Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jotunheimen mountains.jpg

File:Jotunheimen mountains.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2010 at 13:08:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Jotunheimen mountains.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jotunheimen mountains.jpg

•  Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 13:08, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 13:08, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:34, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - MPF (talk) 22:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 17:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good quality, except I dislike the composition. If the subject is the mountain range, why is a huge amount of the foreground focus on the trail and some rocks? It's a really poor compositional choice. Steven Walling 00:23, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:28, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Steven Walling. Depth of field should be larger. bamse (talk) 09:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice, but the composition is not featurable IMO. --99of9 (talk) 23:50, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Achird (talk) 09:27, 3 July 2010 (UTC) It's good that we see the ground, and not just some mountain peaks in the distance. This way the picture has more relevant information about the mountain range and not just about the highest peaks.

Sure, it is good to see the ground, but why not have both, the peaks in the distance and the foreground sharp? bamse (talk) 10:14, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose Ambiguous composition: neighter the eroded track nor the mountain have sufficient strenght IMO. --Elekhh (talk) 10:29, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice place -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:10, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--MZaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 18:42, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Sorry to be the bad guy but the composition doesn't convince me. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:06, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much foreground. Snowmanradio (talk) 23:17, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:31, 8 July 2010 (UTC)