Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lagon poé.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Lagon poé.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2011 at 08:07:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Roman.b
- Support -- Roman.b (talk) 08:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Tamba52 (talk) 07:11, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:54, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition and colours. But 72 dpi is very small. We need 300 dpi for printing. Please give us the camera-location. Use the Coordinates tool and add the template underneath the information. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:38, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- I could be wrong but I've always believed the DPI figure inside a JPG is merely a hint to a publishing application about what default size to display / arrange on the page. It has nothing to do with image resolution or printing. This 10MP image will print 12 inches wide by 9 inches tall at 300dpi. One could argue that with the heavy noise-reduction in compact cameras that the official 10MP no longer contains that much resolution detail but that is a different issue from DPI. Colin (talk) 21:56, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't like composition. In such case, I'd rather see the whole tree. As a side note, it's tilted to the left. - Benh (talk) 18:56, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose The quality is so-so (strong noise reduction?). It's hard to tell which dark parts are actually dark (lake bed) and which ones (if any) are just cloud shadows. The tree is debatable... I'd say a more complete view of the tree would look better. --Kabelleger (talk) 21:57, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I like the composition and colours. But the camera has applied some heavy noise reduction and/or compression and even if I resize the image down to 5MP there's still insufficient detail for FP IMO. Plus it is tilted too. Colin (talk) 22:04, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support –ElmA (Talk – My files) 17:47, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:02, 1 December 2011 (UTC)