User talk:Archaeodontosaurus/Premier trimestre 2012
Je te félicite bonne année ![edit]
-- George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
gl: Feliz aninovo[edit]
Happy New Year--Miguel Bugallo 18:56, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
MAP Expo Armure Clan Ikeda Dragon 30 12 2011 2.jpg[edit]
Voilà, c'est fait, merci du conseil. Bonne année ! --Vassil (talk) 14:55, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Bonne année 2012[edit]
Didier, je te souhaite une bonne et heureuse année 2012 ! -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 10:02, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tithrone roseipennis MHNT vol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Onymacris unguicularis MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hello![edit]
Hi! Happy new year, and Marry Christmas! Can you please help me, and advice how to correct the perspective for this and this file, to match QI nomination? Thanks in advance! :) --WhiteWriter speaks 15:22, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- P.S. Wooow, bravo for your vast contribution to Wikipedia... --WhiteWriter speaks 15:22, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help, i will try to fix the other one. --WhiteWriter speaks 12:22, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Callichroma velutinum MHNT male.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Callichroma auricomum MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Image guidelines - downsampling[edit]
Hello. There have been many inconsistencies regarding the evaluation of images in Commons, mainly on the issue of resolution and sharpness. I think we should agree upon a uniform policy, and try to reach a consensus. I started a new discussion on the matter of downsampling, if you would like to share your view. Thank you. Gidip (talk) 17:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for sought. I voted according to my convictions. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mionochroma aureotinctum MHNT male 2 faces.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Happy New Year! Anything more needed for this image? I narrowed the scope from Dacian mythology to Dacian hoard of Lupu. I believe this is as narrow you can go. Merci beacoup! --Codrin.B (talk) 19:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- OK "VI" seems to work in part --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Masque de Samouraï[edit]
Merci beaucoup pour ton conseil. Cet éclairage trop contrasté est un problème que je rencontre souvent avec les objets dans les musées, et je n'avais jamais pensé à utiliser ce réglage. --Vassil (talk) 21:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ceragenia bicornis MHNT male 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Voeux[edit]
Bonjour Didier (?),
j'espère que tu excuseras la lenteur de la réponse. C'est gentil de dire que mon avis est "intéressant" ;) disons que je préfère dire ce que je pense (je n'ai pas peur de "représailles" sur mes images). Le problème est d'arriver à un consensus... et je n'ai jamais vu que les plus belles choses soit nées de consensus. Et puis combien ne sont pas capable de prendre une photo correcte et viennent donner leur avis ? Si toi tu penses qu'une ombre vaut le coup, et que tu penses que c'est mieux sur Wikipédia, alors je crois que tu devrais laisser l'ombre (mais attention à la forme de celle-ci ;) ).
J'espère qu'en parallèle à tes activités Wiki, 2012 t'apportera gloire, richesse et pouvoir, mais surtout que tu seras heureux, en bonne santé et que tu seras entouré des personnes qui te sont chères - Benh (talk) 20:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Stagmatoptera supplicaria MHNT vol.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stagmatoptera supplicaria MHNT vol.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Four Great Beauties[edit]
I changed it as your propose.Trongphu (talk) 22:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Metilia amazonica MHNT male vol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Set Promotion[edit]
Congratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Eupatorus gracilicornis.
Eupatorus gracilicornis.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 20:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| Thank you for supporting the Valued image set: Helmet of Coţofeneşti! Codrin.B (talk) 21:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC) |
- Do you think I can try quality images or feature pictures with any of these photos? Best regards. Merci! --Codrin.B (talk) 21:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ascia monuste, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catasticta susiana male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Angela guianensis, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Egretta garzetta (Little Egret), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tetrao urogallus (Western Capercaillie), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Clausirion comptum MHNT femelle 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chlorida festiva MHNT 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Happy New Year[edit]
--H. Krisp (talk) 19:30, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Falco tinnunculus (Common Kestrel), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acanthops amazonica, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Titanus giganteus (Titan beetle) male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Atiaia consobrina MHNT male 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Callipogon cinnamomeus MHNT male 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Juiaparus batus MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Set Promotion[edit]
Congratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Belenois java peristhene (Caper White).
Belenois java peristhene (Caper White).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 20:38, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Melete leucadia, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
VI Bonne année ![edit]
Bonjour Didier, Je te souhaite une très bonne nouvelle année, il est encore temps! Que 2012 soit pour toi douce et propice, remplie de lumière, de musique et de joie.
J'ai poursuivi la discussion sur Commons_talk:Valued_image_scope#Scopes_of_churches_and_other_religious_buildings par une proposition. Amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 13:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Déformation Péruvienne MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Déformation Péruvienne MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tetrao urogallus (Western Capercaillie) skeleton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Falco rusticolus (Gyrfalcon) egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cerapterus pilipennis male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Mâchoire de renne[edit]
Done. Rien à redire, à part un Louis "Lartet" qui était devenu "Laret", même erreur au même endroit dans les deux langues. Pas possible, il doit y avoir une explication scientifique !
- Merci pour l'info sur l'expo !--Jebulon (talk) 16:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Archaeoprepona demophon muson male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ascia monuste monuste MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palazzo Corner Contarini dei Cavalli (Venice).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Physopleurus crassidens female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Archaeoprepona demophon muson MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ialyssus tuberculatus MHNT male.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Macropophora trochlearis MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vates multilobata, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Promotion abusive en VI[edit]
Bonsoir mon ami.
Je viens de faire parvenir à User:Yann un message dont je tiens à te faire partager la teneur:
:Bonjour Yann.
- A mon humble avis, tu as pris une lourde responsabilité de clore la discussion par une promotion concernant cette image alors que le débat la concernant n'était pas clos, et que par ailleurs une discussion très importante est en cours sur le sujet général ici.
- Selon moi, selon d'autres, selon les règles (guidelines) telles qu'elles sont écrites (même si tu es en désaccord avec elles, auquel cas il faut t'exprimer sur la page ci-dessus), et nonobstant le conflit récurrent qui m'oppose au proposant (je ne suis pas hélas pas le seul, et pour info il est indéfiniment exclu de la wikipédia allemande pour son comportement), cette image ne remplit pas les critères pour être promue, et le débat était en pleine évolution, sans avoir définitivement été tranché.
- Certes j'aurais dû m'opposer pour maintenir la parité des votes 3/3 (c'est donc ce que je ferai la prochaine fois), mais je préfère toujours débattre avant de prendre une décision. J'ai eu tort de me conformer à ce que je crois être l'esprit de "Commons".
- En tout état de cause, tu viens de créer un précédent qui, entre les mains d'un procédurier tel que le proposant, au comportement général déjà maintes fois relevé négativement, ne manquera pas de peser sur le débat en cours, et de le fausser.
- Bref, tu n'as commis aucune irrégularité formelle, évidemment, mais tu as en quelque sorte "forcé la main", en catimini, et c'est embêtant.
- Si tu n'as pas mesuré le sens de ta décision, j'espère que ce court message amical t'éclairera.
- Si en revanche tu l'as fait exprès, alors considère que je ne t'ai rien dit, mais que je suis fermement opposé à ta démarche et à cette façon de faire, et que je veillerai, autant qu'il me sera possible, à empêcher qu'elle se renouvelle.
- Bien cordialement,--Jebulon (talk) 18:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
De deux choses l'une, ou c'est un excès de zèle et son auteur sera éclairé, ou c'est fait exprès, et c'est un "passage en force", certes légal, que je ne saurais accepter. J'ai un sérieux doute, la promotion ayant été décidée par lui après que, sans autre argument, il ait soutenu la nomination. Je vais évoquer l'affaire sur la page de discussion appropriée, de façon à "horodater" l'incident, et tenter de faire en sorte qu'il ne puisse pas faire jurisprudence tant que nous n'aurons pas, par consensus, changé les règles. J'ai peu d'espoir compte tenu du manque de sens de la décision de certains...
As-tu un sentiment sur ces sujets ?
Bien amicalement à toi,--Jebulon (talk) 18:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- Le sujet est difficile. Sur le fond tu as parfaitement raison. Il faut faire abstraction de l’auteur de la photo qui est connu de tous. Il y a probablement une maladresse de Yann, mais qui m’apparait que presque tu me l’as fais remarquer. Il est le seul à pourvoir dire le sens de sa décision. Personnellement je l’ai ressentie comme l’envie de continuer et de passer à autre chose. Elle ne m’a donc pas choquée. L’idée, ténue, que je défends est de prendre chaque image comme un cas particulier. Si tu avais voté contre, nous serions retrouvé avec une « non promotion », Yann aurait entériné et çà aurait été une fin possible, qui m’aurait satisfait. Le label ne va pas très bien mais il est toujours là je tache de le faire vivre, malgré les soubresauts qui l’agite. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:42, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
- Je viens de lire la réponse qu'il t'a faite et qui me conforte dans l'idée que c'est un parfait honnête homme avec qui on peut discuter...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:51, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
- C'est bien parce que je vois que tu t'investis fortement dans ce projet que je t'ai alerté. Je ne peux faire abstraction de l'auteur, en ce que je "sais" qu'il va se servir de cette maladresse plus tard... Sais-tu que la saga de son exclusion de la WP allemande a fait l'objet d'un article dans "der Spiegel" (je l'ai) illustrant le petit monde de wikipédia ? Imagine un article sur toi dans "le Point" ou l'"Express" ! La prochaine fois, en effet, je voterai contre tout de suite, au lieu de débattre... C'est ça qu'on veut ? Tu as remarqué que j'étais revenu, et que j'avais pris de la peine à proposer un "set" qui m'a demandé beaucoup de travail, je suis donc un poil désappointé et agacé. Mais on continue ! --Jebulon (talk) 11:30, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ton SET a été très bien accueilli. Je sais que ce n'est pas facile de faire abstraction des auteurs. Mais je préféré me souvenir de honnêtes. J'aime bien tes colères et je trouve que nous nous complétons bien... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:36, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macropophora trochlearis, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Set Promotion[edit]
Congratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Chiesa di San Girolamo (Mestre).
Chiesa di San Girolamo (Mestre).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 15:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Acrocinus longimanus MHNT femelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Ciels![edit]
Bonjour, J'ai essayé d’améliorer mes images. Voir ma page de discussion. Merci pour ton aide, Yann (talk) 15:41, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Galeries ?[edit]
Salut mon camarade.
- C'est quoi, cette "novelleté" en VI à propos des "galeries" ?
- Vous ne jurez plus que par ça, et notre ami WS en fait même un point d'opposition (non valide à mon avis). J'ai bien lu quelque chose là-dessus, mais je ne vois pas d'autre intérêt à part celui de "taguer" automatiquement l'image avec le petit sceau... Cela vaut-il de générer un conflit que je sens poindre ?--Jebulon (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
- Le conflit est là. sur le fond : les galeries sont intéressantes car, dans l'avenir, elles seront la plaques tournante des images. Sur la forme il y a deux écoles :personnellement je les conseille mais ce n'est pas une condition de vote. Notre ami W.S. est plus intégriste, et je n’approuve pas sa méthode qui est propre a chasser les bonnes volontés, plutôt que de promouvoir le label. Il nous faut des gens sensés qui viennent contre-balancer le pouvoir des extrêmes. Venez voter! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
- Les galeries sont intéressantes, car dans l'avenir elles seront la plaque tournante des images. C'est ça que je voudrais qu'on m'explique. Quant au comportement de ws, il est passible de la correctionnelle et je vais le dénoncer aux admins. Il vote contre les règles, pour imposer son point de vue. C'est sanctionnable.--Jebulon (talk) 21:36, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
- W.S. qui était le sujet de ma dernière insomnie à un comportement talibanesque, je soutiendrai ta démarche. Si tu regarde le nombre d'image qui arrivent tu ne peux qu'être impressionné et certaines catégories sont déjà pléthoriques. Les galeries sont là pour hiérarchiser l'information la trier et n'en faire ressortir que l'utile. Label en tête. Les références que je fais dans les articles de Wikipedia ne se font que vers les galeries. Pour être franc le point de galerie n'est pas d'un intérêt transcendant. Ce conflit montre encore une fois que des individus toxiques peuvent bloquer une branche du projet... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- Galeries: pourquoi alors ne pas créer des sous catégories ? Nous avons par exemple la Category:Pont Alexandre III, laquelle recèle la Category:Quality images of Pont Alexandre III, ce qui me parait bien aussi, non ? Pour WS, je dois rechercher le règlement, mais je vais le faire, j'en ai marre. Il sape et détruit tout (je te l'avais prédit...)--Jebulon (talk) 10:14, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- Les galeries sont intéressantes, car dans l'avenir elles seront la plaque tournante des images. C'est ça que je voudrais qu'on m'explique. Quant au comportement de ws, il est passible de la correctionnelle et je vais le dénoncer aux admins. Il vote contre les règles, pour imposer son point de vue. C'est sanctionnable.--Jebulon (talk) 21:36, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
- Les sous-categorie sont aussi une voie, le problème est secondaire. J'ai essayé de dialoguer mais je ne vois pas d'amélioration possible. Tu avais raison, mais il fallait essayer...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- Salut les gars, un petit mot d'encouragement en passant ! Je suis trop occupée en ce moment pour contribuer à Commons, mais les batailles autour du projet VI sont préoccupantes et je reprendrais volontiers la discussion et les propositions sur les scopes (églises, faune et flore and so on), je suis certaine qu'on peut améliorer les règles et le fonctionnement actuels, en dépit de tout. Et quelques règles partagées sont nécessaires pour que les décisions ne virent pas à l'arbitraire systématique. Concernant W.S., je suis attristée, car c'est grâce à lui que j'avais commencé à m'intéresser au projet VI en 2009. Depuis, bien des conflits ont eu lieu et des rancœurs accumulées autour des labels, dérive trop humaine sans doute. @+, --Myrabella (talk) 14:25, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Le conflit est là. sur le fond : les galeries sont intéressantes car, dans l'avenir, elles seront la plaques tournante des images. Sur la forme il y a deux écoles :personnellement je les conseille mais ce n'est pas une condition de vote. Notre ami W.S. est plus intégriste, et je n’approuve pas sa méthode qui est propre a chasser les bonnes volontés, plutôt que de promouvoir le label. Il nous faut des gens sensés qui viennent contre-balancer le pouvoir des extrêmes. Venez voter! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oreodera paulista, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arawacus aetolus, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vindula arsinoe ada MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
VI[edit]
Sorry Archaeodontosaurus! I had changed the scope. Thank you very much!--Paris 16 (talk) 18:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- Je peux parler français. J'habitais quelques années à Paris. C'est la raison que j'aime bien Paris.--Paris 16 (talk) 07:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Je te parlerai donc en français, car je ne parle anglais que par l’intermédiaire de Mr Google qui trahie souvent ma pensée. Reviens souvent en VI, c'est un label interressant, tu m'aideras à le faire vivre... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:22, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- OK, merci!--Paris 16 (talk) 07:43, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- Je te parlerai donc en français, car je ne parle anglais que par l’intermédiaire de Mr Google qui trahie souvent ma pensée. Reviens souvent en VI, c'est un label interressant, tu m'aideras à le faire vivre... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:22, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hirtobrasilianus villiersi MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Toujours les VI[edit]
Salut mon courageux camarade. Voici la dernière en date des suggestions, que tu as peut-être vue. Un ayatollah fait une tentative pour rejeter des VI toutes les espèces, plantes ou animaux, qui ne seraient pas photographiées dans leur élément naturel... Cette suggestion me parait facile à contrer, mais je laisse d'abord la parole aux spécialistes... Quelle fatigue...--Jebulon (talk) 15:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Dans un premier temps j'avais écris des choses assez vigoureuses, je me suis repris, mais je ne peux pas faire plus gentil que ce que j'ai écris. Pour le cas des "gallery" je suggère de voter contre l'obligation d'une "gallery"... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:05, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ostrinotes tarena, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
ça lui apprendra à la salamandra[edit]
Pas grave, les copains, c'est fait pour ça !--Jebulon (talk) 17:58, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pierella astyoche MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cithaerias andromeda andromeda.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cithaerias andromeda esmeralda.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FYI: Used your media file[edit]
This is a courtesy note. One of your media files is featured in a new commercial eBook in Apple’s iBooks store: http://itunes.apple.com/us/book/dr.-kemps-kids-love-bugs/id497852225?mt=11
I’ve contributed images to Wikipedia for over seven years now (including several POTD and Featured Images) and I designed the WikiSpecies logo. I respect your work here and the CC-BY-SA license we all labor under.
I know commercializing Wikipedia work is tricky and so I’ve taken great pains to follow your CC-BY-SA license requirements. I also plan to donate 10% of my proceeds to the Wikimedia Foundation directly. This is the very first self-published e-book created with Apple’s new tools and sold in the store.
I’ve given your file a credit line in the “Image and Video Credits” section starting at page 24 as required here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License
This compilation features many of the finest Wikipedia media files in their exact form and not as derivative works. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verbatim_copying_under_the_GFDL#Making_verbatim_copies_of_images
If I did alter your work -- such as cutting out an insect part or adding a video sound track -- I shared a Share Alike version of the new media in a DRM-free format and listed the web address in the credits section.
Thank you very much for uploading your work to Wikipedia and releasing it for the world to use in enriching educational formats.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jeremykemp
- It's my pleasure.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Semnopithecus[edit]
Bonjour, J'ai fait de nouvelles versions en corrigeant le contraste. Merci, Yann (talk) 11:37, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salamandra salamandra MHNT 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pierella lamia MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Ici Londres[edit]
les wikimédiens parlent aux wikimédiens.--Jebulon (talk) 20:38, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acrocinus longimanus, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Titanacris picticrus picticrus MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Cavalli (Venice) exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
HELP ![edit]
Salut,
- J'ai essayé d'ouvrir une MVR sur la députée européenne, et je crois que j'ai fait une bêtise. Tu peux jeter un coup d'oeil et réparer si besoin ?
- Merci !--Jebulon (talk) 18:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
sauterelle détourée[edit]
pardon d'insister, mais l'animal n'est pas en cause, c'est bien de souci de détourage qu'il s'agit, regarde bien dans les carrés d'annotation, il y a des traces rosées bizarres. --Jebulon (talk) 21:49, 2 February 2012 (UTC) agghh! j'ai vu. j'ai changé le fond et je recharge l'image. Meric! Vivement que je change de sujet, les sauterelles ne sont plus de mon age...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tropidacris cristata cristata MHNT flanc dos nymphe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aeolacris caternaulti MHNT dos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atiaia consobrina, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Set Promotion[edit]
Congratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Megasoma actaeon.
Megasoma actaeon.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Prionolopha serrata MHNT double.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Onymacris unguicularis ( Namibian fog-basking beetle).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Batus barbicornis, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aeolacris caternaulti, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callichroma auricomum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tropidacris collaris MHNT dos & flanc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Methone cecilia, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Set VIC "Hôtel de Ville"[edit]
Merci mon ami.
- J'ai trouvé l'erreur, j'avais fait quelque part une faute d'orthographe bien digne de quelqu'un que je connais... Mon set s'appelait, suivant les étapes, "Hotel de Ville de PARIS", ou "Hotel de Ville de PAIS" sans le "R". J'avais essayé de corriger, mais pas moyen, je pensais que ça passerait. Donc, le titre du set comporte désormais une faute, mais le domaine-lien avec la galerie-catégorie restent bons et corrects, sans faute.
- J'espère que ça te plaît. Les images ne sont pas parfaites, mais ça fait je crois une très belle série artistico-historique qui enrichit "Commons".
- A l'heure où je te parle, j'ai des candidats dans les quatre labels, on ne peut pas dire que je me désintéresse.
- Peu à peu, en affinant ma réflexion, et aussi grâce aux explications apaisantes de Slaunger, j'ai finalement adhéré (à peu près) à l'idée des galeries, tu constateras que je m'y suis mis !
- Pourtant, selon WS, je suis le "pire" de tous... Je n'ai pas répondu.
- Passionné par le sujet depuis tout petit, je me suis mis à l'héraldique dans "Commons", il y a là aussi de vrais dingues, très intéressants, et prêts à aider. Je vais essayer de voir ce que donne le format SVG... On progresse et on apprend !
- Merci en tous cas de ta vigilance, mon camarade.--Jebulon (talk) 11:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Je veux bien continuer à numériser, mais mon ouvrage est une réédition. Si toi tu as un original, c'est mieux...--Jebulon (talk) 09:16, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Magneuptychia tricolor MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bia actorion, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callichroma velutinum, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callipogon cinnamomeus, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ceragenia bicornis, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Titanacris picticrus picticrus MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Titanacris picticrus picticrus MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 06:12, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Je te remercie bien vivement de cette promotion que j'apprend dans l'instant et que je te dois. Je ne fréquent pas beaucoup FP et QI au profit de VA que j'essai d'animer. Je vais faire un effort pour m'y intéresser et y allant voter de temps en temps...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Félicitation pour ton travail vraiment remarquable. Beaucoup de tes photos méritent d'être misent en valeur, ne serait ce que pour montrer le résultat positif de la collaboration avec des insitutions. Ça donne envie de faire pareil avec le MNHN ! Je t'ai vu sur VA, c'est courageux de l'animer, elle n'est pas très populaire. amicalement--Citron (talk) 18:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chloreuptychia arnaca, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Irons museum[edit]
Looks that I messed up the direct way. Thanks for the help!--PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Encore un triomphe ![edit]
Tu as vu qu'une de tes bestioles est encore en train de rafler le gros lot en FP ?
Je ne prends pas grand risque à te féliciter par avance...
Tu fais vraiment un boulot magnifique.--Jebulon (talk) 17:26, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Je te remercie car comme tu l'as compris je ne l'avais pas vu... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Catonephele acontius[edit]
Vous avez oublié le "scope" dans votre dernière VI-nomination. Salutations --Llez (talk) 08:26, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Tropidacris collaris MHNT vol.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tropidacris collaris MHNT vol.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Quel succès ! Y a une autre nomination en cours. 
--Citron (talk) 18:12, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Catonephele acontius MHNT male.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Request[edit]
Didier I'd like to expand Papilio but my external drive failed.Do you have any or all of the zenobia species-group?: They are Papilio cyproeofila Butler, 1868 Papilio fernandus Fruhstorfer, 1903 Papilio filaprae Suffert, 1904 Papilio gallienus Distant, 1879 Papilio mechowi Dewitz, 1881 Papilio mechowianus Dewitz, 1885 Papilio zenobia Fabricius, 1775 Very best regards Robert Notafly (talk) 20:56, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- I'm on it tomorrow, I'm at the Museum all day. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
- African Butterflies are not yet listed in our database. The curator in entomology is on a mission in Central Africa, when he returned I asked him where are the butterflies you are looking for ...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- Very many thanks Notafly (talk) 13:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chlorida festiva, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pernis apivorus (European Honey Buzzard), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
MNHN[edit]
Tu as évoqué le MNHN. Es-tu sur Paris ? Le travail que j’ai initié sur Toulouse a vocation à faire des émules. Il est arrivé à un stade où ce qui a été fait peut servir d’exemple pour d’autre structure. Si tu as l’envie et la volonté de partir à l’assaut du MNHN je t’aiderai dans cette voie. Merci pour tes nominations, je suis assez timoré pour FP, et QI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
- Je suis parisien et je vais souvent au MNHN pour prendre des photos. Mais il est indéniable qu'un cadre officiel serait vraiment plus pratique, surtout pour les collections non-publiques. Je suis carrément motivé pour un partenariat, mais je ne sais pas trop comment m'y prendre. Peut être qu'en passant par la Wikimédia France. Je pourrais mettre Jebulon dans le coup aussi. Amicalement--Citron (talk) 10:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Set Promotion[edit]
Congratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Carineta rufescens.
Carineta rufescens.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 21:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nessaea batesii MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Processing time for Commons:Valued image candidates/Set candidate list[edit]
How long does it take for the approved sets in the Commons:Valued image candidates/Set candidate list to be validated/processed by bots? The Dacian bracelets has been there for a while and I assume there are no outstanding issues remaining to be solved. Merci. --Codrin.B (talk) 20:07, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
- I noticed it too. I do not have the power not being a director, I make a note in the discussion of the label.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
VI[edit]
Hallo my friend, sorry to disturb you but as if you voted for these two candidates (1 and 2) but forgot to sign the votes ;) We can already close one of them. Cheers --MrPanyGoff 10:29, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, my wireless keyboard runs rough! I am very glad to see you in VI!--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catonephele acontius male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aphrissa fluminensis MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hamadryas arinome MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Plus alone dans le scope[edit]
Salut, je voulais te demander conseil pour cette image, passée VI en avril car alone in the scope, et à qui j'ai aujourd'hui ajouté deux concurrentes dans sa catégorie... J'ai vu qu'il existait des séries... dois-je regarder par là ? Totodu74 (talk) 21:47, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
-
Mâle en plumage nuptial, mâle en plumage inter-nuptial et jeune -
Mâle -
Jeune
- C’est un problème qui se pose parfois. Le SET qui contiendrait les 3 images pour le male serait supérieur; mais il y a déjà une image reconnue VI. Le seul qui peut t'aider est le concepteur du projet VI : c’est Slaunger ! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- Merci de ta réponse, je lui ai laissé un mot. J'ai trouvé plein d'autres dessins de bestioles non illustrées (voir ici les cases marquées d'un «
»), et si je retombe un de ces quatre sur de nouveaux dessins alors que j'en ai fait nominé, ça m'aidera de savoir comment faire :P Totodu74 (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- Merci de ta réponse, je lui ai laissé un mot. J'ai trouvé plein d'autres dessins de bestioles non illustrées (voir ici les cases marquées d'un «
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Aigrette_garzette_MHNT.jpg&curid=16954127&diff=61211583&oldid=61163835&rcid=62421462){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Falco vespertinus (Red-footed Falcon), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Hamadryas arinome MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hamadryas arinome MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
25 support ! C'est la première fois que je vois une telle approbation ! Chapeau bas ! Amicalement--Citron (talk) 14:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- Merci à toi. Dans un an, si ton projet abouti c'est toi qui serras à cette place... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chloreuptychia herseis, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
I have changed the scope in the below nomination for your review Commons:Valued_image_candidates/GreenHead01-AltesMuseum-Berlin-reconstructed.png -- Yjenith (talk) 02:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Falco cherrug (Saker Falcon), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cissia penelope, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dubiefostola auricollis, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Falco columbarius (Merlin), egg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adelpha cytherea, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pterocles alchata (Pin-tailed Sandgrouse), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dynamine athemon male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pterocles quadricinctus (Four-banded Sandgrouse), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eunica alpais ( Shining Purplewing), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Médecine légale et histoire[edit]
Salut.
- Je sais que tu n'es pas médecin légiste, mais lors de mon voyage récent à Vienne, j'ai réussi (avec difficultés) à voler (les photos étaient interdites) une image de ce document inestimable. Les faits dont il s'agit ayant eu lieu à Genève, c'est en français. Je tenais à te signaler le versement de ce document dont j'ai pensé qu'il pouvait intéresser un professionnel, même s'il est de très mauvaise qualité techniquement, quoique lisible. Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 11:12, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Il y avait peu de chance quelle puisse survivre à la plaie cardiaque. Je trouve ce document très émouvant et j'approuve entièrement ton action militante de nous le faire partager. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:38, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pterocles senegallus (Spotted Sandgrouse), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eunica amelia, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lophius piscatorius (The angler), skeleton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pterocles orientalis (Black-bellied Sandgrouse), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chloreuptychia hewitsonii, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
omission de signature[edit]
J'te jure, si j'étais pas là !! Tu as oublié de signer ta promotion du ministère des Affaires Etrangères letton en VI... Amitiés --Jebulon (talk) 17:57, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Houps! effectivement il était temps. Merci.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
- Bis repetita comme dirait l'autre ! Je suppose que c'est à toi que je dois le soutien de mon groupe sur la "puissance sur les mers", et je t'en remercie grandement, mais je ne fais que le supposer ;) !!--Jebulon (talk) 10:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clausirion comptum, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dorisiana bicolor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lophius piscatorius MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eunica alpais alpais MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Œuf de cigogne[edit]
Salut, je me demandais si tu avais à ta disposition des photos du Muséum de Toulouse un œuf de Cigogne blanche (Ciconia ciconia), qui serait assez utile sur l'article de WP:fr que je travaille en ce moment. Je ne sais pas si tu vas régulièrement au muéum ou si tu as toute une ribambelle de photos en stock qu'il te faut importer petit à petit. Donc à tout hasard, quoi... :) Amicalement, Totodu74 (talk) 11:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- j'en ai une centaine déjà en "boite" non traité mais de mon souvenir je n'ai pas de cigogne. Qu'à cela ne tienne, nous avons effectivement cet article, je devrais te le faire mercredi prochain. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:33, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- Je le dis un peu tard mais en fait il n'y a pas de véritable urgence ! Merci pour ton aide, et tant que je suis là, je te redis mon enthousiasme et mon admiration face à ce que tu fais dans ce musée (et donc Commons, mais aussi WP). C'est à la fois faramineux et génial, tout simplement. Bonne continuation !! Totodu74 (talk) 14:52, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eudyptes chrysocome (Rockhopper Penguin), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Doxocopa agathina, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Gourance ?[edit]
- Bonjour Papageno l'oiseleur.
- Je t'alerte au sujet de l'animal représenté sur cette photo, que j'ai froidement qualifié de Grus grus, et dont je me demande de plus en plus s'il ne s'agit pas d'un héron cendré (Ardea cinerea) plutôt que d'une grue du même métal. ça la ficherait mal de laisser traîner un zosiau mal identifié, surtout que la photo a déjà été reprise dans une WP (danoise) à l'article "grue".
- Comme tu sais très bien faire l'oeuf, je me dis que tu pourras peut-être (faire) confirmer ou (faire) infirmer sur le produit fini.
- Je te remercie à l'avance !--Jebulon (talk) 15:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- J'ai cet article en collection et je le vois tous les jours c'est un héron! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:12, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- Grand merci, je m'en doutais, je rectifie !--Jebulon (talk) 15:17, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- Merci pour le renommage. Tu n'as plus qu'à signer ta promotion de ma statue en VI, et ça sera parfait ;) !!--Jebulon (talk) 15:38, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- Grand merci, je m'en doutais, je rectifie !--Jebulon (talk) 15:17, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- J'ai cet article en collection et je le vois tous les jours c'est un héron! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:12, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- Je le savais : quand je vois ton nom sur ma page c'est que j'ai oublié de signer! C'est curieux cette manie de partir sans signer; encore du temps où on faisait de chèques j'y trouvais mon compte. Mais de nos jours, non je n'ai pas d'idée...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:02, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eunica sophonisba, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fidicina ethelae.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flatolystra verrucosa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Graphium encelades, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gypaetus barbatus hemachalanus (Bearded Vulture), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anartia amathea (Brown Peacock), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gigantotrichoderes conicicollis, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Name in italics[edit]
|
Hello, Archaeodontosaurus. You have new messages at Jkadavoor#Name_in_italics's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
-- Jkadavoor (talk) 07:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, This image category is changed. Please verify. --Yjenith (talk) 11:43, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hamadryas arinome (cracker butterfly), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Requin[edit]
Il est versé : Isurus oxyrinchus Machoire.jpg. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:20, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ça y est la machoire trone dans l'article ! Bravo ! --Citron (talk) 16:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Re: Thanks[edit]
|
|
Hello, Archaeodontosaurus. You have new messages at Jkadavoor#Name_in_italics's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
-- Jkadavoor (talk) 07:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, a lot. -- Jkadavoor (talk) 08:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eresia nauplius, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Isurus oxyrinchus (Shortfin mako shark), jaw.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anartia jatrophae (White Peacock).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anartia amathea MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gypaetus barbatus aureus (Bearded Vulture), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Biblis hyperia (Red Rim).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Scope changed for VI[edit]
Hi the below valued image nomination is changed for further review.
- Commons:Valued image candidates/Miss Avatar World Competition girl.png
- Commons:Valued image candidates/An eagle snapped in top of the tree, AU.jpg
--Yjenith (talk) 13:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
This VI image nomination scope is changed. -- 00:58, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Isurus oxyrinchus Machoire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baeotus aeilus MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diomedea exulans (Great albatross), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eresia eunice male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Set Promotion[edit]
Congratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Dynamine postverta.
Dynamine postverta.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Colobura dirce male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oreodera paulista MHNT male 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Question technique[edit]
Bonjour mon ami.
- J'ai besoin de tes conseils en matière de travail de "masquage".
- Vois cette image, on y distingue très visiblement des traces du masquage que j'ai effectuées. Mais si tu ouvres le fichier, ces traces ont disparu. J'ai utilisé un fond rouge uniforme (prélevé à la pipette sur le fond original, dégueu, mais rouge), car les parties métalliques reflètent ce rouge, et rendent impossible l'utilisation d'une autre couleur. Puis j'ai ajusté au pinceau avec la même couleur, pour lisser les imperfections. Je ne comprends pas pourquoi on voit ces traces en "thumbnail", et sur la page de l'image, et qu'on ne les voit plus dès lors qu'on ouvre le fichier.
- Je pense que je procède mal dès le départ. Pourrais-tu me communiquer ta méthode pour extraire un premier plan, même aux contours complexes comme tes insectes par exemple (quels outils tu utilises ?), et le placer sur tel ou tel fond préalablement choisi ?
- Merci de ton aide.--Jebulon (talk) 11:01, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ce n’est pas très difficile mais je ne peux te décrire que ce que je connais à savoir Photoshop.
- 1) Tu captures ta zone
- 2) Tu rétractes le calque (pour moi s’est un %age)
- 3) Tu demande une zone de lisage ou de floue de 2pcx au moins dans cette rétractation. Sinon tu as des bords trop tranchés.
- 4) Tu copies cette zone où tu as ton objet et tu vas le coller dans un beau fond que tu auras préalablement préparé.
- Ce n’est qu’à la fin que tu fusionnes pour le JPG. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:06, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Merci, je crois que j'ai compris ! J'ai à peu près les mêmes spécificités dans GIMP. Je vais essayer. Avoue que c'est un beau casque ! en plus c'est un objet historique, ce serait dommage de s'en priver en QI !--Jebulon (talk) 16:18, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crossoptilon mantchuricum (Brown Eared Pheasant), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baeotus aeilus male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Butorides striata (Striated Heron), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fidicina mannifera.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zaretis itys itys MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lagopus lagopus (Scandinavian Willow Ptarmigan), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hamadryas chloe (Chloe Cracker), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Agrias claudina claudina MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Siproeta stelenes meridionalis MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Siproeta stelenes meridionalis MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
--Citron (talk) 19:22, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Meric, mon implication dans VI me tiens éloigné des deux autres labels, et c'est toujours un choc (sympathique) que de trouver une de mes images nommée... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heliconius erato (Red Postman), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Necrosyrtes monachus (Hooded Vulture), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agrias claudina male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Agrias narcissus narcissus MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Please, check fish identification[edit]
Salut, mon ami!
Please, check fish identification with my pictures here Category:Parachanna obscura. Parachanna obscura - identification by fish owner. But, probably this is Channa diplogramma or other snakehead fish. I am not sure.
Très amical, Georges -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- Bonjour George.I posed the question to our curator in zoology. You have to ask also User:citron, which could have an idea. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Our curator is sure that this is not the correct determination. We should know the geographical origin. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:10, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Merci!
- This fish lives in an aquarium in Kiev. Natural area and other information is unknown.
- Note 1: The tail fin it has a round form, however in movement look similar to the triangular.
- Note 2: Fish has very dark coloring, however with flash photo green and lilac shine is visible.
- -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:20, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Identification Parachanna obscura re-confirmed by owner. This is an very old fish, so very dark. -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Channa micropeltes fits better imho. The old/dark-thing sounds a little weird. Totodu74 (talk) 10:54, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed. -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:56, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Channa micropeltes fits better imho. The old/dark-thing sounds a little weird. Totodu74 (talk) 10:54, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Identification Parachanna obscura re-confirmed by owner. This is an very old fish, so very dark. -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Our curator is sure that this is not the correct determination. We should know the geographical origin. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:10, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- A plusieurs, on est plus efficace! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:06, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hermeuptychia hermes, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gypohierax angolensis (Palm-nut Vulture), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alectoris barbara (Barbary Partridge), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agrias narcissus, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chionis minor (Black-faced Sheathbill), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Agrias claudina claudina MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agrias claudina claudina MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
Encore ! --Citron (talk) 21:09, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- J'ai vu; j'en suis enchanté et confus... surtout enchanté.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historis acheronta.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ectopistes migratorius (Passenger Pigeon), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
