User talk:Wojsław Brożyna

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Wojsław Brożyna!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


File:Logo Labour Party.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Auric (talk) 17:24, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Wojsław Brożyna,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Logo Konfederacji Rodzimowierczej.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 10:41, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS Received[edit]

ank you for your contributions to Wikimedia Commons. Please note that only OTRS agents can add OTRS Received template. If you have sent an email to the OTRS team, please add Template:OTRS pending instead. Thank you! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:13, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:XV Rodowy Wiec Słowian 1734514550.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:XV Rodowy Wiec Słowian 1734514550.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anatoliy (talk) 08:19, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:XV Rodowy Wiec Słowian 1734514550.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 14:32, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not overwrite files[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Religion distribution.png. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

--Denniss (talk) 06:52, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toporzeł.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Altenmann (talk) 21:46, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How was I suppoed to know you were the one who made the symbol and not Stanisław Szukalski? RootOfAllLight (talk) 19:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:XV Rodowy Wiec Słowian 1718598138.jpg was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No OTRS permission for 30 days

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:XV Rodowy Wiec Słowian 1204744193.jpg was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No OTRS permission for 30 days

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zvezda-Zirka by Andrey Shishkin.jpg was recently deleted by Fitindia for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No permission since 25 December 2020

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zdravstvuj, Solncze by Andrey Shishkin.jpg was recently deleted by Fitindia for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No permission since 25 December 2020

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yarilo by Andrey Shishkin.jpg was recently deleted by Fitindia for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No permission since 25 December 2020

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:31, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dodola-Perunica by Andrey Shishkin.jpg was recently deleted by Fitindia for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No permission since 25 December 2020

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Devana by Andrey Shishkin.jpg was recently deleted by Fitindia for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No permission since 25 December 2020

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dazhbog by Andrey Shishkin.jpg was recently deleted by Fitindia for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No permission since 25 December 2020

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:34, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

English: Category: Slavic folk calendar linked to the article Slavic folk calendars. Therefore, it is imperative to leave it so that the illustrations for the article do not disappear. Category: Slavic folk calendar linked to the article Slavic folk calendars. Therefore, it is imperative to leave it so that the illustrations for the article do not disappear.
Polski: Kategoria jest powiązana z artykułem Słowiańskie kalendarze ludowe. Dlatego konieczne jest pozostawienie go, aby ilustracje do artykułu nie zniknęły. Pozdrawiam Лобачев Владимир (talk) 08:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clean-up of anarchist content[edit]

Hi Wojsław Brożyna, I've noticed you reverted my clean-up of anarchist content where I was removing non-anarchist content from anarchist categories. National-anarchism is widely considered as not a form of anarchism, which is also the consensus on Wikipedia, therefore it has been removed from categories that collect anarchist content. We could create a separate category for content that references anarchist symbols, and put it there. Thanks. BeŻet (talk) 15:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Polish: Konsensus jest już od dawna, niedawno była dyskusja tutaj na temat innej ideologi nawiązującej nazwą do anarchizmu, ale nie będącą odmianą anarchizmu. Zarówno anarcho-kapitalizm jak i nacjonalistyczny anarchizm zostały przeniesione do "Issues", i nie są kwalifikowane jako odmiany anarchizmu. Możesz przeczytać argumentację i źródła tam. Nacjonalistyczny anarchizm chyba nawet nie był nigdy umieszczany na liście odmian anarchizmu i został od razy przyłączony do issues. Z tego co też widzę uczestniczyłeś w dyskusji na ten temat w 2018. Czy mógłbyś proszę usunąć te kategorie, które znowu przywróciłeś? Tak jak powiedziałem, powielamy koncensus z Wikipedii, więc należy to zrobić. BeŻet (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Jan Stachniuk – Dzieje bez dziejów.pdf has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Masur (talk) 06:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ad. "Kategoria Wayside shrines in Poland"[edit]

Na świecie są "wayside shrines" tworzone przez wyznawców różnych religii. Nie jest merytoryczne, ani ponadczasowe, aby wrzucać je do jednego worka. Takie zmieszanie może prowadzić do nieporozumień, błędów lub przekłamań. Przykładowa hipotetyczna sytuacja za lat 100 - ktoś bez większej wiedzy, może dziecko, w kategorii o kapliczkach przydrożnych znajduje 10 fot. kapliczek przedstawiających wizerunek świętego religii chrześcijańskiej, 1 fot. kapliczkę przedstawiającą Zeusa, 1 fot. kapliczkę przedstawiającą Buddę - skutkiem czego może błędnie uważać, że Zeus i Budda, to kanonizowani święci chrześcijańscy, a nie są, gdyż Zeus to bóstwo mitologii greckiej, a Budda to założyciel buddyzmu. VVerka5 (talk) 09:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slavic home altar with Veles.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Missvain (talk) 02:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aztecs Swastika[edit]

What's the dude? --Pedro158 (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kropotkinen su estudio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

czar 16:20, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slavic calendar.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:36, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]