User talk:Wiiii

Welcome to the Commons, Wiiii!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:Casa del Fascio.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Casa del Fascio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--User:G.dallorto 20:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Shizuoka Press and Broadcasting Center in Tokyo2.jpg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Why did you remove my photos from the category?

Hello Wiiii,

You removed my photos from Category:Architecture of Japan. Can you tell me the reason?

1. Image:Nagasaki-Suwa-Shrine-1565.jpg‎; 23:58 . . (-35) . . Wiiii (Talk | contribs)
2. Image:Kodaiji-0133.jpg‎; 23:57 . . (-35) . . Wiiii (Talk | contribs)
3. Image:Kodaiji Teahouse Dimage 0159.jpg‎; 23:52 . . (-34) . . Wiiii (Talk | contribs)
4. Image:Kodaiji-0131.jpg‎; 23:51 . . (-35) . . Wiiii (Talk | contribs)
5. Image:Kodaiji-0141.jpg‎; 23:49 . . (-35) . . Wiiii (Talk | contribs)

Fg2 22:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello Fg2,

There is not a refusal, either the file is moved, and it is sorry.

But, your file had to come in the place into which the category had been divided. It is necessary to be included there about Kodai-ji Temple because there is already a category. To enable inspection at once, the image that remains in the category of Architecture of Japan has left Architecture that represents Japan. I have managed the file of the category of Architecture of Japan for one year or more. It takes time to display for the image to increase too much there. Wiiii 18:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I see. Thank you for the explanation. Fg2 20:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanematsu auditorium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's OK. --Lestath 17:56, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

File:Iima .jpg

File:Iima .jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Leoboudv (talk) 07:39, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Rōkyōsō.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Mary's Cathedral Tokyo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments quick support --Ikar.us 22:08, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edo-Tokyo Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 08:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tokyo Institute of Technology Centennial Hall 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 08:13, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Nakagin Capsule Tower200810.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nakagin Capsule Tower200810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Ikar.us 11:32, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! National Art Center Tokyo 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Oh, it's really curved in all dimensions. --Ikar.us 13:14, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Imperial Garden Theater Japan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:43, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Onishi Civic Center 2009.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Onishi Civic Center 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thanks to Elekhh for this very interesting choice. Composition, light, lines, curves, shadows, reflects, all seems good for a QI IMO.--Jebulon 22:29, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image in the News

Hi Wiiii. Just letting you know that your image File:Dior Building.jpg currently appears "In The News" section, on the main page of the English Wikipedia. Congratulations and cheers. --Elekhh (talk) 11:40, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi Elekhh. Thank you for informing and recommending my Image for Qi! I'm very glad :) --Wiiii (talk) 13:56, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading so many good images to Wikimedia! I placed more than a dozen into en.Wiki articles. Hope you'll continue the good work :) --Elekhh (talk) 14:22, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Byodoin Phoenix Hall Uji 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! K Museum1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Berthold Werner 07:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:FOG Building Fuji Television Headquarters Odaiba Tokyo.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FOG Building Fuji Television Headquarters Odaiba Tokyo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 05:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum of Modern Art Saitama 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mojiko Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very sharp and othersie also good. --Cayambe 17:47, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! National Museum of Modern Art Kyoto 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame of the front shadow, but good enough for QI.--Jebulon 17:53, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tepia 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems to be QI, but lacks geocode and explanation of what is TEPIA. Please add, thank you.--PereslavlFoto 20:36, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Gallery of Hōryū-ji Treasures.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gallery of Hōryū-ji Treasures.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky is a bit noisy but composition and quality are good. --Selbymay 19:49, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Cocoontower.jpg

File:Cocoontower.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ox1997cow (talk) 12:10, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:The Auditorio de Tenerife.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Saint Benedict Chapel 3.jpg

And also:

• File:Saint Benedict Chapel2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)