User talk:Wvdp

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Wvdp!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:51, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


File:Noor Mohammed Zubair.jpg[edit]

Hi, Wvdp I noticed you have placed my picture for deletion. Any reason you have to put it under deletion? Thanks User:Zacknoor123 (talk)

most of these kinds of uploads are low quality. but since you used it on your user page it should be ok. i will say so on the delete request and we will see what other editors think of it
--Wvdp (talk) 13:09, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I used it just cause I wasn't able to upload any media directly hence I had to take the other route.
User:Zacknoor123 (talk)

File:Mishti-Chakraborty-12131.jpg[edit]

Hi, Wvdp I nnoticed that you uploaded a new version of File:Mishti-Chakraborty-12131.jpg as high resolution but that version posted on hiteshkaneria.com and it's not under {{BollywoodHungama}}, so I reverted your upload. Please cross check license/Permission before you upload any version Thanks ZI Jony (talk) 20:38, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


understood -- Wvdp (talk) 20:46, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Birgit Hagen[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Birgitlang.jpg

Hva er problemet og hva gjør jeg med det? KjellG (talk) 17:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the main problem is that we can't verify the source. it looks like a vimeo video but there is no link. we don't know if the image has the right licence for the wiki commons. you can read more about licecing at Commons:Licensing --Wvdp (talk) 11:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vimeo is hosting a video owned by Stiftelsen til fremme av Birgit Hagens kunst. They have placed the video at Vimeo for everybody to watch. It could have been placed at no:Hallindal Museum web site, but currently they cannot hoste streaming material, therefor Vimeo. I have added a link currently at no:Bruker:KjellG/Birgit later to be moved to article no:Birgit Hagen. The purpose of this picture is to give a clear indication of a link to a video. The video could have been uploaded to Commons. I do not know how and in what format. Video on WP seems a bit immature. Everything I do regarding Birgit Hagen are done in conjunction with and/or behalf of Stiftelsen.. and Hallingdal museum and coordinated with them. KjellG (talk) 12:23, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
well if you think everything is on the up and up than please send prove of the copyright holder's consent to the wikicommons team according to Commons:Email_templates/Consent -- Wvdp (talk) 12:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Var vänlig och notera att enbart den som är upphovinnehavaren kan licensera något under en fri licens. Äger stiftelsen bilden på Birgit, eller äger fotografen det? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:27, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bildet er hentet fra et privat fotoalbum i Birgit Hagens familie. Fotograf er ukjent. Dersom kun copyright holder kan laste opp bilder til Commons, så er dette umulig, flere er over 70 år og uten PC. Ingen i Stiftelsen er i stand til å gjennomføre en slik opplasting. Derfor forsøkte de å delegere dette til meg. Reaksjonen fra Commons er ulogisk. Jeg lastet opp to bilder samtidig, i forståelse med Stiftelsen, de har sett resultatet og applaudert før dette ble slettet. Begge bildene tar utgangspunkt i deres materiale, men er lett manipulert av meg for å indikere start av en video. Det ene bildet ble slettet, det andre ikke, hvorfor? Det ene inneholder delvis et portrett, slettet. Det andre eksempel på Birgit Hagens kunst, ikke slettet? Begge bilder er underbygget med en tekstfil fra Stiftelsen, undertegnet av stiftelsens forkvinne som gir meg fullmakt til å laste opp materiale på deres vegne. Dette fikk jeg aldri noe forståelig respons på. Nå forstår jeg det slik at på Commons er det kun mulig å laste opp noe dersom du selv er Copyright holder, en sterk begrensning.

Jeg har forsøkt å hjelpe noen med lite kunnskap om WP/Commons, men innser at jeg burde holdt meg unna. I stedet planlegger Stiftelsen å rigge egen nettside hvor dette materiale kan publiseres. Det er greit for dem, WP går glipp av eksperimenter med video og på sikt, portrett og eksempler på BHs kunst. KjellG (talk) 18:39, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just a kind reminder, don't forget to remove geotag when uploading photos to protect your privacy![edit]

I bought a Sony DSC-HX90V camera recently and I just happened to read the article about it. The caption image was taken by your Nexus 6P and I found the geotag information in Exif data. the location on Google map So be careful next time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomskyhaha (talk • contribs) 03:23, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Löschanträge von hochgeladenen Bildern AS-Motor (25.09.18)[edit]

Hallo Wvdp, zu Ihren Löschanträgen: sämtliche Bilder ist im Eigentum von AS-Motor, AS-Motor Germany GmbH & Co. KG, bei uns liegen auch sämtliche Urheberrechte. Unsere AS-Motor-Wikipedia-Seite https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:AS-Motor ist auch verifiziert. Die abgebildeten Produkte sind auch auf unserer Website https://www.as-motor.de enthalten und zweifelsfrei als AS-Motor-Produkte identifizierbar. Selbstverständlich können die Produkte auch über andere Website verkauft werden, wie Sie bei AS 625 KM gesehen haben. Dennoch liegen die Rechte bei AS-Motor. Machen Sie bitte die Löschanträge rückgängig? Vielen Dank. --AS-Motor (talk) 14:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you marked this file for deletion with the note "there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license". I see in category:media missing permission as of 4 October 2018 that a couple of other Apple Maps logos were marked for deletion at the same time, so I wonder if in doing this batch you missed the fact that the info for this file does not claim that there is any license applicable to the file, nor any copyright holder, but that it is copyright-ineligible, being a set of simple geometric shapes. This characterisation can be contested, of course, but that is a different complaint, then. Do you think the file is copyright-eligible and therefore nonfree? Arlo James Barnes 16:37, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

well I think this is copyright eligible. the question is when some shapes a mondriaan. i know this argument doesnt fly on wiki projectes but what about the google maps logo it is about the same complexcety. so yes i question if this is too complex for a pd-shape licence. but i only raze the question it is to somebody else to answer the question. --Wvdp (talk) 20:58, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I apologise for the delayed response. To address your points in reverse order: I believe it is the responsibility of each Commoner to both raise and answer questions about copyright, suitability for COM:SCOPE, freedom, and so on. We need resources, but we need our use of those resources to be ethically and legally defensible and, indeed, defended where appropriate. As for the comparison to the Google Maps logo, the reason why the "other things exist" argument often 'does not fly' on Wikimedia projects is that it is a w:en:logical fallacy; we can and should evaluate each case independently, although of course one file can be used to understand another. In this case, we do indeed have a vector version of the Google Maps logo: file:GoogleMaps logo.svg. Lastly, I got a chuckle out of your presumed comparison to such logos to the neoplastic works of Piet Mondrian. Arlo James Barnes 00:54, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue, you'll be blocked from editing. Fiery3 (talk) 13:27, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

could you please explain yourself further because i don't see any thing wrong with my actions --Wvdp (talk) 13:30, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wvdp, there was nothing wrong with your edit. This is an LTA and I suggest you disregard the message. Hiàn (talk) 19:43, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wvdp, why do you think this image has no permission? --Túrelio (talk) 21:12, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The image that you indicate that violates copyright was removed. Thanks --Alfredo Molina (talk) 19:55, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

do NOT overwrite[edit]

Hi, do not overwrite existing images, as you have done with File:Dove Cameron in October 2017.jpg. Instead, use a different filename for a new image. --Túrelio (talk) 09:25, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить Землю 2019 в Україні триває до 31 травня![edit]

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 травня триває сьомий конкурс «Вікі любить Землю» (Wiki Loves Earth), метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Протягом травня ви можете завантажувати власні фото природно-заповідного фонду України та змагатися за призи. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Цього року є деякі зміни в правилах, зокрема:

  • фотографії пам'яток, які на момент початку конкурсу не мали жодної ілюстрації на Вікісховищі або у Вікіпедії, отримують коефіцієнт 10 в кількісній номінації. Якщо ви маєте фото ще не проілюстрованих пам'яток — це збільшить ваші шанси на перемогу;
  • окрема спецномінація для аерофотозйомки (фото з дронів тощо).

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте на сайті конкурсу. Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wle@wikimedia.org.ua – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in English). 22:28, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re:File:Strada statale 647 dir-B.png[edit]

Hi Wvdp, source of the work is {{own}} since i've manually created the map from a service wich use open street map tiles, here it is link. How should i update the licence?--Sayatek (talk) 08:57, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for tagging the image. i did not recognize the style. But since it is osm and the tiles are available as cc0 it should all be ok. Although you should use Template:OpenStreetMap to make clear that it is osm. And you should also add the link as you have already done.
So if you add the osm template than you can remove the source warning.
So I want to apologize again and encourage you to continue contributing. thank you for your contribution.
-- Wvdp (talk) 10:21, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, i'll find and insert the osm template. Best regards!--Sayatek (talk) 14:40, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, what is the problem with Jolanta Pieńkowska 2.jpg? You did not even ask me directly. Vege.cyclist (talk) 11:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that i don't believe the photo is your own work. As in you held the camera taking the picture. If i'm mistaken than you can send proof to commons according to this page: Commons:OTRS. -- Wvdp (talk) 11:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries[edit]

I also make mistakes. Thank you for volunteering for the project. Don't worry about our formal language on Deletion Nominations! Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshots[edit]

Hello, how can I find out that I can take screenshots of videos on YouTube and upload them here?--Sanslogique (talk) 06:03, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The main way is to see if the video is released under cc-by. you can find this if you click open the description. take for example this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEeseGUHJQ8 in the description it says that it is released under the creative commons. So you can cut out Gal Gadot and put her on the wiki commons if you use the right licence and template. In the search tools of youtube there is also a function to only search for creative commons videos.
there is also this page with more information about youtube and commons: Commons:YouTube_files
--Wvdp (talk) 07:28, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Enrique Cuenca.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Enrique Cuenca.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 17:15, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Logo destock.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:33, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source = {{Own work}}. If you are sure this image is from another website, please change "source" to a link to the image website. (`・ω・´) (talk) 14:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@-akko: the whole point of the addition of the tag is to find this out -Wvdp (talk) 15:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What's your mean? (`・ω・´) (talk) 15:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[1] (`・ω・´) (talk) 15:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Sony Alpha 7s has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removing border[edit]

Hi Wvdp, thanks for your contributions! I just reviewed File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F086697-0009, München, Konferenz der Ministerpräsidenten.jpg and it seems to still have a small white border down in the picture. Regards --Mirer (talk) 09:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the picture and i can't seem to find it. I did need to clear my cache before the updated image appeared. (ctrl+shift+R) thanks for the review, it is nice to see that my work is checked for errors. and someday we will have removed all borders from the german archive pictures. and then only the library of congress will remain. --Wvdp (talk) 11:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh sorry, this was my fault - everything is OK with this picture.
I don't think that your work still needs to be reviewed - except for the random cases where all our work is "reviewed" by others. Do you know, when you get auto-patrolled rights (is it far away? It feels, like I patrolled your first edits months ago.) or should I ask an admin (I think no application is needed) to grant those right to you? --Mirer (talk) 14:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my God ... just checked it myself, since I couldn't remember the rule. You have 27.000+ edits here since 2015. Unfortunately these rights are not automatically assigned on commons (unlike Wikipedia).
Even more unfortunate it looks as if too few of us care about user rights (like you and me here in this case ;-) ). I'll ask an admin to change that for you to autopatrol (see Commons:Patrol for more info on what changes or interest in other rights for you or others, you think are helpful. Sorry for the late notice of the amount of work you've done here, but it looks like the red link to the userpage always leads me to thinking that this is a somewhat new user. ;-| --Mirer (talk) 14:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Schirmherr Henning Scherf.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Schirmherr Henning Scherf.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

A1Cafel (talk) 16:06, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BriefEdits (talk) 09:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Joseph G Abraham India Gold 800 hurdles AsianGames2010.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Secretlondon (talk) 20:20, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Scarra (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 12:05, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Laura Pedersen and Family.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Laura Pedersen and Family.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

mattbr 04:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Joe Daniels Drummer.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Joe Daniels Drummer.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Materialscientist (talk) 20:22, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Привіт!

З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.

Також вперше проводиться спеціальна номінація «Пам'ятки Подесення», знову пройдуть спецномінації «Відео», «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини», «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» та «Via Regia Ukraine». Для участі світлин у цих спецномінаціях не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:29, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні триває до 30 вересня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine is on till September 30[edit]

Автор фото Aeou, інфографіка AnastasiaPetrova (WMUA), CC BY-SA 4.0
Переможці спеціальної номінації «Відео» 2020. Автори роликів: Ігор Мартинів, Кирило Венцеславський; Музика: Erik Satie: Gymnopedie No 2 by Kevin MacLeod. Монтаж: Atoly. Ліцензія CC BY-SA 4.0

Привіт!

Нагадуємо, що до 30 вересня включно можна вантажити світлини та відео культурної спадщини України до національного етапу міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»!

Зараз Україна посідає 3-є місце за кількістю завантажених світлин, поступаючись Російській Федерації та Німеччині. За першу половину місяця було завантажено світлини пам'яток із усіх регіонів України, але частина із них є дуже погано представлена. Севастополь зараз представлений тільки однією пам'яткою і одним фото, Крим — 12 пам'яток і 51 фото. Детальніше — у таблиці:

Проміжна статистика
Регіон К-ть пам'яток К-ть фото
Севастополь 1 1
АР Крим 12 51
Закарпаття 26 96
Миколаївщина 29 81
Рівненщина 36 186
Херсонщина 36 83
Житомирщина 55 324
Донеччина 57 153
Тернопільщина 62 234
Буковина 75 220
Луганщина 82 90
Львівщина 82 351
Кіровоградщина 88 181
Волинь 98 270
Одещина 115 383
Сумщина 129 414
Дніпропетровщина 139 278
Київ 159 248
Хмельниччина 166 538
Полтавщина 171 594
Харківщина 175 625
Київщина 181 651
Черкащина 186 455
Прикарпаття 240 305
Вінничина 242 775
Запоріжжя 253 317
Чернігівщина 305 519

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Цього року у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій:

Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Приєднуйтеся!

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlm@wikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:10, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Multichill (talk) 22:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harry Djanogly.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

191.116.39.131 10:51, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 is on![edit]

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo googledotorg.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 in India is on![edit]

Hello Wvdp,

Greetings from Wiki Loves Folklore India Team!

Wiki Loves Folklore is an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons, this campaign invites participants to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, folktales, folk games, folk religion, mythology and many more. Let's help to protect and develop our intangible Indian culture, which consists of customs or active expressions that we have acquired from our ancestors and passed down to our offspring.

How to Contribute?

The dates for the submission in the photography contest on Wikimedia Commons are from 1 February to 31 March 2023. Probably you are wondering how you can take part. It’s simple: grab a camera, record an image, video or audio under the folklore theme, create a Wikimedia account and start uploading! To learn more about the rules, check out our Project page on Wikimedia Commons.

Below are the exciting prizes which you can win internationally an locally. (Contributors can win both International and Local Prizes as well )

International Prizes

  • 1st prize: 400 USD
  • 2nd prize: 200 USD
  • 3rd prize: 100 USD
  • Top 10 consolation prizes: 10 USD each
  • Best Video prize and best Audio prize: 25 USD, 25 USD (each)
  • Top uploader prize for images: First Prize 100 USD, Second prize 50 USD
  • Wiki Loves Folklore Postcards to top 100 Uploader's

Local Prizes

  • 1st prize - 15000 INR + WLF Goodies
  • 2nd prize - 10000 INR + WLF Goodies
  • 3rd prize - 5000 INR + WLF Goodies
  • Consolation : Top 5 winners - 1000 INR each + WLF Goodies
  • Wiki Loves Folklore Certificate for Winners

(Disclaimer : The above prizes for International and Local Contest will only be disbursed in form of gift card or voucher format only)

If you are interested in participating in the photography campaign, start photographing and collecting media of your local culture and upload them on the photo campaign happening on Wikimedia Commons.

For more information about rules and prizes of the contest, refer the project page. For any questions, reach out to us via support@wikilovesfolklore.org.

You have been sent this message because you have been a part of Wiki loves Folklore in its journey in the past 5 years, lets continue to embrace our folk culture and drive through the path towards creating the largest database collection of folk Images on the internet

Warm regards,

Gaurav Gaikwad (User:Rockpeterson)

Coordinator for Wiki Loves Folklore India.

File:Léon de Poncins.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Felix QW (talk) 17:47, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pararius-nl.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 13:11, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:AlexDiGiorgio1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:AlexDiGiorgio1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Solomon203 (talk) 04:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:=) - panoramio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Komarof (talk) 07:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forsythe and Fullerton2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Archie02 (talk) 21:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ellywa (talk) 09:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]