User talk:Wolfgang glock

Welcome to the Commons, Wolfgang glock!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 23:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Category:Ägydiuskirche

hello there, I undeleted your request for Ägydiuskirche and created a disambiguation instead, I hope that is fine and it should be resolved in this manner in the future if there are multiple places or buildings with the same name, see also Category:Grand Bazaar for example. sincerely Gryffindor 15:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:WrNeustadt_NeunkichnerStr_02.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:WrNeustadt_NeunkichnerStr_02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

wg 22:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Foto Serbenhalle

Sehr geehrter Herr Glock, für das Buch "Wir vom Jahrgang 1942", Wartberg-Verlag, würde ich gerne Ihr Foto von der "Serbenhalle http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:WrNeustadt_Serbenhalle.JPG verwenden. Falls möglich bitte ich Sie um einen kurzen schriftlichen Vermerk per Email an mich, in dem Sie mir das für alle Auflagen der Publikation genehmigen. Als Fotocredit würde ich Wolfgang Glock/CC-BY-SA 3.0 angeben, es sei denn Sie wünschen etwas anderes. Als Bildgeber stünde Ihnen auch ein Belegexemplar zu, wenn Sie das in Anspruch nehmen wollen bitte um Bekanntgabe Ihrer Postadresse.

Vielen Dank für Ihr Entgegenkommen,

mit freundlichen Grüßen

Helmuth Santler

Lieber Herr Santler! Da ich leider keine E-Mailadresse von Ihnen habe, auf diesem Weg meine Antwort: Gerne können Sie das Foto verwenden - das ergibt sich schon aus der Lizenz, unter der ich es veröffentlicht habe. Der Fotocredit in der von Ihnen vorgeschlagenen Form ist ganz ok. Für das Angebot eines Belegexemplars danke ich herzlich, möchte davon aber nicht Gebrauch machen.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen: Wolfgang Glock. --wg (talk) 20:41, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Carnuntum - Thermae

römische Badewanne

Hallo Wolfgang glock,

so ein Zufall, beinahe hätten wir uns im April im Archäologiepark Carnuntum getroffen! Soeben habe ich drei weitere Bilder von den Thermen hochgeladen, darunter diese Innenaufnahme. Kannst du im Beschreibungstext bitte ergänzen, um welchen Raum es sich handelt? Ich habe es mir leider nicht notiert, aber du als "Lateiner" weißt sicher Bescheid.

Schönen Gruß aus der deutschen Partnerstadt Hainburgs. --E-W (talk) 21:18, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Wolfgang glock, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Foto:Figuren-Schreitende und Schreitender-01.jpg

Hallo Wolfgang glock! Du hast bei meinem Foto den FOP-Baustein eingefügt, ist es sinnvoll wenn ich diesen Baustein auch bei den anderen von mir geknipsten Denkmälern einfüge? Ist er auch bei Fotos von Gebäuden notwendig? Gruß Priwo (talk) 18:39, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Priwo! Ich gebe den Baustein immer dann, wenn Bauwerke oder Kunstwerke abgebildet sind, deren Schöpfer vor weniger als 70 Jahren verstorben ist, weil in manchen Ländern auch bloße Abbildungen davon urherberrechtlich geschützt sind (z.B. in Belgien - siehe Commons:Freedom of panorama). In Österreich und ähnlich in Deutschland ist das wegen der sog. Panoramafreiheit kein Problem. (Dabei bevorzuge ich {{FOP}}, weil dieser Baustein allgemein gehalten ist, während {{Panoramafreiheit}} speziell auf die Situation in Deutschland abzielt.) L.G., --wg (talk) 21:10, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Piesting Kupelwieser-Haus 02.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:19, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Erledigt. --wg (talk) 22:35, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Steinhofmauer

Hallo Wolfgang! Danke, daß Du Dich um mein Bild von der Steinhofmauer Sanatoriumstraße gekümmert hast! Allerdings hab ich einen Teil Deiner Änderung wieder rausgenommen, da die Steinhofmauer Sanatorium nur den Teil des Sanatoriums umgibt, der Teil Heschweg hingegen nur die Steinhofgründe. Daher ist auch der Teil Heschweg extra geschützt, während der Teil Sanatoriumstraße mit dem Sanatorium geschützt ist. In der Bildbeschreibung sollte das dann nicht in einen Topf geworfen werden. Danke und liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 22:47, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, in der Genauigkeit war mir das nicht klar! LG --wg (talk) 21:02, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Wolfgang glock, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 13:40, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Research of the 1800-1880s

Dear Wolf, I hope you are reading this, I just finished making a contribution to your english wiki page:.http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Wolfgang_glock. You can change it as you see fit. The language barrier might make it a bit difficult. I hope you speak enough english so we can correspond. I think what you are doing is essential to preserving our history.

Tell me what you think of this picture.

File:Http://rdrsteelsales.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/632px-Bessemerbirne-300x284.jpg

http://rdrsteelsales.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/632px-Bessemerbirne-300x284.jpg Posted: April 10th, 2013.

Air blasting technology revolutionized iron and steel production, a huge leap for 1847.

Copyright status: File:Schollach Hausberg Stefring 04.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Schollach Hausberg Stefring 04.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 14:01, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Done --wg (talk) 18:31, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Schollach Hausberg Stefring 05.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Schollach Hausberg Stefring 05.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Didym (talk) 14:02, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Done --wg (talk) 18:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Public Art 2013! Dear Wolfgang glock, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Public Art 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 9,000 pictures of works of art from five countries. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images, and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you would like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. Your feedback will help us improve future contests! To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Public Art 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Public Art team

Copyright status: File:Piesting Kupelwieser-Haus 03.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Piesting Kupelwieser-Haus 03.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 05:50, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Done 28 July 2013.--wg (talk) 21:14, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

dein Foto auf flickr

Hallo Wolfgang, da geht jemand mit deinem Foto hausieren, noch dazu mit falscher Autorin und mit Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Magst du dich drum kümmern? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:34, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Vielen Dank, hab's vor kurzem selbst gesehen, bin aber noch ein bisschen unschlüssig, was ich am besten tue. LG Wolfgang--wg (talk) 21:12, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Einvernehmlich erledigt.--wg (talk) 20:35, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Attribution for The Reichstag, 3.2-S7

Dear Mr. Glock, I am writing to thank you for making your photograph available for publication through Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. We plan to use the following photograph for inclusion in Harold Kalman, Heritage Planning, to be published in 2014 by Routledge. The image that we plan to use is: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Reichstag_Plenarsaal_Kuppel.JPG

You will be credited as the photographer in the caption as Wolfgang Glock.

If you have any questions please contact me by email at skicbbc@gmail.com.

Thank you,

Susan

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Wolfgang glock, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Wolfgang glock, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Copyright status: File:Kitzbuhel FW + RK 02.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kitzbuhel FW + RK 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Kitzbuhel Schloss Lebenberg02.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:02, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Accidentally forgotten! Done. --wg (talk) 21:46, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

File:LUAS single ticket.jpg

File:LUAS single ticket.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

darkweasel94 04:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

siehe dort. --wg (talk) 22:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Wiener Neustädter Grundlinie

Servus Wolfgang! Die Wiener Neustädter Grundlinie sollte eine Entfernung von 12.158 Meter haben. Hat aber angeblich von einem Autofahrer festgestellt zwischen den Endpunktdenkmälern nur eine Entfernung von ca. 10 km. Du hast ja eine ziemlich eindeutige GEO-Angabe zum südlichen Basis-Punkt gegeben. Leider sind beide Endpunkte nicht denkmalgeschützt. Wo mag der Fehler liegen? --Anton-kurt (talk) 08:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Servus Anton-kurt! Bei einer überschlagsmaßigen Kontrolle anhand der Österreichischen Karte (via NÖ Atlas) komme ich auch nur auf etwa 9.650 m. Jetzt auf die Schnelle kann ich nicht sagen, ob die beiden Säulen noch immer exakt am ursprünglichen Aufstellungsort stehen. Schließlich ist die Neunkirchner Allee seit damals sicher x-mal um- und ausgebaut worden und der Nördliche Basisendpunkt steht mitten im Knoten A2 - Neunkirchner Allee. --wg (talk) 18:30, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich

... für Dein Engagement

Danke für Deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich. Du hast damit einen wertvollen Beitrag geleistet, Bildmaterial für die Wikipedia und für eine Weiternutzung im Sinne freien Wissens bereitzustellen. Die Jury sichtet nun in einem mehrstufigen Verfahren die Einreichungen. Die Gewinner geben wir am 30. September 2015 unter anderem auf wikilovesearth.at bekannt. Die öffentliche Preisverleihung, zu der wir Dich schon jetzt herzlich einladen, findet im November 2015 in Wien statt. Bei Fragen zum Wettbewerb schreibe bitte an infowikilovesearth.at. Der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich wird Wiki Loves Monuments im September 2015 sein.

Danke ebenso für Deine Beiträge, die Du unabhängig von Wiki Loves Earth leistest. Solltest Du bei Deinen Fotounternehmungen Unterstützung benötigen, kannst Du Dich jederzeit an den österreichischen Förderverein Wikimedia Österreich wenden (eine Vereinsmitgliedschaft ist keine Voraussetzung). Zu den Serviceangeboten für ehrenamtliche Fotografinnen und Fotografen gehören ein Pool an Fotoequipment, die Organisation von Fotoakkreditierungen, Reisekostenerstattungen sowie E-Mail-Adressen und Visitenkarten. Wikimedia Österreich kannst Du über vereinwikimedia.at kontaktieren.

--Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk)  14:49, 3 Jul 2015 (UTC)  > für das Team von Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich

Die Preisträger stehen fest

Die Jury hat entschieden - die zehn Preisträger von Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich findest Du hier: http://wikilovesearth.at/gewinner-wle-2015/. In dieser Endauswahl ist leider kein Bild von Dir vertreten. Unter den 500 Fotos, die von der Vorjury für die engere Auswahl vorgesehen wurden, ist ein Bild von Dir: http://wikilovesearth.at/tools/vorjury/index_2015.html. Noch bis 30. September gibt es die Möglichkeit am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments rund um denkmalgeschützte Bauwerke teilzunehmen. --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 08:14, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Lizenz

Hallo Wolfgang glock, ich bin auf dein Foto File:Bezirksamt XV.JPG gestoßen. Du hast die Lizenz als PD-Old eingegeben. Diese allerdings für Fotos vorgesehen, deren Fotograf 70 Jahre tot ist ;-) - Kannst du die Lizenz bitte korrigieren. --danke K@rl (talk) 17:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Wollte damals wohl betonen, dass die Architekten seit mehr als 70 Jahren tot sind. --wg (talk) 21:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Versteh - gruß K@rl (talk) 20:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich

... fürs Mitmachen!

Vielen Dank für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich. Die Jury hat entschieden und die diesjährigen Preisträger wurden veröffentlicht: http://wikilovesmonuments.at/.

In etwa einem halben Jahr findet mit Wiki Loves Earth (http://wikilovesearth.at/) der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich statt, bei dem es um Naturdenkmäler geht. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn du auch an diesem Wettbewerb wieder teilnimmst.

Für das Team von Wiki Loves Monuments in Österreich - liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 19:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2016

Servus Wolfgang glock,

Am Sonntag, den 1. Mai 2016 startete zum dritten Mal der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich.
Wir laden dich herzlich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mit Fotos von Naturdenkmälern und weiteren unter Naturschutz stehenden Objekten aus Österreich teilzunehmen. Der Zeitraum, in dem die Bilder auf Wikimedia Commons hochgeladen werden sollen, läuft bis 31. Mai 2016.
Alle Informationen findest du hier: https://wikilovesearth.at/.

Zusätzlich wollen wir dich dazu einladen, als Mitglied der Vorjury die diesjährigen Beiträge zu begutachten: Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Earth 2016/Österreich/Jury. Du kannst bei der Vorjury auch mitmachen, wenn du selbst am Fotowettbewerb teilnimmst. Deine eigenen Fotos werden dir dann nicht zur Bewertung vorgelegt.
Bitte melde dich zur Vorjury an. Der Bewertungszeitraum liegt zwischen 15. Mai und 15. Juni 2016. Jede Stimme ist willkommen. Liebe Grüße im Namen des Organisationsteams,
--Agruwie  ^Disk    15:08, 5 May 2016 (CET)

File tagging File:Giessen St. Albertus 04.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Giessen St. Albertus 04.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Giessen St. Albertus 04.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Hallo Wolfgang glock, die Panoramafreiheit gilt natürlich nur von außen. Von innen fotografierte Kunstwerke bedürfen der Genehmigung des Künstlers, der bei einer so jungen Kirche mit großer Sicherheit noch keine 70 Jahre verstorben ist. Viele Grüße und sorry, Emha (talk) 19:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Habe leider die unterschiedliche Rechtslage in Österreich und Deutschland übersehen. --wg (talk) 21:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Giessen St. Albertus 04.jpg

File:Giessen St. Albertus 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

darkweasel94 22:37, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Zur Info

Hallo Wolfgang, nur zur Info, hier hat der ORF ein Foto von dir verwendet. Allerdings nicht Lizenzgerecht. Wie schon früher habe ich den ORF NÖ angeschrieben um zu erklären, bisher wurde es immer gleich korrigiert - diesmal stellen sie sich aber taub :-( --K@rl (talk) 22:10, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Lieber K@rl, vielen Dank (hab erst heute wieder einmal eingeloggt und deine Benachrichtigung gesehen). Mittlerweile heißt es immerhin "Wikimedia Commons/Wolfgang Glock". Ein Hinweis auf Creative Commons fehlt allerdings immer noch ... --wg (talk) 21:41, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

So ist es eh von Anfang an gestanden. Nur die Lizenz hat auch von Anfang an gefehlt. Versuch du einmal an noe.publikum@orf.at zu schreiben - es geht mir nicht darum finanziell zu mahnen, sondern das freizubleibende Foto soll auch als frei beim ORF stehen bleiben, sonst kann der ORF es beim nächsten einklagen, da er es beim ORF "geklaut" haben könnte. Offen muss offen bleiben. Als Urheber hast du vielleicht mehr Chance. --lg K@rl (talk) 08:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2018 – Danke!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2018! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 14.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Orte in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinen möglich war. Aus rund 500 von einer Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat nun eine Jury die Preisträger-Fotos dieses Jahres gewählt: Commons:WikiDaheim.

Übrigens: Wikimedia Österreich unterstützt Dich gerne bei Deinen Beiträgen auf Wikimedia Commons, beispielsweise mit Foto-Leihgeräten oder einem Foto-Software-Stipendium. Einen Überblick über die Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten findest Du auf Wikipedia:Förderung.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 18:10, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Your camera is set for the wrong date

Hi, you're uploading photos today with the date of tomorrow. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 18:42, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Oops, back to the future! Thank you! --wg (talk) 18:54, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2020/Kellergassen: Gratulation zum Sonderpreis!

Hallo Wolfgang glock!
Danke für deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb WikiDaheim 2020. Die Jury hat entschieden und ich freue mich dir mitteilen können, dass dein Foto Eibesthal Pfandnerweg den Sonderpreis in der Kategorie Kellergassen gewonnen hat.
Alle ausgezeichneten Fotos findest du auf de:Wikipedia:WikiDaheim/Jury#Gewinnerfotos 2020. Die Preisverleihung findet hoffentlich im Sommer 2021 statt. Dazu bekommst du zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt noch eine eigene Einladung. Für Fragen bis dahin erreichst du das WikiDaheim-Team unter wikidaheim[at]wikimedia.at. Liebe Grüße --Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) 08:47, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! Ich fühle mich geehrt und freue mich sehr! --wg (talk) 17:10, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Bildanfrage Kreisgraben Heldenberg

Lieber Herr Glock, ich melde mich mit einer Nutzungsanfrage zu einem Ihrer Bilder: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreisgrabenanlage#/media/Datei:Rekonstruierte_Kreisgrabenanlage2.jpg Ich würde es gerne im Rahmen eines Projekts im Bereich archäologische Kulturvermittlung der Landessammlungen Niederösterreich zur besseren Sichtbarmachung archäologischer Fundstellen nutzen. Für die von uns zur Veröffentlichung gewählten Internetseite reicht die angegebene Lizenz jedoch nicht aus, es müsste eine eigene Vereinbarung unterzeichnet werden. Falls Sie sich vorstellen können, Ihr Bild für ein solches Projekt zur Verfügung zu stellen, würde ich Sie um eine Kontaktaufnahme bitten. Meine Emailadresse findet sich unter https://www.donau-uni.ac.at/de/universitaet/organisation/mitarbeiterinnen/person/4295314526 ; meine Telefonnummer unter https://www.neolithikum.at/impressum Herzlichen Dank und mfg, Jakob Maurer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archaeodingsda (talk • contribs) 10:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Hinweis zur Teilnahme an WikiDaheim

zu klein (917 × 1377)

Hallo Wolfgang glock, danke für dein Bild Wallfahrtskirche Obermauern Madonna mit Kind.jpg (917 × 1377) zu unserem Fotowettbewerb WikiDaheim. Obwohl das Bild generell nützlich sein kann, erfüllt es nicht die Anforderung der Mindestgröße von 2 Megapixel (siehe Regeln) für unseren Fotowettbewerb. Es wird daher nicht bewertet werden.

Falls du noch eine Version desselben Bildes mit mehr als 2 Megapixeln hast, kannst du das Problem beheben, indem du diese als neue Version über das existierende Bild mit dem Link neue Version von Wallfahrtskirche Obermauern Madonna mit Kind.jpg hochladen drüberladest. Die größere Version als neues Bild hochzuladen löst das Problem beim alten Bild nicht.

Gleiches gilt für File:Wallfahrtskirche Obermauern Sonnenuhr.jpg (1728 × 1147) und File:Wallfahrtskirche Obermauern Hl. Petrus.jpg (656 × 1244) lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:15, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Lieber Herzi Pinki, danke für deinen Hinweis! Leider besteht die beschriebene Reparaturmöglichkeit nicht, da es sich um Ausschnitte aus (etwas) größeren Fotos handelt, die - bedingt durch das Alter meiner Kamera - nicht wahnsinnig groß sind. Allerdings ist die Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zwar eine schöne Sache, aber doch von sekundärer Bedeutung (bitte das nicht falsch als Arroganz verstehen!); Hauptsache ist für mich die Ergänzung der bis dato fehlenden Dokumentation. LG wg (talk) 19:40, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Danke, ich sehe das genauso. Der Wettbewerb bloß als Vehikel. Es sehen halt nicht alle so. Darf ich mich bei der Gelegenheit für deine Bilder bedanken, genau aus diesem Aspekt heraus. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:23, 19 September 2023 (UTC)