But you do see one, don't you? ;) At the first glimpse the change might not seem that big, but if you look at the details (the windows for example) you'll see that the sharpness is improved quite significantly. Besides, the lack of sharpness was the reason of the most negative votes in the first nomination, so now that it's solved... diego_pmc19:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Do you really think that we should delist POTY #2? I opposed this image, but this is an extremely fast change of mind. I personally feel that if we delist a POTY finalist, it means that the FPC process would be incomplete and wrong. If we delisted that, we would admit defeat. And I am not one to do this (except if it is blatant). --Freedom to share20:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I also thought about that, but thinking that this is only an improved version of the exact same picture that was POTY #2, I don't why the fact that it once was POTY2 makes changing the FP status over to an improved version wrong. Oh, BTW, defeat over what? And since when is improvement defeat? I mean, c'mon, sheesh. Just for the note: this edited version was uploaded after the original became POTY #2. Now, without any intention to offend, this thing about "it was POTY2, it can't be replaced" is really foolish. Again: it is just an improved version of the exact same picture. Let's say a game becomes GOTY - should that mean the devs shouldn't release fixes/improvements for the game?diego_pmc20:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Though it probably has quite few changes to be changed rigt now, I have to say that I can't understand you people. Even if the improvement is not gigantic, it still is a visible improvement, one that was asked for in the original nomination. I really don't see why it would hurt to make the updated version of the file FP. diego_pmc20:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Info An edited image which improved the sharpness and straightened the verticals has been uploaded. (Original nomination)
Delist --diego_pmc 18:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep I don't see that big of an improvement. --Dori - Talk 19:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Comment The new image should probably go through FPC - at the end of the day, it is a different image. Regards, Ben Aveling 13:08, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
