User:Martinvl/Promotions 2019

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
No mooring sign in France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:12, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City gate of the ruined Roman city of Calleva Atrebatum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:16, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:27, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volksgerichtshof Denkmal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 12:48, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chart showing Population of England since 1550..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
British World War II Type 24 pillbox at Burton Bradstock.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:13, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portable quadrat.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Clearly best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:32, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
English coppiced sweet chestnut woodland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope needs to be fixed, quite a few errors are present. --BoothSift 01:06, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

 Question @Boothsift: Please explain your statement? Martinvl (talk) 08:30, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

I don't know what Boothsift is thinking of, but "jpg" is obviously not part of a scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:39, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from English coppiced sweet chestnut woodland.jpg to English coppiced sweet chestnut woodland --Martinvl (talk) 20:58, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

• @Boothsift and Ikan Kekek: Scope changed. Martinvl (talk) 20:58, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Having read about coppicing on Wikipedia, I can understand why this is a useful scope. And this image seems to be unique in the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:43, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Tainan Confucius Temple.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:28, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chart showing how the six working prototype kilograms drifted from the International Prototype Kilogram.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support ok and useful Ezarateesteban 01:19, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Witches Scale, Oudewater.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Thompson Graving Dock, Belfast.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good resolution and lighting, particularly like the people to indicate scale. Best in scope. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:56, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Riding School, Bolsover Castle (Interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment it would be a lot easier to judge if the riding school had its own subcategory. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:18, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Info @Rodhullandemu: Done & scope changed to map onto new sub-category Martinvl (talk) 19:48, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope, gives a good impression of the interior. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:57, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canons Ashby Priory west end..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
South African Class D locomotive.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
South African Railways Class MB (Mallet) locomotive (2-6-6-0).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:46, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noilly-Prat Boutique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:45, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Cardinal Briçonnet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 SupportBest in scope and used --Llez (talk) 04:51, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gateway to the Château de Pézenas.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please check the link --Llez (talk) 05:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Gateway to the Château de Pézenas to Gateway to the Château de Pézenas --Martinvl (talk) 17:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

 Info@Llez: Link is scope corrected. Martinvl (talk) 17:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pumps at the Thompson Graving Dock, Belfast..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Useful, but cropped in the lower right corner. Is it impossible to get a full, uncropped photo of this subject? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Info @Ikan Kekek: Due to the depth of the well in which the pumps were situated, I had to make all sorts of compromises. I pushed my lens to its minimum focal length (23 mm). I was faced with a choice - do I get all three pumps into the image, or do I get the railings (at eye level) around the pit (thereby giving a horizontal line which viewers can use as a point of reference) into the image? I chose to sacrifice the third pump rather than scarifice the horizontal line. I have however amended the image description to draw to attention that there is a third pump. --Martinvl (talk) 12:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Question - Did you have the opportunity to take both photos? It would be good to see the other one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I think it should be possible to make a panorama to show all --Llez (talk) 12:37, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Info@Ikan Kekek and Llez: No, I did not take any pictures from any other angle. I took two or three near-identical picture and chose the best one. Also, I am not sure that a vertical panorama is very effective, especially as our eyes are in the horizontal plane rather than the vertical plane. --Martinvl (talk) 19:23, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

I found this image of a vertical panorama on the internet (taken from the opposite end of the room to where I took my photo). In order to get a badly distorted view of part of the third pump, the photographer sacrificed the view of the staircase. I don't think that he did a good job. -- Martinvl (talk) 16:18, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, but I think it's a more useful image. And you probably could have done better than he did. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: But the current situation is that this is probably the best image of the pump house on Commons, interior or exterior and I have no plans to visit Belfst again in the foreseeable future (500 km away). Also the criteria for a VI is that as of now this must be is the best image in Commons under that scope. If somebody takes a better shot under this scope, the VI will be passed on to their image -- Martinvl (talk) 18:04, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

" Must illustrate its subject well" is also a criterion. I'm not sure this cut-off image passes that test. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 23:51, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ElizabethanProstheticArm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:24, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Engine room, HMAS Onslow.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cevennes Steam Railway Locomotive 040 T 1751.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:21, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ChateauDeCassan Hallway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TriceratopsFernForest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support There are overexposed areas, but in total it's fine for me. --Tomer T 16:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:33, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Western facade of the Château-Abbey Cassan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:30, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Choir of the Abbey of Sainte-Marie de Fontcaude.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - Isn't it the only image on Commons of the choir, or are there other photos that are not in the right gallery? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:58, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Info @Ikan Kekek: There is another one here -- Martinvl (talk) 13:10, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - OK. Obviously best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:51, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GardenLake ApolloTemple Stourhead.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Multi-faceted sundial, Barrington Court.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barrington Court, South facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Isn't too far away, isn't cropped, and is well lit. Rodhullandemu (talk)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former stables, Barrington Court.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Enchanted City of Bolnuevo, Spain.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:04, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shillito Cross.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. :-) Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
East Cliff, West Bay, Dorset.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 24 December 2019 (UTC)