Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 21 2017
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Balcony of the Ceremonial Hall at the Old Jewish Cemetery Prague, Czech Republic --Uoaei1 04:35, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ilse falls in the Ilsetal in Harz National Park near Ilsenburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany --XRay 04:06, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Water flow is almost artificial and somewhat unnatural, but good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Highland bull, Isle of Skye, Scotland (by Raphael Hofmann) --Ikan Kekek 03:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Highland bull, Isle of Skye, Scotland (by Raphael Hofmann) --Ikan Kekek 03:41, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 04:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal eines Weinkellers in der Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 03:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. -- Ikan Kekek 04:15, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal eines Weinkellers in der Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 03:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail eines Weinkellers in der Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 03:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail eines Weinkellers in der Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 03:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Objekt in der Kellergasse Etzmannsdorf/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 03:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Latin inscription on Federauner Strasse #28 in Oberfederaun, Villach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:55, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 03:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ancient Roman ara (2nd/3rd century A.D.), a medieval gravestone relief and other devotional objects on Federauner Strasse #28 in Oberfederaun, Villach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:55, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:39, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Medieval gravestone relief on Federauner Strasse #28 in Oberfederaun, Villach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:55, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:16, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Federauner Strasse in Oberfederaun, Villach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:55, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 04:00, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Home automation in Sotavento Experimental Wind Farm, Xermade, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 21:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Solar cooker in Sotavento, Xermade, Galicia (Spain) --Lmbuga 21:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sanctuaire de Rocamadour, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 21:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 04:06, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Cyr and Saint Julitte Church of La Pannonie, Couzou, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 21:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pied crow (Corvus albus), Ghana --Charlesjsharp 20:59, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion IMO good quality. Tournasol7 21:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Green-backed heron (Butorides striata atricapilla) juvenile, Ghana --Charlesjsharp 20:59, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Atamari 00:39, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Restaurant and parking lots at the Lizarraga mountain pass, quarry. Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 18:48, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Zoppo59 20:29, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cumbre de Saratsa en la Sierra de Andía. Navarra, España --Basotxerri 18:48, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 19:42, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the summit of Saratsa in the Andia mountain range. Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 18:48, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Special.--Famberhorst 19:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Summit of Saratsa in the Andia mountain range, mountaineer's mailbox. Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 18:48, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 20:24, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rasos de Saratsa: mountain pastures at the Andia mountain range. Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 18:48, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bllue hour shot of the south west facade of Berliner Philharmonie. --Code 18:29, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Excellent! --Basotxerri 18:51, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Treffen der Jungwikipedianer. --Freddy2001 18:27, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline This is a really nice idea but unfortunately it is motion-blurred and some whites are clipped. Not enough for a QI IMO, sorry. --Basotxerri 18:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wijnjeterper Schar, Natura 2000 area of Friesland province. Solitaire oak on heath field.
--Famberhorst 17:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --XRay 18:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Wijnjeterper Schar, Natura 2000 area of Friesland province. Solitaire oak on heath field.
-
- Nomination Cornjum, Martenastate, (garden) Lane with lindes.
--Famberhorst 17:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 18:46, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Cornjum, Martenastate, (garden) Lane with lindes.
-
- Nomination Walk across the Hulshorsterzand. Pinus sylvestris at the edge of the sand drift.
--Famberhorst 17:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 17:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Walk across the Hulshorsterzand. Pinus sylvestris at the edge of the sand drift.
-
- Nomination Water Gate in Grudziądz, Poland --1bumer 16:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:54, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Exterior wooden facade in a gound-floor corner of an observation deck at Nørre Vorupør, Denmark. --W.carter 14:33, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Looks good for me. Tournasol7 14:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inflorescence of Ligularia dentata 'Desdemona'. --Bff 11:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ercé 13:04, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination King Ang Duong's stupa. Royal Palace. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. --Halavar 09:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:19, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Keong Preah Bat. Royal Palace. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. --Halavar 09:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination King Norodom statue. Royal Palace. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. --Halavar 09:55, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Piazza del Quirinale and Scuderie del Quirinale at the Quirinal Palace in Rome. --Moroder 09:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:02, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Berlin: Bruno Taut's "Horseshoe Block" --A.Savin 08:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 08:53, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Berlin: Kratzbruch Island --A.Savin 08:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Water container in Lori Berd, Armenia --Poco a poco 08:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 08:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cerros Pintados, Pampa del Tamarugal, Chile --Poco a poco 08:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cocos Monastery, Romania --Poco a poco 08:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Perfect --A.Savin 08:23, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cairns near the Geghard Monastery, Armenia --Poco a poco 08:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Piedras Rojas, Salar de Aguas Calientes, Chile --Poco a poco 08:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 09:52, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grottgera Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grottgera Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 08:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jagiełły Square in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 08:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jagiełły Square in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Elymnias caudata --Jkadavoor 07:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Deer rudel in the nature reserve near Neuhaus in the Aischgrund --Ermell 06:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:27, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Breeding grebe --Ermell 06:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:27, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature reserve Krausenbechhofen --Ermell 06:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good and colorful. -- Ikan Kekek 07:02, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature reserve Krausenbechhofen --Ermell 06:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Peaceful and good. -- Ikan Kekek 07:02, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trillium grandiflorum blooming at the North Walker Woods, Ontario, Canada. --СССР 04:53, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:23, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cornjum, Martenastate, Top of the tower.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Interesting spire. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:24, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Cornjum, Martenastate, Top of the tower.
-
- Nomination Fammensrakken Mûzekamp, Boornzwaag (Netherlands). boat jetty.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 05:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Fammensrakken Mûzekamp, Boornzwaag (Netherlands). boat jetty.
-
- Nomination Kellergasse Kirchenberg in Wartberg/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 04:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion In this case I think it's correct to use a high f-value. Quality is for me high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:14, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dry stream bed of the «Studenza spring» next to the ancient Roman road «Via Julia Augusta» in Oberfederaun, Villach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:59, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Halle de Thémines, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 21:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moulin de Cougnaguet, Cales, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 21:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Grand Canyon of Crimea --N 3 14 15 92 65 18:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 08:11, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of Saint-Martin Church of Themines, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 22:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion The bottom is straight and horizontal, but the upper tower is leaning. Is it doing that in reality or could you fix this? --W.carter 21:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
New version. Tournasol7 13:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Good quality. --W.carter 14:35, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ilse falls in the Ilsetal in Harz National Park near Ilsenburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany --XRay 03:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good photo, but unfortunately sky is overexposured --Michielverbeek 05:25, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Fixed Thank you. I think it's better now. --XRay 15:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Yes it's a bit better, a weak support --Michielverbeek 05:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gate to the Royal Palace in Fes. By User:Ritahouari --Reda benkhadra 16:01, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Beautiful sharp photo, but unfortunately a bit deformed --Michielverbeek 18:31, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
@Michielverbeek: I took the liberty of doing a minor perspective correction to Ritahouari's photo (I presume that's what you mean by deformed). IMO it is good enough for QI, but I leave it to your judgment. Rhododendrites 23:32, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Well done! --Michielverbeek 05:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculptures on the walls of the Saint Peter Church of Assier, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 22:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose there is a lack of contrast, the imgage is oversharped and you cropped the head at the top. Sorry, for me not QI. --Zoppo59 21:57, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Idaeo Andro, Crete. --C messier 18:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline there is a bit of purple fringing on the rocks in the corners and it would be nice to see some more detail in the very bright gravel of the road. Think you could fix that? --W.carter 09:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Not done within a week. --W.carter 14:38, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination School for world trading, Vienna --Thomas Ledl 06:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion The shadows at the bottom are way too dark, think you could brighten them a bit? I like the dog though. :) --W.carter 10:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Finally found time to change that, didn't look bad on my monitor, no blue area in photoshop --Thomas Ledl 16:46, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! Even if we don't get an indication from a program that there are totally black or white areas, some parts may look too dark or bright to the eye anyway. It is about the perception of the image as a whole. Good quality. --W.carter 18:59, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Northern medieval tower in Bozouls, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 22:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Anyone will look, please? Tournasol7 22:29, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Please reload the photo again, bottom part is not visible. Btw: the tower needs a vertical perspective correction, please think about the verticals --Michielverbeek 06:47, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
I don't kbow why, but I have a problem with reloading this photo. Tournasol7 14:40, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:Junger_Igel_P9210039.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Young hedgehog --Ermell 09:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Sorry, I don't think enough of the face is sharp for QI, though I like looking at the hedgehog. If you can sharpen the snout a little, I'd reconsider. -- Ikan Kekek 10:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Here, only the eyes are sharp purposely. I know the picture is marginal and I would possibly withdraw it. Let's see what others think. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 19:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose The DoF seems a bit too shallow in this case. The image also seems a bit overprocessed.--Peulle 10:47, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Tours medievales a Bozouls 03.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Tours médiévales a Bozouls, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 22:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Maybe some opinions? Tournasol7 22:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment It requieres perspective correction both sides are leaned out. can you fix it?, --Cvmontuy 04:27, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- Done, it's better? Tournasol7 22:11, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose No, it is not better. It is even worse than the previous version. On the edges are large parts of blur. For example, see the horse or lantern at the lower right. The editing seems exaggerated the image gets the character of a painting not of a photograph. I guess you're trying to control the weakness of your lense by electronic processing. But this dosn't work. Don't be disappointed by this statement, but for me this is not a good quality. Perhaps there are different opinions --Zoppo59 06:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. Well stated, Zoppo59. -- Ikan Kekek 01:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Heavily overprocessed. It's a nice image illustrating the town's buildings when you see it at low resolution, but as for technical quality this falls far short of QI for the reasons Zoppo59 gave.--Peulle 10:52, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Münster,_Westdeutsche_Lotterie_--_2017_--_6822.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Westdeutsche Lotterie, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Bold perspective, but acceptable to me.--Famberhorst 04:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - I find it very weird. What was the point of it? -- Ikan Kekek 07:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not voting against promotion at this point, but I've changed the status to "Discuss" because I'd like XRay to explain the reason for the weird, unrealistic perspective and give other people an opportunity to express their views. I'm unconvinced so far. -- Ikan Kekek 01:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support Flags and buildings shooting up into the sky, now there is something I've seen before. ;) I have no problem with the "onwards and upwards" perspecitve as it is very well executed here with even more lines joining in to a vanishing point up in the sky. It creates tention in an otherwise rather dull scene of a corporate building. --W.carter 08:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- I don't get it. People complain when a building is tilted by 1 degree or less, but this is OK? How are we supposed to judge what's OK, then? I can't even see a lot of the rotations and tilts people complain about and demand correction of here. But this is really extreme distortion, and it's OK because it's artistic or something? I really don't get it. -- Ikan Kekek 12:36, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Ikan, photography is like editing the WP, sometimes if you get a more interesting shot that is aesthetically pleasing by doing something unconventional, it is OK to ignore the rules. If you are looking for total logic and obedience to rules, you are on the wrong site. ;) --W.carter 16:19, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- I just thought that QIC had certain standards. I don't understand some of the standards here, if imperfections so minor that I don't notice them, even when prompted, are enough to decline a picture if not corrected, but drastic things are OK because they're intentional. I guess the intentionality or lack of it is the issue? -- Ikan Kekek 21:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- I think that's pretty accurate: the intention of the photographer is key. As we can see in the technical merit section, there are many cases in which a photographer can intentionally create a work of art that bends the otherwise logical rules. Do we hang Picasso for painting images that have people's eyes in the wrong places? No, because it's supposed to be like that. If, however, a painter tried to paint a normal portrait and failed to place the eyes properly, we'd consider it a bad painting. I see the same argument as relevant here. (In this particular case, IMO it's a failed attempt at a perspective shot, not a normal photo with perspective issues). --Peulle 11:00, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- That's logical, sure. Side point: Have we seen genuinely Cubist photography at QIC? -- Ikan Kekek 11:35, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- I would say some of the mathematical photos might fall into that category. --W.carter 13:00, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Not in the conventional meaning of "Cubist", which isn't an accurate representation from life of actual geometric figures but the deliberate distortion of subjects like a woman, a clarinet or a pipe through geometric means. -- Ikan Kekek 22:04, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- I know, but that is as close as we have come so far. Doing a real cubist photo, now there's a challenge. --W.carter 22:20, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Not in the conventional meaning of "Cubist", which isn't an accurate representation from life of actual geometric figures but the deliberate distortion of subjects like a woman, a clarinet or a pipe through geometric means. -- Ikan Kekek 22:04, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- I would say some of the mathematical photos might fall into that category. --W.carter 13:00, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- That's logical, sure. Side point: Have we seen genuinely Cubist photography at QIC? -- Ikan Kekek 11:35, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- I think that's pretty accurate: the intention of the photographer is key. As we can see in the technical merit section, there are many cases in which a photographer can intentionally create a work of art that bends the otherwise logical rules. Do we hang Picasso for painting images that have people's eyes in the wrong places? No, because it's supposed to be like that. If, however, a painter tried to paint a normal portrait and failed to place the eyes properly, we'd consider it a bad painting. I see the same argument as relevant here. (In this particular case, IMO it's a failed attempt at a perspective shot, not a normal photo with perspective issues). --Peulle 11:00, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm all for setting up this kind of perspective in "looking-upwards" shots, but this is not one of those. The distance from the camera to the building is too great for such a perspective to be acceptable IMO.--Peulle 14:23, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Idon't like the distortion. Charlesjsharp 09:18, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I rarely decline images only because of composition, but I do not get the point. The extreme wide angle does not support anything here. Nothing of interest in the foreground, random, leaning objects (pole, building, tree) at the margins. Sorry, not QI imo. --Smial 09:47, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle (talk) 09:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)