User talk:Arbeiterreserve

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi, as the above image was reviewed and assessed by our specialists as a "Featured Picture", please upload new versions under different filenames. -- User:Docu at 05:44, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I dit not change the picture, I improved the overall image quality by removing the visible image noise, so the picture is now a lot clearer. I belive, featured pictures should be as perfect as possible. Sorry, but I can't realy see a sense in this policy or in reverting to a worse version. --Arbeiterreserve (talk) 06:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There are usually 10-20 people that review an image before it gets featured. We don't want to disrespect their view of the quality of the image. You are free to upload the picture under another filename and request that it replaces the first one as a featured picture. BTW the same applies to the other two pictures you overwrote. -- User:Docu at 06:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'll keep that in mind. --Arbeiterreserve (talk) 06:08, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noise reduction & sharpening[edit]

Hello Arbeiterreserve, if you happen to come around here,

I noticed an image you improved by reducing its noise and sharpening it, and I saw you did so on several images, with what seems to me a very good result.

I am very interested to know how you did it.

You can answer me on this very page or on my talk page here. I might not see it very quickly but I will have it eventually ; should you want me to get quickly your answer, the best would be to answer me on my main account at the French Wikipedia, there : fr:User talk:Cos.

Thanks a lot! - Cos-fr (talk) 20:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, the noise reduction is always done with Dfine 2.0, the sharpening with the unsharp mask tool of Photoshop an a bit of magic. ;) Arbeiterreserve (talk) 08:48, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Bronson 1973.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Ho (talk) 20:47, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File:Bill Clinton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.97.3.37 21:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

File:Hans-Dieter Flick 2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

37.209.140.185 11:04, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kleopatra-VII.-Altes-Museum-Berlin1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

181.137.211.53 20:15, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arbeiterreserve, auf meinen ersten Blick hat deine Retouche das Foto etwas verbessert. Aber: da es bereits vor über 1 Jahr auf Commons hochgeladen wurde, solltest du unbedingt den ursprünglichen Ersteller fragen, ob er einverstanden ist, dass du seine Version überschreibst. Denn letzteres dürfte in diesem Fall keine der in unserer Policy Commons:Existierende Dateien überschreiben genannten Bedingungen erfüllen. Daher im Zweifelsfall unter einem abweichenden Dateinamen hochladen. --Túrelio (talk) 21:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, ich bewege mich bei der Bearbeitung (Farbkorrekturen, Rauschreduzierung) im Rahmen des Punktes "Überschreiben bei Geringfügigen Verbesserungen" von Commons:Overwriting_existing_files/de#Geringf.C3.BCgige_Verbesserungen. --Arbeiterreserve (talk) 19:10, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:BaldwinStreet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Schwede66 21:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]