User:ComputerHotline/Archive 18

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-04 09-47-45-croix-chemin-offemont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-08-15 16-24-09-Acanthosomatidae.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

I have made ​​a mistake in QI

Sorry, the comment that I have made in QI (File:2013-09-10 17-04-05-Monument-commemo-PA00101151.jpg) was for File:2013-09-10 17-26-56-Monument-commemo-PA00101151.jpg.

Later I tried comment this last photo, but I can not because my monitor is a little dark and the photo has dark areas. I avoid commenting pictures with dark areas. Sorry--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:16, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your quality images. I like--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 20:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leptoglossus occidentalis - 2013-09-06 19-57-05-hemiptera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 11:16, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leptoglossus occidentalis - 2013-09-06 19-57-55-hemiptera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 11:16, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leptoglossus occidentalis - 2013-09-06 20-00-52-hemiptera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment crop (bottom) not good, but QI --Rjcastillo 11:16, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Monuments historiques in Thann

Cher Monsieur, les monuments historiques, ce ne sont pas seulement les édifices, mais aussi les objets, comme les statues, les vitraux, les orgues... C'est pour cela qu'il existe la Base Mérimée, pour l'immobilier, et la base Palissy, pour le mobilier, et qu'elles forment toutes les deux un ensemble indissociable. Vous avez totalemant saccagé la catégorie Monuments historiques in Thann ainsi que l'ensemble de son contenu dans l'intention sans doute bonne, je suppose, de corriger ce que vous avez pris pour une erreur. J'ai rétabli les versions correctes partout. Par pitié, ne recommencez pas ! --Edelseider (talk) 09:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Certes, mais cela est redondant. Et la redondance ne sert à rien. De plus, je n'ai fait que préparer la catégorie conformément aux habitudes en vigueur ici afin d'y mettre mes images. Donc je n'ai rien saccagé/cassé du tout. Pour preuve, visitez cette catégorie :

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Monuments_historiques_in_Paris et voyez son classement dans les autres catégories. --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:20, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Il n'y a aucune redondance puisque chaque fiche porte un numéro différent dès lors qu'il s'agit dobjets différents ! IM68000786, IM68000788, IM68000790, voyez-vous ce que je veux dire ? Regardez donc ici, sur la base du ministère de la Culture, pas la peine d'aller chercher ailleurs : [1]. Cordialement, --Edelseider (talk) 09:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Si. Il y a redondance (sur-catégorisation) au niveau du classement des images sur WikiC. Voir ce chapitre pour en savoir plus. --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:19, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Je suis allé voir ce chapitre, il ne dit rien à propos des fiches et des numéros de référence des bases Mérimée et Palissy. Or, pour les monuments historiques, ce sont ces fiches et numéros qui décident du classement. Pourquoi cette mauvaise volonté ? --Edelseider (talk) 09:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Ce n'est pas de la mauvaise volonté mais la logique de WikiCommons. Je ne parle pas des bases Mérimée et Palissy, mais de la catégorisation des images sur WikiCommons. Par exemple, le fait de mettre une image ici : [2] ET là : [3] s'appelle la sur-catégorisation car la première est liée à la seconde. --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:30, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Mais non, ce n'est pas de la sur-catégorisation, puisque le lien de l'une à l'autre ne signifie pas l'identité de l'une avec l'autre ! Je ne suis pas responsable des fiches du ministère de la Culture mais il y a une distinction claire entre l'ensemble architectural et chacun de ses éléments pris à part qu'il est nécessaire de reproduire dès lorsqu'il est on ne peut plus officiel. Êtes-vous allé voir ici : http://www.culture.gouv.fr/public/mistral/palissy_fr?ACTION=CHERCHER&FIELD_8=REF,REFA&VALUE_8=IA00024314 ? Cordialement, --Edelseider (talk) 09:35, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Tout cela pour dire que les MH (comme tous fichiers) doivent être catégorisés le plus précisément possible, conformément à ce qu'il y a écrit ici. De plus, les indications des n° des bases Palissy et Mérimée ne devrait être utilisée que pour les fichiers, non pour les catégories, ce qui simplifierait les choses. Ou alors, il faut mettre les 2 types de cartouches (base Palissy et Mérimée) dans les catégories concernées. --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Mais je suis entièrement d'accord avec vous, c'est pour cela que depuis des années je crée catégorie sur catégorie pour regrouper les photos isolées ; seulement lorsqu'il n'existe qu'une ( 1 ) photo par objet référencé, comme les statues IM68000786, IM68000788 et IM68000790, créer une catégorie paraît abscons, pour moi une catégorie commence à deux photos. Mais rien ne vous empêche de créer la catégorie Category:Statue de St Henri (Collégiale de Thann) pour y mettre la photo du monument historique File:2013-09-14 10-35-42-Collegiale Saint-Thiebaut de Thann-PA00085696.jpg si vous trouvez cela plus indiqué. Cordialement --Edelseider (talk) 17:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-13 18-58-49-petite-fontaine-belfort-PA00101137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:17, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-13 18-53-43-petite-fontaine-belfort-PA00101137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:17, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-13 18-51-24-petite-fontaine-belfort-PA00101137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:17, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-08 18-13-15-croix-chemin-evette-salbert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 21:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-14 11-43-21-Collegiale Saint-Thiebaut de Thann-PA00085696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good detail --Colin 20:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-14 11-40-10-Collegiale Saint-Thiebaut de Thann-PA00085696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good frame --Colin 20:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-13 18-49-31-petite-fontaine-belfort-PA00101137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-14 10-41-39-Collegiale Saint-Thiebaut de Thann-PA00085696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 15:53, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-14 10-48-57-Collegiale Saint-Thiebaut de Thann-PA00085696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Lmbuga 15:53, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-14 11-24-50-Halle aux blés-PA00085700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Lmbuga 13:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-14 11-21-52-Fontaine des Vignerons-PA00085699.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:41, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-14 11-37-20-Maison Ehrhard-PA00085702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though slight unsharpness at the roof probably due to perspective correction. --Smial 12:19, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-14 11-35-33-Maison Ehrhard-PA00085702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:19, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-14 11-33-47-Maison Ehrhard-PA00085702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:19, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-13 18-22-39-palais-gouverneur-belfort-PA00101138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-14 11-47-01-Collegiale Saint-Thiebaut de Thann-PA00085696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice Detail! --P e z i 18:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-14 11-45-35-Collegiale Saint-Thiebaut de Thann-PA00085696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:31, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-14 11-44-54-Collegiale Saint-Thiebaut de Thann-PA00085696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-13 18-55-09-petite-fontaine-belfort-PA00101137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:36, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-10 17-12-19-Monument-commemo-PA00101151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:06, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-10 17-18-16-Monument-commemo-PA00101151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:06, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-13 18-23-18-palais-gouverneur-belfort-PA00101138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 19:43, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-19 15-45-28-tour-PA00085697.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-19 14-39-50-collegiale-thann-PA00085696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-14 11-46-18-Collegiale Saint-Thiebaut de Thann-PA00085696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Pleclown 19:01, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-23 14-56-00-egl-brasse-PA00101134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-23 15-10-06-egl-brasse-PA00101134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-18 16-21-12-croix-frais-PA00101149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-25 14-02-47-egl-st-dizier-eveque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 17:09, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-25 14-17-16-egl-st-dizier-eveque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 21:19, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-25 14-16-01-egl-st-dizier-eveque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 21:19, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-25 15-03-08-fontaine-st-leger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-29 14-36-43-egl-Granges-la-Ville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 18:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-29 14-23-24-egl-Granges-la-Ville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great.--ArildV 16:20, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-29 16-34-52-chateau-hericourt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-29 16-33-47-chateau-hericourt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-29 16-32-35-chateau-hericourt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I'd suggest to clone out the lonely wire in upper right corner. I believe this would be a tolerable manipulation, as the wire has no ends and does not mask relevant details in the background. --Smial 09:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC) Done. --ComputerHotline 12:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-19 15-25-45-immeuble-PA00085703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:39, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-19 15-14-34-collegiale-thann-PA00085696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:29, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-09-25 15-05-24-fontaine-st-leger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 16:21, 4 October 2013 (UTC)