User:Lvova/qi

own

gallery

• 
  • Nomination View at Gulf of Finland from Krestovskiy Island, Saint-Petersburg. -- Lvova 15:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Decline Over- and underexposed. --Lestath 17:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pulsatilla patens; May, Russia. --Lvova 18:49, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Decline What a pity, the flower is beautiful, but suffers from oversaturation and strong chromatic abberation (CA). Could you try again next year? Lycaon 22:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brass claddagh ring on the sphere --Lvova 13:33, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. --Eusebius 13:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White columba livia --Rave 19:28, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --Korall 19:42, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination User:Drbug at Wikiconference in Saint Petersburg -- Rave 19:00, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK --Mbdortmund 16:35, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Adonis, Summer Garden, Saint-Petersburg --Lvova 21:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline not sharp enough in full solution --Mbdortmund 22:40, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Friedrich I, Summer Garden, Saint-Petersburg --Lvova 21:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 22:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Julius Caesar, Summer garden, Saint-Petersburg --Lvova 21:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 22:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Allegory 'Winter'. Summer garden, Saint-Petersburg --Lvova 20:11, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Inadequate lighting, dull sky would make the statue brighter. --Ikiwaner 20:33, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Woman in pink, Summer garden, Saint-Petersburg --Lvova 20:11, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Good quality, but I'd crop it to focus more on the statue. -- H005 00:40, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
     DoneI've uploaded the cropped version of this file. Lvova 10:28, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
    That was a bit too tight, I've made it a litle wider. -- H005 23:48, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
    Thank you :) Lvova 06:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Friedrich I, Summer Garden, Saint-Petersburg --Lvova 21:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Basically good, but there is chromatic aberration (in violet} mainly on the chin and neck. --Cayambe 16:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Because of what Cayambe said and because the black-green background is disturbing. --Ikiwaner 14:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Alexandr Makedonsky, Summer Garden, Saint-Petersburg --Lvova 12:38, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Review Did you try to put a little bit more sharpnes and contrast on the face? --Mbdortmund 12:33, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
    I'll try tonight. --Lvova 08:34, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Medal 850th Anniversary of Moscow, avers Lvova 20:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion Minor fluff on background which could be removed but otherwise good. --Iotatau 21:15, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Medal 850th Anniversary of Moscow, revers Lvova 20:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion Again minor fluff but otherwise good. --Iotatau 21:15, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Medal 30th anniversary of victory in The Great Patriotic War, avers Lvova 20:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 21:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Medal 30th anniversary of victory in The Great Patriotic War, revers Lvova 20:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion Also good. --Cayambe 21:52, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Medal 20th anniversary of victory in The Great Patriotic War, avers Lvova 20:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion Also good. --Cayambe 21:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Medal 40th anniversary of victory in The Great Patriotic War, avers Lvova 20:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 09:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Medal 40th anniversary of victory in The Great Patriotic War, revers Lvova 20:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 09:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Medal «60 Years Since the Creation of the Soviet Armed Forces», avers Lvova 20:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 19:29, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Medal «60 Years Since the Creation of the Soviet Armed Forces», revers Lvova 20:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 19:29, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Medal 20th anniversary of victory in The Great Patriotic War, revers Lvova 20:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion Would benefit from a top crop. --Iotatau 11:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
    ok,  Done Lvova 12:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
    Thanks, QI now. --Iotatau 12:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Alexander Pushkin in Moscow. --Rave 15:58, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. Geocode would be very useful! --Jovianeye 17:38, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kozuli, the type of Arkhangelsk's gingerbreads. --Lvova 09:42, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Seems good. Mattbuck 13:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lomographic ActionSampler --Lvova 22:14, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Coat of arms of grand master Franz Ludwig von Pfalz-Neuburg. --Lvova 07:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice symmetry, detail, color --Daniel Case 02:01, 27 March 2011 (UTC)  Question Grand-Master of what, please ?--Jebulon 21:49, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
     Info Count Palatine Francis Louis of Neuburg, bishop of Breslau since 1683, archbishop of several dioceses, Hochmeister of the Teutonic Order (1694-1732). --Rave 09:23, 29 March 2011 (UTC) very interesting, thank you very much.--Jebulon 11:39, 30 March 2011 (UTC).
• 
  • Nomination ZiS-2 at Mound of Glory. --Lvova 07:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline last piece is cut off, sorry --Ianare 20:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination IS-3 at Mound of Glory (machine-gun left). --Lvova 07:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion ok --Ianare 20:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manhole cover with a big coat of arms of Wrocław --Lvova 19:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion IMO, such a circle needs a better (symmetric, like a nice square) framing. The crops, then the composition, are not good...--Jebulon 00:01, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
    cropped. --Lvova 09:16, 27 March 2011 (UTC) Better, thank you, even if the crop is too tight a bit, now... --Jebulon 21:59, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The part of monument of John of Nepomuk in Wrocław. --Lvova 07:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: ZiS-3 at Mound of Glory. --Lvova 07:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Lomographic ActionSampler. --Lvova 07:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The part of monument of John of Nepomuk in Wrocław --Lvova 14:17, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The part of monument of John of Nepomuk in Wrocław --Lvova 14:17, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The part of monument of John of Nepomuk in Wrocław --Lvova 14:17, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The part of monument of John of Nepomuk in Wrocław --Lvova 14:17, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination The part of monument of John of Nepomuk in Wrocław --Lvova 16:21, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 09:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lomocamera Fisheye Woodgrain. --Lvova 09:33, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination The part of monument of John of Nepomuk in Wrocław. --Lvova 12:21, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Composition is not QI. --Elekhh 20:57, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The part of monument of John of Nepomuk in Wrocław --Lvova 16:21, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Carschten 09:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The part of monument of John of Nepomuk in Wrocław --Lvova 16:21, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Carschten 09:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
• 
  A partof the set: Commons:Valued image candidates/Nesvizh Castle

File:Aleja Solidarnosci.jpg

• Nomination Aleja Solidarnosci in Warsaw --Lvova 21:23, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
• Promotion  Oppose because of the strange "triangle" in the left bottom corner of the picture.----Jebulon 22:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
   Question How about now? --Rave 07:36, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
• Thanks for removing the "triangle". I do  Support now, because of the very nice light.---Jebulon 20:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 07:34, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Man statue in Lazenki.JPG

• Nomination Zeus, Łazienki Królewskie in Warsaw --Lvova 21:23, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
• Promotion *Oppose: Would be better without the people in the background, and the description, translated from Russian, just says "Statue in Royal Baths Park". I've added in a little more clarification in an English version, but we don't know who made the statue, and, while I'm willing to buy this may well be Zeus, I'd like to know how that conclusion was reached. Adam Cuerden 18:45, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
   Comment I think, that full description is not necessary for this nomination. And sign up, please. --Rave 18:19, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
  Sorry, forgot to sign. But I do think that we need to at least credit the sculptor, if only to allow the image to be effectively used. Adam Cuerden 18:45, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
  It is Bachus, probably; I'm looking for description. Lvova 04:17, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
  I've found and added description. If anybody want to see how old conclusions were reached - here, in russian. In fact it is (polska) Alegoria rzeki Bug, posąg na tarasie przed Pałacem na Wyspie w Łazienkach Królewskich w Warszawie. Rzeźba autorstwa Ludwika Kaufmanna z 1855 r. Lvova 10:22, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
   Support Accurate identification makes this special: It can now be used in articles on the Bug River, or Ludwig Kaufmann. Adam Cuerden 13:42, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

  I admit that I was wrong. Correct description increased the value of picture. --Rave 19:24, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment Yes, but I'm not sure it is a QI : noise reduction seems to be too strong. But picture not so bad though... well... Neutral--Jebulon 22:14, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 07:40, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Castle in Malbork, stained-glass window in the church02.jpg

• Nomination Castle in Malbork, stained-glass window in the church. --Lvova 20:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
• Promotion
• Needs to be straightened. --King of Hearts 04:03, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

• Straightened. Check again, please. --Rave 16:58, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Good now -- George Chernilevsky 14:29, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Too wide In my opinion. The correction is not enough. Look at the helm, very "fat", isn't it ?--Jebulon 23:01, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Please add to the description the approximate date of fabrication of the stained-glass window to avoid questions regarding copyright infringement. Wsiegmund 01:17, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Info Width fixd. --Rave 20:17, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment I think the copyright tag should be {{PD-Art}}. Please see Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag.
•  Support good to me now.--Jebulon 08:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Wsiegmund 23:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jebulon 08:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

...

File:Claddaghring.jpg

• Nomination Gold Royal Claddagh Ring Lvova 11:55, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
• Decline
• Background is not white. --ComputerHotline 12:33, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
• I think it is better not to have a white background, as white would be too much contrast. I support the colors as-is, and move to discuss. --JalalV 16:37, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Image is tilted (line of simmerty not vertical).#!George Shuklin 18:38, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose --High Contrast 17:51, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose tilted, distracting background (uniform color, not neccessarily white, would have been better). --Florian Prischl 18:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 15:09, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Перенесённое

Image:Bufo viridis.jpg

• Nomination European Green Toad. Ivengo(RUS) 20:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Interesting but would have been better in natural environment. Reflecting areas are overexposed. --B.navez 07:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment Reflecting areas are....reflecting areas. Of course they are overexposed, cause they are reflecting the sun. Not a reason for declinig in my eyes, but for illustrating the slimy skin of the toad. I want to discuss this first. Btw. I agree with you that the pic would be much better, if it shows the toad in its natural enviroment. So this isn't a support vote. --LC-de 17:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support sharp --Beyond silence 16:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Sharp picture, the specular highlights give a good idea of the texture of the skin. A more natural background would be nice, but is not necessary. --PieCam 21:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --B.navez 13:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

вообще самолюбование

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Columba white.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WConf-ru3-42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fridrih I, Summer garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caesar, Summer garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woman in pink, summer garden (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 850th anniversary of Moscow.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 850th anniversary of Moscow - revers.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 30th anniversary of Victory in Patriotic War.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 30th anniversary of Victory in Patriotic War - revers.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20th anniversary of Victory in Patriotic War.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 40th anniversary of Victory in Patriotic War.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 40th anniversary of Victory in Patriotic War - revers.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 60th anniversary Armed Forces of USSR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 60th anniversary Armed Forces of USSR - revers.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20th anniversary of Victory in Patriotic War - Revers.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Man statue in Lazenki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleja Solidarnosci.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PushkinMskVblizi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Example.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Example.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Malbork, stained-glass window in the church02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Three kozuli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-34-85 at Mound of Glory (machine-gun left).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slaski tydzien 5047.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slaski tydzien 5004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slaski tydzien 5072.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slaski tydzien 5062.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slaski tydzien 5070.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kozuli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please link the scope to a category or gallery on Commons. Yann (talk) 07:31, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 Done Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 08:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Well, since there is a homemade cloudberry jam VI ;) and considering the info that I understood from the article in the Russian Wikipedia, I support it. As for the photo in itself, it is of very good quality, highly informative and is best in its category.--MrPanyGoff 08:56, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:11, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Alexander Pushkin by Alexander Opekushin (Moscow).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - I wonder if the so named scope is too broad or not because while browsing the categories under this scope name I found some other interesting monuments to Pushkin. I don't say that every statue needs own scope but what if we narrow a bit the area and call it Statues of Pushkin in Moscow. Let's see what others think.--MrPanyGoff 20:34, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Sorry, I beg to disagree : in my opinion, a scope "Statue of [any poet]" is not a too narrow, unless it is masterpiece work of art. Same argument as in this other former VIC. If we consider the statue as a piece of art by itself, the sculptor must be know then and noted in the description -isn't it Alexander Mikhailovich Opekushin here?- and the scope adjusted, for instance "Statue of xxx by yyy" -> an example there.--Myrabella (talk) 12:42, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

• That's right. To summarize - we have three possibilities of interpretation when it comes to a statue, depending on the relation of the scope with the topic lists (galeries): 1) If we refer the scope to section People considering the statue as a portrait then the scope should be named after the man it represents - in this case: Alexander Pushkin. (we already have photos of statues as portraits) 2) If we refer the scope to section Works of art considering the statue as a piece of art (meaning sculpture or architecture) then the scope should be named: Statue of Pushkin by XXX. 3) If we refer the scope to section Places considering the statue as a memorial-monument (meaning a landmark of some place) then the scope should be named: Statue of Pushkin, Town or better Monument to Pushkin, Town . Of course when some image obtain own scope in 2) or 3) it has to be a notable sculpture and respectively notable monument. I think that the nominator here doesn't mean 1) so the question here is: a Place or Work of art. Both are OK, imo.--MrPanyGoff 16:49, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

•  Request We could mix 2) and 3) in that precise case, with a scope worded like this : "Monument to Alexander Pushkin by Alexander Opekushin (Moscow)". There is an article on Ukrainian Wikipedia and on Russian WP. Then I invite the nominator to change the scope, and to complete the description, mentioning the sculptor and the date of the sculpture. --Myrabella (talk) 20:26, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

•  Info Done. --Rave (talk) 07:22, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

•  Support OK to me for this QI giving a good view of this nonument nowadays. Best in scope, all criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 21:34, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:12, 4 April 2011 (UTC)