निर्वाचित चित्र उम्मीदवार वो चित्र (छवियाँ) हैं जिनके कॉमन्स पर सर्वोत्तम चित्रों में से एक होने के लिए समुदाय के लोग मतदान करेंगे। यह सूची उन उम्मीदवारों की है जो निर्वाचित चित्र हो सकते हैं। आज का चित्र निर्वाचित्र चित्रों में से चुनी हुई एक छवि होगी।
यदि आपको लगता है कि आपने एक महत्वपूर्ण चित्र प्राप्त अथवा निर्मित किया है जो उपयुक्त चित्र विवरण और मुद्राधिकार के साथ है, तब निम्न कार्य करें।
प्रथम चरण: चित्र का नाम निम्न खाने में उपस्थित पाठ के आगे लिखें, उदाहरण के लिए, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:आपके चित्र का नाम.jpg लिखें और "नया नामांकन आरम्भ करें।" बटन पर क्लिक करें।
सभी एकल फाइलें:
पुनः नामांकन के लिए चित्र के नाम 'के बाद केवल /2 लिखें। जैसे:– Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
Set nominations ONLY
Sets are temporarily disallowed for technical reasons; will reopen soon.
द्वितीय चरण: आप जिस पृष्ठ पर पहुँचे हैं वहाँ के निर्देशों का पालन करें और पृष्ठ को संरक्षित करें।
वो सम्पादक जिनका खाता कम से कम १० दिन पुराना है और ५० सम्पादन कर चुके हैं, अपना मत दे सकते हैं। अपने नामांकन के लिए कोई भी मतदान कर सकता है। अज्ञात (आईपी) मतों की अनुमति नहीं है।
आप निम्न साँचे काम में ले सकते हो:
{{Support}} (Support),
{{Oppose}} (Oppose),
{{Neutral}} (Neutral),
{{Comment}} (Comment),
{{Info}} (Info),
{{Question}} (Question),
{{Request}} (Request).
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.
Comment Nice light but the tower on the right has visible purple fringing. Would happily support if cleaned up. BigDom (talk) 00:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 19:09:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:AMAZONIA - Gran Exposicion Sebastiao Salgado - Madrid 2023 01.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:AMAZONIA - Gran Exposicion Sebastiao Salgado - Madrid 2023 01.jpg
Comment So Nerve net has taken photos of photographs by Sebastião Salgado, a living photographer, at an exhibition. How does that work in terms of copyright? Was it ok because the exhibition was in an institution similar to a museum, or what? --Cart(talk)20:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
COM:FOP Spain only mentions outdoor spaces ("in parks or on streets, squares or other public tracks and passes") and in any case the work would have to be permanently located there. Works like this that were only shown in a temporary exhibition in a museum don't seem to be covered. I think if this were sent to Deletion Requests it would go. BigDom (talk) 00:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 14:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Facóquero común (Phacochoerus africanus), parque nacional del Lago Mburo, Uganda, 2024-02-01, DD 66.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Facóquero común (Phacochoerus africanus), parque nacional del Lago Mburo, Uganda, 2024-02-01, DD 66.jpg
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 14:14:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Gorila de montaña (Gorilla beringei beringei), parque nacional de la Selva Impenetrable de Bwindi, Uganda, 2024-02-02, DD 80.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gorila de montaña (Gorilla beringei beringei), parque nacional de la Selva Impenetrable de Bwindi, Uganda, 2024-02-02, DD 80.jpg
We are not in the section Valued image candidates here and the image in the infobox has not a better quality than this one (look at the edges of the bird in the infobox image, in addition the image tilts to the left). El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 09:36:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Aerial image of Finsteraarhorn (view from the south).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aerial image of Finsteraarhorn (view from the south).jpg
Info The Finsteraarhorn is the highest mountain of the Bernese Alps, the ninth-highest mountain of the Alps, the most prominent peak of Switzerland and the third-most prominent peak in the Alps; the image shows the 1200 m high southwest face which lies in the canton of Valais; created by Carsten Steger - uploaded by Carsten Steger - nominated by Carsten Steger -- Carsten Steger (talk) 09:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you shouldn't create a new nomination until one of your two active is done, not just because someone might find it and add it (like what happened here) but mostly because having a nom waiting in the pipeline will shorten the time for your nom and that is rigging the game if it's done on purpose. The voting time starts when you create a nom, not when you add it to the FPC list, and by creating it in advance you are in effect shaving off time on this voting platform until it closes. --Cart(talk)08:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.
I withdraw my nomination Even though I didn't put it here, I guess I can withdraw it and restart the nomination. And of course I wasn't rigging the game as Cart implies above. Since the FPC rules state "The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination", I suggest you change this wording. 'Nomination' to me means when I add it to the FPC nomination page, not when I prepare the page. And please place a warning on the FPC nomination page to stop others getting their next FP nomination ready in advance like I did. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is already a warning on every nomination page, it's that timestamp that is clearly visible right below the heading saying "Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 20:33:26 (UTC)". That time is set the second you click on 'Publish' on the nomination page, not when you add it to the FPC list. What is so hard about creating a nomination page that you have to do it so long in advance? --Cart(talk)21:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 12:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:008 Black-headed heron from up close in the Tarangire National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:008 Black-headed heron from up close in the Tarangire National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
Info A razor clamshell dress by Alexander McQueen for his spring/summer 2001 collection "Voss", featured here as part of a Metropolitan Museum of Art exhibition "Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion". all by — Rhododendritestalk | 00:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quality is excellent with a very high level of detail and a good light. The subject itself, with its natural fractal structure, is another wonder -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question How would the metadata reveal if the moon has been edited in Photoshop? 07:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs)
Charlesjsharp, the moon is one of those things that is very constant at various locations, but with the same camera settings. The size here is ok for 70 mm lens and the moon phase is right, but the exposure time of 10/1 sec will give you a brighter moon. This moon looks like it's been taken with a shorter exposure time, so that's probably a partial HDR. Not a "terrible" photoshopping in my view, but people can be sensitive to such things. Compare with a photo of a full moon with similar settings that I know is just one shot. --Cart(talk)13:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 12:30:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Taxidermy specimen of a Black-tufted marmoset (Callithrix penicillata).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Taxidermy specimen of a Black-tufted marmoset (Callithrix penicillata).jpg
InfoBlack-tufted marmoset (Callithrix penicillata). Taxidermy specimen of a marmoset on display at the Museum of Veterinary Anatomy FMVZ USP. Created by Museum of Veterinary Anatomy FMVZ USP / Wagner Souza e Silva - uploaded by Joalpe - nominated by ★ -- ★12:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 12:30:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Pico das Agulhas Negras - Início da escalada.JPGCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pico das Agulhas Negras - Início da escalada.JPG
Abstain Outstanding composition and well-made stacking, so don't want to vote against it, but lower part of the flower is rather noisy, so no support from me either. Красныйwanna talk?08:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ArionStar: Thanks for the hint. However, please do not set the Neutral example as an active template, otherwise it will be counted by the bot. Please use either a NoWiki code (e.g. {{Neutral}}) or the plain symbol (e.g. File:Symbol neutral vote.svg) without template. I took the liberty to do so. Thank you and best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Radomianin, thanks for the notification. I have changed the "File" with a {{tl}} otherwise the FPCBot considers there's an alternative, and asks which image should be promoted -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technical issue and low wow factor. The clouds are burnt (blown highlights) and the scenery is not exceptional in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See "Wow factor" in the dictionary : "a quality or feature of something that makes people feel great excitement or admiration" or "a quality that makes someone feel excited or surprised when they first see something". See also COM:I: "Featured pictures candidates should meet all the following requirements, must have a "wow factor" and may or may not have been created by a Commons user. Given sufficient "wow factor" and mitigating circumstances, a featured picture is permitted to fall short on technical quality." -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 17:58:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:At Tenerife 2023 644 - Sub Fun Cinco entering Marina San Miguel.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:At Tenerife 2023 644 - Sub Fun Cinco entering Marina San Miguel.jpg
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 13:18:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:006 Wild Baby Alpine Chamois Creux du Van and Swiss Alps Sunset colors Photo by Giles Laurent.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:006 Wild Baby Alpine Chamois Creux du Van and Swiss Alps Sunset colors Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
Thank you for your review. I guess you are talking of one of the two trees? They are the reason the chamois were there: close to them the snow is less deep and they can dig the snow with their hooves to eat the grass. The trees are thus part of the habitats of these chamois, which is one of the reasons why the gallery Animals in their habitat was chosen for this picture. Also, I actually personally think that they give a nice touch to the image with their soft colors illuminated by the sunset. Also both trees point to the subject and the chamois clearly stands out with its dark color in this snowy background with soft sunset illuminated colors. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support From the point of view of the chosen gallery, I think the composition is appropriate. In my opinion, the blurred elements in the foreground and background can be considered a compositional style. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review. I still personally think that the background tree is a nice echo of the foreground tree, giving the viewer a sense of what the foreground tree actually looks like while also beeing relevant to the chamois' environment. Giles Laurent (talk) 13:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I still think that the chamois stands out way more than the background tree for multiple reasons : 1) the chamois is the clear subject in the middle of the frame ; 2) the chamois is wearing it's black winter coat which makes it stand out compared to the light-colored snow ; 3) the bokeh is cleary separating the subject from the background ; 4) the foreground tree creates perfect leading lines that point directly at the center of the frame where the subject is placed ; 5) the snow horizon on the background on the left side creates another leading line to the center of the frame where the subject is placed ; 6) the snow on the middleground of the image that goes from the bottom right of the picture to the center also creates another leading line pointing to the subject ; 7) finally, even the background tree is pointing right at the subject. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review. The gallery "animals in their habitats" was especially created to feature pictures where a step back was taken and where a wider view is presented. Per creator of this gallery : "It is so great to see the animals as part of photos of their habitat. So please, when you super-record the critters, do also take a step back and compose a few great photos where we can see a bit more of the places where they live". This image is exactly that, it allows to have a wider view that changes from the usual "mugshots" that we often see on animals here. The wider view on this shot was intended for various reasons. It emphasizes the small size of the subject and the fact that it is still a small baby on a big snow covered environment with only a few trees. The wider look also allows to see two trees that are relevant to the environment of the chamois in winter because close to them there is less snow on the ground and the chamois can more easily dig the snow with their hooves to eat the grass. Finally the wider shots also allows to showcase the swiss alps in the background beautifully illuminated by sunset light to complete the scene. If the image would have been cropped/framed to only include the chamois, it would have in my opinion a lot less educational value because we would be missing all these interesting elements about it's habitat. Moreover the wider shots allows to showcase the beautiful sunset colors which is a rare thing to capture with wildlife photography. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice light but 1) the feet are hidden, 2) the big blurry brown mass is distracting, and 3) the snowy branch is out of focus. Cluttered composition in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 04:49:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Restaurant Amigos de Acapulco (window), Chico.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Restaurant Amigos de Acapulco (window), Chico.jpg
Info Window of the Mexican restaurant Amigos de Acapulco, located on Oroville Avenue in Chico, California. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 04:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support nice one, but the half-cut weeds at the bottom right kinda ruin the wow for me. It would me much better with whole weeds or no weeds at all IMO. Красныйwanna talk?09:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the constructive review, Красный. I agree that without the small plant, it would be a classical composition with conformity. Keeping it as an intrusive object was intentional because it matches the green paint residue from the previous coat as well as the other tiny plants on the left. It is cropped because the wall actually ends at the right edge of the image. Also, because of the plant, the asphalted section fits as a contrast. But you can find an edited version without the plant for comparison under the SwissTransfer link. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 04:06:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Avefría senegalesa (Vanellus senegallus), parque nacional del Lago Mburo, Uganda, 2024-02-01, DD 61.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Avefría senegalesa (Vanellus senegallus), parque nacional del Lago Mburo, Uganda, 2024-02-01, DD 61.jpg
Oppose Most interesting part, the head is out of focus. The focus is on the feathers of the back, behind. And with this low resolution, only 2,159 × 2,879 pixels, it is a real quality issue -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A striking snapshot, but unfortunately the technical quality is inadequate. I wonder why the image received QI status when head and eyes are not in focus. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 17:33:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Corvus corax in puddle at Bonny Doon Beach.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Corvus corax in puddle at Bonny Doon Beach.jpg
Thank you for your advice, the shooting conditions were particularly difficult, this statue of sleeping Buddha is located on the uppermost terrace. I couldn't figure out how to fix this problem. If the image is not OK for FP, I will quickly remove it from the proposals made Best regards. --Pierre André (talk)15:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition is fine but the head is out of focus. Shallow depth of field. And at ISO 2500, the quality is on the low level. A tripod would have helped -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info A composite image of a miniature poodle galloping, showing full contraction followed by full extension. The two images were shot 0.189 sec apart. The poodle is 14 inches (36 cm) high at the shoulder and head+body length is 23 inches (58 cm). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 02:52:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Colorful canal houses at golden hour in Damrak avenue Amsterdam the Netherlands.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Colorful canal houses at golden hour in Damrak avenue Amsterdam the Netherlands.jpg
Support Finally in Europe ! The right side is a bit unsharp, but colors and compo are very good, and the left side is very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The dramatic cloudy sky provides a great contrast to the evening light effects on the houses and water surface. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I think maybe a highlights reduction washed the colors out a little bit? Looks good, regardless. I'm a sucker for bright light on dark sky. — Rhododendritestalk | 12:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 02:50:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Water reflection of canal houses at blue hour in Damrak Amsterdam the Netherlands.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Water reflection of canal houses at blue hour in Damrak Amsterdam the Netherlands.jpg
Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2024 at 14:50:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:2024 Solar Eclipse over Cleveland Terminal Tower - 53650722351.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:2024 Solar Eclipse over Cleveland Terminal Tower - 53650722351.jpg
@Milseburg What's so "strange" and "artificial" about this? Are the eclipse patterns symmetrical? Are the buildings too bright for you? Your comment is too vague for me to see the problems. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Milseburg The image is a composite, which means that it went through some tweaking to achieve the desired effect. By my looks, the image must have been captured during totality, then the eclipse phases were added to some parts of the sky based on the location during that phase. I'm not a photography expert, so if anyone can explain it better and more accurately than me, please do. WildMouse76 (talk) 15:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2024 at 04:22:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Bloemknop van een Camellia × williamsii 'Roger Hall'. 26-03-2024 (actm.) 02.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bloemknop van een Camellia × williamsii 'Roger Hall'. 26-03-2024 (actm.) 02.jpg
Oppose The petals have alternate blurry and sharp sections. Looks like the number of images used is not sufficient. --Tagooty (talk) 04:12, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The new image is not much improvement, it has blurs where the previous was sharp. Eg the top edges of the petals. The focus stacking needs rework. The tool I use, Zerene Stacker, allows one to copy a part of a specific image into the output. I find this useful for sharpening blurry areas that the automatic stacking cannot fix. --Tagooty (talk) 03:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's probably one of a series of photos from the fueling mission, and explanation to why the planes were so close to each other and lazy file naming. It could be renamed "Airman in F-15E takes photo of KC-10" ;-), given what is going on in the photo, or "F-15E during fueling stage from KC-10". --Cart(talk)10:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just expressing a wish for more photos like this that aren't so tightly cropped. It's a very fast plane, but right up against the frame it doesn't look it. — Rhododendritestalk | 12:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 19:47:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Heracles statue at the Schwerin Castle (1).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Heracles statue at the Schwerin Castle (1).jpg
Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 14:22:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Mont de Chemun sun Mot de Sëuc y Sasplat.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mont de Chemun sun Mot de Sëuc y Sasplat.jpg
Temporarily changed my vote to Neutral until the issue mentioned below is fixed. It would be a pity if the nomination fails because of this small detail. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have to agree with Basile, that the addition of the sky has resulted in a strange cross pattern in the new section, as well as blurring the top of the peak. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice Hasselblad X2D-100C! However, Poco is right that the composition could use more room above, hence the weak support. dllu(t,c)00:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the notification, but the top of the mountain now shows weird artifacts and the generated clouds are of much lower quality than those really photographed. There are also colorful outlines around. Thus my negative vote remains. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'll just take note that adding a strip of computer-generated sky and clouds here, sparked no debate, only a comment that the fix was was badly executed. --Cart(talk)16:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very nice shot and compo. But there are a lot of CAs at the top of trees at left and right, and in the top on the mountain at the middle and at right. There are CAs on the left building too. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love these kinds of photos that most photographers forget to take. As far as I'm concerned: simple but in the right proportions.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 30 May 2024 at 09:05:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Pécheurs démêlant les filets à Bahiret el Bibane.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pécheurs démêlant les filets à Bahiret el Bibane.jpg
Commons is just an archive for photos; very few photos are "used" here. The photos kept here are used in Wikipedias all over the world, as well as all the Wiki sister projects, schools, museums, organisations, and thousands of others that get their photos from Commons. Commons is like a "stock photo site" where images can be used for free if you credit the photographer. --Cart(talk)19:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Clear distorsions of the face in the corner, due to the wide angle (24 mm) lens. Crop is too tight at the top. The guy seems to lower his head to fit it into the frame :-) The arm and hand in the foreground suffer from motion blur. Probably the shutter speed was not fast enough. The background is not very sharp, and the light is dull around the man with red jumper. To finish, there are big dust spots in the center, one between the worker and the street lamp, another one at the top, and at the right too -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]