User talk:Wilfredor/Archive 26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


FP

Please, upload this one. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

@ArionEstar: Melhore a imagem e também mude a licencia para que voce pode subir ela :D sem problemas --The Photographer (talk) 11:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 18:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 18:06, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello again

Hello The Photographer. It is me again. Thank you for your advises you gave for my last two files. I would be glad to get some feedback if there is any problems in this file. I also have a question. Should I outline the text? In preview part, the texts doesn't look good so I just wondered that would it be better if I give it an outline or not. Ali Zifan 01:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

@Ali Zifan: Hi Ali thanks for your question, how are you?, I'm sorry for my delay, however, I was busy making pictures and uploading it. The only problem that I can see is the irregular border surface or edge layer of the stoma body sometimes it is smaller in some sections. IMHO text is fine --The Photographer (talk) 22:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Municipal Market of São Paulo city.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Municipal Market of São Paulo city.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Is this fair use of your picture?

Hello!

I recognised your picture of the fingerprint put on a teeshirt: https://www.teezily.com/mx-sweden-my-dna

Is that fair use?

Regards Thomas D — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.225.250.113 (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Thomas!, Thanks for your warning, could be nice to have a teeshirt like this for free to me :D --The Photographer (talk) 00:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

#SOSWorld

Você já parou para analisar como o mundo está ficando instável? Guerra na Ucrânia, atentados na França, tentativa de golpe de Estado na Turquia, crise na Venezuela, impeachment no Brasil. Estou com medo desse mundo e do seu trajeto obscuro que está tomando. Torço para que a Venezuela se cure deste trauma que está passando. É muito triste quando vejo imagens que são divulgadas de lá. Toda sorte do mundo para os nossos hermanos!!! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:33, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

FYI --The Photographer (talk) 01:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Ajuda

O que você consegue fazer disso? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Categorization of files

Hi, The Photographer, this file needs to be categorized. Since you were the uploader, your help would be highly appreciated. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 13:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:International Commerce Centre on Victoria Harbour.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:International Commerce Centre on Victoria Harbour.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Poco a poco

File:Casa de la Prensa Libre, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 19.jpg

Olha o que eu achei! Parece com as suas fotos! Você poderia nomear isso? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:04, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

@ArionEstar: Obrigado, deixa sair de umas aqui e depois nomino issa, firmeza? --The Photographer (talk) 15:55, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
@ArionEstar: Lamentavelmente a imagem foi deletada :( --The Photographer (talk) 00:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Limited FPC

How many nominations can be per day in FPC? --Harpagornis (talk) 17:28, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

@Harpagornis: A user can have only 2 active nominations and this 2 nominations could be done in the same day. --The Photographer (talk) 17:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Es decir, si las dos nominaciones de hoy, siguen activas mañana, no podría volver a nominar otra no?--Harpagornis (talk) 17:47, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
@Harpagornis: Si el usuario posee dos nominaciones activas, tiene que esperar el lapso de vencimiento de alguna de ellas para nominar otra de nuevo, o retirar una de las nominaciones activas usando la plantilla {{withdraw}} --The Photographer (talk) 17:56, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
@Harpagornis: Además puedes pedirle a otro usuario que te nomine alguna de tus fotos si él tiene vacantes de nominación. --The Photographer (talk) 18:01, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Historical building close to Municipal Market of São Paulo.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Historical building close to Municipal Market of São Paulo.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

WLE

Você gostou do resultado do WLE Brasil? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Melhor que o ano passado, fiz uma pequena correção em File:Os lencois.jpg --The Photographer (talk) 02:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Discordo. Inclusive as fotos que eu nomeei são melhores que todas elas. Aliás, quase todo ano uma imagem do Brasil nomeada por mim vira finalista do ano. A única que poderia ser finalista na fase internacional é a 4ª ou a 7ª porque possuem uma agradável composição. Basta olhar a dos outros países. Eu penso que não souberam avaliar os critérios como um todo. Esse ano tivemos um arsenal de fotos de alta qualidade carregadas, no entanto, nenhuma delas figurou como as melhores. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:40, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
@ArionEstar: O problema e mais complicado do que você acredita --The Photographer (talk) 04:29, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Boa tarde

Como tem passado? A Beria sumiu... O que faz ela? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

SVG

Hi, how can I convert files to the svg format? I need to convert Arroyo, Puerto Rico flag to svg. Thanks Seriesphile (talk) 07:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

@Seriesphile: You can't "convert", you need do it manually drawing again like a vector, however, I already did that here->> File:Flag official of Arroyo.svg --The Photographer (talk) 16:54, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry I didn't know that and thank you very much. Seriesphile (talk) 19:43, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc du Vieux Passage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Pedrocarmona.jpg

File:Pedrocarmona.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

186.139.151.3 14:05, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

File:17082013 - Venice Beach - L.A. - California (9594725876).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:17082013 - Venice Beach - L.A. - California (9594725876).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Artwork created in 2014. See source. Delete per COM:FOP US.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Missvain (talk) 15:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

File:17082013 - Venice Beach - L.A. - California (9594782680).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:17082013 - Venice Beach - L.A. - California (9594782680).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Contemporary artwork with matching garbage can. This is not public domain. It even has a website for the artist on the mural. Per COM:FOP US.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Missvain (talk) 15:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

File:17082013 - Venice Beach - L.A. - California (9594901252).jpg

File:17082013 - Venice Beach - L.A. - California (9594901252).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Missvain (talk) 15:09, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:My Public Lands Magazine, Spring 2015 (16441469038).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:My Public Lands Magazine, Spring 2015 (16441469038).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:My Public Lands Magazine, Spring 2015 (16441469038).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Missvain (talk) 22:36, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Uknow circuite.JPG

File:Uknow circuite.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:14, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intérieur de la basilique-cathédrale Notre-Dame de Québec 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:06, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Interior of the Basilica of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:54, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue principale de la basilique-cathédrale Notre-Dame de Québec 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Noisy, but acceptable. --Steindy 23:11, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passage du Chien-d’Or, Quebec, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:11, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paella de fruit de mer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. There are some little spots in the white background, presumably actually there. -- Ikan Kekek 21:26, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wilfredor/Archive_26&oldid=696280670"