User:A.Savin/Archive/2011

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kolomna town - Mall in Golutvin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dschwen 23:49, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SPB Newski house 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a little brightening. --King of Hearts 19:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC)  Done A.S. 01:13, 31 December 2010 (UTC) Ok now IMO. --Ankara 12:10, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weisse Weihnachten in Duennwald - Nikolauskirche 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments White balance is a little too blue. --King of Hearts 19:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC)  Done A.S. 01:13, 31 December 2010 (UTC) Better. --King of Hearts 22:45, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weisse Weihnachten in Duennwald - Nikolauskirche 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments White balance is a little too blue. --King of Hearts 19:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC)  Done A.S. 01:13, 31 December 2010 (UTC) Better. --King of Hearts 22:45, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Новое

Предлагается к удалению со всей начинкой: Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/01/Category:Buildings in Russia - NVO (talk) 08:57, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Servatius-kirche-immendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 22:52, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion, mistake of the Bot

I've received this on may talk page. It is for you, I'm only the reviewer ! Congratulations.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poller Wiesen 03 - Landzunge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gut für mich --Jebulon 23:46, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

--Jebulon (talk) 14:43, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans Mommsen 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good portrait von dem alten Griesgram inspite of some CA --Mbdortmund 19:00, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Eine Bitte

Hi!
Könntest du mir bitte einen Gefallen tun, und ihm erklären, dass er nicht einfach eine Datei aus dem Internet (sie hatte richtig massig tineye-Treffer) bei commons hochladen kann? Ich verstehe kein Wort von dem, was er schreibt, es sieht mir aber russisch aus. ;) Korrigier' mich bitte, wenn es etwas anderes ist. Das wäre echt nett. Danke, abf «Cabale!» 20:09, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Herzlichen Dank! :) abf «Cabale!» 20:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novgorod - Volkhov beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes to me.--Jebulon 17:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Главное_здание_МГУ_-_здание01.jpg

File:Главное_здание_МГУ_-_здание01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.62.200.57 11:54, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

file:Robert Labs 2009.jpg

Hello A.Savin, I just want to inform your that this picture was deleted because there was a request OTRS:2010022410052966 of the depicted person not to publish it in Wikipedia. He will provide another picture for the article. Best regards --Neozoon (talk) 13:06, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Das DIE

Hallo A.Savin! Kannst Du mir bitte erläutern, wo genau Du diese Aufnahme gemacht hast? Das ist doch nicht die Heinemannstraße 12-14 oder doch? Schönen Dank & Gruß --Sir James (talk) 14:21, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Das muss da gewesen sein, bin mir relativ sicher, dass dort damals das DIE ansässig war... falls nicht (mehr), bitte ersetzen. A.S. 15:36, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Okay. Ich habe gestern Aufnahmen der Kreuzbauten gemacht, um das Eisenbahn-Bundesamt zu bebildern. Die Adresse ist Heinemannstrasse; der Zugang erfolgt aber über die Max-Löbner-Straße. Dort konnte ich anhand der Beschilderung erkennen, dass im Gebäudekomplez u.a. auch das DIE untergebracht ist; werde es im Artikel ändern. Gruß --Sir James (talk) 18:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SPB Newski house 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments typical russian ;) --Ralf Roletschek

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boris Khlebnikov 2010 Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Carschten 19:57, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gagarin town - Gzhat River 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good. --Cayambe 16:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Просьбы

Здравствуйте! Если можно, то удалите, пожалуйста, следующие повторы:

• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RR5216-0060R.png - самая лучшая картинка, ниже её повторы:
  • http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:МОНЕТА-РЕВЕРС.jpg - любительский снимок с некудышним освещением
  • http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pobedonosetz_revers.gif - низкое разрешение
  • http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:5216-0060-09-reverse.gif - т/с
  • http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RR5216-0060-10R.gif - т/с

Если у вас нет возражений, буду писать ещё, чтобы распределять нагрузку на админов. Заранее спасибо. Serjio-pt (talk) 14:51, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Добрый вечер. Две последние удалил, так как являются почти точной копией. Но первые три не совсем друг на друга похожи. К сожалению, правилами проекта не предусмотрено удаление файлов по той причине, что есть более высококачественное, не идентичное изображение того же мотива. A.S. 19:37, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Благодарю. Serjio-pt (talk) 20:15, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Gorky Park View from Frunzenskaya Embankment 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 10:33, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novgorod - Church of John the Apostle on Vitka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspektive nicht korrigiert. --Mbdortmund 10:34, 12 February 2011 (UTC)  Done A.Savin 12:20, 12 February 2011 (UTC) OK now --Mbdortmund 20:53, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigma 8-16 Lens for Canon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I see no technical flaws here (except the cutoff shadow). --IdLoveOne 00:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minsk Ozerishche railplatform.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lighting looks good. IdLoveOne 03:17, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Seltsam - Kategorien werden nicht angezeigt

Hi Alex, ich weiß nicht, ob es an Düsseldorf liegt, aber bei bei diesem Bild ist die Kategorisierung komplett fehlgeschlagen, obwohl vier Kategorien eingefügt worden sind. Hast Du ´ne Ahnung woran das liegen könnte? Gruß --Rolf H. (talk) 12:28, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Da war nur ein Syntaxtag nicht geschlossen, hab ich repariert. Grüße A.S. 13:23, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Danke Dir! Gruß Rolf

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SPB Mosvokzal building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a crop below IMO, but otherwise good.--Jebulon 18:58, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Innere Kanalstrasse Aussicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is ok, but I think the license plate numbers need to be blurred out don't they? IdLoveOne 03:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC) Really? Why now? A.Savin 12:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Well I don't know if it's official policy, I've just heard it suggested in similar cases on featured picture candidates for privacy reasons. IdLoveOne 21:07, 14 February 2011 (UTC)  Done albeit I actually see no need for A.Savin 10:31, 15 February 2011 (UTC) QI for me. --Ralf Roletschek 21:44, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

File:MoscowTVtower-2009-view08.jpg

File:MoscowTVtower-2009-view08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.155.241 14:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EL-DE Haus Koeln - Testing Sigma 8-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Taxiarchos228 09:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC) Unnatural corner. Uff

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinhochwasser Januar 2011 - LEV Flusspromenade Rheindorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Taxiarchos228 09:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinhochwasser Januar 2011 - LEV Autobahnbruecke 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Taxiarchos228 09:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pargolovo SPB railplatform.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novgorod - View on Yuriev Monastery from Volkhov 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buecherschrank in Hoehenhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volga-terminal-yar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice lighting --Carschten 18:29, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traderows-church-kostroma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments it dont must be always sun. --Ralf Roletschek 16:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahner Heide Aussicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 16:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dmitry Rogozin Moscow Interfax 02-2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments we need more of such pictures! --Ralf Roletschek 13:22, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minsk Metro in 2010 - Mogilevskaya Entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments minor CA, but anyway good quality --Taxiarchos228 13:14, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow GUM Middle Line view from 2nd floor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for QI in spite of some noise, and very little stitching issues.--Jebulon 11:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Govardovo station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment there are a lot of halos, always around the trees (see annotations). If you would remove them, I promote this file --Carschten 15:24, 19 March 2011 (UTC) That are just the clouds which look a little bit like a halo in the thumbnail view. A.Savin 15:55, 19 March 2011 (UTC) Das kann natürlich sein, wobei ich mir da nicht sicher war/bin, weil das Haloartige bei allen Baumstrukturen zu sehen ist. Möge dieses Bild ein anderer bewerten. --Carschten 16:49, 19 March 2011 (UTC) Es scheint derzeit sehr "in" zu sein, halos zu sehen, besonders jene, die es nicht wirklich gibt. Ich sehe keines, stattdessen ein ordentliches Bild mit schönem Spiel der Fluchtperspektive. --Taxiarchos228 11:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC) It seems that the halos around the trees are an optical effect on computer screens: at full resolution, I don't see any halos. So I support the promotion of this picture. -- MJJR 22:32, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

С удаления: ищем человека

Привет! пожалуйста, как сисоп на de.wiki, проясни ситуацию, изложенную на Commons:Deletion requests/File:08-02-02 IMG 3080A Krefeld.jpg. В шаблоне сказано, что исходный файл был загружен в de.wiki de:Benutzer:Wolfgang Dudler, но de.wiki говорит, что такого нет. А что было на самом деле? NVO (talk) 13:54, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Я уже давно не сисоп на де.вики. Участник под этим именем, кажется, существует, но файл был, по-видимому, удален как перенесенный на склад. Попробуй спросить кого-нибудь оттуда, есть ли среди удаленных страниц участника этот файл. - A.S. 15:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Церковь Николая Чудотворца в Троекурове.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 15:39, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

About CA;

Hello, I've seen your picture and the discussion about CA (chromatic aberration). I've got something similar here, which has been fixed. I've tried to fixed your picture, and here you can compare both images. If you think so, I can upload the new version. --DPC (talk) 15:25, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Здравствуйте, я видел свою фотографию и обсуждение CA (хроматические аберрации). У меня что-то подобное здесь, которая была исправлена. Я пытался фиксированной свою фотографию, и здесь вы можете сравнить оба изображения. Если вы так думаете, я могу загрузить новую версию. Я не говорить Россию. Это был переведен с помощью Tradukka. --DPC (talk) 15:25, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello and thanks a lot for the job! Of course you can overwrite my version (for this, eventually take the version without my own attempts). - A.S. 17:43, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

 Done, let's see what happens! --DPC (talk) 09:47, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

pomoguite poshaluista!

Ich kann ja russisch - aber nicht mit Tastatur schreiben, sorry! Kannst du auf http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal_Diskussion:Essen_und_Trinken#Uscha helfen? --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 17:21, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Kurze Bemerkung zu den aktuellen Ereignissen

Hallo,

bezugnehmend auf deinen Editkommentar [1] kann ich dir nur recht geben. Label5/ Bwag und es gibt leider noch so ein paar andere in der WP sind reine Intriegenspinner, deren Artikelarbeit offensichtlich bestenfalls ein Alibi bieten soll, um sie nicht gleich wegzusperren. Leider haben die meisten Admins zum einen nicht den Durchblick solche Vorgänge zu erkennen und sie konsequent zu reglementieren, andere aber tolerieren den Quatsch weil sie bei zu konsequentem Vorgehen um ihre dämlichen "Knöpfe" fürchten. Und leider sind auch die CU-Admins nicht über alle Zweifel erhaben und lassen die notwendige Objektivität und Integrität vermissen. Soll man deswegen die Flinte ins Korn werfen oder sich mit Trolls aufeinandersetzen? Bitte nicht!

Du machst hervorragende Arbeit und es wäre schade, wenn Du dich von im Prinzip irrealem Wikipedia-Second-Life-Scheiß beeindrucken lässt. Selbst meine objektiv geglaubte Diskussion um den Donauturm (und andere Episoden ebenso) war letztlich ein von einigen angezettelter Popanz und ich war zu blöd, das nicht früh genug durchschaut zu haben. Heute kümmert sich keine Sau mehr um den Artikel. Er ist im wesentlichen so belanglos und unspektakulär geblieben wie an dem Tag als die Diskussion abebbte. Es gibt nämlich nur sehr wenige in der Wikipedia, die sich eines Themas ernsthaft und konsequent annehmen und einen stimmigen Artikel abliefern können.

Da die Arschloch-Dichte hier bei Commons (bisher) erfreulich niedrig ist "operiere" ich von hier, lade Bilder hoch, kategorisiere sie, übe eher verwaltende Tätigkeiten aus und schreibe als IP nach wie vor Artikel in WP, die ich beim Einstellen mit einem entsprechenden Vermerk auf meinen commons-Benutzerseite versehe. ([2]) Bisherige Konfliktrate: Null. So ist der Artikel einerseits klar mir zuzuordnen, was mir als Autor wichtig ist, andererseits kann man nur sehr mühsam nachvollziehen (und auf Knopfdruck schon mal gleich gar nicht), wo ich noch überall was schreibe und mir damit nicht hinterhersteigen.

Fazit: es wäre Verschwendung, wenn Du weiterhin deine Energie mit Individuen teilst, die das Kooperativ-Prinzip konterkarieren und sich als Moralisten gebärden, die aber nicht den Funken dessen besitzen, was sie nach Außen gerne glaubhaft machen wollen. Viele Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 11:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sergey Lukyanenko MOW 03-2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinhochwasser Januar 2011 - K-Flittard Deich 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA on the chimneys, correctible. Strange thing to be deleted on the ground of the corner right below. --Jebulon 14:34, 9 April 2011 (UTC) OK A.Savin 17:40, 9 April 2011 (UTC) Better now, indeed.--Jebulon 22:39, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gagarin town - Gagarin Street 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but a dust spot (see annotation) and need a crop of the shadow below IMO.--Jebulon 14:31, 9 April 2011 (UTC) OK A.Savin 17:40, 9 April 2011 (UTC) very good now. Thank you.--Jebulon 22:35, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minsk Stolichny railplatform.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 14:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Bearbeitung

Hi,

was für Bearbeitungen nimmst Du bei deinen Bildern so für gewöhnlich vor? Sie sehen zwar grundsätzlich gut aus, aber ich finde sie oftmals einen Tick zu übersättigt, wie z.B. File:Myatlevo - Library.jpg. Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:27, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Taxiarchos228, ich korrigiere in der Regel den Kontrast über die Tiefenlichter-Leisten und erhöhe ggf. noch die Sättigung, jedoch nicht sehr stark (+10 oder +15, so um die Ecke). Ich persönlich finde, dass das gerade bei Landschaftsfotos besser aussieht. Mfg - A.S. 21:07, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Myatlevo - Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Niabot 09:38, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dmitry Glukhovsky MOW 03-2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--PetarM 17:52, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heidi Hautala IF MOW 04-2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 12:49, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Kievskaya_APL.jpg

File:Kievskaya_APL.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:55, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

File:KievskayaAPL-mm.jpg

File:KievskayaAPL-mm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:56, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sergey Glazyev RN MOW 04-2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 08:34, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rheinhochwasser Januar 2011 - LEV Autobahnbruecke 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a bit soft, but good enough for QI --Carschten 20:06, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Löschanträge

Hallo. Hast du einen Überblick darüber, welche Bilder von Pereslavl wegen FOP nominiert wurden? Ich kenne mich mit Commons nicht aus. Falls die Löschanträge durchkommen, würde ich aber versuchen, wenigstens die Bilder auf de hochzuladen, die in Artikeln verwendet werden. Dafür müsste mir dann jemand die Bilder kurzzeitig wiederherstellen. Vielleicht willst du deine Bilder (sollten sie gelöscht werden) ja auch lieber selbst dort hochladen. Grüße, --Paramecium (talk) 18:25, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Von meinen Bildern laufen derzeit LAe auf dies und jenes, beide in der Metro-Liste auf DE verwendet. Falls du mit dem Retten nach DE helfen magst, wäre es vllt. hilfreich, die Bilder herunterzuladen und erstmal auf der Festplatte abzulegen. Wenn was gelöscht wird, werde ich hier irgendwo den Quelltext publizieren. Mfg - A.S. 19:15, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

OK. --Paramecium (talk) 19:31, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Nun ist es soweit. Das Bild der Kiewskaja wurde gelöscht. Wenn du mir den Quelltext hier postest, werde ich es auf de wieder hochladen. Grüße, --Paramecium (talk) 16:04, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Erledigt: User:A.Savin/Bilder-DE, bitte ggf. beobachten. - A.S. 19:07, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Danke. Hab die Datei auf meiner Beobachtungsliste. --Paramecium (talk) 21:59, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Re:File:Moskvich and a bus in Moscow.jpg

Hello.

I have no idea why that is. Maybe it is some kind of commons-related glitch. It could be because I was uploaded both this picture and the one that shows up on the page at the same time.

I would suggest asking the administrators this question.

Regards. - SuperTank17 11:28, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

• Asked at Commons:Help_desk#Thumb_and_image_show_completely_different_things. Curious. NVO 14:42, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Now it's clear, thanks. - A.S. 16:28, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanislav Govorukhin IT MOW 04-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 14:41, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

ЕвгенийГибралтар

Hallo A.S., könntest du dir mit deinen Sprach- und Landeskenntnissen mal die uploads von ЕвгенийГибралтар (talk · contribs) anschauen. Danke. --Túrelio (talk) 13:48, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Angesprochen und, weil er munter weitermachte, vorerst ausgebremst. - A.S. 14:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perepechinskoe04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great perspective. That's what an ultrawide is for! :-) King of Hearts 19:36, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Commons:List of administrators by language

I see you've moved yourself from German to Russian. I think you should probably be in both -- the whole point is to make it easy to find Admins with a particular language pair -- and while Russian/German is by no means scarce, why not?      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pavel Rostovtsev RN MOW 05-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:43, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! May 2011 Moskva River ship 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me, but too tight crop at left and right (to me). Good good quality except the composition. The perspective perhaps is not the better--Lmbuga 20:49, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Irina Antonova RN MOW 05-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice portrait, good detail level, expression, and light and colors. If it wasn't for the somewhat distracting background I would have nominated it for COM:FPC. --Slaunger 08:05, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Главное_здание_МГУ_-_здание08.jpg

File:Главное_здание_МГУ_-_здание08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.137.197 09:03, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikhnevo Water tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Harrison49 01:51, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Про избу

Законы вполне нормальные (как и все остальные законы вообще). Вся моя ошибка состоит в том, что я не могу подтвердить слова музейных работников. Буду искать решение этого вопроса.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 00:21, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detkovo forest and rail track.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:22, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikolai Vinnichenko IF MOW 06-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 17:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Kremlins

[3] - полагаю, неверный ход. Кремль (крепость, цитадель) - это не здание, а район, ядро города, "историко-географическая сущность", потому не стоит её опускать на уровень отдельных построек.

Кстати, вот старый вопрос - как правильно называть категории городищ, на которых никаких фортификаций нет уже много веков? Category:Vereya Kremlin, Category:Borovsk Kremlin - городища есть, кремлей нет. ?? NVO (talk) 08:09, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

М.б. можно создать городские субкатегории от Fortifications in Russia. - A.S. 10:12, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Категории

Это не пользовательские категории. Это категории, где собраны фотографии по их признаку: QI. Поэтому я буду возвращать снова и снова. Насколько я понял, главная цель так называемых пользовательских категорий — добиться того, чтобы они были скрытыми от всех, то есть устранить их, избавиться от них. Это можно объяснить для случая, где фотографии собраны по автору (хотя я всё-таки не понимаю, почему фотографии Ильи Ильфа — не пользовательская категория); однако если фотографии собраны не по автору, это не пользовательская категория.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:15, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Однако я благодарю вас за ссылку. Я написал там свой вопрос и надеюсь, что мне объяснят, почему многие пользовательские категории, которые служат только для сбора картинок конкретных фотографов, не отмечены как пользовательские категории. Как я понял из ваших действий, все категории, куда фотографии собираются по авторам — это именно пользовательские категории.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:24, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Я задал вопрос по вашей ссылке и получил ответ, что это неправильная ссылка. На этой странице не обсуждают такие вопросы.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:40, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Илья Ильф обладает, кажется, энциклопедической значимостью в отличие от вас или меня. А на COM:ANU встретимся, если вы вздумаете учинять войну правок из-за ваших более чем странных амбиций. - A.S. 03:51, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Я изучил практику категории "фотографов 21 века". Я — фотограф 21 века, мои фотографии публиковались в местной и центральной периодике. Поэтому я буду вносить категорию моих фотографий в общую категорию "фотографов 21 века из России", как это делают и другие практикующие русские фотографы.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Тем временем на Commons:Village pump идёт обсуждение того, имеет ли фотограф право на категорию, в которой собраны его творческие работы. Читайте и удивляйтесь.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Если следовать вашей логике, так обо мне и вовсе впору писать статью в вике, так как мои фотки попадают время от времени в прессу отнюдь не местечковую. Но, как про таких как вы немчура бы сказала - "Bescheidenheit war noch nie unsere Stärke". LOL - A.S. 16:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Я не понимаю немецкого языка. Я не понимаю, при чём тут "писать статью". Если вы знаете ответ, напишите там в обсуждении, почему фотограф не имеет права быть фотографом, если он решил использовать свободную лицензию и участвовать в коммонс. Почему для того, чтобы быть фотографом, надо избегать коммонс?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:13, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

not to know how to categorize correctly

Я думаю, что вам надо удалить вынесенные в заголовок слова из дискуссии, и постараюсь объясниться. Я создал категорию и задумался, в какие категории она входит. Я проверил по аналогии: открыл категорию Category:Graves by country и посмотрел, как созданы категории по другим странам. В других странах категория для страны была разделена по городам. Именно так я поступил для созданной мною новой категории: создал категорию города как подкатегорию для страны. Вы правы, я действительно не умею правильно расставлять категории по могилам: именно поэтому я стал учиться на образцах. Неужели никто не умеет расставлять эти категории, а все изученные мною образцы оказались неверными? Трудно поверить. Участник NVO обсуждал со мной эту категорию, однако не изменил её связи с другими категориями. Вы обратились к категории и связали её с кладбищами, хотя в ней никогда не будет ни единой фотографии с кладбищ. Итак, вы узнали логику моего рассуждения, и я надеюсь, что вы уберёте неэтичный выпад ad hominem.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:14, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Пожалуй, я сейчас сделаю оговорку в этой категории. Хорошая мысль: спасибо, что навели меня на неё.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:14, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Вы сначала посмотрите, что я конкретно исправил по сравнению с вашей версией, а потом уже занимайтесь своими домогательствами. Ничего опровергать не буду. EOD. - A.S. 07:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Я вижу. Вы добавили категорию Cemeteries in Yaroslavl Oblast, которая совершенно не подходит в данном случае.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:24, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Я, прежде всего, добавил туда категорию вашего столь любимого города и исправил ключ сортировки. Вы и вправду такой бестолковый, или только прикидываетесь? - A.S. 14:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Ключ я заметил не сразу, а после того, как вы это подчеркнули здесь. К сожалению, про такие детали я часто забываю! А «личный аргумент», к которому вы снова прибегаете, я пропускаю. В дискуссии у колодца «личный аргумент» предполагал, что вы лучше меня знаете категории, однако речь там идёт не про меня и не про вас, да и аргумент обоюдоострый (в правке был не только внесён необходимый ключ сортировки, но и добавлена ошибочная категория). В дискуссии же речь идёт про отличие «фотографов» от «пользователей». Об этом же задаёт вопросы участник NVO.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizhnie Kotly Railplatform 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

diplomatic missions and embassies

Hallo A. Savin, Können Sie mir sagen: Was ist der Unterschied zwischen Category:Diplomatic missions in Beijing und Category:Embassies in Beijing Beide werden verwendet, um Botschaften ein zu ortnen. m.fr.gr. H.O.

Ich erläutere es anhand eines existenten Beispiels: Die Category:Embassies in Bonn ist eine Unterkategorie von Category:Diplomatic missions in Bonn, denn letztere ist ein Oberbegriff und kann neben Botschaften auch Konsulate etc. beinhalten. Mit Beijing und anderen Städten wäre natürlich analog zu verfahren. - A.S. 13:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Anosino Monastery 04.jpg

Однако, как хорошо. Прошу вас, расскажите, как это снято? Спрашиваю ещё и потому, что снимаю таким же тамроном.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Обычная автоматика, в фотошопе по обыкновению света немного темнее сделал. A.S. 20:33, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Меня больше интересует, как вы добиваетесь "не падающих" вертикалей, ровной геометрии. Кстати, на моём мониторе замечаю жёлтый оттенок на вашем кадре. Если это намеренный эффект, хорошо; иначе можно думать, что баланс белого неточен.PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:37, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Там было достаточно расстояния, чтобы даже при 34мм держать камеру прямо. ББ, кажется, в порядке. - A.S. 06:36, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anosino Monastery 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 19:33, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anosino Monastery 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments If there is room the right would add to an already good image. --Saffron Blaze 19:33, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anosino Monastery 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 19:33, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adjika in a can.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok IMO --Carschten 15:26, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

За что мне такое несчастье? (user right:patroller)

[4]

Уберите, пожалуйста. Не хочу играть в эти игры с патрулями и нашивками. NVO (talk) 02:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Please re-add autopatrol to NVO. Thank you -- RE rillke questions? 15:47, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Huh? I asked to remove it. I don't need it. NVO (talk) 15:52, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

autopatrol. You do not need it but it is annoying if I have to patrol your (a trusted user) edits. -- RE rillke questions? 15:58, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Ah, understood: you may be right (although, honestly, my edits are a drop in the ocean - one thousand over three weeks, and many of them to highly-watched, high-traffic pages in project space). But not patrol proper: I was appaled by the fact that my edits were interpreted as "marking revision XXX of file YYY patrolled" - these were just edits, not a supreme endorsement of everything there. NVO (talk) 16:22, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

I think, as an active user he should have the autopatrol right. A.S. 17:41, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

I am the same opinion. And what's the problem? -- RE rillke questions? 17:44, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

That is rather a question to NVO. I would not be comfortable with having given the flag against his will. - A.S. 18:03, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Hier geht es doch ausschließlich um das autopatrol, oder? Das ist ein anderes Recht. Da muss der Benutzer auch nicht zustimmen, normalerweise bemerkt er es gar nicht. Patroller ist etwas anderes: Da erhält man diese "als kontrolliert markieren" (mark as patrolled)-Links. -- RE rillke questions? 15:39, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kolomenskoe Wooden StGeorge Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me. --Ximonic 13:23, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golosov Gully in Kolomenskoe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jovianeye 12:37, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teatralnaya July 2011 (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs small perspective and distortion correction. --Jovianeye 11:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC) I see no distortion except the small tilt on the very right edge. - A.Savin 15:06, 22 July 2011 (UTC) See image annotation. --Jovianeye 22:53, 23 July 2011 (UTC) Done - A.Savin 09:21, 24 July 2011 (UTC) Better now. --Jovianeye 11:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Panoramafreiheit in Russland

Hi,

wie ist es mit der Panoramafreiheit in Russland? Ist dieser Löschantrag Commons:Deletion requests/File:Moscow July 2011-38a.jpg gerechtfertigt? Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 14:20, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Leider ja, siehe z.B. Commons:Deletion requests/Foreign Ministry Moscow oder auch das da. (Da es allerdings kaum möglich ist, alle fraglichen Bilder zu löschen, treffen solche LAe den Empfänger selten "zufällig", wie auch im Fall der Schweizer Sockenspielerin Allesmüller/Fernrohr mitnichten der Fall ist/war.) - A.Savin 18:01, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kolomenskoe view from Dyakovo hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:41, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kolomenskoe Front Gates and Colonel's Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:41, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valery Polkhovsky RN MOW 05-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:41, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Russian Rasstegai with Fish.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 11:20, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igor Borisov RN MOW 07-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 11:20, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Нужна помощь

После переустановки системы у меня какие-то нелады с калибровкой монитора - якобы откалиброванный экран очевидно зеленит (особенно заметно на голубом небе). Ума не приложу, почему проверенный Spyder так врёт по сравнению с самим собой три месяца назад (система - Win7, монитор NEC S-IPS, установки на 6500К, 150 кд/м2, гамма 2.2). Единственное изменение - обновление софта Spyder c v.3 до v.4.0.15. Пожалуйста, прокомментируй что не так c цветами на этих фото:

• 
  небо?
• 
  небо?
• 
  общий тон (в синее?)

Все фото - камерный jpg (auto WB) + правка контраста и ББ + кроп. NVO (talk) 05:37, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

У меня все цвета выглядят нормально. - A.Savin 07:16, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Значит, у меня с глазами что-то - граница между cyan tint и purple tint субъективно воспринимается очень узко, смотрю на featured pictures и каждая вторая кажется либо зелёной, либо фиолетовой. Пора в аптеку ;( NVO (talk) 15:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Попробуйте посмотреть те же файлы на другом компьютере, смею предположить что дело в мониторе. - A.Savin 18:37, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Отвечаю

Прошу вас придираться к фото, которые я выставляю на QI, такие придирки мне всегда помогают. Категории на русском языке не запрещены, потому что викисклад является международным и мультиязыковым проектом. Неуважение к русскому языку — это не мультиязыковое дело, а совсем противоположное. Прошу вас выставлять мои фотографии на удаление, если я что-то нарушаю. Спасибо.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:14, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Я считаю Ваше поведение как Администратора, как минимум, неэтичным. Налицо угрозы участнику, вместо конструктивного обсуждения. В любом случае, обсуждать надо работы, а не личность участника.

Предлагаю Вам остыть, успокоиться и извиниться.

По поводу загруженных Вами фото: очень хорошая резкость, но немного желтит. Объектив Tamron 17-50? Иногда он дает небольшое смещение баланса белого в желтый.

С уважением, Георгий -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:34, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

У меня такой же тамрон. Покупая его, я выбрал один из трёх вариантов. Перейдя с 350D на 50D, я решил уточнить наводку на резкость по настроечной линейке, и пришлось вводить моему объективу поправку. Пишу это как иллюстрацию того, что такие тамроны — хотя и превосходны за свои деньги, и резкость дают великолепную начиная с диафрагмы 5, — однако требуют осторожности.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Что касается жёлтого оттенка, то я подчеркнул это для портрета, где цвет должен быть приведён к естественному. Пейзажные фотоснимки нельзя критиковать за желтизну, потому что именно такая желтизна бывает в вечернее время.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:56, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Do not block talk page access

Please read COM:BLOCK and act accordingly. Specifically, do not block talk page access. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:12, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

If you mean this guy, I do not see what's actually the problem. - A.Savin 17:59, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

It is a problem when admins disregard policy. Systematically. If you continue doing this, I will take this to the user problems board. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:06, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

I think it's rather a problem with you systematically breaking community rules. Of course you're free to complain anywhere, but as long as you refuse to say where's the real problem with my last user blocks, it certainly will not succeed. - A.Savin 18:14, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

I have to ask why you actually did block the user's access to their talk page which you pointed to above? You don't seem to have replied here and I see no abuse of talk page access? Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:24, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I thought that pure vandal or spam accounts always get full block. At least, it is (or was) handled in the german WP this way. Kind regards, - A.Savin 12:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Certainly not normal practice on Commons or most other places I've worked. Revoking talk page access is only done if the access is abused. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:38, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

OK. - A.Savin 12:46, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kolomenskoe Mouth of the Zhuzha River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 05:37, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Bull Flugtag 2011 Moscow - participating machines 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 12:28, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isidor Church SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice photo, very high saturation and sharpness but no CA, - I don't know the location, but I guess, the bit disturbing wires are unavoidable? --J. Lunau 15:54, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Rename request

Would you mind renaming another file? This one should be called "Kubrick-Eyes-Kidman-small.jpg" Thanks in advance if you can do this. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 21:06, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Russian Coulibiac with Cabbage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is nothing to claim. --High Contrast 10:04, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Про станции

Category:Golitsyno, Belorusskoye dir, MZD etc. - а может, не надо таких мудрёных сокращений? Т.е. с одно стороны, Doomych уже наделал критическую массу в полсотни таких категорий (переделывать - кому охота время тратить?), а с другой - ну совершенно ясно, что никому продолжать это (именно в такой форме) не охота. Так и останется четерть Московской области MZD-шной, а всё остальное как получится. Я, право, когда на это MZD наткнулся, первая реакция была - прибить. Потом понял, сколько их ...

??? NVO (talk) 14:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

• Их очень мало, какие-то десятки штук, как я погляжу. Где они? Как надо переименовать? Работы-то на час!--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Здесь каждый день какие-нибудь умники считают нужным создавать микрокатегории с грамматически нонсенсными, неверно транскрибированными, непонятными или неоднозначными и еще бог знает какими именами, а многие при этом еще и не снизойдут до практического использования собой же созданных категорий. Лично я уже давно на это ... махнул рукой и премного благодарен, когда хотя бы для файла не поленятся найти нужную категорию, сколь бы дико оная ни называлась. А уж исправление имен - дело светлого коммунистического будущего. - A.Savin 19:02, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Eщё про названия

Как бы удачнее назвать Category:Views of Borovsk countryside и им подобные (смысл = содержание). Это не сам город, но и не "окрестности" (и в самом городе тоже есть зелёные виды); и не 100% nature - возделанные поля, дороги, плетни-колдобины... ?? NVO (talk) 15:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

FYI

Hallo. Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass du den Meta-Kram auf de:wiki nicht mehr verfolgst. Vielleicht wäre aber die Diskussion und die damit verbundene Aufgabe interessant für dich. Viele Grüße, --Paramecium (talk) 18:41, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Ich mache desöfteren Personenfotos und würde daher nicht grundsätzlich Nein sagen. Dass ich allerdings ausgerechnet vom deutschen WM-Chapter einen solchen Auftrag bekäme, wage ich mal zu bezweifeln; habe da kein so gutes Standing. Mfg - A.Savin 19:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Der Budget-Ausschuss besteht aus diesen Personen, wobei Ralf Roletschek selbst deinen Namen ins Spiel gebracht hat. Da die Reise von Moskau aus (zumal als Russisch-Muttersprachler) sicher preiswerter ist, wären die Chancen vielleicht gar nicht so schlecht. Aber gut, wollt dich ja nur drauf aufmerksam machen. Gruß, --Paramecium (talk) 20:23, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Danke danke, wäre in der Tat nie selber auf den Link gekommen. Nunja, vielleicht mischen ja bei jenem geheimnisvollen Ausschuss eben nicht nur "diese Personen", sondern auch unsere heißgeliebten "Power-Enzyklopädisten" Hubertl und Brummfuss mit. Wer weiss. LOL. Mfg - A.Savin 21:11, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

миниатюры старой версии файла

Добрый день! Нужна помощь в решении одной досадной проблемы. Есть djvu-файл, в первой версии которого отсутствовала пара страниц. В конце концов страницы были найдены, файл пересобран и последняя версия содержит всё что нужно. Проблема в том, что из-за бага в mediawiki-движке осталось множество миниатюр от старых версий файла, которые не соответствуют теперешним страницам. Например, смотрим страницу 277 файла - она самая свежая. Но стоит перейти на следующую, как в окошке "предыдущая страница" показывается устаревшая миниатюра 277-ой страницы из предыдущей версии файла. Проблема усугубляется тем, что файл используется для вычитки книги в Викитеке и приспособленному под это расширению Proofread Page проходится показывать в разных местах те самые неправильные картинки. Доходит до смешного: при просмотре одной страницы её изображение из файла правильное, а при редактировании - неверное, а на другой странице - наоборот. Естественно, "разброд и шатания" начинаются с середины книги, с той страницы, которая в самой первой версии отсутствовала, и для тех страниц, которые кто-нибудь успел просмотреть ещё в самой первой версии файла. На своей локальной версии mediawiki-сервера я поставил несколько экспериментов и вычислил, что без доступа непосредственно к структуре каталогов (для ручного удаления неправильных миниатюр) можно решить проблему полным удалением файла и заливкой его последней версии. Использовавшие его страницы из пространства Индекс и Страницы при этом не страдали. Возможна ли такая операция в нашем случае на комонзе? Заранее спасибо за любой ответ. -- Crower (talk) 00:45, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Добрый день. Я удалил файл и восстановил, как вы просили, только последнюю версию. Надеюсь, что это помогло, но вообще я в технических вопросах не силен, если что - лучше спросите на форуме. - A.Savin 05:57, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Большое спасибо. Старые версии действительно больше не нужны и удалить их стоило в любом случае, чтобы место не занимали. Но, к сожалению, миниатюры от старых версий всё равно остались. Возможно, причина здесь именно в "восстановлении". Если я правильно понимаю, то восстановление этой версии файла произошло из архива, в который движок их перекладывает при удалении. А перекладывает он файлы, скорее всего, именно вместе с миниатюрами. Соответственно вместе с миниатюрами он их и восстанавливает. В своём эксперименте на локальном движке я файл полностью удалял, все версии. И загружал заново. Именно такая схема очистки от старых миниатюр у меня сработала. Чтобы не утруждать лишний раз Вас (мне, право, немного неудобно даже), загрузить файл ещё раз Виталий наверняка сможет. Ну или на крайний случай это сделаю я - у меня есть и сам файл последней версии, и его описание скопировал. Если и после этого ничего не получится - будем спрашивать "зубров" на форуме. -- Crower (talk) 08:54, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Special:ListFiles/Adiladil

Hallo. Wärst du so nett und würdest dem russischsprachigen (wohl kasachischen) Benutzer Adiladil erklären, dass aus Büchern gescannte Bilder nicht als {{Own}} hochgeladen werden dürfen und dass Formeln bzw. Tabellen am besten mittels TeX bzw. Wikicode erstellt werden? --Leyo 11:41, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Danke! --Leyo 17:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kolomenskoe Wooden Palace (Morning).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 08:53, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Russian Cod liver in an opened can.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 08:53, 25 August 2011 (UTC)  Info Now used in french WP.--Jebulon 09:35, 25 August 2011 (UTC) And in swedish WP. But canned cod liver is traumatic childhood memory for me, I hope the Russian taste better. Fresh cod liver is a delicacy!--Ankara 11:21, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel National Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 17:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Школьное

Поскольку вы были в Ногинске и даже кое-что оттуда привезли ;), - ищу совета: как правильно назвать категории ногинских школьных зданий (бывших и/или нынешних). Речь только об исторических памятниках, по которым уместны отдельные категории:

Бывшая...	Современная...	Category ??
Реальное училище	Ногинский педагогический колледж	?
Женская гимназия	Средняя школа N 2 имени Короленко	?
Начальное мужское училище	Проф. училище N 2	?
Глуховское фабричное среднее училище	Средняя школа N 10	?
Дом Зотова	Ногинская Детская Школа Искусств	?

NVO (talk) 04:55, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Я действительно в Ногинске как-то раз был, но пару часов, и про эти здания доселе не слышал. В изысках русско-английского перевода вообще-то силен в лучшем случае не более вашего. Вы же сами где-то очень верно приметили, что часто остается руководствоваться здравым смыслом. Почему бы и не здесь? Former Realschule (Noginsk), Former women's gymnasium (Noginsk) и т. д. При порой абсурднейших наименованиях российских категорий "осрамиться" здесь на этом поприще практически невозможно. - A.Savin 05:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Я тоже склоняюсь к простым именам "от исторических". Но в данном случае прямой перевод исторических названий порождает двусмысленность: есть "последнее" по времени реальное училище (в таблице выше), а есть его предшественник (у этого вряд ли категория будет). А "мужских начальных училищ" и вовсе было несколько, город-то не маленький. Потому не уверен. NVO (talk) 05:58, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Но если я правильно понял, в этом конкретном здании было только "последнее" реальное училище. Если так, то я бы просто прибавил к названию города название улицы, чтобы получить однозначную категорию. A.Savin 06:12, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

О, не надо о грустном: Category:Tretyego Internatsionala Street (Noginsk) (бывшая Московская (Богородск)). Это та самая мэйн-стрит, на которой пешеходный арбат и (за углом) толстовская тюрьма. NVO (talk) 08:50, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

"Former Realschule (Noginsk, Tretyego Internatsionala Street)" звучит не так уж уродливо имхо. - A.Savin 09:42, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blens-felsen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please geotag. --Cayambe 19:09, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Template:Self-photographed

Hallo A.Savin. Könntest du vielleicht eine russische Übersetzung spendieren? --Leyo 23:17, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Nach Google Translate heisst es nun übersetzt „eigenes Foto“. Die Vorlage wurde aber angelegt, um nicht {{own|photo}} zu verwenden, weil dieses fälschlicherweise als „es ist mein eigenes Foto“ = „das Foto gehört mir“ interpretiert wird. Bei „eigenes Foto“ besteht diese Gefahr IMHO auch. Falls Google Translate ungenau war, dann sorry fürs Spamen. ;-) --Leyo 08:10, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Собственная фотография sollte «eigenes Foto» im Sinne von «selbst angefertigtes Foto» bedeuten, somit eigentlich die Betonung auf die Fotografie anstatt auf das abgebildete Kunstwerk ausdrücken. Die von mir anfangs benutzte Übersetzung [5] ist die präziseste und bedeutet wörtlich «Foto aus eigener Arbeit», könnte insofern aber auch als «Foto der eigenen Arbeit» (= des abgebildeten Kunstwerks) missverstanden werden, von daher ist die zweite Variante mMn geeigneter. Mfg - A.Savin 08:27, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

OK, klingt einleuchtend. Danks übrigens noch. :-) --Leyo 09:34, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Cafedelyon

I didn't see that you blocked this user. I left him a message on the talk page. Never mind. mickit 08:11, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:SergeyMavrodi.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SergeyMavrodi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:SergeyMavrodi.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Laim (talk) 17:39, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

corrupt? Nee!

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File%3AZoo+Leipzig+-+Tou+Feng.png Mehr gern hier. :-) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Trade rows in Russia

Hi. Till recently, I did not know what the meaning of "Trade rows" as in Category:Trade rows in Russia was. Thanks to the interwiki's, now I have some idea. So I realise that the IWs and the doc are not perfect, why I did not adapt the categories, but it is better than nothing. So, if you don't agree with the documentation, you can improve it, but deletion is no option. --Foroa (talk) 11:54, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

• I overhauled the page (back to original intent) and left a note at Foroa's. NVO (talk) 13:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Great, we can't delete information because we don't like it, this is not how Commons functions. Thank you. --Foroa (talk) 14:10, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

As you meanwhile may read at the top of the category, trade rows were a sort of market buildings in many cities and towns of the Russian Empire. That is (I hope) already enough arguments to say that it's nonsense to add a description of a particular building to this common category. Moreover, the GUM is rather a traditional Russian style building and has nothing to do with "true" trade rows which are typically classicist (this is a good example for "true" Russian trade rows, I would say). GUM "inherited" its old name from the old Upper Trade Rows which do not exist anymore. And please do not revert me using your rollback button, it is somewhat impolite. Thanks - A.Savin 16:15, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

опять перевод

Как бы правильно перевести категорию "Присутственные места" (File:Kaluga01 0812 168g.jpg, File:Mgtu-kaluga.jpg) - в данном случае речь не о здании а об ансамбле в несколько кварталов. ?? - NVO (talk) 02:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Public buildings (Kaluga), Public chambers, Public offices,... A.Savin 04:18, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

вопрос по загрузке

Александр здравствуй. Давно не общались :). У меня тут при загрузке фотографий странные вещи происходят. Нормальное фото в превью выглядит перевёрнутым на 90 градусов (пример), а если на него нажать, то в полном разрешении он нормально расположен. Раньше такого не было. Как с этим бороться? Я пробовал немного изменить файл, пересохранить и загрузить как новую версию - эффект тот же. --Lodo27 (talk) 15:19, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Блин, вот незадача?! У меня то же самое (не помогло и удаление с загрузкой по новой). Наверно, очередные серверные капризы. Ждём-с... A.Savin 17:11, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Кажется, после вращения в фотошопе показывает правильно. ... A.Savin 18:16, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Это запланированная фича Mediawiki 1.18. Если в exif-е флаг поворота выставлен как-то криво, Mediawiki сама поворачивает thumbnail (но не полноразмерный исходник). См Commons:Village_pump#Autorotation_using_EXIF_tag_with_MW_1.18. NVO (talk) 19:35, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

На вой вопрос: А как этот тег обмануть...?, PereslavlFoto пишет: "Вы вступили в область управления EXIF данными. Вам надо сделать одно из двух. Или вам надо прописать в этот тег точную информацию про поворот, или стереть его, обнулить его значение. Я поступаю именно так. Для этого я использую свободную программу exiftool, которая доступна в интернете. Команда выглядит вот как: exiftool -Orientation="" filename.jpg. Прочитав, что в кавычках ничего нет, программа пишет в этот тег пустое значение. Можно даже не писать кавычки, а дать более простую команду: exiftool -Orientation= filename.jpg. Тут главное, чтобы после знака равенства был пустой пробел." --Lodo27 (talk) 21:07, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Фотографии метро

Привет!

Я тут намедни съездил и заснял несколько "оранжевых" станций Петербургского метро (от "Лиговского проспекта" до "Проспекта Большевиков"). Не уверен, что получилось именно то, что я хотел, но если будет желание и немного времени, то ими можно заменить некоторые «оранжевые» снимки в иноязычных ресурсах, с которыми ты, в отличие от меня, тесно сотрудничаешь. Так что, herzlich willkommen! :) Alex Florstein (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Спасибо за совет. Новые фотки действительно лучше. - A.Savin 18:26, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Gelöschte Datei

Hallo Alex. Könntest du mir bitte die Datei Ахмет-хан.jpg wiederherstellen, die nach dieser Diskussion gelöscht wurde? Ich würde das Bild gerne auf de retten. Grüße, --Paramecium (talk) 18:31, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

 Done Gib mal Bescheid, wenn die Datei nicht mehr benötigt wird. - A.Savin 21:39, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Danke. Bin fertig. --Paramecium (talk) 22:18, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zosimova Pustyn 08 Belltower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 22:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Example.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 22:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Что за стекло?

F=8mm - File:Kashira 10-2011 Church of Ascension 02.jpg, F=11mm - что за диво (дивы?) ??

Субъективно, оба кажутся чрезмерно вытянутыми по вертикали. NVO (talk) 20:21, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Так вы там уже успели побывать?

Sigma 8-16 очень выручает при тесноте, но и растягивает нещадно, увы. A.Savin 20:34, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

У меня с лета много из Каширы - только-только дошли руки обработать. А вчера в Калуге под солнцем грелся. Во весь день где-то полчаса хорошего света было. NVO (talk) 21:11, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

В следующий раз, если надумается куда ехать, надо у вас спрашивать - куда же еще больше фоток одного города, чем бывает у вас? Все равно что велосипед изобретать... - A.Savin 21:24, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Велосипеды тоже меняются во времени. Я был удивлён в июне, когда увидел, что стоящий во дворе купол Никитского монастыря, который там два года пылился (а купол, между прочим, фанерный) - наконец-то обшили ... нержавейкой. Возможно, его уже поставили на место? Вот и пригодилось бы. А то в июне было и смех, и грех - над барабаном за время реставрации выросла трава в человеческий рост. NVO (talk) 21:32, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

А так, конечно, спрашивайте. Из ещё незагруженного - ЮЗ четвертушка Калуги, Ногинск, Алабино (при плохом, как вчера, свете) и вроде всё. NVO (talk) 21:32, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

• 
  c юго-востока
• 
  c запада

(ec) А вот каширская загадка - страная постройка (54°50′38.377637″N 38°9′12.495789″E) - что бы это могло быть? В известных мне справочниках такого нет. NVO (talk) 21:32, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Никитский так и не нашел, быстро стемнело, на странное здание тоже внимание обратил. В викимапии значится только как некое "здание церковной архитектуры". Наверно, так и останется загадкой до конца дней наших. - A.Savin 21:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Wooden houses in Kashira

Есть ли "консенсус", что это такое - дома в узком смысле (жилые, на одну-две семьи) или деревянные здания вообще? Там в Кашире есть деревянная больница и деревянные многоквартирные - стоит ли над houses городить надстройку (wooden buildings, wooden architecture) ? NVO (talk) 21:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Здрасьте, согласен. В ближайшие дни, наверно, руки не дойдут переделать в wooden architecture (фактический стандарт). Так что, если охота, правьте смело. - A.Savin 14:28, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

fyi

You wrote a comment on Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (de-adminship 2) I thought I would let you know I left a long response.

You are not obliged to go back to Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (de-adminship 2) to respond to my followup comment, or even to go there and read it.

My basic point is that Jcb has been behaving as if he thought he was above addressing good faith questions and concerns, he has been doing so since at least May, when he first showed up on my radar, and has probably been doing so since he became an administrator. He acts like he is above accountability. This is not due to no one explaining why this is a concern. As he has many contributors explain to him how his unwillingness and inability to explain himself is a problem -- and he ignores that feedback, or, as in my case, may have knowingly abused his administrator powers to retaliate against me for raising the issue, as I explained in the discussion. As I said, I don't care whether he he intended to be malicious, or whether he was too reckless to appreciate the appearance of malice his actions left.

Thanks for reading this note Geo Swan (talk) 15:50, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the notice - I know your diffs indeed, but as I said already, I don't see a need for infinite removal of flag, but maybe 1-2 months due to missing rationales on DRs and arrogant behaviour. What you of course cannot have known: In German WP where I formerly was active, 1) a temporary de-admin in misuse cases is possible, 2) there are much worse admins who offend+harass authors and protect trolls and where no chance is given that their flag will ever be removed due to the fact that they mostly have a big "Stammtisch" lobby; 3) due to this fact I have no confidence anymore in DE-WP admins (therefore also not in the initiator of this poll, albeit that's not that big point) and what you perhaps know anyway: 4) I have - regardless of all above - the opinion that Commons does not need even more amateurish penis/vagina/ejaculation photographs. Today, it is simple to shot photographs of relatively good quality even using the simpliest+cheapest equipment, OK. But that does not mean that every "somewhat good" shot is a quality photograph which has really additional value for Wikimedia projects. Therefore, I also have the opinion that Commons needs admins who have courage to delete stuff which in my opinion is - at best! - not much more than trash. Thanks - A.Savin 11:25, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

MediaWiki Diskussion:Spam-blacklist#sporvognsrejser.dk

Guten Tag A.Savin, wirfst Du bitte einmal einen Blick auf http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_Diskussion:Spam-blacklist#sporvognsrejser.dk? Danke. Lantus (talk) 14:05, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

FOP

Здравствуйте. Давным-давно вы сказали, что будете придираться к моему вкладу. Пожалуйста, проверьте категорию Category:Пересечение 2011 в Переславле и подскажите, где могут быть проблемы. Я обращусь к участникам фестиваля и соберу у них разрешительные письма. Большое спасибо!--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:32, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Робот Flickr

• Вы не могли бы проверить возможность скачиванию двух фотографий с помощью робота модель Flickr, я соответствующего опыта не имею, но судя по тексту к фотографиям, понял, что их скачивает какой-то робот. Нужен самолёт Mak.10 [6], там ещё внизу страницы 3 штуки и Mak.123 [7] [8]. Я не прошу Вас их скачивать, это наверно занимает время, только определите, пожалуйста, опытным взглядом, скачиваемые ли это роботом фотографии (это авиационная энциклопедия) или нет смысла этим заниматься. С уважением,

--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 21:15, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Вы хотите загрузить эти файлы на викисклад, я правильно понял? Если да, то файлы должны иметь свободную лицензию (CC, GFDL). На вашей ссылке соответствующей информации нет. - A.Savin 18:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Спасибо за ответ, то есть Вы посмотрели и Вам стало ясно, что робот загрузить их не может. Остаётся теоретически ждать 70 лет со смерти автора, если фотография 1931 года, то как определить, жив ли автор, если он неизвестен (не указан на сайте), есть ли какие-либо нормы, скажем выдаётся разрешение на всё, что снято до 1933-1945 г. Немецкие коллеги загрузили фотографию 1919 г., можно ли её теперь использовать в других языковых разделах или лучше подождать пару недель? - С уважением, --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 05:27, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Насколько я знаю, изображения с неизвестным авторством можно загружать с PD-old через 100 лет после публикации. Соответственно, для 1919 еще рано. - A.Savin 12:52, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

• • Спасибо за ответ, уберу фото в таком случае с Вашей страницы, так как могут обвинить в недобросовестности использования, немецкий коллега, очевидно, просто хотел мне помочь, сам я опыта ещё не набрался. Очевидно кто-то свяжется с ним со Склада. Да, я хотел бы Вас попросить удалить из русской Вики поднятое мною фото (Файл:MS Konstantin Simonov an der Anlegestelle in Uglitsch.JPG) на Викисклад. Это та же самая фотография. Видел Ваше фото теплохода "Уникум", здорово, не так фото, сколько сам поступок, с уважением,

--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 16:30, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Александр, здравствуй. Давай я отвечу за тебя :). Уважаемый PjotrMahh1 всё гороздо проще - нужно попросить изменить лицензию - смотрите пример --Lodo27 (talk) 16:49, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

PjotrMahh1: выставил на удаление как дубликат файла со склада (я не админ в русской ВП).

Lodo27: спасибо за совет. - A.Savin 15:00, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

• • Спасибо за советы, точно - это же не Википедия, перепутал из-за тематики (загрузка фотографий). Я проверю у Авиаторов, кому там писать можно, но по Panaramio знания пригодятся, с уважением,

--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 18:38, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Вопрос про лицензию при загрузке

Александр, здравствуй. Ко мне обратился PjotrMahh1 с вопросом можно ли загрузить файл и под какой лицензией. Переадресую его тебе, как более компетентному в этом вопросе:

"Здравствуйте, в эстонской Вики есть файл Pilt:Piirissaar.png. Мне нужно перенести его на Викисклад, разрешение дано по-эстонски: Eesti Maa-amet lubab kõigil seda pilti kasutada igal eesmärgil koos allika äramärkimisega.- Перевод: Эстонский Земельный департамент разрешает всем использовать это изображение в любых целях вместе с указанием источника [9]. По-английски написано другое:This is an image of Estonian Land Board from [2]. Reproduction is authorised, provided the original source and author is acknowledged. Вопрос:Достаточно ли моего перевода на русский эстонского текста, как разрешение для Викисклада. Автор:Эстонский земельный департамент, Источник:[10]. Я поднял изображение в немецкую Вики, возникли вопросы, поэтому наверно проще убрать оттуда изображение и сразу загрузить из эстонской Вики на Викисклад? --PjotrMahh1 " --Lodo27 (talk) 19:08, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Вообще-то я не сильно специалист в лицензиях. Если бы я исходил из эстонского текста, то попробовал бы перенести файл на склад, используя Template:Attribution. Но английская формулировка ("acknowledged") меня несколько смущает. Участнику PjotrMahh1 посоветовал бы поэтому попробовать написать туда и уточнить. - A.Savin 20:53, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Vielleicht ...

... als Vorweihnachtsüberraschung: Andreas Leifeld, auch wenn dein Wunsch auf Wikipedia:Weihnachten schon etwas her ist. Viele Grüße und einen schönen zweiten Advent wünscht --Paulae (talk) 19:56, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Ah ... hab schönen Dank (kennen wir uns??), nunja, ist mir zwar inzwischen relativ wurscht, aber nett dass sich jemand kümmert. - 21:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Nein, ich glaub, wir kennen uns nicht. Ich hab einfach deinen damaligen Wunsch als Anlass genommen, um den Artikel anzulegen. Ich fands traurig, dass das Lemma tatsächlich fünf Jahre lang rot dastand, und mehr Infos zu AL wird ja auch in fünf Jahren nicht geben. Viele Grüße, --Paulae (talk) 21:57, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

* Frohe Weihnacht und einen guten Start ins neue Jahr
* Prettige Kerstdagen en een gelukkig nieuw jaar
* Merry Christmas and a happy New Year
from --Neozoon (talk) 23:28, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Terlezky-2010-doloi.jpg

Получается двойная категоризация по Category:Xenophobic nationalism и Category:Antisemitism. Почему-то второе не входит в первое.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:53, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Смею разочаровать. Антисемитизм и национализм не одно и то же. 18:58, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

FOP

Мне хотелось бы увидеть ваши предложения или поправки. Получив тикет, я создал карточку архитектора и поместил тикет в обсуждении. В карточке указал, что можно использовать его постройки для свободных фотоснимков. После этого я включаю карточку архитектора в описание фотоснимков. Это — что сделано. Что осталось не сделанным? Спасибо.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Про категории

Из того, что пишет Kaganer на Commons:Форум, получается, что дерево Buildings использовать нельзя. Потому что если для разбивки по улицам есть чёткий признак (адрес здания), то для разбивки по всему остальному чётких признаков нет, и в результате появится захламлённая категория.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 00:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC)