Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2019/11

Gare - couloir nord (Strasbourg)

View opposition Nominated by: Gzen92 [discuter] on 2019-06-11 11:02 (UTC) Scope: Couloir nord de la Gare de Strasbourg  Best in Scope -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:50, 12 June 2019 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 16 June 2019 (UTC) 1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Gare - couloir nord (Strasbourg).jpg: 0<-- 2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Gare - couloir nord (Strasbourg) (2).jpg: +3 => 1. File: Gare - couloir nord (Strasbourg).jpg : Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- 2. File: Gare - couloir nord (Strasbourg) (2).jpg : Promoted Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Gzen92 [discuter] on 2019-07-17 10:22 (UTC) Scope: Couloir nord de la Gare de Strasbourg  Comment other photo in the same place, the colors are better, the camera (up right) is less blurry, Gzen92 [discuter] 10:24, 17 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Charles (talk) 18:45, 31 August 2019 (UTC)  Support --Boothsift 02:02, 21 October 2019 (UTC)  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 18:39, 24 October 2019 (UTC) 1. Commons:Valued image candidates/Gare - couloir nord (Strasbourg).jpg: 0<-- 2. Commons:Valued image candidates/Gare - couloir nord (Strasbourg) (2).jpg: +3 => 1. File: Gare - couloir nord (Strasbourg).jpg : Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- 2. File: Gare - couloir nord (Strasbourg) (2).jpg : Promoted Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Portal of maison des Têtes (Colmar)

View opposition Nominated by: Gzen92 [discuter] on 2019-09-19 10:28 (UTC) Scope: Portal of maison des Têtes (Colmar)  Support - Much clearer details. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:30, 6 October 2019 (UTC) Scores: 1. Maison des Têtes - portail (Colmar).jpg: +1 2. Colmar maison tetes portail.jpg: +3 => File:Colmar maison tetes portail.jpg: Promoted. File:Maison des Têtes - portail (Colmar).jpg: Declined. ---- Veikk0.ma (talk) 08:50, 18 November 2019 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-06-23 17:41 (UTC) Scope: Maison des Têtes, Portal, Colmar (France)  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)  Oppose in favor of the other photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:30, 6 October 2019 (UTC)  Support There are different pictures of the same object, once with half closed and one with open gate. The picture with open goal is better designed overall. Look at the window on the left and the background in the yard. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:02, 6 October 2019 (UTC)  Support As per User:Spurzem. Martinvl (talk) 21:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)  Support for reasons mentioned above. The color balance in this one also seems better. -- Veikk0.ma (talk) 07:50, 13 November 2019 (UTC) Scores: 1. Maison des Têtes - portail (Colmar).jpg: +1 2. Colmar maison tetes portail.jpg: +3 => File:Colmar maison tetes portail.jpg: Promoted. File:Maison des Têtes - portail (Colmar).jpg: Declined. ---- Veikk0.ma (talk) 08:50, 18 November 2019 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Meghla Park Lake‎

Commons:Valued image candidates/Meghla Park Lake, Bandarban (9677).jpg	Commons:Valued image candidates/Meghla Park Lake, Bandarban (9695).jpg

Tectus fenestratus (Fenestrate Top Snail), shell

View opposition Nominated by: Butko (talk) on 2010-10-02 12:49 (UTC) Scope: Tectus fenestratus, shell  Support Best in scope. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:31, 2 October 2010 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 14:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC)  Comment I just noted that we have two VIs of this species --Llez (talk) 04:39, 26 October 2019 (UTC)  Oppose - Clearly not as valuable or good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:52, 1 November 2019 (UTC) Scores: 1. Tectus fenestratus shell.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Tectus fenestratus 01.JPG: +3 => File:Tectus fenestratus shell.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. File:Tectus fenestratus 01.JPG: Promoted. <-- ---- Veikk0.ma (talk) 09:33, 18 November 2019 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2016-10-15 18:07 (UTC) Scope: Tectus fenestratus (Fenestrate Top Snail), shell  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. lNeverCry 23:20, 19 October 2016 (UTC)  Comment I just noted that we have two VIs of this species --Llez (talk) 04:40, 26 October 2019 (UTC)  Support - The obvious winner of this contest. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:52, 1 November 2019 (UTC)  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:43, 7 November 2019 (UTC) Scores: 1. Tectus fenestratus shell.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Tectus fenestratus 01.JPG: +3 => File:Tectus fenestratus shell.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. File:Tectus fenestratus 01.JPG: Promoted. <-- ---- Veikk0.ma (talk) 09:33, 18 November 2019 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Enceintes médiévales de Colmar

View promotion Nominated by: Gzen92 [discuter] on 2019-09-11 06:50 (UTC) Scope: Enceintes médiévales de Colmar  Support - Sharper, better light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:24, 6 October 2019 (UTC)  Comment But here the building is very distorted. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:18, 6 October 2019 (UTC)  Support for reasons mentioned above. This one also has better composition than the current VI. -- Veikk0.ma (talk) 07:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC) Scores: 1. Medieval enclosures of Colmar (3).jpg: +2 2. Enceinte médiévale, Lauch (Colmar).jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- => File:Medieval enclosures of Colmar (3).jpg: Promoted. File:Enceinte médiévale, Lauch (Colmar).jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- ---- Veikk0.ma (talk) 09:48, 18 November 2019 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	Commons:Valued image candidates/Enceinte médiévale, Lauch (Colmar).jpg

The Grapes, Mathew Street

View opposition Nominated by: Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2019-02-14 13:04 (UTC) Scope: The Grapes, Mathew Street Used in: it:Luoghi_beatlesiani, Mathew Street, Liverpool  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 15 February 2019 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:11, 18 February 2019 (UTC)  Oppose in favor of the other photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC) Scores: 1. The Grapes, Mathew Street 2019.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. The Grapes, Mathew Street 201911.jpg: +2 => File:The Grapes, Mathew Street 2019.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:The Grapes, Mathew Street 201911.jpg: Promoted. ---- Veikk0.ma (talk) 10:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2019-11-09 08:37 (UTC) Scope: The Grapes, Mathew Street Used in: See global usage Reason: Repainted frontage, no yellow bin at front, no cartoons in window. -- Rodhullandemu (talk)  Support per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)  Support for reasons mentioned in nomination, plus a better perspective. This one's taken from directly in front of the building.-- Veikk0.ma (talk) 07:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC) Scores: 1. The Grapes, Mathew Street 2019.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. The Grapes, Mathew Street 201911.jpg: +2 => File:The Grapes, Mathew Street 2019.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:The Grapes, Mathew Street 201911.jpg: Promoted. ---- Veikk0.ma (talk) 10:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Double-edge safety razors

View opposition Nominated by: -- Veikk0.ma (talk) on 2015-10-18 23:27 (UTC) Scope: Double-edge safety razors Used in: an:شفرة_حلاقة, de:Rasierhobel, en:Razor, en:Safety razor, eo:Sendanĝera razilo, fi:Partahöylä, fr:Rasoir, ja:安全剃刀, nl:Krabbertje, pl:rasoio di sicurezza, pt:Barbeador  Support clear and useful -- Popo le Chien ouah 14:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)  Question @Popo le Chien: Please change the status to "supported". / Merci de changer le statut pour "supported". Cordialement, Yann (talk) 20:13, 19 October 2015 (UTC) @Yann: Oops, my bad. Updated. Popo le Chien ouah 07:52, 20 October 2015 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)  Oppose in favor of the other photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC) Scores: 1. Chrome-Safety-Razor.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Parker-76R Safety Razor.jpg: +3 => File:Chrome-Safety-Razor.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:Parker-76R Safety Razor.jpg: Promoted. ---- Veikk0.ma (talk) 01:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: -- Veikk0.ma (talk) on 2019-11-12 15:07 (UTC) Scope: Double-edge safety razors Used in: de:Rasierhobel, en:Razor, en:Safety razor, wikidata:Q64008239 Reason: Nominated this for review in the scope since the image also demonstrates a double-edge razor blade, which is relevant to a razor of this type. The current Valued image in this scope doesn't include one. In addition, the black handle of the pictured razor adds some contrast to the image, whereas the current Valued image is more one-note. -- -- Veikk0.ma (talk)  Support per nom. I was surprised how many images of razors there are in Commons. IMO the focus stacking and careful composition shown in this one is the better of the two. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GRDN711 (talk • contribs)  Support Nice clear image. Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)  Support per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC) Scores: 1. Chrome-Safety-Razor.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Parker-76R Safety Razor.jpg: +3 => File:Chrome-Safety-Razor.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:Parker-76R Safety Razor.jpg: Promoted. ---- Veikk0.ma (talk) 01:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)