Commons:Signalazzioni pâ vitrina
Signalazzioni pâ vitrina n àutri lingui:
Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(中国大陆) | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/− |
Shortcut: [[:]] |
Sti mmàggini sunnu candidati pâ vitrina. Stari accura di nun cunfùnniri sta pàggina chê mmàggini dô jornu.
Guida[edit]
Candidari na mmàggini[edit]
Lìnii guida pi candidari na mmàggini[edit]
È mpurtanti lèggiri li lìnii guida prima di candidari na mmàggini.
A sèguitu è ripurtatu un riassuntu dê punti essinziali pi candidari e valutari li mmàggini candidati:
- Risuluzzioni - Li fotugrafìi cu na risuluzzioni nfiriuri a 2 miliuna di pixel vennu giniralmenti rifiutati e livati a eccizzioni di mutivi cuntrari di mpurtanza particulari. Si nota ca li mmàggini cu risuluzzioni 1600 x 1200 hannu 1.92 Mpx, appena nfiriuri ô lìmiti mìnimu di 2Mpx.
- Arricurdamu ca li mmàggini carricati nta Commons vennu taliati nun sulu nta schermi tradizziunali di PC ma sunnu utilizzati puru pi stampa e visualizzazzioni nta schermi a risuluzzioni àuta. Nun putemu certu privìdiri quali ticnoluggìi vennu utilizzati ntô futuru quinni è mpurtanti ca li mmàggini scigghiuti pâ vitrina hàianu na risuluzzioni quantu chiù àuta è pussìbbili.
- Scanzioni - È cunzigghiàbbili siguiri la guida â scanzioni, ca pruponi suggirimenti pi l'ottinimentu di mmàggini ottimali
- Focu - ovviamenti ogni oggettu significativu dâ mmàggini havi a èssiri difinutu bonu e a focu.
- Primu pianu e sfunnu - Oggetti n primìssimu pianu o di sfunnu ponnu distràiri dâ vista di l'oggettu principali dâ mmàggini. È lu casu di cuntrullari si quarchi elimentu n primu pianu nun copri nuddu elimentu mpurtanti e ca lu sfunnu nun leva l'attinzioni e renni cunfusa la mmàggini (p'esempiu evitari ca c'è na luci forti ê spaddi di na facci)
- Qualità ginirali - li mmàggini candidati hannu a èssiri di qualità tècnica àuta.
- Li manipulazzioni diggitali nun hannu a èssiri effittuati pi ngannari, ma vannu usati sulu limitatamenti e cu cura pi currèggiri difetti fotugràfici. Li manipulazzioni cumunimenti accittati sunnu lu ritagghiu e la currizzioni di pruspittiva, fucali, culuri e espusizzioni. Manipulazzioni chiù estisi, comu pò èssiri la livata di n'elimentu di distrazzioni dô sfunnu, vannu chiaramenti discrivuti ntô testu di discrizzioni pi menzu dô template {{Retouched picture}}. Manipulazzioni nun discrivuti o discrivuti n manera nzufficienti nun pirmèttinu la candidatura â vitrina.
- Valuri - lu nostru obbiettivu principali è elèggiri li mmàggini cô maiuri valuri rispettu a tutti li sò sìmili. Li mmàggini hannu a èssiri n quarchi manera spiciali, pirciò teni accura:
- quasi tutti li scurati sunnu esteticamenti piacèvuli, nfatti tanti mmàggini sunnu sìmili a l'àutri,
- li scatti nutturni sunnu gradèvuli ma giniralmenti li fotu scattati di jornu ammùstranu tanti chiù dittagghi,
- nun tutti li fotu beddi hannu n rialtà un valuri ca nun è esclusivamenti pirsunali.
Pi quantu arriguarda l'aspettu tècnicu avemu comu paràmitri l'espusizzioni, la cumpusizzioni, lu cuntrollu dô muvimentu e la prufunnità di campu.
- L'espusizzioni s'arrifirisci â cumminazzioni ntra tempu d'espusizzioni e diaframma. Sta cumminazzioni pirmetti giniralmenti d'aviri na curva di tonu ch'è n gradu di rapprisintari ùmmiri e luci cu un dittagghiu accittàbbili. Sta curva veni ditta latitùdini di posa. Na mmàggini pò èssiri ntâ banna vascia, media o àuta. Li fotucàmiri diggitali (e li sò fotu) hannu na latitùdini di posa chiù stritta dâ màchini a pillìcula. La mancanza di dittagghi ntê zoni d'ùmmira nun è nicissariamenti na carattirìstica nigativa. Nfatti chista pò èssiri parti di l'effettu addisiatu, mentri zoni ampii eccissivamenti suvraesposti ponnu distràiri la vista.
- La cumpusizzioni s'arrifirisci â distribbuzzioni di l'elimenti ntâ mmàggini. La “Règula dê Terzi” è na lìnia guida bona pâ cumpusizzioni e rèdita tantu dê studi di disignu. Lu cuncettu principali cunzìdira la mmàggini divisa cu dui lìnii orizzuntali e dui virticali, ca divìdinu la mmàggini n tri parti. Giniralmenti si l'oggettu veni cintratu s'havi n'effettu picca ntirissanti, mentri si l'oggettu veni pusizziunatu nta unu dê punti di ntiressi, ovveru la ntirsizzioni dê quattru lìnii, s'otteni n'effettu dicisamenti megghiu. Li lìnii di l'orizzonti nfatti nun avìssiru a èssiri pusizziunati ntô centru, pirchì tagghiàssiru la fotu a mità; è nveci prifirìbbili scègghiri una dê lìnii orizzuntali. Cumplissivamenti abbisogna tènniri a criari na mmàggini dinàmica.
- Lu cuntrollu dô muvimentu s'arrifirisci â manera ca veni rapprisintatu lu muvimentu ntâ mmàggini. Lu muvimentu pò èssiri bluccatu (siguitu dâ fotucàmira) oppuru pò èssiri lassatu scùrriri, tuttavìa l'oggettu principali dâ mmàggini havi a èssiri visìbbili. Nudda dê dui tècnichi è megghia di l'àutra, l'arrinisciuta bona addipenni esclusivamenti dô tipu d'effettu arricircatu. P'esempiu, fotugrafannu na vittura di cursa c'appari stàtica n rilazzioni ô sfunnu, ca nveci scurri ntô retru, s'otteni l'oggettu principali nta na cunnizzioni stàtica mentri lu sfunnu crea lu senzu di muvimentu. (sta tècnica è chiamata "panning"). D'àutra parti, fotugrafannu un jucaturi di basket n sàutu, bluccatu n rilazzioni a tuttu lu restu dô sfunnu, s'ottinissi un scattu bonu propiu pâ posa nun naturali.
- La prufunnità di campu (PdC o DOF dô ngrisi depth of field) è la distanza davanti e darreri lu suggettu principali c'appari nìtida (a focu). Stu paràmitru veni scigghiutu a sicunna dê nicissità d'ogni mmàggini e pò parimenti migghiurari o mpijurari la qualità di na fotugrafìa. Giniralmenti veni utilizzata na PdC arriduciuta pi mèttiri ô centru di l'attinzioni lu suggettu principali, siparànnulu di tuttu lu restu dô sfunnu. Nveci veni utilizzata na PdC granni p'enfatizzari la prufunnità di na mmàggini. L'obbiettivi grannangulari n gèniri na PdC granni mentri li tiliobbiettivi nn'hannu una dicisamenti arriduciuta. N granni parti la PdC addipenni dâ grapitura dô diaframma: aumenta cô diminuiri dâ grapitura e viciversa.
Pi quantu arriguarda l'aspettuo gràficu pigghiamu nveci n cunzidirazzioni nitidizza, prufunnità, culuri, supirficii, pruspittiva, valanzamentu, prupurzioni, ecc.
- La nitidizza s'arrifirisci a lìnii di cuntornu dô suggettu principali.
- La prufunnità s'arrifirisci â qualità di l'aspettu tridiminziunali dô suggettu. Chistu s'otteni suprattuttu tràmiti na lluminazzioni latirali adiguata (comu chidda dâ prima matinata o dô tardu pumiriggiu) e nun esclusivamenti fruntali, ô fini d'evitari l'appiattimentu dô suggettu.
- Lu culuri è n'elimentu assai mpurtanti e nun havi a èssiri nè troppu nè picca sàturu.
- La supirficii s'arrifirisci â qualità dâ supirficii di l'oggetti fotugrafati.
- La pruspittiva s'arrifirisci a l'angulazzioni dâ quali fu scattata la fotugrafìa. Chista crea na serii di ritti mmagginarii ca sèguinu li spìguli paralleli di l'oggetti e si ncòntranu ntôn puntu ca pò èssiri dintra o fora la mmàggini.
- Lu valanzamentu s'arrifirisci â dispusizzioni di l'oggetti ntâ mmàggini e pò èssiri equilibbratu o pòniri pisu maiuri versu na dirizzioni.
- La prupurzioni s'arrifirisci â rilazzioni ntra li diminzioni di l'oggetti ô nternu dâ mmàggini. Giniralmenti si tenni a rapprisintari oggetti cu rilazzioni arriduciuta, ma na tècnica bona è chidda di rapprisintari l'oggetti di diminzioni minuri n manera chiù estisa, cuntrariamenti a quantu è n rialtà. P'esempiu, un ciuri nicu ca veni rapprisintatu chê stissi diminzioni di na muntagna granni: sta tècnica veni chiamata nvirsioni di scala.
- Ovviamenti, nun tutti li carattirìstichi hannu a èssiri nicissariamenti prisenti. Li mmàggini ponnu èssiri giudicati sia pi na sula carattirìstica ca pi diversi carattirìstichi, macari cuntimpuraniamenti.
- Significatu simmòlicu o rilivanza particulari …Li guerri d'opinioni ponnu accuminzari!…. Va arricurdatu ca na pèssima fotugrafìa dûn suggettu difficilìssimu di fotugrafari è sicuramenti megghiu di na mmàggini ordinaria e tradizziunali (comu na scurata cumuni).
- Li mmàggini ponnu èssiri scigghiuti dûn fotògrafu o di n'ossirvaturi macari pi mutivi culturali, tinennu pirò sempri cuntu dô cuntestu dô scattu e nun di chiddu di l'ossirvaturi. Na mmàggini noltri pò "parrari" ê pirsuni e aviri la capacità d'evucari emuzzioni, ca tuttavìa nun hannu a èssiri nicissariamenti piacèvuli.
P'ottimizzari le pussibbilità di successu dê candidaturi dê tò mmàggini è cunzigghiàbbili lèggire li lìnii guida cumpleti.
Comu candidari na mmàggini[edit]
Si cridi d'aviri attruvatu o criatu na mmàggini ca pò èssiri pigghiata n cunzidirazzioni pâ vitrina, c'havi na discrizzioni apprupiata e na licenza adiguata, allura segui sti nnicazzioni.
Puntu 1: copia lu nomu dâ mmàggini dintra la casedda di testu (ncludennu macari lu prifissu Image: ) a sèguitu dô testu già prisenti ntâ casedda (p'esempiu Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:LU-NOMU-DÂ-TÒ-MMÀGGINI.JPG.) e nfini clicca lu pulsanti càndida na mmàggini nova.
Puntu 2: segui li struzzioni dâ pàggina â quali veni culligatu e sarva li canciamenti appurtati.
Puntu 3: nzirisci manualmenti un culligamentu â pàggina criata n cima â lista candidati:
Clicca ccà e agghiunci lu testu ca segui a l'accuminzagghia dâ lista di candidaturi:
- {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:LU-NOMU-DÂ-TÒ-MMÀGGINI.JPG}}
Vutari[edit]
Pi vutari poi usari li templates siguenti:
- {{A favuri}} ( Support) pi suppurtari la candidatura,
- {{Cuntrariu}} ( Oppose) p'oppunìrisi â candidatura,
- {{Niutrali}} ( Neutral) p'esprìmiri un pariri niutrali,
- {{Cummentu}} ( Comment) p'esprìmiri sulu un cummentu,
- {{Nfurmazzioni}} ( Info) p'agghiùnciri dê nfurmazzioni c'arriguàrdanu la mmàggini,
- {{Addumannata}} ( Question) p'addumannari nfurmazzioni.
Poi noltri evidinziari ca la mmàggini nun havi pussibbilità d'èssiri eliggiuta cô template {{FPX|mutivu}}, nzirennu ô postu di mutivu li raggiuni pê quali è chiaramenti nun accittàbbili pâ vitrina.
Ogni vutanti è prijatu di mutivari lu propiu votu cu quarchi palora, n manera particulari si si vota contra. Arricorda noltri d'agghiùnciri la tò firma (~~~~). Li voti anònimi nun sunnu accittati.
Candidari na mmàggini â livata dâ vitrina[edit]
Li standard dâ vitrina càncianu cô tempu. Pò succèdiri ca na mmàggini c'avìa statu eliggiuta pâ vitrina nun è chiù adatta ê standard attuali.
Sta lista è pirciò cumposta dê mmàggini cunzidirati nun chiù adatti a ristari ntâ vitrina. Vota:
- {{Mantèniri}} Keep pi fari sì ca la mmàggini resta ntâ vitrina.
- {{Livari}} Oppose pi fari sì ca la mmàggini veni livata dâ vitrina.
Si cunzìdiri ca na mmàggini nun rispetta chiù li criteri dê mmàggini n vitrina, candidala pâ livata cupiannu lu nomu dâ mmàggini dintra sta casedda di testu (ncludennu lu prifissu di l' Image:) a sèguitu dô testu già prisenti n chista:
Ntâ pàggina appena criata ncludi:
- Li nfurmazzioni supra l'orìggini dâ mmàggini (auturi dâ mmàggini, auturi dâ candidatura);
- Un culligamentu â candidatura nizziali pô nzirimentu ntâ vitrina (ca va nzirutu sutta ==Collegamenti== ntâ discrizzioni dâ mmàggini);
- Lu mutivu pô quali l'hai candidata pâ livata dâ vitrina e lu tò Nomu utenti.
Doppu aviri fattu chistu hai a nziriri manualmenti un culligamentu â pàggina criata a l'accuminzata dâ lista di livata dâ vitrina.
Pulìtica d'elizzioni pâ vitrina[edit]
Règuli ginirali[edit]
- Lu pirìudu di vutazzioni è di 9 jorna cumpleti, a pàrtiri dâ candidatura. Lu risurtatu veni ditirminatu â fini di stu pirìudu. Li voti agghiunciuti lu dècimu jornu o a sèguitu nun vèninu cunzidirati.
- Sunnu bimminuti li cuntribbutura anònimi.
- Li cuntribbuti d'anònimi ê discussioni sunnu bimminuti.
- Li voti di cuntribbutura anònimi nun sunnu accittati.
- La candidatura nun cunta comu votu. Lu votu di supportu va esplicitatu.
- L'autura dê candidaturi ponnu ritirari li sò mmàggini candidati n ogni mumentu. Chistu s'otteni scrivennu simplicimenti "I withdraw my nomination" (n ngrisi: ritiru la mè candidatura)
o agghiuncennu lu testu{{withdraw|~~~~}}
. - Arricorda ca l'obbiettivu dô pruggettu Wikimedia Commons è di custruiri na cugghiuta di mmàggini utilizzàbbili di tutti li pruggetti Wikimedia, nclusi pruggetti futuri pussìbbili. Pirciò nun abbisogna pinzari ca chistu è na cugghiuta didicata esclusivamenti ô pruggettu Wikipedia e pi tantu li mmàggini nun vannu valutati n funzioni di chistu.
- Li mmàggini vennu livati dâ lista di candidaturi si nun hannu voti a supportu (esclusu chiddu di l'auturi dâ candidatura) intra lu quintu jornu dâ candidatura (La règula dô quintu jornu)
- Li mmàggini dutati dô template {{FPX}} nun hannu a èssiri livati dâ lista intra li 48 uri succissivi ô mumentu ntô quali fu applicatu lu template, purchì nun ci sia nuddu votu a supportu oltri chiddu di l'auturi dâ candidatura.
Règuli d'ammissioni e livata dâ vitrina[edit]
Na mmàggini candidata veni ammisa â vitrina si si virìficanu li cunnizioni siguenti:
- La licenza è adiguata (ovviamenti).
- Si havi armenu 5 voti a supportu.
- Si lu rapportu ntra voti pro/contra è armenu 2/1 (si havi dui terzi di maiuranza).
- Nun ponnu èssiri ammisi â vitrina diversi virsioni dâ stissa mmàggini, nn'havi a èssiri scigghiuta una sula virsioni.
Li criteri pâ livata dâ vitrina sunnu li stissi pi l'ammissioni a chista, cumprisu lu pirìudu di votu e la règula dô quintu jornu (talìa ntê Règuli ginirali).
Ogni utenti spertu pò purtari a tèrmini na vutazzioni: pi struzzioni supra comu chiùmpiri st'opirazzioni talìa la guida pi purtari a tèrmini la vutazzioni.
Nfini, sî curtisi[edit]
Pi piaciri nun ti scurdari ca la mmàggini ca stai giudicannu è fruttu dô travagghiu di quarchidunu. Èvita d'usari frasi comu è orrìbbili: si t'hai a oppòniri nun fari cunzidirazzioni spiacèvuli. Noltri arricorda ch'è nicissariu scrìviri n ngrisi si voi èssiri cumprisu di l'àutri utenti e ca lu tò utilizzu di sta lingua e chiddu di l'àutri utenti pò comuegghiè ginirari ncumprinzioni si nun s'havi na canuscenza òttima, pirciò scegghi li palori cu cura.
Bonu votu… e arricorda ca.... tutti li règuli ponnu aviri quarchi eccizzioni.
Talìa macari[edit]
- Pi canciari la lista di candidaturi: Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
- Pi na lista crunulòggica dê candidaturi: Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological
- Pi n'archiviu dê candidaturi pricidenti: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
- Pi struzzioni supra comu purtari a tèrmini na prucidura di votu: Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished
- Lista di tèrmini basi dô linguaggiu fotugràficu
- Candidaturi pê mmàggini di qualità
- Crìtica fotugràfica
- Guida â scanzioni
Ìnnici[edit]
Candidati pâ vitrina[edit]
Featured picture candidates[edit]
File:Oxelaëre.- Porche de l église Saint-Martin, relief de Ste Cécile.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2024 at 09:43:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- InfoRelief, carved with the effigy of Ste Cécile represented with her zither, to the right of the portal of the Saint-Martin church. Oxelaëre (Nord, Fr).
all by me -- Pierre André (talk) 09:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Pierre André (talk) 09:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Chlebowski-Bajazyt w niewoli.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2024 at 09:18:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others
- Info created by wp:en:Stanisław Chlebowski - uploaded by Ejdzej - nominated by Elvorix -- Bayezid I held captive by Timur, painting by Stanisław Chlebowski (1878) ×Elvorixtalk 09:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ×Elvorixtalk 09:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Unfortunately, at 1.6 megapixels, this image is below the required minimum resolution of 2 megapixels. Perhaps you can find a higher resolution with a freely available license, in which case we would appreciate a renewed nomination. Sorry for that. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 12:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
File:Spectacled weaver (Ploceus ocularis ocularis) male feeding Mbombela.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 21:15:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)
- Info No FPs of this species. I think the garden tree may be an exotic. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support - WildMouse76 (talk) 03:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Plaza de España (Sevilla) - 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 19:18:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain
- Info created and uploaded by Kadellar - nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 19:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice light but the tower on the right has visible purple fringing. Would happily support if cleaned up. BigDom (talk) 00:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:AMAZONIA - Gran Exposicion Sebastiao Salgado - Madrid 2023 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 19:09:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Others
- Info AMAZÔNIA Exhibition, Madrid, 2023. Created by Sebastião Salgado - uploaded by Nerve net - nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 19:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment So Nerve net has taken photos of photographs by Sebastião Salgado, a living photographer, at an exhibition. How does that work in terms of copyright? Was it ok because the exhibition was in an institution similar to a museum, or what? --Cart (talk) 20:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- COM:FOP Spain only mentions outdoor spaces ("in parks or on streets, squares or other public tracks and passes") and in any case the work would have to be permanently located there. Works like this that were only shown in a temporary exhibition in a museum don't seem to be covered. I think if this were sent to Deletion Requests it would go. BigDom (talk) 00:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello! The exhibition team told us that it was allowed to take photographs of the exhibition and publish them over Internet. I do not have a written consent from them if you are asking for it.
- The exhibition took place at the publicly owned Fernán Goméz Theater (Madrid City Council): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teatro_Fern%C3%A1n_G%C3%B3mez
- Exhibition information: https://www.teatrofernangomez.es/actividades/amazonia
- Press release: https://www.teatrofernangomez.es/prensa/amazonia-sebastiao-salgado Nerve net (talk) 07:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Underexposed, Overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I do not want to have this image promoted -- Javier Perez Montes (talk) 07:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your interest, but I do not want to have this image promoted. Nerve net (talk) 07:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- COM:FPC: Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~ -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank You! Nerve net (talk) 09:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- COM:FPC: Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~ -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you all! But I do not want to have this picture promoted in any way. Nerve net (talk) 09:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Санкт-Петербург, Чкаловский 46, барельеф.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 17:20:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 17:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 17:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Alouette bilophe.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 17:12:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Alaudidae (Larks)
- Info Temminck's lark (Eremophila bilopha) in Douz desert, Tunisiacreated by Houssembo - uploaded by Houssembo - nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I've just uploaded this image which I prefer even though I would not nominate it for FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The bird is looking away -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Facóquero común (Phacochoerus africanus), parque nacional del Lago Mburo, Uganda, 2024-02-01, DD 66.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 14:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Suidae (Pigs)
- Info Common warthog (Phacochoerus africanus), Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Correct focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Gorila de montaña (Gorilla beringei beringei), parque nacional de la Selva Impenetrable de Bwindi, Uganda, 2024-02-02, DD 80.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 14:14:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Hominidae (Great Apes)
- Info Female mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei beringei), Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 17:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Focus on the eyes, high resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Courvite Isabelle Jbil NP.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 13:33:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family : Glareolidae
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would always recommend checking Wikipedia to see if a nomination is better than the image in the infobox. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- We are not in the section Valued image candidates here and the image in the infobox has not a better quality than this one (look at the edges of the bird in the infobox image, in addition the image tilts to the left). El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Anas zonorhyncha swimming.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 13:19:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas
- Info created and uploaded by Alpsdake - nominated by TKsdik8900 -- TKsdik8900 (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TKsdik8900 (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Aerial image of Finsteraarhorn (view from the south).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 09:36:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Valais
- Info The Finsteraarhorn is the highest mountain of the Bernese Alps, the ninth-highest mountain of the Alps, the most prominent peak of Switzerland and the third-most prominent peak in the Alps; the image shows the 1200 m high southwest face which lies in the canton of Valais; created by Carsten Steger - uploaded by Carsten Steger - nominated by Carsten Steger -- Carsten Steger (talk) 09:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Carsten Steger (talk) 09:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 12:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Definitely impressive to me! -- Radomianin (talk) 22:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Вид Нижний Урунгач.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 18:47:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Uzbekistan
- Info created and uploaded by Arina Pan - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 18:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 18:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:008 Black-headed heron from up close in the Tarangire National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 12:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Ardea
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 23:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High resolution and level of detail, striking look -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:View from the Schlossbergalm 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 09:10:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 09:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 23:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Elaborately created panorama in which there is much to discover. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Dunnock (Prunella modularis) 3.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 07:33:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Prunellidae (Accentors)
- Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 07:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 07:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Falesia Nome e Cognome2.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 02:27:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily
- Info: rock climbers at the Nome e Cognome crag; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would try to clone out the power line in the background --Llez (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Llez: Done --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 10:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Chiesa di San Michele, Savoca.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 02:27:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info Saint Michael Church, Savoca, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, no wow IMO. —kallerna (talk) 07:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very good light, but just a QI in my opinion, because the architecture is not exceptional. Flat façades -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Killdeer (20453).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 00:36:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Charadrius
- Info Adult killdeer (Charadrius vociferus). All by — Rhododendrites talk | 00:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Got lucky with it walking right towards me for a moment. — Rhododendrites talk | 00:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well captured -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 07:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 10:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 23:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 09:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Alexander McQueen clamshell dress (51611p).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 00:32:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
- Info A razor clamshell dress by Alexander McQueen for his spring/summer 2001 collection "Voss", featured here as part of a Metropolitan Museum of Art exhibition "Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion". all by — Rhododendrites talk | 00:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 00:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support another kind to present shells --Llez (talk) 08:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 10:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poor skin inside :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 09:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 12:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I wish he didn't kill himself -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Romanesco broccoli texture.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 18:20:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Vegetables_(raw)
- Info nomination per ArionStar's request; c/u/n by Ivar (talk) 18:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing textures and shapes! ★ 21:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quality is excellent with a very high level of detail and a good light. The subject itself, with its natural fractal structure, is another wonder -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 11:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Never knew this was in my mouth -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Exellent. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 18:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support As fractal lover :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Benoît Mandelbrot would love this image. --Carsten Steger (talk) 09:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 12:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. A fascinating vegetable. – Aristeas (talk) 15:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Titan2456 (talk) 14ː12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Leopard (Panthera pardus pardus) young female Kruger 2.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 09:03:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info A leopard 'in its habitat'. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support This one is better. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Definitely better. ★ 12:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Impressive but temperature too cold? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think the white balance needs further adjustment on the magenta/green axis - there is a strong magenta cast to the image. JJ Harrison (talk) 23:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Ou-Line-Series701-N12.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 08:32:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created by MaedaAkihiko - uploaded by MaedaAkihiko - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 08:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 08:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Kobbet lahwé à la Marsa.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 08:23:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Tunisia
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 08:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 08:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Seems to be missing EXIF data? (I went to look for the lens type and there is only an attribution in the EXIF). — Rhododendrites talk | 12:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like sky and clouds here. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice, but motif and quality are not outstanding. Sky is noisy and there are some spots. --Milseburg (talk) 14:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The sky has a weird turquoise color. Oversaturated? And is very noisy, with dust spots -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: would support if the sky is denoised and cleaned up. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Allium purple sensation, 17-04-2024 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 04:07:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family : Amaryllidaceae
- Info Budding flower bud of an Allium purple sensation. Focus stack of 38 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Outstanding composition and well-made stacking, so don't want to vote against it, but lower part of the flower is rather noisy, so no support from me either. Красный wanna talk? 08:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Do you mean {{Neutral}}? ★ 17:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: Thanks for the hint. However, please do not set the Neutral example as an active template, otherwise it will be counted by the bot. Please use either a NoWiki code (e.g.
{{Neutral}}
) or the plain symbol (e.g. File:Symbol neutral vote.svg) without template. I took the liberty to do so. Thank you and best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Radomianin, thanks for the notification. I have changed the "File" with a
{{tl}}
otherwise the FPCBot considers there's an alternative, and asks which image should be promoted -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good point concerning possible misreadings as an alternative. Thanks a lot, Basile! -- Radomianin (talk) 05:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Radomianin, thanks for the notification. I have changed the "File" with a
- @ArionStar: Thanks for the hint. However, please do not set the Neutral example as an active template, otherwise it will be counted by the bot. Please use either a NoWiki code (e.g.
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 23:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Пристан во Преспанското Езеро.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 22:25:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
- Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral It would be great without the (somewhat ugly) white board -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Трпејца со Охридското Езеро.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 22:06:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#North Macedonia
- Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Thueringen NSG271 Bischofsau1.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 22:00:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Thuringia
- Info created by KaiBorgeest - uploaded by KaiBorgeest - nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Technical issue and low wow factor. The clouds are burnt (blown highlights) and the scenery is not exceptional in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile --Milseburg (talk) 14:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: How do you define the 'Wow factor'?--KaiBorgeest (talk) 21:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- See "Wow factor" in the dictionary : "a quality or feature of something that makes people feel great excitement or admiration" or "a quality that makes someone feel excited or surprised when they first see something". See also COM:I: "Featured pictures candidates should meet all the following requirements, must have a "wow factor" and may or may not have been created by a Commons user. Given sufficient "wow factor" and mitigating circumstances, a featured picture is permitted to fall short on technical quality." -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment In my opinion it's unappealing how the horizon intersects the plants, it makes for a messy composition Henrysz (talk) 23:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Continental I-1430 NASM.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 18:57:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Others
- Info created by Dane A. Penland, uploaded by Nimbus227, nominated by Yann
- Info Continental Hyper I-1430-11, Inverted V-12 Engine. One-half right front view.
- Support For a change from nice birds and cute animals. ;o) -- Yann (talk) 18:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. Thanks for bringing something fresh! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Attractive photo in cavalier perspective; and per Yann and Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice machines and cute engines? :) — Rhododendrites talk | 12:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 11:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Frank and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 15:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:At Tenerife 2023 644 - Sub Fun Cinco entering Marina San Miguel.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 17:58:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Submarines
- Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 17:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 17:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see anything extraordinary here. Light and compo aren't special. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing exttraordinary and yacht in the background riuns the composition. Красный wanna talk? 08:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
File:006 Wild Baby Alpine Chamois Creux du Van and Swiss Alps Sunset colors Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 13:18:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Artiodactyla (Even-toed Ungulates)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose That dark blurred area on the right spoils the composition IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 17:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. I guess you are talking of one of the two trees? They are the reason the chamois were there: close to them the snow is less deep and they can dig the snow with their hooves to eat the grass. The trees are thus part of the habitats of these chamois, which is one of the reasons why the gallery Animals in their habitat was chosen for this picture. Also, I actually personally think that they give a nice touch to the image with their soft colors illuminated by the sunset. Also both trees point to the subject and the chamois clearly stands out with its dark color in this snowy background with soft sunset illuminated colors. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support From the point of view of the chosen gallery, I think the composition is appropriate. In my opinion, the blurred elements in the foreground and background can be considered a compositional style. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin --Terragio67 (talk) 03:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose (regretfully). I have to agree with Poco2 that the blurred area on the right ruins it. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. I still personally think that the background tree is a nice echo of the foreground tree, giving the viewer a sense of what the foreground tree actually looks like while also beeing relevant to the chamois' environment. Giles Laurent (talk) 13:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a fair point, but the tree takes the salience. SHB2000 (talk) 22:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- I still think that the chamois stands out way more than the background tree for multiple reasons : 1) the chamois is the clear subject in the middle of the frame ; 2) the chamois is wearing it's black winter coat which makes it stand out compared to the light-colored snow ; 3) the bokeh is cleary separating the subject from the background ; 4) the foreground tree creates perfect leading lines that point directly at the center of the frame where the subject is placed ; 5) the snow horizon on the background on the left side creates another leading line to the center of the frame where the subject is placed ; 6) the snow on the middleground of the image that goes from the bottom right of the picture to the center also creates another leading line pointing to the subject ; 7) finally, even the background tree is pointing right at the subject. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a fair point, but the tree takes the salience. SHB2000 (talk) 22:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. I still personally think that the background tree is a nice echo of the foreground tree, giving the viewer a sense of what the foreground tree actually looks like while also beeing relevant to the chamois' environment. Giles Laurent (talk) 13:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop IMO, the photo is mainly just "background". —kallerna (talk) 07:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. The gallery "animals in their habitats" was especially created to feature pictures where a step back was taken and where a wider view is presented. Per creator of this gallery : "It is so great to see the animals as part of photos of their habitat. So please, when you super-record the critters, do also take a step back and compose a few great photos where we can see a bit more of the places where they live". This image is exactly that, it allows to have a wider view that changes from the usual "mugshots" that we often see on animals here. The wider view on this shot was intended for various reasons. It emphasizes the small size of the subject and the fact that it is still a small baby on a big snow covered environment with only a few trees. The wider look also allows to see two trees that are relevant to the environment of the chamois in winter because close to them there is less snow on the ground and the chamois can more easily dig the snow with their hooves to eat the grass. Finally the wider shots also allows to showcase the swiss alps in the background beautifully illuminated by sunset light to complete the scene. If the image would have been cropped/framed to only include the chamois, it would have in my opinion a lot less educational value because we would be missing all these interesting elements about it's habitat. Moreover the wider shots allows to showcase the beautiful sunset colors which is a rare thing to capture with wildlife photography. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- If so, the habitat should not be OOF. —kallerna (talk) 13:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- The chamois is still the main subject of the image so it's normal to have the focus on him. The bokeh is destined to bring the viewer's attention to the main subject while still allowing to have an idea of the surroundings, without needing to see them in details (or they would steal attention from the main subject). We have several FP on the gallery "Animals in their habitat" that also have bokeh background : 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Moreover, except if background is extremely close to the subject (or if the subject is far away), you will always have bokeh at 600mm. The use of a 600mm zoom was intentional, as it creates a compression effect that allows the background elements to look closer than they really are. Here is an exemple with a photo (from the internet) of the Château de Chillon with a probably like 25-35mm lense. The red square illustrates where the Dents du Midi are. Here is now a photo of the Château de Chillon taken from more far away with a 155mm zoom in order to have the Dents du Midi mountain appearing in big behind the castle to make them look like they are closer than they really are. This same technique was used in this shot in order to have the Swiss Alps appearing in the background (else they would be extremely small in the background because they are 40-60km further away). -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- This new gallery was not an improvement for several of us. See Strange disconnected extra gallery.
- kallerna takes great photographs of animals in their environment, like File:Vicugna vicugna Salar de Chalviri.jpg and File:Faroese sheep Sumba 1.jpg (both FP) and I think that if you choose to include the background, then this visible context should be attractive / aesthetic in some way. Otherwise the animal is just too small -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- You are comparing a domestic animal like a sheep that can extremely easily be approached + an animal that can also easily be approached by humans (vicuna) to a chamois, a wild animal that can't be approached like that. Both pictures you linked were taken at 21mm and 48mm at a close distance (=no bokeh), which is usually not something that can be done with this animal where you have to use a telephoto lense like the 600mm that I used (=inevitable bokeh). To photograph the animal I had to crawl on the snow and hide my body behind a natural bump on the ground with only my head, camera and hands appearing to the chamois, in order to not disturb him and not feel threatening to him or he probably would have fled. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are a bunch of photos of Rupicapra rupicapra on Commons and Wikipedia. So it doesn't seem so difficult to approach them.
- Backgrounds in focus don't necessary "steal attention from the main subject", at least not in the two examples shown above.
- The problem with long focal lengths is they focus on small things. Everything around gets blurry. So the compromise "subject + around" is difficult. Since it quickly gives an insignifiant small subject lost in a big uninteresting space. I think that's what Kallerna says when writing the photo is mainly just "background". Regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you look the images from your link you will notice that they have been all taken from very far or with a telephoto lense, and/or went into a big crop, which proves my point that they are not as easily approachable as a domestic sheep or a vicuna. The group of chamois that I saw was a bit nervous and I have no doubt they would very likely have fled if I would be standing up and not lying on the ground with just my head visible. Moreover, for the sheep image you link I personally have my attention very much directed to the houses on the right because they are in clear focus and I personally don't like animal photography with human constructed elements but that's just my personal taste. Finally I don't think that the subject gets lost in a big uninteresting space for this photo because as said above it emphasizes the small size of the subject and the fact that it is still a small baby on a big snow covered environment with only a few trees. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Proportionally, it's a huge background with small animal. And the background itself is... white, with almost nothing apart from distracting blurry elements -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know it's more rare to see such composition on FPC because here people usually only do mugshots of wild animals but there still are other images in the same situation as linked above : 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. I personally think that this composition brings value to the image because it allows to have a view of the environment and also because it tells a story that a narrow croped/frame picture would not be able to tell. Also I personally think that the background would be distracting if it was in focus and that the bokeh beautifully separates the subject from the background while still beeing possible to understand the context. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Proportionally, it's a huge background with small animal. And the background itself is... white, with almost nothing apart from distracting blurry elements -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you look the images from your link you will notice that they have been all taken from very far or with a telephoto lense, and/or went into a big crop, which proves my point that they are not as easily approachable as a domestic sheep or a vicuna. The group of chamois that I saw was a bit nervous and I have no doubt they would very likely have fled if I would be standing up and not lying on the ground with just my head visible. Moreover, for the sheep image you link I personally have my attention very much directed to the houses on the right because they are in clear focus and I personally don't like animal photography with human constructed elements but that's just my personal taste. Finally I don't think that the subject gets lost in a big uninteresting space for this photo because as said above it emphasizes the small size of the subject and the fact that it is still a small baby on a big snow covered environment with only a few trees. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- You are comparing a domestic animal like a sheep that can extremely easily be approached + an animal that can also easily be approached by humans (vicuna) to a chamois, a wild animal that can't be approached like that. Both pictures you linked were taken at 21mm and 48mm at a close distance (=no bokeh), which is usually not something that can be done with this animal where you have to use a telephoto lense like the 600mm that I used (=inevitable bokeh). To photograph the animal I had to crawl on the snow and hide my body behind a natural bump on the ground with only my head, camera and hands appearing to the chamois, in order to not disturb him and not feel threatening to him or he probably would have fled. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- The chamois is still the main subject of the image so it's normal to have the focus on him. The bokeh is destined to bring the viewer's attention to the main subject while still allowing to have an idea of the surroundings, without needing to see them in details (or they would steal attention from the main subject). We have several FP on the gallery "Animals in their habitat" that also have bokeh background : 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Moreover, except if background is extremely close to the subject (or if the subject is far away), you will always have bokeh at 600mm. The use of a 600mm zoom was intentional, as it creates a compression effect that allows the background elements to look closer than they really are. Here is an exemple with a photo (from the internet) of the Château de Chillon with a probably like 25-35mm lense. The red square illustrates where the Dents du Midi are. Here is now a photo of the Château de Chillon taken from more far away with a 155mm zoom in order to have the Dents du Midi mountain appearing in big behind the castle to make them look like they are closer than they really are. This same technique was used in this shot in order to have the Swiss Alps appearing in the background (else they would be extremely small in the background because they are 40-60km further away). -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- If so, the habitat should not be OOF. —kallerna (talk) 13:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice light but 1) the feet are hidden, 2) the big blurry brown mass is distracting, and 3) the snowy branch is out of focus. Cluttered composition in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. I don't think the feet beeing hidden is a problem for ungulates and we have multiple FP in that situation (in addition to the image of the domesetic sheep you sent yourself above) : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, etc. Moreover, as explained above, to photograph the animal I had to crawl up a a natural bump in the snow to only have my head, hands and camera appearing to the animal so that it would not feel threatened by me. If I had stood up to have the chamois feet in the image, not only would the chamois have probably fled, but also the composition would have been extremely boring because you would not have the swiss alps in the background and just a boring high-angle shot with just ground visible in the background (click here for an illustration). As for the two trees you mention, they are relevant to the chamois environment. In my opinion the image would have been much more cluttered if they were in focus (which anyway can not be the case at 600mm) and they would also be very distracting in my opinion because they would steal the attention from the chamois. So I still think that having them blured not only creates a good classical foreground, midleground, background photography which gives a 3 dimensional sense to the image but also allow to keep the attention on the main subject. Also, as already said, the foreground tree creates a perfect leading line to the subject just as many others that are present in the image. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Would, would, would... if, if, if :-) So to be short, it's sometimes just a question of luck. The environment here was not so cooperative in my personal opinion, but your subjective taste is of course totally acceptable -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Seeing how the chamois were a bit nervous, I have almost no doubt they would have fled if I stood up (but we can never be 100% certain of course). Also, I have been a dozen times to this place and I have no doubt that I was extremely lucky to cumulate multiple favorable factors for this image : 1) there is only a few days/weeks every year that you can have snow there as it is not very high in altitude and also because winters are becoming warmer and warmer lately ; 2) chamois are not often seen there (most of the time it’s just ibexes that are seen) ; 3) the picture was taken with beautiful sunset colors which is rare and lucky for wildlife photography because usually the wild animals will not be placed in a good place or you will face challenging light conditions with for example contre-jour and for this shot I was lucky that the baby chamois was well placed to not have contre-jour, it was also lucky that the chamois was not in a shadow area that would not be benefiting from the sunset colors and it was also lucky that the chamois lifted its head in a way that it could be beautifully illuminated by the soft sunsets light ; 4) the combination of all of the previous elements is extremely lucky because it is way more likely to see the chamois without snow or with no beautiful sunset colors ; 5) it was very interesting to witness how the chamois adapted to this unusual situation for them (snow covering their food and having to go to places with less snow to dig to reach the grass) ; 6) having that small baby chamois far enough from the rest of the herd (especially form the mother) was extremely lucky and allowed to isolate the subject in this big snowy fairy tail environment ; 7) 98% of the time the chamois was just eating/digging the ground with head down and it was only during a very small few seconds that it had its head up like that to monitor me (even though I just had my head, hands and camera visible for him in order to not appear threatening)(but most of the time it was the rest of the herd that kept monitoring me) ; 8) most of the time with wildlife animal you are not able to place yourself to have the elements you want in the background. For this shot I was extremely lucky to be able to have the Swiss alps in the background. 9) the chamois was really perfectly placed with all these leading lines pointing to him, which is uncommon for wildlife photography. With all these elements I honestly personally think this image is of FP level. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Would, would, would... if, if, if :-) So to be short, it's sometimes just a question of luck. The environment here was not so cooperative in my personal opinion, but your subjective taste is of course totally acceptable -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Rambutão.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 12:48:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
- Info created and uploaded by ArionStar, nominated by me -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support (fun fact, tastes like persimmon but sort of resembles a lychee) -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you! Another one eye-catching textures and shades captured by me. ★ 12:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pleasantly striking. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Restaurant Amigos de Acapulco (window), Chico.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 04:49:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
- Info Window of the Mexican restaurant Amigos de Acapulco, located on Oroville Avenue in Chico, California. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 04:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support nice one, but the half-cut weeds at the bottom right kinda ruin the wow for me. It would me much better with whole weeds or no weeds at all IMO. Красный wanna talk? 09:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the constructive review, Красный. I agree that without the small plant, it would be a classical composition with conformity. Keeping it as an intrusive object was intentional because it matches the green paint residue from the previous coat as well as the other tiny plants on the left. It is cropped because the wall actually ends at the right edge of the image. Also, because of the plant, the asphalted section fits as a contrast. But you can find an edited version without the plant for comparison under the SwissTransfer link. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A classic XRay's style. ★ 12:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--SDudley (talk) 21:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful exemplary composition. – Aristeas (talk) 14:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Guermassa, vue sur le village.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 00:55:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Tunisia
- InfoGeneral view of Guermassa, Berber village in southern Tunisia created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by نعيم قربوسي -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 00:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 00:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The clone stamp error should be fixed.--Ermell (talk) 21:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- i fix the problem , thank you Skander zarrad (talk) 21:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful view of a stunning site. – Aristeas (talk) 14:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Grèbe huppé Thyna008.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 21:55:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Podicipedidae (Grebes)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 03:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 06:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Most interesting part, the head is out of focus. The focus is on the feathers of the back, behind. And with this low resolution, only 2,159 × 2,879 pixels, it is a real quality issue -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A striking snapshot, but unfortunately the technical quality is inadequate. I wonder why the image received QI status when head and eyes are not in focus. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Corvus corax in puddle at Bonny Doon Beach.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 17:33:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Corvidae_(Crows,_Jays_and_Magpies)
- Info A raven, Corvus corax, standing in a puddle at Bonny Doon Beach in Davenport, California. created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 17:33, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 17:33, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
File:2014-Cambodge Angkor Wat (21).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 08:50:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues indoors
- InfoStatue of reclining Buddha in the central Prasat. Angkor Wat Siem Reap, Cambodia
all by me -- Pierre André (talk) 08:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Pierre André (talk) 08:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I am not sure it is OK for FP. A tripod with less ISO may be required. Yann (talk) 10:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your advice, the shooting conditions were particularly difficult, this statue of sleeping Buddha is located on the uppermost terrace. I couldn't figure out how to fix this problem. If the image is not OK for FP, I will quickly remove it from the proposals made Best regards. --Pierre André (talk) 15:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love the atmosphere Henrysz (talk) 23:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition is fine but the head is out of focus. Shallow depth of field. And at ISO 2500, the quality is on the low level. A tripod would have helped -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Tapsi Miniature Poodle Galloping Contraction Extension Harangi Apr24 A7C 10646-7 Pano.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 04:02:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Composites (Multiple images merged into one)
- Info A composite image of a miniature poodle galloping, showing full contraction followed by full extension. The two images were shot 0.189 sec apart. The poodle is 14 inches (36 cm) high at the shoulder and head+body length is 23 inches (58 cm). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Colorful canal houses at golden hour in Damrak avenue Amsterdam the Netherlands.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 02:52:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Netherlands
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Finally in Europe ! The right side is a bit unsharp, but colors and compo are very good, and the left side is very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The dramatic cloudy sky provides a great contrast to the evening light effects on the houses and water surface. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I think maybe a highlights reduction washed the colors out a little bit? Looks good, regardless. I'm a sucker for bright light on dark sky. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Water reflection of canal houses at blue hour in Damrak Amsterdam the Netherlands.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 02:50:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Netherlands
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely reflections --Tagooty (talk) 04:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great long exposure composition and colors. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:48, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 08:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful, technically excellent. – Aristeas (talk) 14:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:2024 Solar Eclipse over Cleveland Terminal Tower - 53650722351.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2024 at 14:50:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Sequences (Chronological)
- Info created by EDrost88 - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! ★ 15:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Support I’m super excited for the new year. Wolverine XI 16:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)- Support Great matching between the tower and the eclipse. Yann (talk) 20:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- The timing is perfect! Riad Salih (talk) 17:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:35, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perfect planning -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support interesting approach to a much-photographed phenomenon — Rhododendrites talk | 12:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too strange and artificial for me. --Milseburg (talk) 14:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg What's so "strange" and "artificial" about this? Are the eclipse patterns symmetrical? Are the buildings too bright for you? Your comment is too vague for me to see the problems. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- In reality, the city's lighting situation certainly not have been as static as the picture makes it seem. Milseburg (talk) 14:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg The image is a composite, which means that it went through some tweaking to achieve the desired effect. By my looks, the image must have been captured during totality, then the eclipse phases were added to some parts of the sky based on the location during that phase. I'm not a photography expert, so if anyone can explain it better and more accurately than me, please do. WildMouse76 (talk) 15:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think so too. Too strange and artificial for me. Milseburg (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg The image is a composite, which means that it went through some tweaking to achieve the desired effect. By my looks, the image must have been captured during totality, then the eclipse phases were added to some parts of the sky based on the location during that phase. I'm not a photography expert, so if anyone can explain it better and more accurately than me, please do. WildMouse76 (talk) 15:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- In reality, the city's lighting situation certainly not have been as static as the picture makes it seem. Milseburg (talk) 14:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg What's so "strange" and "artificial" about this? Are the eclipse patterns symmetrical? Are the buildings too bright for you? Your comment is too vague for me to see the problems. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I don't even want to think how hard it was to place everything for that photo. Красный wanna talk? 15:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 09:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rhododendrites. – Aristeas (talk) 14:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Bloemknop van een Camellia × williamsii 'Roger Hall'. 26-03-2024 (actm.) 02.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2024 at 04:22:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Theaceae
- Info Flower bud of a Camellia x williamsii 'Roger Hall'. Focus stack of 13 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Meiræ 12:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The petals have alternate blurry and sharp sections. Looks like the number of images used is not sufficient. --Tagooty (talk) 04:12, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Alternative meer kaders[edit]
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:21, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The new image is not much improvement, it has blurs where the previous was sharp. Eg the top edges of the petals. The focus stacking needs rework. The tool I use, Zerene Stacker, allows one to copy a part of a specific image into the output. I find this useful for sharpening blurry areas that the automatic stacking cannot fix. --Tagooty (talk) 03:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
File:F-15E takes on fuel from KC-10.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2024 at 02:22:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
- Info created by Staff Sgt. Sean Carnes - first uploaded by ToprakM - edits by FOX 52 - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 02:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is an outstanding photo if you can ignore the overly compressed background-- Schierbecker (talk) 02:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Is the title incorrect? where is the fuel coming from? Buidhe (talk) 03:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's probably one of a series of photos from the fueling mission, and explanation to why the planes were so close to each other and lazy file naming. It could be renamed "Airman in F-15E takes photo of KC-10" ;-), given what is going on in the photo, or "F-15E during fueling stage from KC-10". --Cart (talk) 10:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 03:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Just expressing a wish for more photos like this that aren't so tightly cropped. It's a very fast plane, but right up against the frame it doesn't look it. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Tight crop and lacking "wow". It is well below the bar of FPs in the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 10:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Heracles statue at the Schwerin Castle (1).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 19:47:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the stormy sky matching the mood of the statue. Yann (talk) 08:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 10:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mont de Chemun sun Mot de Sëuc y Sasplat.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 14:22:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
- Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
SupportNeutral Impressive range of detail, great composition in good light. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Temporarily changed my vote to Neutral until the issue mentioned below is fixed. It would be a pity if the nomination fails because of this small detail. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have to agree with Basile, that the addition of the sky has resulted in a strange cross pattern in the new section, as well as blurring the top of the peak. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It needs to breath at the top, could you add more crop? Poco a poco (talk) 16:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- you’re right but I’d have to construct it, thanks ----Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- It´s only sky, where is the problem. Ermell (talk) 22:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- you’re right but I’d have to construct it, thanks ----Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice Hasselblad X2D-100C! However, Poco is right that the composition could use more room above, hence the weak support. dllu (t,c) 00:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
CommentOppose Poco pointed out exactly what I was going to write. The picture needs more space at the top to breathe -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)- Oppose Crop is too tight. -- Karelj (talk) 12:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
OpposeNice picture, but bad crop. Yann (talk) 20:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Crossed out my vote. Yann (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose per Karelj. Красный wanna talk? 07:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Support now, very cool. Красный wanna talk? 09:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC)- Comment @Poco a poco, Radomianin, Ermell, Basile Morin, Karelj, Yann, and Красный: Thanks for your comment. I uploaded a new version with extension of the sky (thanks to "AI") --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification, but the top of the mountain now shows weird artifacts and the generated clouds are of much lower quality than those really photographed. There are also colorful outlines around. Thus my negative vote remains. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note but I have to agree with Basile. PP should done better.--Ermell (talk) 21:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'll just take note that adding a strip of computer-generated sky and clouds here, sparked no debate, only a comment that the fix was was badly executed. --Cart (talk) 16:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: would support if the sky is fixed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Villnoess St Magdalena 1.JPG[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 11:19:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
- Info created and uploaded by Böhringer, nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 11:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great photo! Very nice composition, file page seems properly filled out. Toadspike (talk) 16:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very nice shot and compo. But there are a lot of CAs at the top of trees at left and right, and in the top on the mountain at the middle and at right. There are CAs on the left building too. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agree -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have asked Böhringer to look at it. Yann (talk) 07:39, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- And please, a fix of the perspective correction, too Poco a poco (talk) 15:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Windows - Playa Santiago 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 09:16:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 09:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love these kinds of photos that most photographers forget to take. As far as I'm concerned: simple but in the right proportions.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Grafo (talk) 15:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Красный wanna talk? 06:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Pécheurs démêlant les filets à Bahiret el Bibane.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 09:05:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 09:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 09:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The crop is too tight. Wolverine XI 13:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like this photo. However, I would like to see it used on a project other than Commons. Toadspike (talk) 16:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Commons is just an archive for photos; very few photos are "used" here. The photos kept here are used in Wikipedias all over the world, as well as all the Wiki sister projects, schools, museums, organisations, and thousands of others that get their photos from Commons. Commons is like a "stock photo site" where images can be used for free if you credit the photographer. --Cart (talk) 19:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Clear distorsions of the face in the corner, due to the wide angle (24 mm) lens. Crop is too tight at the top. The guy seems to lower his head to fit it into the frame :-) The arm and hand in the foreground suffer from motion blur. Probably the shutter speed was not fast enough. The background is not very sharp, and the light is dull around the man with red jumper. To finish, there are big dust spots in the center, one between the worker and the street lamp, another one at the top, and at the right too -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Candidati pâ livata dâ vitrina[edit]
Featured picture candidates[edit]
File:Oxelaëre.- Porche de l église Saint-Martin, relief de Ste Cécile.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2024 at 09:43:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- InfoRelief, carved with the effigy of Ste Cécile represented with her zither, to the right of the portal of the Saint-Martin church. Oxelaëre (Nord, Fr).
all by me -- Pierre André (talk) 09:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Pierre André (talk) 09:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Chlebowski-Bajazyt w niewoli.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2024 at 09:18:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others
- Info created by wp:en:Stanisław Chlebowski - uploaded by Ejdzej - nominated by Elvorix -- Bayezid I held captive by Timur, painting by Stanisław Chlebowski (1878) ×Elvorixtalk 09:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ×Elvorixtalk 09:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Unfortunately, at 1.6 megapixels, this image is below the required minimum resolution of 2 megapixels. Perhaps you can find a higher resolution with a freely available license, in which case we would appreciate a renewed nomination. Sorry for that. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 12:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
File:Spectacled weaver (Ploceus ocularis ocularis) male feeding Mbombela.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 21:15:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)
- Info No FPs of this species. I think the garden tree may be an exotic. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support - WildMouse76 (talk) 03:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Plaza de España (Sevilla) - 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 19:18:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain
- Info created and uploaded by Kadellar - nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 19:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice light but the tower on the right has visible purple fringing. Would happily support if cleaned up. BigDom (talk) 00:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:AMAZONIA - Gran Exposicion Sebastiao Salgado - Madrid 2023 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 19:09:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Others
- Info AMAZÔNIA Exhibition, Madrid, 2023. Created by Sebastião Salgado - uploaded by Nerve net - nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 19:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment So Nerve net has taken photos of photographs by Sebastião Salgado, a living photographer, at an exhibition. How does that work in terms of copyright? Was it ok because the exhibition was in an institution similar to a museum, or what? --Cart (talk) 20:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- COM:FOP Spain only mentions outdoor spaces ("in parks or on streets, squares or other public tracks and passes") and in any case the work would have to be permanently located there. Works like this that were only shown in a temporary exhibition in a museum don't seem to be covered. I think if this were sent to Deletion Requests it would go. BigDom (talk) 00:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello! The exhibition team told us that it was allowed to take photographs of the exhibition and publish them over Internet. I do not have a written consent from them if you are asking for it.
- The exhibition took place at the publicly owned Fernán Goméz Theater (Madrid City Council): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teatro_Fern%C3%A1n_G%C3%B3mez
- Exhibition information: https://www.teatrofernangomez.es/actividades/amazonia
- Press release: https://www.teatrofernangomez.es/prensa/amazonia-sebastiao-salgado Nerve net (talk) 07:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Underexposed, Overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I do not want to have this image promoted -- Javier Perez Montes (talk) 07:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your interest, but I do not want to have this image promoted. Nerve net (talk) 07:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- COM:FPC: Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~ -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank You! Nerve net (talk) 09:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- COM:FPC: Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~ -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you all! But I do not want to have this picture promoted in any way. Nerve net (talk) 09:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Санкт-Петербург, Чкаловский 46, барельеф.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 17:20:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 17:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 17:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Alouette bilophe.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 17:12:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Alaudidae (Larks)
- Info Temminck's lark (Eremophila bilopha) in Douz desert, Tunisiacreated by Houssembo - uploaded by Houssembo - nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I've just uploaded this image which I prefer even though I would not nominate it for FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The bird is looking away -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Facóquero común (Phacochoerus africanus), parque nacional del Lago Mburo, Uganda, 2024-02-01, DD 66.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 14:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Suidae (Pigs)
- Info Common warthog (Phacochoerus africanus), Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Correct focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Gorila de montaña (Gorilla beringei beringei), parque nacional de la Selva Impenetrable de Bwindi, Uganda, 2024-02-02, DD 80.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 14:14:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Hominidae (Great Apes)
- Info Female mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei beringei), Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 17:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Focus on the eyes, high resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Courvite Isabelle Jbil NP.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 13:33:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family : Glareolidae
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would always recommend checking Wikipedia to see if a nomination is better than the image in the infobox. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- We are not in the section Valued image candidates here and the image in the infobox has not a better quality than this one (look at the edges of the bird in the infobox image, in addition the image tilts to the left). El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Anas zonorhyncha swimming.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 13:19:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas
- Info created and uploaded by Alpsdake - nominated by TKsdik8900 -- TKsdik8900 (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TKsdik8900 (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Aerial image of Finsteraarhorn (view from the south).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 09:36:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Valais
- Info The Finsteraarhorn is the highest mountain of the Bernese Alps, the ninth-highest mountain of the Alps, the most prominent peak of Switzerland and the third-most prominent peak in the Alps; the image shows the 1200 m high southwest face which lies in the canton of Valais; created by Carsten Steger - uploaded by Carsten Steger - nominated by Carsten Steger -- Carsten Steger (talk) 09:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Carsten Steger (talk) 09:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 12:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Definitely impressive to me! -- Radomianin (talk) 22:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Вид Нижний Урунгач.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 18:47:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Uzbekistan
- Info created and uploaded by Arina Pan - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 18:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 18:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:008 Black-headed heron from up close in the Tarangire National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 12:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Ardea
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 23:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High resolution and level of detail, striking look -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:View from the Schlossbergalm 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 09:10:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 09:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 23:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Elaborately created panorama in which there is much to discover. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Dunnock (Prunella modularis) 3.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 07:33:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Prunellidae (Accentors)
- Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 07:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 07:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Falesia Nome e Cognome2.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 02:27:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily
- Info: rock climbers at the Nome e Cognome crag; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would try to clone out the power line in the background --Llez (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Llez: Done --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 10:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Chiesa di San Michele, Savoca.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 02:27:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info Saint Michael Church, Savoca, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, no wow IMO. —kallerna (talk) 07:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very good light, but just a QI in my opinion, because the architecture is not exceptional. Flat façades -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Killdeer (20453).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 00:36:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Charadrius
- Info Adult killdeer (Charadrius vociferus). All by — Rhododendrites talk | 00:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Got lucky with it walking right towards me for a moment. — Rhododendrites talk | 00:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well captured -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 07:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 10:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 23:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 09:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Alexander McQueen clamshell dress (51611p).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 00:32:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
- Info A razor clamshell dress by Alexander McQueen for his spring/summer 2001 collection "Voss", featured here as part of a Metropolitan Museum of Art exhibition "Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion". all by — Rhododendrites talk | 00:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 00:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support another kind to present shells --Llez (talk) 08:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 10:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poor skin inside :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 09:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 12:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I wish he didn't kill himself -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Romanesco broccoli texture.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 18:20:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Vegetables_(raw)
- Info nomination per ArionStar's request; c/u/n by Ivar (talk) 18:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing textures and shapes! ★ 21:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quality is excellent with a very high level of detail and a good light. The subject itself, with its natural fractal structure, is another wonder -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 11:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Never knew this was in my mouth -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Exellent. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 18:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support As fractal lover :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Benoît Mandelbrot would love this image. --Carsten Steger (talk) 09:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 12:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. A fascinating vegetable. – Aristeas (talk) 15:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Titan2456 (talk) 14ː12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Leopard (Panthera pardus pardus) young female Kruger 2.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 09:03:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info A leopard 'in its habitat'. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support This one is better. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Definitely better. ★ 12:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Impressive but temperature too cold? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think the white balance needs further adjustment on the magenta/green axis - there is a strong magenta cast to the image. JJ Harrison (talk) 23:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Ou-Line-Series701-N12.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 08:32:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created by MaedaAkihiko - uploaded by MaedaAkihiko - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 08:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 08:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Kobbet lahwé à la Marsa.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 08:23:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Tunisia
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 08:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 08:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Seems to be missing EXIF data? (I went to look for the lens type and there is only an attribution in the EXIF). — Rhododendrites talk | 12:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like sky and clouds here. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice, but motif and quality are not outstanding. Sky is noisy and there are some spots. --Milseburg (talk) 14:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The sky has a weird turquoise color. Oversaturated? And is very noisy, with dust spots -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: would support if the sky is denoised and cleaned up. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Allium purple sensation, 17-04-2024 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 04:07:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family : Amaryllidaceae
- Info Budding flower bud of an Allium purple sensation. Focus stack of 38 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Outstanding composition and well-made stacking, so don't want to vote against it, but lower part of the flower is rather noisy, so no support from me either. Красный wanna talk? 08:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Do you mean {{Neutral}}? ★ 17:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: Thanks for the hint. However, please do not set the Neutral example as an active template, otherwise it will be counted by the bot. Please use either a NoWiki code (e.g.
{{Neutral}}
) or the plain symbol (e.g. File:Symbol neutral vote.svg) without template. I took the liberty to do so. Thank you and best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Radomianin, thanks for the notification. I have changed the "File" with a
{{tl}}
otherwise the FPCBot considers there's an alternative, and asks which image should be promoted -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good point concerning possible misreadings as an alternative. Thanks a lot, Basile! -- Radomianin (talk) 05:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Radomianin, thanks for the notification. I have changed the "File" with a
- @ArionStar: Thanks for the hint. However, please do not set the Neutral example as an active template, otherwise it will be counted by the bot. Please use either a NoWiki code (e.g.
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 23:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Пристан во Преспанското Езеро.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 22:25:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
- Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral It would be great without the (somewhat ugly) white board -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Трпејца со Охридското Езеро.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 22:06:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#North Macedonia
- Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Thueringen NSG271 Bischofsau1.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 22:00:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Thuringia
- Info created by KaiBorgeest - uploaded by KaiBorgeest - nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Technical issue and low wow factor. The clouds are burnt (blown highlights) and the scenery is not exceptional in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile --Milseburg (talk) 14:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: How do you define the 'Wow factor'?--KaiBorgeest (talk) 21:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- See "Wow factor" in the dictionary : "a quality or feature of something that makes people feel great excitement or admiration" or "a quality that makes someone feel excited or surprised when they first see something". See also COM:I: "Featured pictures candidates should meet all the following requirements, must have a "wow factor" and may or may not have been created by a Commons user. Given sufficient "wow factor" and mitigating circumstances, a featured picture is permitted to fall short on technical quality." -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment In my opinion it's unappealing how the horizon intersects the plants, it makes for a messy composition Henrysz (talk) 23:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Continental I-1430 NASM.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 18:57:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Others
- Info created by Dane A. Penland, uploaded by Nimbus227, nominated by Yann
- Info Continental Hyper I-1430-11, Inverted V-12 Engine. One-half right front view.
- Support For a change from nice birds and cute animals. ;o) -- Yann (talk) 18:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. Thanks for bringing something fresh! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Attractive photo in cavalier perspective; and per Yann and Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice machines and cute engines? :) — Rhododendrites talk | 12:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 11:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Frank and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 15:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:At Tenerife 2023 644 - Sub Fun Cinco entering Marina San Miguel.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 17:58:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Submarines
- Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 17:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 17:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see anything extraordinary here. Light and compo aren't special. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing exttraordinary and yacht in the background riuns the composition. Красный wanna talk? 08:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
File:006 Wild Baby Alpine Chamois Creux du Van and Swiss Alps Sunset colors Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 13:18:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Artiodactyla (Even-toed Ungulates)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose That dark blurred area on the right spoils the composition IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 17:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. I guess you are talking of one of the two trees? They are the reason the chamois were there: close to them the snow is less deep and they can dig the snow with their hooves to eat the grass. The trees are thus part of the habitats of these chamois, which is one of the reasons why the gallery Animals in their habitat was chosen for this picture. Also, I actually personally think that they give a nice touch to the image with their soft colors illuminated by the sunset. Also both trees point to the subject and the chamois clearly stands out with its dark color in this snowy background with soft sunset illuminated colors. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support From the point of view of the chosen gallery, I think the composition is appropriate. In my opinion, the blurred elements in the foreground and background can be considered a compositional style. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin --Terragio67 (talk) 03:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose (regretfully). I have to agree with Poco2 that the blurred area on the right ruins it. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. I still personally think that the background tree is a nice echo of the foreground tree, giving the viewer a sense of what the foreground tree actually looks like while also beeing relevant to the chamois' environment. Giles Laurent (talk) 13:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a fair point, but the tree takes the salience. SHB2000 (talk) 22:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- I still think that the chamois stands out way more than the background tree for multiple reasons : 1) the chamois is the clear subject in the middle of the frame ; 2) the chamois is wearing it's black winter coat which makes it stand out compared to the light-colored snow ; 3) the bokeh is cleary separating the subject from the background ; 4) the foreground tree creates perfect leading lines that point directly at the center of the frame where the subject is placed ; 5) the snow horizon on the background on the left side creates another leading line to the center of the frame where the subject is placed ; 6) the snow on the middleground of the image that goes from the bottom right of the picture to the center also creates another leading line pointing to the subject ; 7) finally, even the background tree is pointing right at the subject. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a fair point, but the tree takes the salience. SHB2000 (talk) 22:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. I still personally think that the background tree is a nice echo of the foreground tree, giving the viewer a sense of what the foreground tree actually looks like while also beeing relevant to the chamois' environment. Giles Laurent (talk) 13:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop IMO, the photo is mainly just "background". —kallerna (talk) 07:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. The gallery "animals in their habitats" was especially created to feature pictures where a step back was taken and where a wider view is presented. Per creator of this gallery : "It is so great to see the animals as part of photos of their habitat. So please, when you super-record the critters, do also take a step back and compose a few great photos where we can see a bit more of the places where they live". This image is exactly that, it allows to have a wider view that changes from the usual "mugshots" that we often see on animals here. The wider view on this shot was intended for various reasons. It emphasizes the small size of the subject and the fact that it is still a small baby on a big snow covered environment with only a few trees. The wider look also allows to see two trees that are relevant to the environment of the chamois in winter because close to them there is less snow on the ground and the chamois can more easily dig the snow with their hooves to eat the grass. Finally the wider shots also allows to showcase the swiss alps in the background beautifully illuminated by sunset light to complete the scene. If the image would have been cropped/framed to only include the chamois, it would have in my opinion a lot less educational value because we would be missing all these interesting elements about it's habitat. Moreover the wider shots allows to showcase the beautiful sunset colors which is a rare thing to capture with wildlife photography. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- If so, the habitat should not be OOF. —kallerna (talk) 13:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- The chamois is still the main subject of the image so it's normal to have the focus on him. The bokeh is destined to bring the viewer's attention to the main subject while still allowing to have an idea of the surroundings, without needing to see them in details (or they would steal attention from the main subject). We have several FP on the gallery "Animals in their habitat" that also have bokeh background : 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Moreover, except if background is extremely close to the subject (or if the subject is far away), you will always have bokeh at 600mm. The use of a 600mm zoom was intentional, as it creates a compression effect that allows the background elements to look closer than they really are. Here is an exemple with a photo (from the internet) of the Château de Chillon with a probably like 25-35mm lense. The red square illustrates where the Dents du Midi are. Here is now a photo of the Château de Chillon taken from more far away with a 155mm zoom in order to have the Dents du Midi mountain appearing in big behind the castle to make them look like they are closer than they really are. This same technique was used in this shot in order to have the Swiss Alps appearing in the background (else they would be extremely small in the background because they are 40-60km further away). -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- This new gallery was not an improvement for several of us. See Strange disconnected extra gallery.
- kallerna takes great photographs of animals in their environment, like File:Vicugna vicugna Salar de Chalviri.jpg and File:Faroese sheep Sumba 1.jpg (both FP) and I think that if you choose to include the background, then this visible context should be attractive / aesthetic in some way. Otherwise the animal is just too small -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- You are comparing a domestic animal like a sheep that can extremely easily be approached + an animal that can also easily be approached by humans (vicuna) to a chamois, a wild animal that can't be approached like that. Both pictures you linked were taken at 21mm and 48mm at a close distance (=no bokeh), which is usually not something that can be done with this animal where you have to use a telephoto lense like the 600mm that I used (=inevitable bokeh). To photograph the animal I had to crawl on the snow and hide my body behind a natural bump on the ground with only my head, camera and hands appearing to the chamois, in order to not disturb him and not feel threatening to him or he probably would have fled. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are a bunch of photos of Rupicapra rupicapra on Commons and Wikipedia. So it doesn't seem so difficult to approach them.
- Backgrounds in focus don't necessary "steal attention from the main subject", at least not in the two examples shown above.
- The problem with long focal lengths is they focus on small things. Everything around gets blurry. So the compromise "subject + around" is difficult. Since it quickly gives an insignifiant small subject lost in a big uninteresting space. I think that's what Kallerna says when writing the photo is mainly just "background". Regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you look the images from your link you will notice that they have been all taken from very far or with a telephoto lense, and/or went into a big crop, which proves my point that they are not as easily approachable as a domestic sheep or a vicuna. The group of chamois that I saw was a bit nervous and I have no doubt they would very likely have fled if I would be standing up and not lying on the ground with just my head visible. Moreover, for the sheep image you link I personally have my attention very much directed to the houses on the right because they are in clear focus and I personally don't like animal photography with human constructed elements but that's just my personal taste. Finally I don't think that the subject gets lost in a big uninteresting space for this photo because as said above it emphasizes the small size of the subject and the fact that it is still a small baby on a big snow covered environment with only a few trees. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Proportionally, it's a huge background with small animal. And the background itself is... white, with almost nothing apart from distracting blurry elements -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know it's more rare to see such composition on FPC because here people usually only do mugshots of wild animals but there still are other images in the same situation as linked above : 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. I personally think that this composition brings value to the image because it allows to have a view of the environment and also because it tells a story that a narrow croped/frame picture would not be able to tell. Also I personally think that the background would be distracting if it was in focus and that the bokeh beautifully separates the subject from the background while still beeing possible to understand the context. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Proportionally, it's a huge background with small animal. And the background itself is... white, with almost nothing apart from distracting blurry elements -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you look the images from your link you will notice that they have been all taken from very far or with a telephoto lense, and/or went into a big crop, which proves my point that they are not as easily approachable as a domestic sheep or a vicuna. The group of chamois that I saw was a bit nervous and I have no doubt they would very likely have fled if I would be standing up and not lying on the ground with just my head visible. Moreover, for the sheep image you link I personally have my attention very much directed to the houses on the right because they are in clear focus and I personally don't like animal photography with human constructed elements but that's just my personal taste. Finally I don't think that the subject gets lost in a big uninteresting space for this photo because as said above it emphasizes the small size of the subject and the fact that it is still a small baby on a big snow covered environment with only a few trees. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- You are comparing a domestic animal like a sheep that can extremely easily be approached + an animal that can also easily be approached by humans (vicuna) to a chamois, a wild animal that can't be approached like that. Both pictures you linked were taken at 21mm and 48mm at a close distance (=no bokeh), which is usually not something that can be done with this animal where you have to use a telephoto lense like the 600mm that I used (=inevitable bokeh). To photograph the animal I had to crawl on the snow and hide my body behind a natural bump on the ground with only my head, camera and hands appearing to the chamois, in order to not disturb him and not feel threatening to him or he probably would have fled. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- The chamois is still the main subject of the image so it's normal to have the focus on him. The bokeh is destined to bring the viewer's attention to the main subject while still allowing to have an idea of the surroundings, without needing to see them in details (or they would steal attention from the main subject). We have several FP on the gallery "Animals in their habitat" that also have bokeh background : 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Moreover, except if background is extremely close to the subject (or if the subject is far away), you will always have bokeh at 600mm. The use of a 600mm zoom was intentional, as it creates a compression effect that allows the background elements to look closer than they really are. Here is an exemple with a photo (from the internet) of the Château de Chillon with a probably like 25-35mm lense. The red square illustrates where the Dents du Midi are. Here is now a photo of the Château de Chillon taken from more far away with a 155mm zoom in order to have the Dents du Midi mountain appearing in big behind the castle to make them look like they are closer than they really are. This same technique was used in this shot in order to have the Swiss Alps appearing in the background (else they would be extremely small in the background because they are 40-60km further away). -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- If so, the habitat should not be OOF. —kallerna (talk) 13:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice light but 1) the feet are hidden, 2) the big blurry brown mass is distracting, and 3) the snowy branch is out of focus. Cluttered composition in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. I don't think the feet beeing hidden is a problem for ungulates and we have multiple FP in that situation (in addition to the image of the domesetic sheep you sent yourself above) : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, etc. Moreover, as explained above, to photograph the animal I had to crawl up a a natural bump in the snow to only have my head, hands and camera appearing to the animal so that it would not feel threatened by me. If I had stood up to have the chamois feet in the image, not only would the chamois have probably fled, but also the composition would have been extremely boring because you would not have the swiss alps in the background and just a boring high-angle shot with just ground visible in the background (click here for an illustration). As for the two trees you mention, they are relevant to the chamois environment. In my opinion the image would have been much more cluttered if they were in focus (which anyway can not be the case at 600mm) and they would also be very distracting in my opinion because they would steal the attention from the chamois. So I still think that having them blured not only creates a good classical foreground, midleground, background photography which gives a 3 dimensional sense to the image but also allow to keep the attention on the main subject. Also, as already said, the foreground tree creates a perfect leading line to the subject just as many others that are present in the image. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Would, would, would... if, if, if :-) So to be short, it's sometimes just a question of luck. The environment here was not so cooperative in my personal opinion, but your subjective taste is of course totally acceptable -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Seeing how the chamois were a bit nervous, I have almost no doubt they would have fled if I stood up (but we can never be 100% certain of course). Also, I have been a dozen times to this place and I have no doubt that I was extremely lucky to cumulate multiple favorable factors for this image : 1) there is only a few days/weeks every year that you can have snow there as it is not very high in altitude and also because winters are becoming warmer and warmer lately ; 2) chamois are not often seen there (most of the time it’s just ibexes that are seen) ; 3) the picture was taken with beautiful sunset colors which is rare and lucky for wildlife photography because usually the wild animals will not be placed in a good place or you will face challenging light conditions with for example contre-jour and for this shot I was lucky that the baby chamois was well placed to not have contre-jour, it was also lucky that the chamois was not in a shadow area that would not be benefiting from the sunset colors and it was also lucky that the chamois lifted its head in a way that it could be beautifully illuminated by the soft sunsets light ; 4) the combination of all of the previous elements is extremely lucky because it is way more likely to see the chamois without snow or with no beautiful sunset colors ; 5) it was very interesting to witness how the chamois adapted to this unusual situation for them (snow covering their food and having to go to places with less snow to dig to reach the grass) ; 6) having that small baby chamois far enough from the rest of the herd (especially form the mother) was extremely lucky and allowed to isolate the subject in this big snowy fairy tail environment ; 7) 98% of the time the chamois was just eating/digging the ground with head down and it was only during a very small few seconds that it had its head up like that to monitor me (even though I just had my head, hands and camera visible for him in order to not appear threatening)(but most of the time it was the rest of the herd that kept monitoring me) ; 8) most of the time with wildlife animal you are not able to place yourself to have the elements you want in the background. For this shot I was extremely lucky to be able to have the Swiss alps in the background. 9) the chamois was really perfectly placed with all these leading lines pointing to him, which is uncommon for wildlife photography. With all these elements I honestly personally think this image is of FP level. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Would, would, would... if, if, if :-) So to be short, it's sometimes just a question of luck. The environment here was not so cooperative in my personal opinion, but your subjective taste is of course totally acceptable -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Rambutão.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 12:48:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
- Info created and uploaded by ArionStar, nominated by me -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support (fun fact, tastes like persimmon but sort of resembles a lychee) -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you! Another one eye-catching textures and shades captured by me. ★ 12:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pleasantly striking. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Restaurant Amigos de Acapulco (window), Chico.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 04:49:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
- Info Window of the Mexican restaurant Amigos de Acapulco, located on Oroville Avenue in Chico, California. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 04:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support nice one, but the half-cut weeds at the bottom right kinda ruin the wow for me. It would me much better with whole weeds or no weeds at all IMO. Красный wanna talk? 09:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the constructive review, Красный. I agree that without the small plant, it would be a classical composition with conformity. Keeping it as an intrusive object was intentional because it matches the green paint residue from the previous coat as well as the other tiny plants on the left. It is cropped because the wall actually ends at the right edge of the image. Also, because of the plant, the asphalted section fits as a contrast. But you can find an edited version without the plant for comparison under the SwissTransfer link. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A classic XRay's style. ★ 12:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--SDudley (talk) 21:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful exemplary composition. – Aristeas (talk) 14:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Guermassa, vue sur le village.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 00:55:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Tunisia
- InfoGeneral view of Guermassa, Berber village in southern Tunisia created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by نعيم قربوسي -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 00:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 00:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The clone stamp error should be fixed.--Ermell (talk) 21:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- i fix the problem , thank you Skander zarrad (talk) 21:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful view of a stunning site. – Aristeas (talk) 14:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Grèbe huppé Thyna008.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 21:55:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Podicipedidae (Grebes)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 03:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 06:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Most interesting part, the head is out of focus. The focus is on the feathers of the back, behind. And with this low resolution, only 2,159 × 2,879 pixels, it is a real quality issue -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A striking snapshot, but unfortunately the technical quality is inadequate. I wonder why the image received QI status when head and eyes are not in focus. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Corvus corax in puddle at Bonny Doon Beach.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 17:33:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Corvidae_(Crows,_Jays_and_Magpies)
- Info A raven, Corvus corax, standing in a puddle at Bonny Doon Beach in Davenport, California. created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 17:33, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 17:33, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
File:2014-Cambodge Angkor Wat (21).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 08:50:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues indoors
- InfoStatue of reclining Buddha in the central Prasat. Angkor Wat Siem Reap, Cambodia
all by me -- Pierre André (talk) 08:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Pierre André (talk) 08:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I am not sure it is OK for FP. A tripod with less ISO may be required. Yann (talk) 10:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your advice, the shooting conditions were particularly difficult, this statue of sleeping Buddha is located on the uppermost terrace. I couldn't figure out how to fix this problem. If the image is not OK for FP, I will quickly remove it from the proposals made Best regards. --Pierre André (talk) 15:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love the atmosphere Henrysz (talk) 23:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition is fine but the head is out of focus. Shallow depth of field. And at ISO 2500, the quality is on the low level. A tripod would have helped -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Tapsi Miniature Poodle Galloping Contraction Extension Harangi Apr24 A7C 10646-7 Pano.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 04:02:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Composites (Multiple images merged into one)
- Info A composite image of a miniature poodle galloping, showing full contraction followed by full extension. The two images were shot 0.189 sec apart. The poodle is 14 inches (36 cm) high at the shoulder and head+body length is 23 inches (58 cm). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Colorful canal houses at golden hour in Damrak avenue Amsterdam the Netherlands.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 02:52:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Netherlands
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Finally in Europe ! The right side is a bit unsharp, but colors and compo are very good, and the left side is very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The dramatic cloudy sky provides a great contrast to the evening light effects on the houses and water surface. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I think maybe a highlights reduction washed the colors out a little bit? Looks good, regardless. I'm a sucker for bright light on dark sky. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Water reflection of canal houses at blue hour in Damrak Amsterdam the Netherlands.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 02:50:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Netherlands
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely reflections --Tagooty (talk) 04:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great long exposure composition and colors. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:48, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 08:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful, technically excellent. – Aristeas (talk) 14:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:2024 Solar Eclipse over Cleveland Terminal Tower - 53650722351.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2024 at 14:50:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Sequences (Chronological)
- Info created by EDrost88 - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! ★ 15:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Support I’m super excited for the new year. Wolverine XI 16:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)- Support Great matching between the tower and the eclipse. Yann (talk) 20:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- The timing is perfect! Riad Salih (talk) 17:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:35, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perfect planning -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support interesting approach to a much-photographed phenomenon — Rhododendrites talk | 12:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too strange and artificial for me. --Milseburg (talk) 14:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg What's so "strange" and "artificial" about this? Are the eclipse patterns symmetrical? Are the buildings too bright for you? Your comment is too vague for me to see the problems. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- In reality, the city's lighting situation certainly not have been as static as the picture makes it seem. Milseburg (talk) 14:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg The image is a composite, which means that it went through some tweaking to achieve the desired effect. By my looks, the image must have been captured during totality, then the eclipse phases were added to some parts of the sky based on the location during that phase. I'm not a photography expert, so if anyone can explain it better and more accurately than me, please do. WildMouse76 (talk) 15:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think so too. Too strange and artificial for me. Milseburg (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg The image is a composite, which means that it went through some tweaking to achieve the desired effect. By my looks, the image must have been captured during totality, then the eclipse phases were added to some parts of the sky based on the location during that phase. I'm not a photography expert, so if anyone can explain it better and more accurately than me, please do. WildMouse76 (talk) 15:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- In reality, the city's lighting situation certainly not have been as static as the picture makes it seem. Milseburg (talk) 14:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg What's so "strange" and "artificial" about this? Are the eclipse patterns symmetrical? Are the buildings too bright for you? Your comment is too vague for me to see the problems. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I don't even want to think how hard it was to place everything for that photo. Красный wanna talk? 15:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 17:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 09:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rhododendrites. – Aristeas (talk) 14:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Bloemknop van een Camellia × williamsii 'Roger Hall'. 26-03-2024 (actm.) 02.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2024 at 04:22:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Theaceae
- Info Flower bud of a Camellia x williamsii 'Roger Hall'. Focus stack of 13 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Meiræ 12:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The petals have alternate blurry and sharp sections. Looks like the number of images used is not sufficient. --Tagooty (talk) 04:12, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Alternative meer kaders[edit]
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:21, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The new image is not much improvement, it has blurs where the previous was sharp. Eg the top edges of the petals. The focus stacking needs rework. The tool I use, Zerene Stacker, allows one to copy a part of a specific image into the output. I find this useful for sharpening blurry areas that the automatic stacking cannot fix. --Tagooty (talk) 03:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
File:F-15E takes on fuel from KC-10.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2024 at 02:22:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
- Info created by Staff Sgt. Sean Carnes - first uploaded by ToprakM - edits by FOX 52 - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 02:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is an outstanding photo if you can ignore the overly compressed background-- Schierbecker (talk) 02:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Is the title incorrect? where is the fuel coming from? Buidhe (talk) 03:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's probably one of a series of photos from the fueling mission, and explanation to why the planes were so close to each other and lazy file naming. It could be renamed "Airman in F-15E takes photo of KC-10" ;-), given what is going on in the photo, or "F-15E during fueling stage from KC-10". --Cart (talk) 10:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 03:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Just expressing a wish for more photos like this that aren't so tightly cropped. It's a very fast plane, but right up against the frame it doesn't look it. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Tight crop and lacking "wow". It is well below the bar of FPs in the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 10:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Heracles statue at the Schwerin Castle (1).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 19:47:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the stormy sky matching the mood of the statue. Yann (talk) 08:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 10:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mont de Chemun sun Mot de Sëuc y Sasplat.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 14:22:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
- Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
SupportNeutral Impressive range of detail, great composition in good light. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Temporarily changed my vote to Neutral until the issue mentioned below is fixed. It would be a pity if the nomination fails because of this small detail. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have to agree with Basile, that the addition of the sky has resulted in a strange cross pattern in the new section, as well as blurring the top of the peak. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It needs to breath at the top, could you add more crop? Poco a poco (talk) 16:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- you’re right but I’d have to construct it, thanks ----Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- It´s only sky, where is the problem. Ermell (talk) 22:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- you’re right but I’d have to construct it, thanks ----Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice Hasselblad X2D-100C! However, Poco is right that the composition could use more room above, hence the weak support. dllu (t,c) 00:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
CommentOppose Poco pointed out exactly what I was going to write. The picture needs more space at the top to breathe -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)- Oppose Crop is too tight. -- Karelj (talk) 12:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
OpposeNice picture, but bad crop. Yann (talk) 20:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Crossed out my vote. Yann (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose per Karelj. Красный wanna talk? 07:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Support now, very cool. Красный wanna talk? 09:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC)- Comment @Poco a poco, Radomianin, Ermell, Basile Morin, Karelj, Yann, and Красный: Thanks for your comment. I uploaded a new version with extension of the sky (thanks to "AI") --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification, but the top of the mountain now shows weird artifacts and the generated clouds are of much lower quality than those really photographed. There are also colorful outlines around. Thus my negative vote remains. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note but I have to agree with Basile. PP should done better.--Ermell (talk) 21:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'll just take note that adding a strip of computer-generated sky and clouds here, sparked no debate, only a comment that the fix was was badly executed. --Cart (talk) 16:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: would support if the sky is fixed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Villnoess St Magdalena 1.JPG[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 11:19:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
- Info created and uploaded by Böhringer, nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 11:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great photo! Very nice composition, file page seems properly filled out. Toadspike (talk) 16:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very nice shot and compo. But there are a lot of CAs at the top of trees at left and right, and in the top on the mountain at the middle and at right. There are CAs on the left building too. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agree -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have asked Böhringer to look at it. Yann (talk) 07:39, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- And please, a fix of the perspective correction, too Poco a poco (talk) 15:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Windows - Playa Santiago 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 09:16:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 09:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love these kinds of photos that most photographers forget to take. As far as I'm concerned: simple but in the right proportions.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Grafo (talk) 15:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Красный wanna talk? 06:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Pécheurs démêlant les filets à Bahiret el Bibane.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 09:05:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 09:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 09:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The crop is too tight. Wolverine XI 13:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like this photo. However, I would like to see it used on a project other than Commons. Toadspike (talk) 16:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Commons is just an archive for photos; very few photos are "used" here. The photos kept here are used in Wikipedias all over the world, as well as all the Wiki sister projects, schools, museums, organisations, and thousands of others that get their photos from Commons. Commons is like a "stock photo site" where images can be used for free if you credit the photographer. --Cart (talk) 19:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Clear distorsions of the face in the corner, due to the wide angle (24 mm) lens. Crop is too tight at the top. The guy seems to lower his head to fit it into the frame :-) The arm and hand in the foreground suffer from motion blur. Probably the shutter speed was not fast enough. The background is not very sharp, and the light is dull around the man with red jumper. To finish, there are big dust spots in the center, one between the worker and the street lamp, another one at the top, and at the right too -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Tabbella dê pirìudi di votu pâ règula dô quintu jornu (5 jorna doppu la candidatura)[edit]
Sat 25 May → Thu 30 May Sun 26 May → Fri 31 May Mon 27 May → Sat 01 Jun Tue 28 May → Sun 02 Jun Wed 29 May → Mon 03 Jun Thu 30 May → Tue 04 Jun
Tabbella dê pirìudi di votu (9 jorna doppu la candidatura)[edit]
Tue 21 May → Thu 30 May Wed 22 May → Fri 31 May Thu 23 May → Sat 01 Jun Fri 24 May → Sun 02 Jun Sat 25 May → Mon 03 Jun Sun 26 May → Tue 04 Jun Mon 27 May → Wed 05 Jun Tue 28 May → Thu 06 Jun Wed 29 May → Fri 07 Jun Thu 30 May → Sat 08 Jun