User talk:Abigor/Archives/2015/February

Welcome back!

Hi Abigor, nice to see you back around here at Commons. I've returned the autopatrol bit to you and hope that this is ok for you. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 12:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi AFBorcherht! I thought lets give it a new try around here :) You scared me for a small second, I got an e-mail that rights where changed, I thought for a sec I got blocked again :P But autopratol sounds good. Will be uploading new images soon, need to get the feel back first :) Huib talk ^{Abigor @ meta} 12:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Abigor, I am sorry for having scared you. This was surely not my intention and you should know better that I am usually not very quick in blocking people. To upload images is surely rewarding and relaxing. But thank you also for catching copyvios. Old habits do not die too quickly ;) Best, AFBorchert (talk) 16:29, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Yeah I noticed that old habits die hard. I think I will be her for a while doing all kinds of things, I sure missed it the last couple of years. Huib talk ^{Abigor @ meta} 17:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Flooding

Hi, You are flooding my bot with deletion notifications (of recent uploads). I prefer to lean it up myself after the mass upload is completed. Thanks. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

I prefer to not get copyrighted material uploaded at all? There is a mass upload of copyrighted materials and bad quality materials going on, you can beter not upload it and clean it up afterwards? Huib talk ^{Abigor @ meta} 19:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Mass upload of copyrighted material is not true. There was a few DW's and a few blurred one's. Best --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

There are 50 images that are named in the series "Portrait_of_an_Unknown_Woman" that are all pictures of pictures, so the Flickr license wouldn't count. Since a picture of a picture doesn't give your rights. Besides that pictures of unknown woman are kind of out of scope? Besides that there are atleast 200 more images that can be discussed if the licensing is correct. Huib talk ^{Abigor @ meta} 20:04, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Not sure what your problem is exactly... *sigh* --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Like I said, I was patrolling new upload and the whole vogue and mass pictures of pictures flooded the uploads. Huib talk ^{Abigor @ meta} 20:08, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for patrolling uploads. There is a filter option to filter uploads by new users, so you can skip mass uploads. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

There seem to be indeed a few hunderts problematic uploads. I deleted all. Seems like flickr2commons ignored my checkbox settings. The first time that this happened to me. Thanks Abigor! --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your fast responses and help :) Huib talk ^{Abigor @ meta} 20:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belgenmonument Ede.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The bottom needs a crop to get rid of the out of focus area --Cccefalon 17:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC) Better now. Please leave notifications about new versions here at the review, so that all reviewers have a chance to look at it. --Cccefalon 01:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau du Loup.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. You didn't clean the stairs before taking the picture ;-) --Moroder 12:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

20:39, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Kosmos 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for QI --Hubertl 11:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Kosmos 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:09, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

09:10, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Belgenmonument Ede.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:50, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

21:23, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hotel Kosmos, Westouter Main Entrance, East Side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It is essential in the case of the highly asymmetrical building, put in the scope the sense of sight. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

 Comment like this? Huib talk ^{Abigor @ meta} 06:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Ok for this point, but now lack geocoding --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
• FixedHuib talk ^{Abigor @ meta} 07:36, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

08:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Car at Car Graveyard.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 12:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

05:44, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument voor de Benzinepomp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (although it can be brightened a bit). --C messier 21:58, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

09:56, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/HydroelectricitySrilanka.png

Hi. Thanks for your vote. I have updated the categories of Hydroelectric power plants in Sri Lanka. Regards, Rehman 14:28, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! URBS Lead light.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

06:21, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Kosmos 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting forms and good angle. Would benefit from either a deeper field or cropping in on the sharper foreground --Daniel Case 06:16, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The A12 near Veenendaal by night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

09:54, 28 February 2015 (UTC)