User talk:Wilfredor/Archive 20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lophotrochozoa (talk) 14:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your candidacy as admin

Hi Photographer, I had to close Commons:Administrators/Requests/The Photographer as unsuccesful. Please allow me to thank you for running and your dedication to Commons. You never know in advance how a candidacy turns out and a new run at another time may be more successful. There were some valid critical points in the comments. However, I am sorry that you were accused of leaking OTRS material. I've never seen this accusation before, it wasn't backed up and to the best of my knowledge your account was closed due to inactivity which is not a big deal. Best wishes, AFBorchert (talk) 23:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

File:La Piragua.ogv
 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:La Piragua.ogv, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La Piragua.ogv has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Chapultepec (3072866551).jpg

File:Chapultepec (3072866551).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2003:45:5C6F:1201:C1A6:4E1F:AF28:6C84 08:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

My apologies

Hey Wilfredo, I would like to formally apologize for that remark the other week, as it was based on the assumption that there was more information out there on a subject that I jumped to a conclusion about. I did not bother checking up into the information, and made an errant comment on your RFC, which I regret. My apologies in the delay for this, as I was finishing work up until spring break, and wanted to write something that would be more than a one-sentence remark. Anyways, I hope that there are no hard feelings here, as I hold no ill will towards you personally as I respect the work that you do on this site. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:32, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

@Ktr101: Thank you very much for taking the time to write this message. Few people are able to take responsibility for being wrong. I have made many mistakes in Commons, however, I try to improve every day learning from my mistakes. I believe that communication is something that I have failed. --The Photographer (talk) 00:53, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Wilfredo

Eu posso nomear uma imagem agora, se você quiser eu posso nomear alguma sua. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 03:02, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

@ArionEstar: Eu gusto que você nomine minhas imagems :D. Eu gusto dos comentarios ruims também porque som bons para melhorar. ;) --The Photographer (talk) 03:20, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Mais imagens do Flickr por favor!!!! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:58, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
@ArionEstar: A muitas ruims, ainda não se cual poderia ser boa para FPC --The Photographer (talk) 04:04, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Kary y Marce (4188161939).jpg

File:Kary y Marce (4188161939).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2003:45:5C6F:1201:1DD1:84A9:7917:EAD2 13:13, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Iris (3306981008).jpg

File:Iris (3306981008).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2003:45:5C6F:1201:1DD1:84A9:7917:EAD2 13:18, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Mis sobrinas (2488053441).jpg

File:Mis sobrinas (2488053441).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2003:45:5C6F:1201:1DD1:84A9:7917:EAD2 13:19, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Jagger (2980169985).jpg

File:Jagger (2980169985).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2003:45:5C6F:1201:1DD1:84A9:7917:EAD2 13:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Gestación de Jesús, Xul Solar, Buenos Aires, Argentina (2364356626).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Gestación de Jesús, Xul Solar, Buenos Aires, Argentina (2364356626).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

-- RTA 11:42, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:A chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarcticus) on Deception Island in Antarctica.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarcticus) on Deception Island in Antarctica.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Please start following the rules and guidelines

It says clearly on Deletion Nomination discussions that they are closed at that source. There is no reason to take a file which I did not delete to COM:UNDEL, that seems a gratuitous waste of volunteer resources. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

@Ellin Beltz: The file was deleted, the author, source and license are wrong. I told you that here --The Photographer (talk) 18:22, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
None of the foregoing justifies not following rules and guidelines. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
@Ellin Beltz: The rules are ask for a deletion request, especially when the author and source are wrong. --The Photographer (talk) 17:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Coat of arms of Venezuela

I would suggest you leave the file alone and move on to other things. You have made 3 DRs and all were denied. Find something else to spend your time on. Fry1989 eh? 19:23, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

@Fry1989: You know that file is not Own work --The Photographer (talk) 19:35, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Do please find something else to do besides continually harassing another user over an image which has a source and has survived all your attempts to remove it. Please see Flogging a dead horse and COM:MELLOW. Sincerely yours, Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
@Ellin Beltz: I have given you valid arguments, both are wrong (source and author), the user who did this has been blocked several times in other wikis and commons --The Photographer (talk) 18:03, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
The user was blocked for Three Days on Commons. Please just give it up. You are causing more trouble than is required by this file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
@Ellin Beltz: You can go to do your stuff, please, this is not about being right and for me the issue of this file is finishe and I will not feel bad because there is one of thousands violations commons. Thanks for your time --The Photographer (talk) 18:14, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Obra derivada

Hola The Photographer. En Wikimedia España estamos organizando Commons:Wiki Loves Folk, un concurso fotográfico sobre fiestas y tradiciones. Para la obtención de un logo para el concurso, vi esta imagen creada por ti File:Party_icon.svg y la modifiqué. En la obra derivada (File:Wiki Loves Folk Logo.svg) está indicada tu autoría. Espero que no haya ningún problema; de ser así, por favor, házmelo saber. Un cordial saludo. --Rodelar (talk) 12:53, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

@Rodelar: Con la cantidad de tradiciones que se celebran ultimamente comenzando con la Semana Santa, no dudo que será una gran oportunidad para enriquecer a los artículos con estas imágenes. Me habría gustado participar de alguna forma en el Concurso, por favor, sientete libre de pedirme cualquier otra cosa. Un abrazo. --The Photographer (talk) 13:33, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Dirty Feet (16178048138).jpg

File:Dirty Feet (16178048138).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

WayneRay (talk) 15:27, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place D'Youville, Quebec City , Canada 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, a strong B/W photo. --Aristeas 09:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Or In Colour...? (19725547104).jpg

File:Or In Colour...? (19725547104).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Rhododendrites talk |  13:38, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 6- Veronica essuie le visage de Jésus, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 1- Jésus est condamné à mort, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you add better description and categories? Same for other yours nomination. s. --Tournasol7 20:12, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
@Tournasol7: ✓ Done Thanks --Wilfredor 12:29, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 Support Good quality now, thanks for category. I added more precise descriptions. --Tournasol7 19:47, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 2- Jésus reçoit sa croix, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 4- Jésus rencontre sa mère, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 3- Jésus tombe pour la première fois, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 5- Simon Le Cyreneen aide Jesus, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 10- Jésus est dépouillé de ses vêtements, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 7- Jésus tombe pour la deuxième fois, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 8- Jésus rencontre les femmes de Jérusalem qui pleurent, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station 9- Jésus tombe pour la troisième fois, Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Quebec, Canada 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Pl. add CAT "Station 9: ..." if appropriate --Tagooty 08:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wilfredor/Archive_20&oldid=696280517"