User:ComputerHotline/Archive 8

Ouvrage Schoenenbourg

Bonjour Thomas. J'ai un service à vous demander. Récemment, l'utilisateur Rh-67 (talk · contribs) a versé une vingtaine de très belles photos dans la Category:Ouvrage Schoenenbourg à laquelle vous aviez vous-même massivement contribué. Du coup cependant, cette catégorie est devenue très grosse et il serait impératif de la réorganiser en sous-catégories. Étant donné que vous êtes le spécialiste des forts sur Commons, je voulais savoir si vous pouviez vous en charger ? Pour un expert, cela ne devrait pas prendre plus de dix minutes avec cat-a-lot. Pour un non-expert cependant, c'est autre chose. Merci d'avance, cordialement, --Edelseider (talk) 18:45, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Bonsoir. Vous dites "il serait impératif de la réorganiser en sous-catégories" : pourquoi ??? Cela ne gêne en rien. De plus, vous dites "Étant donné que vous êtes le spécialiste des forts sur Commons". C'est sympa mais je suis spécialiste des forts "Séré de Rivières" ; je connais beaucoup moins les autres. --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:55, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Pour répondre à votre première question : si, cela gêne, étant donné que beaucoup de photos sont redondantes ( la même pièce sous le même angle, etc. ). Et c'est un peu le principe de Commons de classer et d'ordonner. Quant à la deuxième question/remarque : vous avez tout de même pris une quarantaine de photos de ce fort, ainsi que des forts de Mutzig et d'Oberhausbergen, ce n'est donc pas un hasard que je m'adresse à vous. Mais enfin tant pis, si vous êtes réticent, je me charge de faire un classement primaire intérieur/extérieur, ce sera déjà au moins ça. --Edelseider (talk) 08:13, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Je ne suis pas réticent, ce n'est seulement pas mon centre de prédilection, c'est tout. --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:47, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Merci d'avoir agi entre-temps. Tenez, petite illustration de "la même pièce sous le même angle" : pif, paf, pof. Cordialement, --Edelseider (talk) 19:55, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-09-18 16-23-55-fort-arches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments great! --Ralf Roletschek 19:51, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-09-21 14-55-01-grottes-cravanche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me - Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 18:58, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-09-21 15-04-47-grottes-cravanche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 22:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-09-18 16-25-04-fort-arches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, interesting picture. --Vassil 22:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-09-21 15-46-44-salbert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Still don't like the distortion, but the light level's a lot better. --Mattbuck 11:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-10-02 15-39-22-fort-mt-bart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments poor file name, good quality --Carschten 18:05, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-10-02 14-50-09-fort-mt-bart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 14:49, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort-lomont-fr-FR.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear ComputerHotline, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:52, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-10-16 17-58-33-fort-arches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 16:46, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magasin-caverne-salb-fr-FR.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:33, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salle-a2-fr-FR.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:33, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plan-salbert-salleA2-fr-FR.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:33, 25 October 2011 (UTC) Just a question: what is the sort-of-hemicircular space on levels 0 and 2? and how do you get a balcony for air watch on the -2 level? -- Rama 06:23, 26 October 2011 (UTC) All is writted here. --ComputerHotline 09:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-10-22 22-03-12-belfort-in-night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nicht so langweilig wie sonst immer I like that. difficult light, well-implemented --Ralf Roletschek 12:28, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-10-22 22-59-53-belfort-in-night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nicht so langweilig wie sonst immer I like that. difficult light, well-implemented --Ralf Roletschek 12:28, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2011-07-22 14-29-55-ouv-g.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2011-07-22 14-29-55-ouv-g.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-11-04 17-29-48-a36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 00:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Félicitations !

Salut!

Je viens de voir que ta photo de l'intérieur de l'église de Saint-Maimboeuf faisait partie des 10 vainqueurs de Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 (France). Je te félicite pour ce succès !--Jebulon (talk) 09:56, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Merci à vous. --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:06, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-09-05 10-37-55-PA00101134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Belle qualité. (SVP, pensez à donner un titre descriptif à vos photos.) --Vassil 22:26, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-10-30 16-33-40-fort-arches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 22:36, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-10-30 17-29-07-fort-arches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good shot. Especially considering the challenge of the light in such places. --TwoWings 20:41, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-09-05 10-46-27-PA00101134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 21:13, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-10-30 17-39-10-fort-arches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 20:13, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2011-09-15 13-20-34-eglise-st-maimboeuf.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2011-09-15 13-20-34-eglise-st-maimboeuf.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-09-06 14-18-32-citadelle-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 16:17, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-11-15 22-51-52-porte-brisach-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 12:59, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-11-15 22-47-03-porte-brisach-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments its HDR but i dont see ist - but the sky :-( is too light. --Ralf Roletschek 14:20, 17 November 2011 (UTC) The sky is too light because there is some light pollution. --ComputerHotline 18:51, 17 November 2011 (UTC)