Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Concattedrale of Sutri - intern.jpg

File:Concattedrale of Sutri - intern.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2015 at 16:50:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Concattedrale of Sutri - intern.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Concattedrale of Sutri - intern.jpg

•  Info All by -- LivioAndronico talk 16:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- LivioAndronico talk 16:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Sharpness could be better and I'm not sure about the clearly overexposed window (could only have been avoided using HDR, I think). At least the first issue should be improved to get my support. --Code (talk) 05:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Agree with Code – unfortunately, Diliff pushed the FP threshold for church interiors up pretty far :-) Pity the rightmost candle is leaning, spoiling the balance. --Kreuzschnabel 07:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Good, but DoF not the best. Sharpness could be better.--XRay ^talk 09:25, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Did you read Commons:Photography critiques#File:Concattedrale di San Giovenale.jpg?? You improved, but same issues as before. -- RTA 15:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

  Rodrigo I'll explain: I have a cheap camera with a economic objective (both used) ,I paid 15 euro my tripod (...and my wife also accused me:"with that money you bought new shoes to a child!") , I DO NOT have a objective that allows me good shots, I have NOT the sharpest f-stop, I do not have the built-in HDR, I DO NOT have the bracketing. But I have the remote control (paid 2 euro I can afford it). I tried the HDR on pc and in fact the window at least a little bit you see otherwise only light, the only thing I have actually wrong, as he said good XRay, is the DOF. Thank You.--LivioAndronico talk 15:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Done Code,Kreuzschnabel, XRay I increased the Sharpness , for the candle ..... I don't know what I can do --LivioAndronico talk 15:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

• Sorry guys, but I do what I can with what I have available, I hope not to create too much bother, but if so, I apologize. --LivioAndronico talk 15:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

• Why are you yelling?

You have Adobe Photoshop CC, so you can easily bracketing/stacking photos see and achieve the DOF necessary, and then you can use your sharpest (all lens have a better f-stop, do you know what is it?) any time... it is the same technique to HDRI 2 in 1, and very close to panorama technique.

And mirror lock up will reduce camera shake, and with 15 EUR tripod this could be even more necessary...

No, this not the only mistake, you also cut the main arch, and the benches stills in a weird position.

The only problem I see is: We tried to help, and then you react as this, I have a cheap camera also, and more cheap lens actually, so I know that you can improve... -- RTA 16:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

I'm not yelling, I'm underlining, however I do not have the function raises the mirror (Nikon D3200!), Then I took the bow and also the floor, I remind you that I do not have a wide angle, and then if there is little room not I can not help it. --LivioAndronico talk 17:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

This is a underline, anyway, after you focus, you can switch to "live mode" this will make your mirror rise up, and you will have the same effect. And yes, but, I can see half of a bench, maybe a step back, just guessing, I do not know the church, and with one more shot a beautiful panorama 2 min most, between take the extra shot and edit at PS.

One observation, this not a bad photo, I like the composition, the colours, the perspective, I do not know if you missed something in the overexposed window, but not seems the case, and to a church is a interest thing, looks god light, or something like that, but have technical issues that could be solved with small adjusts. -- RTA 11:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Support now. --Code (talk) 19:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Sharp, detailed. Good colors. -- Pofka (talk) 16:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support per Pofka. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. --Σπάρτακος (talk) 22:40, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support The central window is a bit bright but everything else of the picture is very good. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:01, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 23:30, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support nice --Pudelek (talk) 10:48, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:20, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

•  Info Demoted/Delisted to not featured per this consensus. --Cart (talk) 13:37, 18 October 2018 (UTC)