User:Böhringer/Archive 4

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hühnergans, Cereopsis novaehollandiae.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Take care not to oversharpen. Qiqritiq 10:59, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello

I just wanted to say you have some amazing photos. Really impressive work. Azeri (talk) 21:53, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh thank you, I am very glad. :-)) --Böhringer (talk) 20:25, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ANTONY GORMLEY Widderstein 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wierd but really wonderful. --Saffron Blaze 23:47, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lana 180° Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Amazing quality. Made me go WOW. --Saffron Blaze 21:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Panorama

Hallo Böhringer,

wieviele Bilder hast Du dafür File:360° Hochalppass Panorama.jpg verwendet? Wie ich gelesen habe nutzt Du - wie ich auch - PTGui. Ich habe noch einen recht alten Rechner und ab ca. 40 Einzelbilder weigert sich das PTGui das Stitching durchzuführen. Kennst Du derartige Probleme und/ oder weißt wie man die umschiffen kann? Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:52, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Salü Wladyslaw - es waren 41 Bilder. Die letzte Version 9.**** von PTGui weigert sich schon ab 20 Bilder ein Pano in JPG zu "stitchen". Hab rund 70,- € für das Update bezahlt. Offensichtlich gibt es Probleme mit dem JPEG Format. Im TIF-Format macht er die Bilder, die sind aber übertrieben gross und können nur im Photoshop weiter verarbeitet werden. Ich habe nun die 8.3.5 wieder von der PTGui Homepage herunter geladen und die schneidert die ca. 225MB in 30-40 sec. zusammen. Gleich wie früher. --Böhringer (talk) 21:12, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Das mag der Grund sein: JPG, werde es mit TIFF versuchen. Danke. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:59, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alfenzbrücke Lorüns 360° Panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice work. --Saffron Blaze 20:38, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:360° Hochalppass Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Hochalppass Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ANTONY GORMLEY Widderstein 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great. Try FP. --Tomer T 15:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)  Comment I think this is worthy of FP consideration but it will need an English translation. Saffron Blaze 21:36, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alfenzbrücke Lorüns 360° Panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Avenue 22:01, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ANTONY GORMLEY Hochtannbergpass Warth.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 22:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ANTONY GORMLEY Diedamskopf 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality to me and I like the composition--Lmbuga 21:36, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpenschneehuhn, Lagopus muta 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice--Holleday 05:04, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veilchen-Scheckenfalter ♂ Euphydryas cynthia 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 07:04, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemeine Blutzikade, Cercopis vulnerata 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and useful --DKrieger 11:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karhorn Gipfel Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, more than QI --Taxiarchos228 21:11, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpenmurmeltier Marmota marmota 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ANTONY GORMLEY Widderstein 09.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ANTONY GORMLEY Widderstein 09.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schachbrett Melanargia galathea 5a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 05:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Senfweißling, Leptidea sinapis 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments All criteria satisfied. Selective reduction of mild background luminance noise is a matter of taste. It may be done, but is not required, in my opinion. --Wsiegmund 20:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langhornmotten Adelidae, Nemophora metallica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 06:37, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochalppass Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great!--Ankara 10:16, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Große Ochsenauge, Maniola jurtina 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Quartl 10:44, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schornsteinfeger Aphantopus hyperantus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:23, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zitronenfalter ♂ Gonepteryx rhamni.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 05:57, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gemeine Blutzikade, Cercopis vulnerata 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gemeine Blutzikade, Cercopis vulnerata 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grünes Heupferd ♀ Tettigonia viridissima.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 20:34, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Binsenschmuckzikade Larve, Cicadella viridis 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:09, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langhornmotten Adelidae, Nemophora metallica .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some slight sharpness issues, but otherwise a really nice image, QI. Grand-Duc 22:09, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360° Mohnenfluh Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good image --Taxiarchos228 07:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpen-Gelbling Colias phicomone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good--Holleday 19:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Grünes_Heupferd_♀_Tettigonia_viridissima.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grünes_Heupferd_♀_Tettigonia_viridissima.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360° Mohnenfluh Oberlech Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done! --H005 20:39, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

did you know

that you can be banned from commons for revealing personal information? I'd rather you didn't... W.S. 21:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

komisch, für einen korrekten Urheber muss bei jedem Bild der richtige Name stehen. Ein Pseudonym kann nicht Urheberrechte geltend machen. Ich heisse Böhringer und das steht bei jedem Bild, das ich auf die Commons hochgeladen habe. Teilweise sogar bei deinen [1] Bilder!

Was heisst komisch? Meine Uploads sind alle unter meinem eigenen Namen, haben aber nichts mit Benutzer W.S. zu tun, der nur in FPC, QIC und VIC kritisiert. Warum kann niemand hier ein wenig Kritik standen. Sie wollen nur Ja-Sager auf Commons? Dann brauchen Sie kein FPC. W.S. 21:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

And BTW, as you can see from my user page, I'm not really hiding that information. Only user:Lycaon is dead and burried on Commons. W.S. 21:52, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Ein wenig Kritik? Ich habe aktuell ein paar Bilder in der Bewertung und da sind einige opp-Stimmen. Damit habe ich auch kein Problem. Aber du gibst, wenn 10 pro-Stimmen sind aus Prinzip eine opp-Stimme. Du findest Berge langweilig und gibst nicht nachvollziehbare Negativ Bewertungen. Ich weiss nicht wer dich verletzt hat, du hast tolle Bilder den Commons gegeben und jetzt versteckst du dich hinter einem W.S. und übst Rache an anderen. Guten Abend --Böhringer (talk) 22:12, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Wie ich sehe hast Du mit dem guten Wetenschatje = Biopics = Hans Hillewaert auch schon deine Bekanntschaft gemacht und durftest Zeuge seiner hochkiritischen Art werden. Was das Affentheater mit der biestigen Kritiker-Sockenpuppe Wetenschatje soll fragt man sich wirklich. Denn wenn er mit seinem Nick Biopics generell nicht abstimmt dann bleibt er schön "sauber". Aber für wie blöde hält er hier andere User? Dass seine Kritik sehr oft kleinlich und nicht selten sogar an den Haaren herbei gezogen ist zeigt sich jüngst in dieser Diskussion bei QI: Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:Karte_Confederation_Bridge.png wo er unterstellt, die Karte sei ein Mix aus Deutsch und Englisch. Nur rudimentäre Deutschkenntnisse und die Bedienfähigkeit von google translate scheint ihm offenbar für ein suffizientes Urteil zu genügen. Da lachen ja die Insekten, Gliederfüßler und Schalentiere, deren Bilder er im Gegenzug selbst bei offentlichen Mängeln durchwinkt. Und sowas wird von manchen hier sogar noch als FPC-Instanz angesehen. Lächerlich. --Wladyslaw (talk) 14:11, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

ich hoffe es ist noch nicht so schlimm:

Schizophrenia simplex Hier setzt die Krankheit im Erwachsenenalter langsam und schleichend ein, wobei die auffallenden halluzinatorischen und paranoiden Symptome fehlen. Aus diesen Gründen wird sie auch als blande Psychose bezeichnet. Die an Schizophrenia simplex Erkrankten werden von ihrer Umwelt als „seltsam“ oder „verschroben“ empfunden und ziehen sich mehr und mehr zurück. Die Schizophrenia simplex ist gekennzeichnet durch das Vorhandensein von Negativsymptomen und schreitet langsam fort. Sie kann therapeutisch kaum beeinflusst werden, und hat also eine eher ungünstige Prognose. Seinen Bilder nach zu urteilen [2] ist unser Mann gleich sensibel und intelligent wie wir das sind. Ergo muss in seiner Laufbahn als user:Lycaon ein dramatischer Einschnitt stattgefunden haben. --Böhringer (talk) 21:04, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

sensibel und intelligent wie wir das sind Erkennt man an meinen Kirchen- und Fernsehturmbildern eine sensible Seite an mir? :-) --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:37, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

ja, jeder gute Fotograf hat eine gewisse Sensibilität. Er stellt nach Möglichkeit das Objekt immer von der besten Seite dar. --Böhringer (talk) 10:09, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Photo - Hittisau

Dear Sir,

To our new publication, we would like to put this photograph, We ask that you agree to place the photographs in our publications?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Frauenmuseum_Hittisau_1.JPG

We are very grateful for your response.

Yours sincerely Elzbieta Moore Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN SA www.pwn.pl

no problem, they just write somewhere "Photo by Böhringer" --Böhringer (talk) 20:33, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ANTONY GORMLEY Kriegeralpe.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment To me, Too much insistence with this reason: Category: Horizon Field, Kriegeralpe, but QI--Lmbuga 22:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kriegeralpe Mohnenfluh.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:02, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwarzspanner, Odezia atrata 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 21:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Fließgewässer in Vorarlberg unter Freileitungsmasten.jpg

Hallo Böhringer, ich weiß nicht genau, wieso ich das Bild ausgeschnitten habe, ohne dich vorher gefragt zu haben ... aber nun ist es da: File:Fließgewässer in Vorarlberg unter Freileitungsmasten.jpg. Kannst du mir sagen, wo das ist und wie der Bach/Fluss heißt? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 16:45, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

hab es beim Bild eingetragen. l.g. --Böhringer (talk) 19:46, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Dankeschön! Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 02:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schachbrett Melanargia galathea 5a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schachbrett Melanargia galathea 5a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:01, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Alpen-Gelbling Colias phicomone.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alpen-Gelbling Colias phicomone.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bananenfalter, Caligo atreus dionysos 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Quartl 20:28, 16 July 2011 (UTC) OK. W.S. 22:30, 16 July 2011 (UTC) Thanks for your "ok"--Lmbuga 23:17, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Große Ochsenauge, Maniola jurtina, mating.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Große Ochsenauge, Maniola jurtina, mating.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Große Ochsenauge, Maniola jurtina, mating.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello! thank you for this beatiful image.

Is it possible to have an english caption?

--Berru (talk) 19:32, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm trying--Böhringer (talk) 20:29, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:360° Mohnenfluh Oberlech Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Mohnenfluh Oberlech Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pracht Passionsfalter, Philaethria dido 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bananenfalter, Caligo atreus dionysos 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bananenfalter, Caligo atreus dionysos 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pracht Passionsfalter, Philaethria dido 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pracht Passionsfalter, Philaethria dido 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tilisunahütte Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments sehr beeindruckend --Anghy 14:44, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sulzfluh Plateau Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI und perfekt aufgenommen mit Tieren und dem Fotografen links --Carschten 23:50, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sulzfluh Plateau Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sulzfluh Plateau Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tilisunahütte Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tilisunahütte Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:11, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlegeisspeicher Panorama vom Berliner Höhenweg Nr 526 in den Zillertaler Alpen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 08:08, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hängebrücke am Berliner Höhenweg Nr 526, Zillertaler Alpen 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Super (Aus-)Blick, aber da wird mir mit Höhenangst ja nur beim Anschauen des Bildes schon schlecht... ;-) --Carschten 20:21, 19 August 2011 (UTC); wenn du eine Bildvariante im Weitwinkel sehen würdest, müsstest du lachen :-) --Böhringer 21:37, 19 August 2011 (UTC) auf den Grund bin ich gespannt :) --Carschten 22:29, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Double voting

Hi Böhringer,

I have undone your edit in my Russian cathedral FP nomination. It is perfectly normal to vote in more than one alternative. Sometimes people support one version and oppose another one.

By the way, my warm congratulations on your last FP. As I wrote in the nomination, it is one of the very best nature panoramas I have seen here! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:36, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

its ok; many thanks for the compliment --Böhringer (talk) 11:09, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Olperer Hütte & Schlegeisspeicher Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Olperer Hütte & Schlegeisspeicher Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for this wonderfull picture!
Is it possible for you to add an English caption? I do not read German, unfortunately.
--Berru (talk) 18:26, 9 December 2011 (UTC)  Done --Böhringer (talk) 22:36, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you!--Berru (talk) 16:38, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Friesenbergsee Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Friesenbergsee Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpensteinböcke, Capra ibex auf der Sulzfluh.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment QI to me, but 1 or 2 dust spots (see notes)--Lmbuga 10:37, 2 September 2011 (UTC)  Done--Böhringer 20:25, 2 September 2011 (UTC) Thanks, good picture--Lmbuga 18:31, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sulzfluh Panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks very good, especially in the panorama viewer, I suggest you to try and nominate it at featured pictures candidates --Someone35 17:32, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Felsen Zirmen Seekopf Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Felsen Zirmen Seekopf Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for this wonderfull picture!
I hope that I am not too annoying, but is it possible for you to add english captions to your promoted images?
I translate English captions to French, and from French to English, but I do not speak german.
--Berru (talk) 16:42, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

..And I do not speak English. I do this with Google translator--Böhringer (talk) 21:44, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sulzfluh Plateau 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, very good composition.--Vassil 16:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sulzfluhgipfel 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice mood.--Jebulon 16:56, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Batzenalpen in Schröcken.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alpe Batzen Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

running your photo tomorrow on our website ...

One of your Red Bull photos will run with this article: http://insidehighered.com/news/2011/09/28/university_of_new_hampshire_bans_campus_sale_of_energy_drinks_then_backtracks

Thanks much.

Doug Lederman Editor Inside Higher Ed

schön, wenn sie das Bild brauchen können. --Böhringer (talk) 08:28, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Bild:StNikolausDamüls5.JPG

Sehr geehrter Herr Böhringer,

Wikivoyage nutzt Ihr Bild StNikolausDamüls5.JPG in derselben Weise, wie dies auf der Wikipedia/Commons üblich ist. Wikivoyage ist ein freier Reiseführer.

RolandUnger (talk) 08:30, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Zitronenfalter_♂_Gonepteryx_rhamni.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zitronenfalter_♂_Gonepteryx_rhamni.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Einhof Schrecken 179 in Au .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Engloch 249 Alberschwende Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Engloch 249 Alberschwende Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:360° Schesaplana Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Schesaplana Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enetthur Wildhaus .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition --Mbdortmund 22:41, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Böhringer, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:38, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Säge bei Reute 115, Hittisau 6.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:57, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sauerkirschenfrucht Prunus cerasus 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice fruit-panorama ;) ! --Jebulon 22:53, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hängebrücke am Berliner Höhenweg Nr 526, Zillertaler Alpen 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hängebrücke am Berliner Höhenweg Nr 526, Zillertaler Alpen 2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Batzenalpenpanorama

Lb Friedrich, das bild wurde ja schon auch von kompetenterer Seite gewürdigt, als ich es tun kann. Aber ich hätte dazu noch eine Frage:

ist diese Panorama mit einem Schwenk oder mit 2 Schwenks gemacht worden (oben/unten)? Wie viele Bilder waren es und mit welcher Software hast du diese zusammengefügt?

Und sollte man nicht dieses Bild als Suchbild platzieren - mit der Fragestellung:

Wo befindet sich das einzige (sichtbare) Lebewesen auf diesem Bild und in welche Richtung schaut der Schwanz? :-)

lg --Hubertl (talk) 18:52, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Lieber Hubertl danke für die Fragen, nachstehend werde ich sie beantworten:

Das Panorama besteht aus 19 Einzelbilder im Hochformat in einer Reihe. Der Blickwinkel des Bildes zeigt ca. 180° Grad. Das Panorama ist zylindrisch zusammengesetzt und wurde mit der kostenpflichtigen Software PTGui zusammen genäht. Nun zum Suchbild: Ich glaube du bist kein "Ländler" es befinden sich 11 lebende Tiere in Form von Jungrinder sowie eine Trophäe eines Hirsch, (totes Tier) genauer gesagt ein Hirschgeweih, am Museumseingang. Ich habe die Rinder annotiert und der Schwanz der 11. Kuh zeigt nach rechts. Liebe Grüsse aus dem föhnigen Ländle. Fred --Böhringer (talk) 20:23, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Lb Friedrich, als ich auf den seite-speichern-knopf gedrückt habe, hab ich mir gedacht: jetzt blamierst du dich sicher, da gibts sicher noch mehr Viecher. Wie du mir auch bestätigt hast. Das Bild hat übrigens Platz 4 beim WLM-Contest gemacht, aber das weißt du ja sicher schon. Da kann man wirklich gratulieren. --Hubertl (talk) 20:42, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

echt! nein, das wußte ich nicht. Ich wurde weder benachrichtigt noch weiss ich wo man nachsehen kann, wer gewonnen hat. Danke fürs Lob und Platz vier ist auch nicht schlecht.

Lg. Fred --Böhringer (talk) 23:30, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

oops, ich hab mich verschaut, es ist Platz 7 und Platz 9. Das kommt davon, wenn man halboffizielles ausplaudert. Aber hier ist die Liste. --Hubertl (talk) 07:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

hier das offizielle Ergebnis. Respekt auch dafür, dass du gleich mit 2 Bildern unter den ersten 10 gelandet bist. --Hubertl (talk) 14:43, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

So ganz nebenbei: wirst du zur offiziellen Preisverleihung nach Wien kommen? Die Hofburg ist ja nicht schlecht, so als Motiv :-) --Hubertl (talk) 22:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

da würde ich ungemein gerne hingehen, ich würde auch Urlaub nehmen, aber mir ist der Kostenaufwand für dies zu hoch. Liebe Grüsse aus dem ca.700km entfernten Ländle --Böhringer (talk) 07:49, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Da verstehe ich Dich gut. Für mich wäre das auch sehr schwer, denn die Zugkarte alleine ist es ja nicht. Mir selbst, der ich ja schon seit Jahren den Wiener Stammtisch organisiere, tut es halt um jede Gelegenheit leid, jemanden nicht kennenzulernen, mit dem ich mich halt - wie in deinem Fall - durch seine Bilder und die Sicht auf Motive sehr angesprochen und verbunden fühle. Bei den Arbeiten von Johann Jaritz ist es noch weit intensiver, weil er mein Herkunftsland bebildert. Da wir beide in etwa gleich alt sind (der Johann und ich), kommt auch noch eine ähnliche Erfahrung in bezug die Sicht auf Dinge dazu. Und es hat vielleicht auch damit zu tun, dass man so unbedingt an die Idee des freien Wissens glaubt und hunderte Stunden im Jahr, wahrscheinlich sogar weit mehr damit und dafür verbringt. Wenn man sich die richtige Nische im Projekt gesucht hat, dann kann man für sich selbst viel Freude daraus hervorholen, ohne das dümmliche Hickhack, wofür ja kleine, aber laute Teile der Wikipediaautoren bekannt sind. So geht es zumindest mir. --Hubertl (talk) 10:47, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Ich hab Dir

ein Mail geschickt! --Hubertl (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

ist in Abklärung, vielen Dank einstweilen. Fred --Böhringer (talk) 11:52, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuz aus Konglomerat der Nagelfluh 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice staging --Haneburger 09:13, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Frage zum Foto Österreichische Bundespolizei 07.jpg

Hey,

ich bin auf der Suche nach einem Bild der Polizei Österreich, das ich auch für kommerzielle Zwecke nutzen kann. Dabei bin ich auf das Bild der Österreichischen Bundespolizei gestoßen.

Kann ich das Bild mit Namensnennung ohne Bedenken nutzen? Kann es Probleme beim Recht am eigenen Bild kommen?

Vielen Dank und Beste Grüße

Steve Böttger

Hallo Steve

mit meinen Bilder kann jeder unter der genannten Lizenz cc-by-sa-3.0 machen was er will ausser: Mit deiner Frage in Bezug auf Persölichkeitsrechte (Recht am eigenen Bild) äusserst du die richtigen Bedenken. Hier kann ich dir nur mit nach stehendem Hinweis weiter helfen.

Personality rights Personality rights warning Although this work is freely licensed or in the public domain, the person(s) shown may have rights that legally restrict certain re-uses unless those depicted consent to such uses. In these cases, a model release or other evidence of consent could protect you from infringement claims. Though not obliged to do so, the uploader may be able to help you to obtain such evidence. See our general disclaimer for more information.

.

Möglicherweise würde auch die Einwilligung der gezeigten Person nicht reichen, nachdem sie uniformiert ist. Es könnte die Erlaubnis des BMI (Bundesministerium für Inneres) in Österreich notwendig werden. Die im Rahmen des Photoshooting gemachten Bilder musste ich jedenfalls der Polizei-Presse-Stelle zur Verfügung stellen. Ich durfte jedenfalls selbst keine Bilder veröffentlichen bis auf die hier gezeigten. L.G.--Böhringer (talk) 11:23, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Photoshoot vom Braunvieh.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Scharf und detailreich, gute Qualität. --Haeferl 23:17, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

}}

Picture of the day

Regarding File:Hauhechel-Bläuling, Polyommatus icarus Paarung 1.JPG...I just wanted to say this is a stunningly beautiful picture! Truly impressive. It's one of the best photos ever on Commons. I'd be happy if I could take photos half that good. PumpkinSky talk 00:24, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Oh, thank you very much, makes me very happy. --Böhringer (talk) 11:13, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

See this on Frau Gerda's talk page on en wiki too en:User_talk:Gerda_Arendt#Photo_of_the_day PumpkinSky talk 22:25, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hängebrücke am Berliner Höhenweg Nr 526, Zillertaler Alpen 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Focus finder 00:25, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

A panorama for you

Hallo Böhringer!

Hier gibts eine panorama für dich!

Not of the same excellent quality as yours, but your composition reminded me of some old 2007 photos taken handheld with a compact camera, which I had given up stitching because one of the photos was out-of-focus, and I had parallax errors. It turned out there was quite some overlap between images, so by masking in PTGui I managed to almost get rid of the soft photo and also dampen parallax errors from foreground elements. Thanks for inspiring me to revisit some old photos. It turned out better than I had hoped, although it is not FP material! Mvg, --Slaunger (talk) 23:27, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochzeitsstrauß 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame of the shadow under the chair, but good.--Jebulon 17:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat Nuova 500 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite good. Which one is yours? --Alvesgaspar 23:38, 2 December 2011 (UTC) I learnt driving in the light blue one...--Jebulon 16:29, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Number 7 in the European part of the WLM photo competition

Congratulations in English on your international Commons page. Your photograph of the Alpe Batzen was elected as the number 7 by the European jury. Here are the results: Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2011_winners. Kind regards from --Regiomontanus (talk) 12:51, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

ja, das hättest du auch auf der Deutschen Seite schreiben können :-)) Vielen herzlichen Dank nach Wien --Böhringer (talk) 13:01, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Speicher Spullersee Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Speicher Spullersee Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochzeitsrosendekoration7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO it's ok. --T137 22:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpensteinböcke, Capra ibex auf der Sulzfluh 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow. Klasse Aufnahme. --Haeferl 06:37, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpensteinböcke, Capra ibex auf der Sulzfluh 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Herrlich und perfekt erwischt. --Haeferl 06:37, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berngat Berggut 68 in Au.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Schöne Aufnahme! --Haeferl 22:51, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360° Tilisuna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow. Da will man sich gleich die Wanderschuhe anziehen und losmarschieren! --Haeferl 00:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360° Spullersee & Spuller Schafberg Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:41, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zunderschwamm, Fomes fomentarius 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit shallow dof, but overall ok. --kallerna 13:29, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kopfloser Böhringer.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kopfloser Böhringer.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berngat Bünt Kapellenruine 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. I promote, if you add an English file description. --NorbertNagel 22:58, 22 December 2011 (UTC) - Habe jetzt selbst eine englische Beschreibung hinzugefügt. Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC) - vielen Dank --Böhringer 22:38, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Foto verwendet!

Sehr geehrter Herr Böhringer! Wir haben ihr sehr schönes Foto des Strauss-Denkmals in Wien in unserem Katalog "Ausflüge für Einsteiger 2012" verwendet - Vielen Dank! Das copyright wurde selbstverständlich angegeben! Sie können sich den Katalog unter http://erlebnisbahn.oebb.at ansehen bzw downloaden, das Foto finden Sie auf Seite 36! Gerne senden wir Ihnen auch eine gedruckte Version des Kataloges zu (erscheint Anfang Jänner und liegt ab ca Ende Jänner auch an allen größeren Bahnhöfen auf!)

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Susanna Blaha

ÖBB ErlebnisBahn susanna.blaha@pv.oebb.at

Vielen Dank für die Info Frau Blaha, schön wenn sie für die Bilder eine Verwendung haben. Liebe Güße aus dem Ländle --Böhringer (talk) 20:32, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berngat Berggut 61 Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, QI to me. --Aleks G 15:26, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halde Holdamoos 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Vassil 19:24, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Berngat Berggut 61 Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berngat Berggut 61 Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Image guidelines - downsampling

Hello. There have been many inconsistencies regarding the evaluation of images in Commons, mainly on the issue of resolution and sharpness. I think we should agree upon a uniform policy, and try to reach a consensus. I started a new discussion on the matter of downsampling, if you would like to share your view. Thank you. Gidip (talk) 21:09, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

sorry, um an einer Diskussion teil zu nehmen ist mein englisch einfach zu schlecht. Ich kann leider nicht alles verstehen.--Böhringer (talk) 21:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Botanischer Garten Meran 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI, a caption in English would be welcome --Archaeodontosaurus 07:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Ich war mal so frei. Gruß, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:21, 17 January 2012 (UTC) Vielen Dank :-) --Böhringer (talk) 22:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Ich glaube aber, Du hast dem Bild eine falsche Kategorie verpasst. Es ist "noch" kein commons:FP Bild ;-) Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:48, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

aber ein deutsches FP? Ich sehe keinen Hinweis auf die Commons? Hilfe --Böhringer (talk) 22:54, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Kat: "Featured pictures by Böhringer Friedrich" wenn mal "drau klickt" steht dann FPs auf Commons. Das passt nicht zusammen. Mir ist das letztendlich egal. Viele Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:53, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

ah, jo. Jetzt hab ich gesehen was du meintest. Ich schmeiss da alle (d.h.auch die en, de + türkische FP) rein. Ist ja auch eine verborgene Benutzerkategorie. Trotzdem danke für den Hinweis. --Böhringer (talk) 20:20, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

OK, das erklärt natürlich alles. Dann mal weiterhin viel Erfolg mit dem Sammeln der FP Bilder :-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:27, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberurnen Glarus Nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Aleks G 22:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

FYI: Used your media file

This is a courtesy note. One of your media files is featured in a new commercial eBook in Apple’s iBooks store: http://itunes.apple.com/us/book/dr.-kemps-kids-love-bugs/id497852225?mt=11

I’ve contributed images to Wikipedia for over seven years now (including several POTD and Featured Images) and I designed the WikiSpecies logo. I respect your work here and the CC-BY-SA license we all labor under.

I know commercializing Wikipedia work is tricky and so I’ve taken great pains to follow your CC-BY-SA license requirements. I also plan to donate 10% of my proceeds to the Wikimedia Foundation directly. This is the very first self-published e-book created with Apple’s new tools and sold in the store.

I’ve given your file a credit line in the “Image and Video Credits” section starting at page 24 as required here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License

This compilation features many of the finest Wikipedia media files in their exact form and not as derivative works. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verbatim_copying_under_the_GFDL#Making_verbatim_copies_of_images

If I did alter your work -- such as cutting out an insect part or adding a video sound track -- I shared a Share Alike version of the new media in a DRM-free format and listed the web address in the credits section.

Thank you very much for uploading your work to Wikipedia and releasing it for the world to use in enriching educational formats.

-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jeremykemp

schade! Ihr itunes.apple.com/us/book/dr.-kemps-kids-love-bugs kann ich in itunes.apple.(at) nicht kaufen.

File:Anton_Innauer1980.JPG

File:Anton_Innauer1980.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--MGuf (d) 21:04, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Fieramilano_Rho_Pero_10.JPG

File:Fieramilano_Rho_Pero_10.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

134.176.192.22 02:44, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Fotos auf Wikipedia

Guten Abend Herr Böhringer,

Gerade bin ich auf ihre faszinierende Sammlung von Fotos gestoßen. Wunderschön! Ich betreue die Büro-Homepage meiner Eltern und war deshalb auf der Suche nach ein paar guten Fotos. Mein Vater hat ein Büro für Bauphysik, Bauleitung und Projektleitung und wie bereits erwähnt "versuche" ich diese zu betreuen und aktuell zu halten. Leider fehlen uns von einigen Projekten gute Fotos um die Bauwerke auf der Seite entsprechend vorzustellen. Von einigen dieser Bauten haben sie wunderschöne Aufnahmen auf ihrer Wiki-Seite. Ich wollte mich bei ihnen erkundigen ob ich diese Fotos auf unsere Homepage (www.bauphysik-kuenz.at) stellen darf und ob und wie ich sie kennzeichnen muss? Über eine Antwort an kuenz@chello.at würde mich sehr freuen!

Ich wünsche ihnen noch einen schönen Abend und verbleibe mit freundlichen Grüßen, Christof Künz

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speer-Azurjungfer, Coenagrion hastulatum 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive. --NorbertNagel 21:12, 22 February 2012 (UTC)  Support Awesome -- Jkadavoor 05:43, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ♂ Gebänderte Prachtlibelle Calopteryx splendens 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality image for me. --Frank Schulenburg 04:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Speer-Azurjungfer, Coenagrion hastulatum 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Speer-Azurjungfer, Coenagrion hastulatum 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Bergmannstrasse 1 Feldkirch Villa Maria.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:57, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:♂ Gebänderte Prachtlibelle Calopteryx splendens 4.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:♂ Gebänderte Prachtlibelle Calopteryx splendens 4.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Vielen Dank

Hallo, vielen Dank noch für deine Hilfe bei Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villa Ephrussi de Rothschild BW 2011-06-10 11-42-29.JPG. Der Erfolg ist ja geradezu durchschlagend! --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC) gern geschehen :-) das Foto wars auch Wert, geringfügig nach zu arbeiten --Böhringer (talk) 16:01, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fruchtstand der Schwarzerle, Alnus glutinosa 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is an English description here, you can choose from four languages.--ArildV 23:01, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Mea culpa! --NorbertNagel 23:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Bildbeschreibung der Haflingerbilder

In der Bildbeschreibung von Bildern sollten nicht allgemeine Informationen stehen, die man auch in Wikipedia nachlesen kann, sondern vor allem das, was nicht jeder Laie sofort mit einem Blick auf das Bild erkennt. Bei File:Haflinger Hengstfohlen 15.JPG finde ich die Angabe daß es sich um einen Haflinger und einen Hengst handelt daher notwendig, mich würde aber auch interessieren, in welchem Land und bei welcher Gelegenheit die Bilder aufgenommen wurden. Unwichtig erscheintir dagegen die Kurzbeschreibung der Rasse, die man wie gesagt in Wikipedia nachlesen kann. --Kersti (talk) 19:29, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

nicht jeder findet das Bild über die Wikipedia! Oft tauchen sie durch Suchmaschinen auf und dann ist so eine Beschreibung gut. Die gesetzten Links auf die Wikipedia nimmt nur der in Anspruch, der sich weiter für das Thema interssiert. Im Übrigen ist die Rassenbestimmung und das Geschlecht im Bildnamen bereits erwähnt. Von wo hättest du sonst wissen können, dass es ein Hengst ist? Im Normalfall georeferenziere ich alle meine Bilder, da hast du Recht. Ich versuche dies bei weiteren Aufnahmen zu hinterlegen. --Böhringer (talk) 19:57, 18 March 2012 (UTC)