Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bergtocht in de omgeving van bergdorp S-charl 17-09-2019. (actm.) 04.jpg

File:Bergtocht in de omgeving van bergdorp S-charl 17-09-2019. (actm.) 04.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2020 at 16:04:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bergtocht in de omgeving van bergdorp S-charl 17-09-2019. (actm.) 04.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bergtocht in de omgeving van bergdorp S-charl 17-09-2019. (actm.) 04.jpg

1943

1097

1619

1191

4503

3135

Suggestion for a tight crop that might work a bit better than the current "Alternative" --El Grafo

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People# Woman is drawing.
•  Info The woman on the couch makes a sketch of the panorama what we are looking at.
  All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Good composition, but sharpness could be improved. --XRay ^talk 17:45, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, I just don’t get the idea. Then, I read your description and found this necessary; the image does not explain itself, there’s no clear subject. The foreground rock is distracting and does not help to understand what’s going on here. Overall very noisy. I can’t see anything special here, just a snapshot of an elderly lady doing something enigmatic with a book and a pen, plus a foreground rock to fill the frame and a bit of mountain hidden behind pine trees. --Kreuzschnabel 18:51, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Seven Pandas (talk) 22:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I don't find it particularly noisy but otherwise more or less agree with Kreuz. It's not clear just by looking at the photo that she's sketching, and that doesn't make it a great composition, although it's not bad to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:39, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose To me, this just looks like an everyday shot.--Peulle (talk) 08:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support this version only because I love the composition. The alternative isn't interesting enough for me. Cmao20 (talk) 11:30, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, the composition is not harmonious for me, probably mostly because of that big rock in the foreground. The light is also a bit harsh with blown areas. --Cart (talk) 16:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Cart. I can see what you wanted, but it just doesn't come across. Daniel Case (talk) 22:17, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Very good for me. Good composition, beautiful colors und perfect sharpness -- Spurzem (talk) 21:13, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 09:50, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice converging lines to hone in on the subject. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:31, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kreuzschnabel. --Fischer.H (talk) 09:51, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The combo does not work overall IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 18:37, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kreuzschnabel --Ermell (talk) 22:38, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:31, 13 February 2020 (UTC))