User talk:Wdwd/2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2016
File:Angabentabelle für Startwert-Trägerbeispiel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   16:48, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Logo Grass.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HolubMarianna (talk) 09:58, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Matthieu Huegi

Hallo Walter, kannst du dir bitte die hochgeladenen Dateien von User:Matthieu Huegi anschauen - sie handeln von Eva Afuhs , die ja noch lebt. danke K@rl (talk) 09:39, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Karl, beizeiten, derzeit keinen Kopf dafür. Wenn Du schon stark vermutest, dass es wahrscheinlich eine URV ist: Frage den Uploader ob vielleicht eine Freigabe für die dargestellten Werke zu bekommen ist - andernfalls offensichtlich viele Scans/Fotos aus Büchern -> copyvio und DR.--Wdwd (talk) 20:49, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
File:UKK-Kapelle0816.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Krd 13:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Voltteri (talk) 21:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Ukranenland04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eygenart (talk) 19:31, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Ukranenland06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eygenart (talk) 19:34, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Ukranenland07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eygenart (talk) 19:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Ukranenland08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eygenart (talk) 19:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Ukranenland09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eygenart (talk) 19:36, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Ukranenland10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eygenart (talk) 19:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Ukranenland11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eygenart (talk) 19:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Ukranenland12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eygenart (talk) 19:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Ukranenland13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eygenart (talk) 19:39, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Ukranenland15.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eygenart (talk) 19:40, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Wdwd, woher kommt "Location" in dem genannten File? Die sollte da eigentlich nicht drin sein. Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 08:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi Arndm, interessante Frage. :) Es ist Folge der API-Abfrage für die Metadaten (EXIF, etc..), die auch das Bot-Script in adaptierter Form beim Transfer durchführt:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&titles=File:KowloonWalledCityBerlin2016.jpg&prop=imageinfo&iiprop=metadata
Dabei wird bei diesem Bild der Parameter GPSAltitude mit Wert 0 geliefert. Die Werte für GPSLatitude und GPSLongitude sind nicht vorhanden und standardmässig 0. Da einer dieser drei Werte für die Positionsdaten vorkommt, wird damit {{Location}} mit in den Text eingebaut und die (vorhandenen bzw. default)-Werte darin übernommen - ohne weitere Plausibilitätsprüfung. Ich werde es so umstellen, dass nur bei vorhandenen Wert von GPSLatitude und GPSLongitude (ohne Plausibilitätsprüfung) die Übernahme erfolgt. Danke für den genauen Hinweis.--Wdwd (talk) 17:23, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Könnte ein Bug im LG-H960 sein. --Arnd (talk) 14:33, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Logo Grass.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HolubMarianna (talk) 09:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Logo Grass.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HolubMarianna (talk) 09:31, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

File:4J Studios logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Majora (talk) 23:42, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Australian Football League.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ColonialGrid (talk) 10:11, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Walter, kannst du mir bitte den Usernamen des Benutzers sagen, der o.a. Datei hochgeladen hatte. Ich kenne ihn persönlich, ich weiß aber seinen Usernamen nicht mehr. danke K@rl (talk) 13:39, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi Karl, der Hochlader war User:VK.Kid, im Mai 2016.--Wdwd (talk) 14:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Alles klar, vielen Dank K@rl (talk) 17:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Morrisons Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Audi-Logo 2016.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Pallerti (talk) 06:58, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Was ist das?

Hallo Walte, eine Frage an den E-Techniker. Was ist das hinter der Signalscheibe. Ist das eine Überspannungsbegrenzung - ich sehe nur dass es von Siemens & Halske ist ;-) - danke K@rl (talk) 13:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi Karl,ist ein Art de:Trennschalter älterer Bauart zur Unterbrechung eines Stromkreises. Eventuell sogar den Hauptstromkreis vom Stromabnehmer. Diese beiden "Hörner" rechts/links sind die Kontakte, der Kegel dazwischen ist drehbar und stellt in darstellter Position die Verbindung her. Bei Drehung um 90° ist der offen. Man erkennt neben allerlei Spinnweben auch den Kontaktabbrand im Kontaktbereich vom Lichtbogen. Im Kasterl darunter kann eine mechanische Vorrichtung zur Drehung deses Kegels sein, um damit ein/auszuschalten (z.b. via Seilzug?).
Diese offene Bauweise ohne Löscheinrichtung bei den Kontakten ist typisch für Trenner. Damit kann leicht ohne Hilfsmittel und rein optisch festgestellt werden, ob die Spannungszuführung sicher unterbrochen ist.--Wdwd (talk) 18:24, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Danke für die ausführlcihe Erklärung, das kann man dann am zweiten Foto besser erkennen. An Schalter dachte ich ehrlcih gesagt nicht. Kann man diese wo kategorisieren? --K@rl (talk) 18:42, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Ja, gute Idee. Habs mal einsoritert --Wdwd (talk) 18:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Ich im Cockpit 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GeorgHHtalk   20:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Ich im Cockpit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GeorgHHtalk   20:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

File:BSicon ÜW1dl.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jc86035 (talk) Use {{ping|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
13:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

File:CathayPcficLogo.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gijón16 (talk) 08:10, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Pippilotta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2607:FB90:21BF:194D:4579:E3:2547:A578 22:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

File:V2 duge.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

File:V2 dugn.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

File:V2 gndu.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

File:V2 wsbdu.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Logo RASPADSKAYA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 16:45, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Logo Rössing Uranium.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 16:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:René Eduard Perhab, Portrait Foto.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:René Eduard Perhab, Portrait Foto.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

lNeverCry 23:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Logo RVF.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

   FDMS  4    22:15, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

File:BS TdoT eintreten.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, lNeverCry 07:48, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Logo Schweizerischer Arbeitgeberverband.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SAVUPS (talk) 08:59, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:HFM bearbeitet.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:HFM bearbeitet.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Hallo, ...

zu diesen Edits. Bist du dir sicher, dass beide Richtfunkanlagen sind? Bwag (talk) 17:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi, nicht beide. Der linke rot-weiss lackierte Turm ist, wie beschrieben, eine Rundfunksendeanlage (von ORS, vorher ORF).--Wdwd (talk)
OK, da habe ich schlecht geschaut passt und sorry. Bwag (talk) 20:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
File:5n plus logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 16:25, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

[Datei:Werbung Zensus 2015.jpg

Hallo Wdwd! Hier ist wieder eine Datei vom Bot markiert worden, wozu es bereits eine klare Aussage gibt. Es ist ein amtliches Werk und daher frei. Gruß, --JPF (talk) 14:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi JPF, Du meinst de:Datei:Werbung Zensus 2015.jpg - betrifft nicht commons. Zu den schon auf de.wp angeführten Punkten: Wenn es ein amtliches Werk ist, ist die Quelle davon nötig - aus welchen amtlichen Werk stammt dieses Werk? Abgesehen davon, dass ein Werbeplakat kein "amtliches Werk" im Sinne von de:Amtliches_Werk#Deutschland und die dabei enge Auslegung ist -> daher die DÜP-Markierung mit Bitte um Freigabe vom Rechteinhaber.--Wdwd (talk) 17:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
File:F-Hochgr-gruen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 08:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Noix de saint-jacques caramélisées au miel de lavande sur avocat et bâtonnets de granny smith, crème de vinaigre balsamique et sauce caramel.jpg

Thank you for your indication and scuse-me. ✓ Done --Varaine (talk) 10:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the corrected source, upload reviewed.--Wdwd (talk) 15:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
File:United States Postal Service Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 17:35, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Majora (talk) 04:51, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi there. You deleted the file File:Chung Hyun Kyung.jpg as having a non-free license, but it was granted on the basis of CC BY-SA 4.0. I have forwarded the email for permissions to the permissions email account, which is logged as ticket #2016110610007888. – Caorongjin (talk) 16:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Caorongjin, thank you for the hint. OTRS conversation pending.--Wdwd (talk) 18:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Wdwd, thank you for your note. Does this mean that the image will be undeleted after the permissions information has been reviewed? How long will that take? I am just unclear about the process here. Thank you. –Caorongjin (talk) 09:14, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
After consent from the copyright holder the file will be undeleted. How long this takes can not be predicted. Usually it take some days up to few weeks.--Wdwd (talk) 19:42, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 Info After permission via OTRS file restored with cc-by-sa-4.0 --Wdwd (talk) 18:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! Much appreciated. –Caorongjin (talk) 22:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vainglory-cropped.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vainglory-cropped.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Leyo 10:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Links-Grüne Bewegung Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gestumblindi (talk) 00:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Björt framtid Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gestumblindi (talk) 00:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

File:ODS Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 11:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Disney-Channel-Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reventtalk 20:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Hallo, du hast zu dem Bild einen Lizenzbaustein gesetzt - ich komme nur nicht ganz mit: Zu diesem Bild fehlen ausreichende und korrekte Angaben über die Quelle, den/die Urheber und/oder die Lizenz, unter der das Bild veröffentlicht wurde - also: die Quelle ist das "Assens Lokalarchiv", die da ein Blättchen herausgegeben haben. Stand schon im Text. Der Urheber ist "Assens Lokalarchiv", weil die das Blättchen geschrieben und die Zeichnung gepinselt haben. Daraus habe ich die Skizze gescannt. Das habe ich jetzt etwas klarer formuliert. Und die Lizenz habe ich mit "Schöpfungshöhe" angegeben - paar Quadrate, paar Striche, kein geschützter Stadtplanauszug. Reicht das - oder, wenn nicht, muss es eben weg. --Mef.ellingen (talk) 18:26, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, die Karte ist nach 1948 entstanden und weist im Umfang der Darstellung meiner Meinung Schöpfungshöhe auf. Es wäre eine Freigabe unter einer freien Lizenz vom Rechteinhaber (möcglicherweise: Assens Lokalarchiv?) nötig.
Nur als Idee und als Alternative zu der Kopie/Scan von (urheberrechtlich geschützten) Karten: Karte dieses Auschnitts von der OSM nehmen (mit den freien Kacheln) und das Überfahren des Prellbocks mit eigenen paar Strichen einzeichnen. (mit {{OpenStreetMap}} )--Wdwd (talk) 11:09, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Socialist Party logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bloody-libu (talk) 10:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Logo Parti Breton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bloody-libu (talk) 10:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

File:MDS-Logo (Tunesien).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bloody-libu (talk) 10:15, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Annisokay logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Basvb (talk) 11:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Banner Menschenkette (Danke Hajo).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   20:09, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

File:LaosLogo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Texniths (talk) 00:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Irish Labour Party Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Texniths (talk) 00:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

File:New York City FC.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ACA Galaxy (talk) 07:04, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

File:ACStLouis.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:36, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate MCMLXXXIX 16:37, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate MCMLXXXIX 16:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Bildrechte

Hallo, du bist doch sicher mit den Bildrechten bewandert: ich habe da eine Seite: http://www.samlingsportalen.se, da gibt es ein riesiges Bildarchiv. Unter http://www.samlingsportalen.se/all/om_oss_villkor.htm sind die Nutzungsbedingungen, die habe ich der Einfachheit halber mit dem Gockel übersetzen lassen, weil das verständlich ist:

"Bilder, die bereits veröffentlicht auf www.samlingsportalen.se sind, können verwendet werden, wenn die digitale Quelle, Fotograf und Link gegeben. Wenn diese nicht erfüllt ist, sind die Kosten 1000 SEK pro Bild. Für die Veröffentlichung und sonstige gewerbliche Nutzung der Nutzungsgebühr Bilder wird nach der Preisliste berechnet. Alle Preise verstehen sich für die Veröffentlichung bezieht sich auf einen einmaligen Gebrauch bestimmt. Nach Gebrauch wird das Bild gelöscht und nicht an den Käufer gelagert werden müssen. Foto kann in dem Umfang verwendet werden und für die Zwecke vereinbart. Das Bild kann nicht ohne das Museum ausdrückliche Erlaubnis übertragen werden.

Der Name des Fotografen und die schwedische Eisenbahnmuseum wird in Verbindung mit dem veröffentlichten Bild oder separate Bildliste angegeben werden. Fehlende Namen mit 100% der aktuellen Nutzungsgebühr erhoben, aber nicht weniger als 1000. Eine Kopie der Veröffentlichung sollte der schwedischen Eisenbahnmuseum, Verkehrsverwaltung, PO Box 407, 801 05 Gävle gesendet werden.

Das Bild darf nicht ohne die Zustimmung der schwedischen Eisenbahnmuseum verändert werden. Bilder geändert, ohne die Zustimmung mit 100% der aktuellen Nutzungsgebühr erhoben, aber nicht weniger als 1000. Das Bild darf nicht für Zwecke verwendet werden, dargestellt an den Autor oder die Person, die beleidigend wirken können.

Der Kunde ist in der Regel auch verantwortlich für alle erforderlichen Genehmigungen für die Verwendung des Bildes in jedem Fall erhalten, zum Beispiel, für alle Arten von reproduzierten künstlerischen Arbeiten.

Im Zusammenhang mit der Bestellung des Bildes ist die aktuelle Rechnungsadresse zur Verfügung gestellt. Die Rechnung wird gesendet, nachdem das Bild an den Client geliefert wurde.

Gemäß dem Gesetz über den Namen und das Bild in der Werbung (1978: 800), ist eine Person erkennbar im Bild selbst Einwilligung zu Werbezwecke zu geben. Die Verantwortung dafür liegt allein beim Herausgeber des Bildes. und das Datenschutzgesetz (1998: 204; 2006: 398) Es wird auch auf das Gesetz über das Urheberrecht in literarischer und künstlerischer Werke (:;::; 2005 360 2005 359 729 1960) gemacht."

Jetzt zum Thema: unter http://www.samlingsportalen.se/all/cgitext-list?ID=1003256553&start=253 ist eine beispielhafte Bildübersicht. Dort würde mich in der zweiten Zeile das dritte Bild interessieren (man könnte einen Artikel über die Bauserie machen). Text dort: Jvm.KDAJ03203 - Gävle 1905 - wenn ich auf das Bild klicke, kommt das Bild - und wenn ich jetzt auf dieses Bild klicke, kommen Daten dazu. Meine Frage, kann ich das Bild kopieren (älter als 100 Jahre, kein Fotograf genannt) und auf Commons einspielen? Was sagen dazu die Bildrechte bei uns - und was machen die Portalbetreiber, die irgendwo immer einen Copyright-Hinweis eingestellt haben und obige Bedingungen anziehen?

Danke für Deine Mühe. Achtung, längere Ladezeiten... --Mef.ellingen (talk) 17:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Da ich auch gefragt wurde, versuch ich mal ne Antwort. Die allgemeinenem Bedingungen sind nicht Commons-fahig, da nicht veränderbar. Das spezielle Bild (der Link funzt für mich nicht) wäre nach unserer Ansicht wohl {{Anonymous-EU}}. Aber ob das Museum das genauso sieht oder Dir nicht doch eine Abmahnung schickt, weiss natürlich nur das Museum. Ich würde per mail dort nachfragen, dann bist Du auf der sichereren Seite. Gruß --JuTa 17:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Danke für Tipp, mache ich mal. --Mef.ellingen (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Mef.ellingen, der obige Link mit der beispielhaften Bildübersicht hat leider Ladefehler. Anfrage bei Email an das Museum zur genaueren Abklärung wie von JuTa vorgeschlagen ist sicher eine gute Idee, zumal die automatische Übersetzung nicht ideal ist.--Wdwd (talk) 18:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Der Link läuft bei mir hat aber ewige Ladezeiten. Die Übersetzung passt schon für den Überblick - auf die wörtliche Übersetzung habe ich verzichtet. Es heißt eben, dass eine nicht genehmigte Nutzung mit einer Strafgebühr belegt wird. Ich mache die Anfrage im Museum. Danke und Gruß --Mef.ellingen (talk) 23:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate MCMLXXXIX 17:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Moving files to Commons

re https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WP_Goldberg.jpg instead of

could you use the more specific

? Maybe also inform the maintainer of the script. 77.180.180.151 15:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the hint. Seems to be a (minor) bug. I will check it.--Wdwd (talk) 16:07, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Berthold Werner (talk) 08:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate PK-LMN ([[User talk:PK-LMN|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate PK-LMN ([[User talk:PK-LMN|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate PK-LMN ([[User talk:PK-LMN|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate PK-LMN ([[User talk:PK-LMN|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:17, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate PK-LMN ([[User talk:PK-LMN|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Jon Kolbert ([[User talk:Jon Kolbert|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

License review

apparently since your review the uploader had overwritten the image with a different one but I have changed the source and given a good review but maybe it would be better to split them or you might delete the original upload so as not to confuse anyone. With the new source the flickrreview bot should pass it. Ww2censor ([[User talk:Ww2censor|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for the hint. Deleted the first version with a remark to upload it under different filename. The bot didn't checked it because of size mismatch.--Wdwd ([[User talk:Wdwd#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks Ww2censor ([[User talk:Ww2censor|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 15:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:28, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Du hast dieses Bild mit dem Hinweis versehen, dass keine Genehmigung vorhanden ist. Ich habe das Bild aus der deutschen Wikipedia genommen und hier hochgeladen. Der User "Lizzard81" hat es 2008 in die dt. Wikipedia unter der von mir auf Commons angegebenen Lizenz hochgeladen, in der Beschreibung stand dazu "Genehmigung: Ich bin im Vorstand der Kelkheim Lizzards". Der User hat somit im Namen der Kelkheim Lizzards gehandelt und die Genehmigung erteilt. Du hast das Bild in der dt. Wikipedia bereits gelöscht, aber das lässt sich hier nachlesen. --CaptainOlimar42 ([[User talk:CaptainOlimar42|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi, ja ist mir beim Aufräumen der Dateiduplikate de.wp/commons aufgefallen. Da bist Du in der Tat der falsche Ansprechparnter (Das macht ein Script beim Markieren und Du warst als Uploader hier eingetragen, sorry dafür). Ich hab mal bei dem ursprünglichen Uploader um eine formelle Freigabe angefragt. Danke für den genauen Hinweis.--Wdwd ([[User talk:Wdwd#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)