Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Trango Towers 2.jpg

File:Trango Towers 2.jpg (delist), delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2020 at 15:00:08

•  Info Original nomination
•  Delist Nice view, but for today's standards still not particularly exciting, low resolution, and rather low quality. It's similar as this recently delisted picture. --A.Savin 15:00, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Delist --Ivar (talk) 15:17, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Keep For 2004 this was the top image, made on top. Anyway, the author should be noted - pinged. --Mile (talk) 19:34, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Keep This is a much better composition than the other photo you link to, the quality is not that low, and I again say I don't think we should be delisting photos merely because they're below the current size requirements, unless their status as FPs is really glaring, or otherwise, I'd repeat that we should save time and deputize a bot to remove the FP status of all photos below 2MP. I'd support that in lieu of spending time on one delist nomination of an old FP after another, but I know I won't win that argument so soon after losing it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

  I choose delist suggestions carefully, and I'm against delisting purely on size basis. --A.Savin 21:57, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment OK, I appreciate that. But I don't think the quality is poor enough to be glaring for an old FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:54, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Delist Too small, over-sharpening halo visible at thumbnail size, vignetting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Delist Below 2 MP with no mitigating factors. Again, we're not delisting photos because they're below current size requirements (which are really more like 10 MP for landscapes), but because they're well below current size requirements. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Delist per others.--Peulle (talk) 08:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Delist Per nom --Poco a poco (talk) 16:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Delist It's a very similar case to the other one. Very small and lacking anything truly outstanding to make up for it. Cmao20 (talk) 17:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Regretful delist Beautiful scene that is nevertheless not an FP anymore due to small size and oversharpening, per others. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Delist It looks pretty good at first glance, but it's too small, doesn't contain a lot of details.--Urara Haru 麗春 02:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 9 delist, 2 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 00:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)