Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kunsthistorisches Museum HDR 0082.jpg

File:Kunsthistorisches Museum HDR 0082.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2015 at 09:53:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kunsthistorisches Museum HDR 0082.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kunsthistorisches Museum HDR 0082.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info all by Hubertl
•  Info HDR picture from the base of the Maria-Theresia-Monument as seen on the bottom.
•  Support -- Hubertl 09:53, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose dont like color --Verde78 (talk) 12:12, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Verde78 ti pregherei di rivedere il tuo voto,capisco che il colore non ti piaccia ma normalmente qui giudichiamo la composizione,il cosiddetto effetto WOW. Io punterei più su un neutrale.... Ciao e grazie 18:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment This green is exactly as it is. Are you questioning the picture or just the color? --Hubertl 14:00, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Very good and interesting. --Code (talk) 12:54, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:00, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Color by Vassilakou?! ;-) --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

   Comment Including tooth gap, see dome... ;-) --Hubertl 17:45, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Very nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support interesting colours --Pudelek (talk) 20:22, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I like the colors. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:38, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice idea, but posterization on dome and adjacent cupolas. Daniel Case (talk) 05:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 07:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad quality (noise, sharpless, CA, strong flare, star trails like astrophoto while other are picked from single shot, probably hot pixles). But it passed QI - User:Spurzem ? Was HDR necessary ? I see now it become strange habbit, night HDR. But it more spoil than benefit. Composition, I would cut foreground, this pillars of fountain doesn't help. --Mile (talk) 07:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

   Comment really interesting! I didn´t support your picture yesterday, and this is now the revenge? This is not a Kindergarten, Mile! --Hubertl 10:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Hubertl Definitely not a kindergarten. My vote is not a revenge vote, I have explained you all. And as you can see, there are many more who found the same issue, but revenge vote is what you did on my nominee where nobody follows you. Do you feel the difference ? Don't worry, wont answer you with revenge vote. --Mile (talk) 07:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 07:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unnatural lighting, posterization, foreground and pretty dark sky (should have been taken during the blue hour) doesn't work for me. --Ivar (talk) 08:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

   Comment Thanks for reminding me, that this colors are unnatural, I always meant, that this is normal and just painted. And surprise, the sky is dark. Probably, because it´s very late in the evening and the Vienna street lights illuminate the streets, not the sky. Unfortunately, at blue hour time, this pretty cracy effect doesn´t take place, so I captured it this late. BTW: There are more interesting situations in Vienne beside blue hours. --Hubertl 09:53, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose based on the quality issues, especially around the dome. Also not a fan of the green light, but I guess someone there found it suitable. :) — Julian H.^✈ 13:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support What a dream! --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 15:09, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose There is strong noise in the sky. Even this snapshot of mine has less. (And I don't like this kitschy green either, but this alone would be a reason to ignore the nomination, not to oppose.) --A.Savin 01:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

   Comment Color noise from the sky removed. New version.--Hubertl 08:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose Combining night photography and green lighting is a good idea, but your image falls short in quality as others have mentioned above. I'd prefer a less stout composition, something similar to File:Maria-Theresien-Platz Kunsthistorisches Museum Wien 2010.jpg, sacrificing a clear view on the museum's entrace unless you are willing to climb the Maria Theresa statue. You might want to add to the file's description why and for what occassion the building is or appears to be illuminated in green light. Nonetheless this is definitely worth another try. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 17:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination --Hubertl 20:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)