedeSavoie.jpg?uselang=fr, elle est très bien conçue, toutefois, il existe des légères imprécisions, et de mon côté je ne maîtrise pas les modifications graphiques. Le col du Mont-Cenis est placé à 8 km après sa position réelle, il n'est pas à la frontière mais bien avant. C'est juste un détail, mais cela contribue à maintenir pour beaucoup l'idée que le col fait frontière. Tu as sans doute bien d'autres priorités, mais comme il est indiqué sur la carte, autant qu'il soit à la bonne place, du moins si tu as du temps pour le faire. Sinon la Maurienne est bien trop large surtout à partir de Modane, alors que c'est sans doute la vallée la plus étroite avec les plus massifs directement en aplomb, des deux côtés (Scolette, Échelle, Parrachée Cléry etc.. Cela peut donner une fausse idée de la morphologie du sillon. La moyenne Tarentaise par exemple est bien plus ouverte dans la réalité.Mais n'y voit pas une critique, moi je suis incapable de faire ce que tu as fait. Se sont juste des suggestions. --Gabriel Haute Maurienne (talk) 14:08, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Gabriel
Merci pour tes remarques, mais à ce jour je n'ai plus les outils informatiques qui m'avaient permis de faire cette carte en 1999. Les délimitations que j'avais prise à cette époque étaient calquées sur les découpages cantonales de la Savoie et la Haute-Savoie. Les autres éléments d'information comme les sous-pays, les cols ou autres axes principaux sont une schématisation d'où cet aspect d'imperfection pour un habitué des lieux. Comme je te l'ai indiqué sur le Portail:Savoie j'ai fait une demande pour un nouveau fonde de carte plus précis, je suis dans l'attente de celui-ci. Par contre pour ce qui sera du tracé des frontières provinciales, ce n'est pas sûr de pouvoir en avoir un de précis sauf si je me remets à la cartographie mais ça ne sera pas avant cet été. --B-noa (talk) 08:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:43, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merci Thibaut120094 :) Décidément ici, sur Data ! Heureusement que j'ai un peu d'avance sur toi sur wp:fr ;) --B-noa (talk) 08:01, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Grésy/Isère[edit]

Bonjour B-noa, j'ai l'impression que la (superbe) photo Grésy-sur-Isère.JPG représente en fait... Frontenex. --Stéphane DM.

Bonjour Stéphane DM, merci pour cette correction, je me suis laissé tromper par une mauvaise lecture de la carte. J'ai fait le nécessaire pour la correction. Amicalement. --B-noa (talk) 16:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Candidats pour les images de qualité[edit]

Salut, J'ai vu que tu as eu des problèmes avec la nomination des images. Si prévoyes de proposer d'autres photos, je te recommande d'utiliser ce gadget. Encore une chose, seulement est autorisé un maximum de 5 nominations par jour. Cordialement, --Poco2 08:13, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Poco a poco. Merci pour ta vigilance et ton aide, en effet, je découvre et j'ai eu un peu de mal... Je vais utiliser à l'avenir le gadget pour plus de sécurité :) --B-noa (talk) 08:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Le gadget permet non seulement d'éviter les problèmes, mais aussi de gagner du temps! Je l'utilise tous les jours. Poco2 08:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, J'ai fait les corrections demandées pour les images de qualité. J'ai aussi ajouté la géolocalisation. Et aussi pour File:Fenêtre du château d'Annecy-Vue sur le Logis Perrière-4.jpg et File:Église Saint-Maurice d'Annecy-Portail-1.jpg. Cordialement, de Haute-Savoie. ;oD Yann (talk) 09:48, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Preparation des images de qualité[edit]

Bonjour B-noa,

as-tu compris comme funcionnent les corrections de perspectives et qu'est qu'il est une aberration chromatique? En général, si tu veux préparer les photos d'un mode plus sérieux, je te conseille travailler avec un logiciel comme Adobe Lightroom. Les corrections de cette photo de la chapelle sont très facile avec Lightroom.

Salut,

--Basotxerri (talk) 19:29, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Je vais essayer de voir comment faire ça. --B-noa (talk) 20:51, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Île de Souda (18.IV.14).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 01:29, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle de Saint-Gingolf de Giez (VII.2013)-1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you correct the perspective and remove the CAs, please? --Basotxerri 18:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC) Je ne maîtrise pas la méthode de correction, pour le CA je ne comprends pas. --B-noa 19:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I try to explain. First of all, please read the Commons:Image_guidelines. Here you can find some examples of image problems. In your image, the perspective has to be corrected. This means, you must edit your image file in an adecuate photo editor where you can remove this distortion. All lines in your image that are vertical in the real scene must go straight from up to down. Then there are chromatical aberrations in your image. I've left you a note on your image page, please look at it. You must remove this red border on the left white wall of the chapel. Do you develop your images from RAW? What program do you use? Or are your photos JPEGs out of camera? ----Basotxerri 19:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC) Hello. Yann has corrected some errors. Yes my pictures come directly from the camera. --B-noa 19:14, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK for me. --Basotxerri 19:18, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Refuge de Presset-Lac de Presset-Pierra Menta-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Maurice de Talloires-Détails sculpture en bois.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Je trouve ca beau, et c'est une bonne idee. -- Ikan Kekek 05:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Église Saint-Maurice, Annecy[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint-Maurice, Annecy, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vitrail aux armes d'Amédée VIII-v.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Maybe to purple and a square crop would be better, but QI IMHO. --C messier 11:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balcon des Contrebandiers 2 (2016).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --WClarke 07:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Veyrier 4 (2016).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could be a little bit sharper, but looks fine overall. --WClarke 07:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Réutilisation photo hors Wikipedia[edit]

Bonjour,

je ne suis pas sûre d'être au bon endroit pour discuter de ceci, mais c'est le seul biais que j'ai trouvé. J'aimerais réutiliser une de vos photos hors Wikipédia. Pourrait-on se contacter par mail, par exemple, afin que je vous donne les détails ? Merci d'avance ! Céline — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccandie (talk • contribs) 10:31, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Ccandie: , vous pouvez me contacter en cliquant sur l'onglet situé dans la partie gauche « Envoyer un courriel à cet utilisateur ». --B-noa (talk) 10:33, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear B-noa,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)