Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Danube in Ritopek, Serbia.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Danube in Ritopek, Serbia.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2010 at 02:57:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded by Lošmi - nominated by Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:57, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:57, 28 October 2010 (UTC)- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 03:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Thomas888b (talk) 09:06, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment IMO the sky looks a little bit artificial. Ggia (talk) 10:35, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:59, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose nice location, poor details, strange colors --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:24, 28 October 2010 (UTC)- Support Nice composition. --Mile (talk) 16:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose quality issues, looks like fake sky. Athyllis (talk) 20:27, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Agree with Carschten and Athyllis. I also add the almost symmetrical composition and the geometric distortion/tilt. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:19, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose sky (look my comment above), per {Alvesgaspar, Carschten and Athyllis}. Ggia (talk) 13:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I chose to nominate this picture for several reasons. The most important one is because its informative value, ie, infrastructure, vegetation, agruculture, and more information that one gets observing small details. This picture transports the viewer to the location. Photographically speaking, yes, it could be better, but you would have to wait for days and days and days for wheather conditions to improve. However, considering the circumstances and the objective of the image, which is to document and inform, I think that the picture is featurable. This is one instance where the functional aspect of the image overides aesthetical concerns. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Wow, I didn't expect to see one of mine here. Thanks for the nomination, Tomas! As for the sky, I made some denoising and maybe cloning on some overexposed areas (don't remember exactly, I would have to find originals) — but that's pretty much as the sky was on that day. The quality may not be the best, but all I had was awesome view and simple camera :) --Lošmi (talk) 00:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Bjoertvedt (talk) 09:20, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Neutral Great view with a high encyclopedic value! But because of some quality issues (especially the blurry horizon) unfortunately just not good enough for FP. -- MJJR (talk) 14:17, 1 November 2010 (UTC)- Support — Habib M'HENNI [¿tell me?] 17:20, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- MartinD (talk) 17:55, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:15, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas
