User talk:Waugsberg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Babel: de | en-1 | fr-1 | it-1 | es-1 | pt-1

Tools: CommonSense (Kategorisieren)

The best way to contact me is to write me on this Wikimedia Commons talk page.

Take five[edit]

Take five!

Hallo Waugsberg, ... weil Du gerade hier bist, magst Du die 5 Hübschen nochmal unter einem besseren Namen hochladen? DSC00510a.JPG ist ein bisserl nichtssagend ;-) Viele Grüße --Überraschungsbilder 22:31, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wie wärs mit "Take five.jpg"? --wau 23:05, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Passt genau *g* --Überraschungsbilder 22:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia logo mosaic[edit]

Great image adds! I had to revert one of your edits, there was a loss of the tail end of the file. I think all is sorted now. ++Lar: t/c 21:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry for my mistake and thank you for repairing! --wau 22:34, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, thankyou!! That is so lovely. :) I'm really pleased that it has been such a success and people are helping make it better! --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 11:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :).

I'm just checking blues ones now. Please recheck whites that you've added on last 3 edits.

Nux (talk/dyskusja) Gruß aus dem idyllischen Ramsau. 00:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done --wau 00:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, again. As you are doing most of the work, you will probably want to use this utility :) --Nux (talk/dyskusja) 13:03, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, very useful! And a good opportunity for me to learn about monobooks.js. --wau 00:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ramsau revision[edit]

Ramsau revision

Gruß aus dem idyllischen Ramsau. -- AM 22:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, ich hatte das schon bei Dir entdeckt. Allerdings finde ich, dass jetzt, wo endlich doch einmal eine göttliche Eingebung bei der bayerischen Staatsregierung angekommen ist und man Gewalt in Computerspielen verbieten will, man diese Einsicht nicht durch die Darstellung der Exposion hintertreiben sollte, zumal ich befürchte, das Dauerbombardement könne dem Fischbestand schaden. Geradezu großartig finde ich andererseits die Verdeutlichung der Busschildproblmatik, die in ihrer Deutlichkeit und Eindringlichkeit alle bisherigen Diskussionsbeiträge weit in den Schatten stellt und sowohl Befürwortern als auch Gegnern einer Retousche in der Diskussion sicher schwer zugesetzt hätte, wie schon Wilhelm Busch es ausgedrückt hat: Nur des Bildes Kraft allein schneidet in die Seele ein. Grüsse --wau 23:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nachdem das Busschild ein derartiges Eigenleben entwickelte mußte einfach ein physikalischer Grund dafür her. Es fiel mir nicht leicht, aber das Haus bot sich als Ziel an, und Wegschneiden wäre mir zu undokumentarisch gewesen. Was nun den Fischbestand betrifft, so melde ich leichte Bedenken an, da diese Spezies bisher in der Szenerie nicht auftauchte und somit gewisse Zweifel an ihrer Existenz bestehen. Die Verbindung zu gewalttätigen Computerspielen scheint sich optisch aufzudrängen, ist aber rein zufällig zumal es sich hier nicht um Phantasiedarstellungen handelt sondern um reale Vorgänge, die lediglich womöglich zeitgleich an anderen Orten auftreten. Um mit W.Busch zu erwidern: Was beliebt ist auch erlaubt. (Meine Meinung zu Bildmanipulationen habe ich hier nochmal geäußert, leider war der Kommentar nur einige Stunden lang zu lesen) Ciao, -- AM 13:16, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kein Wunder, dass nach dem Geschrei um das Busschild die Fischwelt etwas Zurückhaltung gezeigt hat. Der Zweifel am Fischbestand hat mich sehr betroffen gemacht. Allerdings war jetzt angesichts der gefährlich gewordenen Umgebung keine Forelle mehr bereit zu springen. Dennoch war es mir ein besonderes Anliegen, im Interesse einer dokumentarisch korrekten Darstellung der Idylle auch einen Fisch zu zeigen. Einen Lachs hat die Explosion als besondere Herausforderung seiner Stunt-Künste gereizt, und so ist es möglich geworden, das Bild zu vervollständigen. Angesichts der engen Verwandtschaft zur Forelle erscheint mir die Verwendung des nur kurz abgebildeten Doubles vertretbar. Die Verwendung dieses Bildes wäre möglicherweise noch angreifbarer erschienen. --wau 09:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jetzt bin ich wirklich erleichtert, daß die Auswirkungen der baulichen Veränderungen in der Nachbarschaft der Kirche nicht allzu gravierend sind. Wenn die Lachse springen, dann ist die ökologische Basis wohl intakt. Eine pfiffige Werbeidee wäre es natürlich, besagte kulinarische Szenerie kurz im Grillfeuer aufblitzen zu lassen um so auf die Qualitäten der hiesigen Gastronomie aufmerksam zu machen. Aber gut, man kann nicht alles haben.
Wenn ich mir die Gegebenheiten so ansehe drängt sich allerdings weiterer Veränderungsbedarf geradezu auf. Servus, -- AM 13:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Permission[edit]

Mr. Waugsberg,

I have been attempting (and pulling what's left of my hair out) to contact you.

I would like to know something about 6 GIF animations on your pages at wikipedia. I would like to know if you created them from original Muybridge photographs (or copies), and if you did, a little about the history of the photographs (not Muybridge). Also, a little bit about you.

The names of the files are; 100px-Muybridge_horse_gallop_animated_2 100px-Muybridge_race_horse_animated 100px-Muybridge_horse_pacing_animated 100px-Muybridge_horse_jumping_animated 100px-Muybridge_Buffalo_galloping 100px-Muybridge_horse_walking_animated

We would like to use some or all of these animations on our website. Please email me back at this email address; author@precinemahistory.net with a CC to this email; burnsp@aci.on.ca

I am not on wikipedia very much, but the user is User:Paul Burns

Regards,

Paul Burns

POTY 2006 competition[edit]

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are almost complete, and voting will take place between 1st and 28th Feb. All the featured pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As the creator of one or more images nominated for the election we invite you to participate in the event. Alvesgaspar 22:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Obrigado pela informação na minha página de discussão! Participarei na eleição. Deixei informação en diversas páginas que correspondem a Commons:Esplanada en alemão, espanhol e italiano e também no portal comunitário na Wikipédia en alemão. (Vi a sua imagem do abelhão. Sou apicultor perto de Munique. Pode ver umas imagens de abelhas aqui.) Cumprimentos! --wau 18:01, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado pela mensagem e pela ajuda na publicidade ao POTY 2006. Dou-lhe os parabéns pelo seu português! Ou será que nasceu neste "jardim à beira-mar plantado"? Se quiser poderá particpiar na organização do evento: Commons talk:Picture of the Year/2006. Cumprimentos, Joaquim - Alvesgaspar 19:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Drohnenwabe[edit]

Hallo Waugsberg,

die Bienen/Wabenfotos sind klasse! Eine Frage: müsste das Bild Image:Drohnenpuppen 62b.jpg nicht um 180 Grad gedreht sein, sodass die Wände leicht nach oben zeigen? --Warden 18:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serie schlüpfende Biene
Vielen Dank! Du hast Recht, es ist verkehrt herum, man sieht es auch an Image:Drohnenpuppen 79a.JPG, wo es richtig herum ist. Ich hatte erst Angst, beim Umdrehen würde die Beleuchtung unnatürlich werden, aber es geht schon, nachdem im Wesentlichen das Blitzlicht direkt von oben kommt. Also werde ich es nochmals verdreht hochladen. Übrigens: Image:Drohnenpuppen 65b.jpg ist auch verkehrt herum, in Wirklichkeit liegen die Burschen auf dem Rücken, aber in dem Fall werde ich es lassen, damit man ihnen richtig ins Gesicht schauen kann.--wau 14:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Das ist ja interessant! Wahrscheinlich ist es für sie dann einfacher, beim Schlüpfen nach oben zu grabbeln statt nach unten. --Warden 06:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nein, sie drehen sich schon beim Aufnagen des Zelldeckels und dann auch beim Schlüpfen herum, siehe Bilderserie. --wau 11:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Stacheldraht 93.jpg, which was nominated by Tano4595 at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Stacheldraht 93.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 09:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rosa dos ventos[edit]

  • Hello Joaquim, I would like to support your wind rose which is a fine work. Only, as the drawing is more exactly executed than the original, not so "hand-made", I think that the indications of the directions at the outer circle which give the impression to be hand-written don't fit to the rose as well as in the original. Would it perhaps be better to make them a little bit more regular, less hand-written, like a calligraphy which is between written and printed (example: Image:Calligraphy.malmesbury.bible.arp.jpg)? The letters or signs in the inner circle are nice, a bit surprising is that they seem to have nothing to do with the name of the directions outside (O for south, S for south-east). Are they not portuguese? - Isso foi diffícil, não fui capaz de escrever em português. Mas continuo a apprender a sua língua porque vou ir de férias a Portugal por uns días em Novembro. Vamos a visitar a Feira Nacional do Cavalo de Golegã, pois a minha mulher é professora de equitação. Depois vamos passar uns dias em Lisboa, quer dizer vamos dormir na pousada de Queluz, vamos ver ali a Escola Portuguesa de Arte Equestre e naturalmente visitar Lisboa. Espero que eu não tire fotografias ali que sejam suas! Cumprimentos, --wau 23:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wow, estou impressionado com o seu excelente português! Além disso, é sempre lisongeante quando nos escrevem na nossa própria língua, muito obrigado. Quanto às suas sugestões, vou analisá-las amanhã com mais atenção e ver o que consigo melhorar. Também não entendo o significado das palavras colocadas nos pontos intercadeais exteriores; não me parecem escritas em português, nem sequer em latim. Os símbolos colocados no círculo interior são também um mistério para mim, excepto a cruz de Cristo, que aponta sempre para Este, que é a direcção de Jerusalém. Mas essa não é a minh área de investigação (daí a minha ignorância), eu ocupo-me sobretudo da análise geométrica das cartas antigas. Was this too hard? if necessary, I'll say it again in English. - Alvesgaspar 23:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Obrigado, compreendi tudo, só para "lisongear" precisei de um dicionário. Compreendo bem os textos escritos. Falar é um pouco diferente! Mas nunca falei com um português, só ando a aprender a língua com livros e cassetes. --wau 01:40, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Olhe na rosa original: Penso que os pontos intercadeais são indicados assim em português: noroest, norleste, sudueste, su(falta "d")est. "S" pode-se escrever de várias maneiras: de:S e exemplos. --wau 14:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Muito obrigado pela ajuda! Também fiquei a pensar no assunto e consegui decifrar os nomes: é como diz. Segui o seu conselho, fui à procura do tipo de letra que se utilizava no fim do século XV e substituí os nomes de todos os pontos cardeias e colaterais. Veja a nova versão, que me parece bastante melhor. O que acha da crítica de LadyofHats? - Alvesgaspar 15:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Drohnenpuppen 79d.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Drohnenpuppen 79d.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 21:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Korrektur: Die Kandidatur (mit 2 verschiedenen Versionen) war unter: (Correction: The candidate page is:) Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Drohnenpuppen 79b.jpg --wau > 23:07, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


English Wikipedia nomination[edit]

Hi! I just wanted to let you know that I liked Image:Drohnenpuppen 79d.jpg so much that I nominated it over at English Wikipedia for Featured Picture there. The nomination is at en:WP:FPC. I also nominated Image:Bienenwabe mit Eiern und Brut 5.jpg for Featured picture here on commons, because, frankly, that is a marvellous picture.


Keep up the great work! Adam Cuerden 06:35, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Bienenwabe_mit_Eiern_und_Brut_5.jpg, which was nominated by Adam Cuerden at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bienenwabe_mit_Eiern_und_Brut_5.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 07:48, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you ...[edit]

File:Teddy bear 27.jpg
powers of deception? --wau

you are a genius and i celebrate you. but i envy you as well. and am scared by your powers of deception. —the preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.213.197.97 (talk • contribs)

Hello Waugsberg, I am interested to know where you acquired the photo of this German "Teddy Bear" circa 1954? I recently purchased an antique Teddy Bear of very similar construction and am trying to determine its origin. Thank you.

The Teddy is mine. It is a present I was given when I was a child. I think it was bought in Munich in 1954 or even a bit earlier, between 1951 and 1954. -wau > 22:30, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

POTY2007[edit]

Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that become a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck.--Kushan I.A.K.J 15:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bienenkoenigin 43a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice sharp macro, good colors, central compo good in this case. --Matl 16:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
fine colors, sharp FRZ 19:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ramsau-extra+F16.gif[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Ramsau-extra+F16.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 10:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ischgl - neue version[edit]

Vielen dank für deine neue Version, die die Perspektive korrigiert. Es gefällt mir sehr und ich werde es vielleicht auch später für FP nominieren. Vielen dank, --Freedom to share 17:13, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Faro Igreja do Carmo[edit]

Recht herzlichen Dank für ihren Bericht und für ihre Wertschätzung! -- MJJR (talk) 09:38, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Italian problems[edit]

Hi Waugsberg, I think you should read this. There is at least one photo you took among those that the Sopraintendenza ai Beni Culturali dell'Etruria meridionale want to be deleted. There is no consensus on deleting all the photos, but you may want to have the photos you uploaded to be deleted. Bye --Jaqen (talk) 23:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per il tuo messaggio. Sto riflettendo sulla situazione e nel prossimo tempo seguirò la futura discussione. Come mai ci hanno lasciato fare fotografie nei musei senza dir niente e adesso chiamano "al ladro!". Saluti --wau > 01:41, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ich hab' diese Nachricht von Jaqen auch bekommen. Hast Du die Diskussion gelesen? Die spinnen, die Italiener. Dann müßte man ja tausende Aufnahmen löschen. Was kann man da unternehmen? Gruß, --AM (talk) 17:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unternehmen? Praktisch wenig. Theoretisch: Wenn nächstes Jahr niemand mehr nach Italien fahren würde, würde der Gesetzgeber wahrscheinlich nachdenklich. Bestürzend sind eigentlich die Beiträge der italienischen Benutzer, dass sie Restriktionen im freien Internetzugang fürchten müssen. Das Gesetz erscheint mir unnötig kompliziert. Man hätte doch nur einfach Berlusconis Kontonummer angeben müssen. Hast du jetzt Angst, an der Grenze verhaftet zu werden? --wau > 00:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
:-)) Eigentlich weniger, da wären die Strafbefehle, die von italienischen Inkassofirmen verschickt werden und in denen für geringfügige Verkehrsverstöße verrückt hohe Bußgelder verlangt werden, die ich nie bezahle, schon eher ein Grund. Aber wie ich aus dem Fortgang der Diskussion entnehme wird sich Wikipedia solchen Forderungen glücklicherweise nicht beugen. Es kann einfach nicht sein, daß die Kulturgüter aus dem Erbe der Menscheit zur Ware verkommen. Schönen Gruß, --AM (talk) 12:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ramsau-extra+F16.gif[edit]

Guten Abend, würdest Du Dich eventuell hier positiv äußern?! Scheint kein Schwein zu interessieren. Schönen Gruß, --AM (talk) 21:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wurde von Forrester gelöscht am 30.8.2008 abends mit der Begründung: (Derivative works: Red sky is DW without documented permission). War die Quelle des roten Himmels nicht angegeben? Kann man das nachholen? --wau > 20:27, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für den Hinweis. Ich hab' nochmal gesucht und bin fündig geworden. Siehe meinen neuen Kommentar. Ciao, --AM (talk) 12:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wieder da! Eigentlich wollte ich ja noch King Kong von hinten her auftreten lassen, aber das wurde nie realisiert ;-) Gute Nacht, --AM (talk) 21:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muybridge Buffalo galloping.gif[edit]

Hallo Waugsberg,
ich habe mal eine Frage zu dieser Animation: Am Ende vor der Wiederhohlung stockt der Kopf immer so plötzlich nach unten. Ich weiß nicht, ob das an meinem PC liegt, aber könnte man das nicht bearbeiten? Gruß, --kaʁstn 16:27, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Du brauchst keine Angst um deinen PC zu haben, der ist nicht schuld. Es liegt einfach an den Aufnahmen. Schau dir mal die Vorlage unten auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite an. Der Büffel ist auf dem ersten Bild kleiner als auf den unteren. Wahrscheinlich war er so frech, dass er nicht genau parallel zur Aufstellung der Kameras gelaufen ist. Na ja, er hatte auch Sorgen, schließlich stand er kurz vor seiner Ausrottung. Oder die Einstellung der Kameras war nicht ganz einheitlich. Überdies sind etliche Bilder drunter, wo er arg am rechten Rand anstößt, dort möglicherweise vom Objektiv her schon verzerrt ist und wo auch der Hintergrund sehr dunkel ist. Hinzu kommt, dass das Buch, aus dem die Aufnahmen stammen, sehr eng gebunden ist, so dass es bei einigen Bildern nicht ganz möglich war, sie am Rand völlig plan zu bekommen. Und das Buch deshalb auseinanderschneiden wollte ich dann doch nicht. Ich habe bestimmt einen ganzen Tag dran gearbeitet, um es so einigermaßen hinzubekommen. Allzuviel an Form hinzuerfinden wollte ich aus Respekt vor den historischen Aufnahmen auch nicht. Sicher, man könnte immer irgendetwas noch ein wenig besser machen. Aber bei dem Ausgangsmaterial bin ich schon froh, dass es so geworden ist. Das Hauptproblem ist der Größenunterschied zwischen dem letzten Bild und dem ersten Bild, das gibt den größten Ruck. Um das auszugleichen müsste man alle 16 Bilder stufenlos so skalieren, dass sie auf dieselbe Größe kommen. So weit wollte ich auch nicht gehen. Grüße --wau > 19:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ich wollte ja auch nur mal nachfragen. Und man kann es ja auch so lassen, erfolgreich ist es sowieso, da es in der Türkischen und in der Deutschen Wikipedia als Exzellent gewählt wurde. Danke für die ausführliche und schnelle Antwort. Gruß, --kaʁstn 14:04, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stechende Biene 12a.jpg[edit]

Hey Wasgsberg. So, I was wondering. Did you just catch a bee and get it to sting you so you could take pictures? seresin (¡?) 05:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I hurt the bee accidentally while working in the beehive. As I had crushed a little the head or the breast, it was dying, but the rear part of it with the stinger still functioned. So I could put it on my finger and it was still able to sting. Unfortunately the picture is not sharp. It's not easy to keep unmoved to take a macro picture while a bee is stinging you. --wau > 23:26, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well then:
The Dedication Barnstar
For letting a bee sting you just to get a picture of it! ÷seresin 08:56, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, thanks. A bee sting is not very bad for a beekeeper. (Though the pain is the same, whether beekeeper or not. But the swelling is much less if you're used to stings.) It would have been more sacrifice to take a picture of a lion eating the head of the artist! --wau > 15:34, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Foto do Mosteiro da Batalha[edit]

Caro Senhor Waugsberg: Sou Professora de Literatura Portuguesa da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. No momento procedo à publicação da minha tese de Doutorado revista, sob o título "Fernão Lopes e a retórica medieval". Gostaria de usar a belíssima foto de sua autoria do Mosteiro da Batalha em uma das páginas do livro, em escalas de cinza. Peço-lhe que me confirme a cessão da imagem e os créditos que o senhor gostaria que figurassem na legenda. Agradeço-lhe desde já a urgência que puder dispensar ao solicitado. Atenciosamente, Maria do Amparo Tavares Maleval.Laismartinsdacosta (talk) 20:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cara D. Maria:
Estou de acordo que usa a foto do Mosteiro da Batalha. Por favor esreva na legenda: Foto: Usuário Waugsberg, Wikimedia Commons. Se quiser pode acrescentar que a foto pode ser usada sob as condições duma das licenças indicadas na página http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mosteiro_da_Batalha_78a.jpg (por exemplo: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.pt). Infelizmente ainda não falo português muito bem. Bom sucesso com o seu livro! Os melhores cumprimentos -- Waugsberg 01:02, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Caro Senhor Waugsberg: Muito lhe agradeço a pronta resposta e a concessão da foto para o meu livro. Peço-lhe que me envie o seu endereço residencial, pois gostaria de enviar-lhe um exemplar do livro. Atenciosamente, Maria do Amparo Tavares Maleval Laismartinsdacosta (talk) 20:58, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cara S.ra D. Maria: Alegra-me que lhe sirva a minha foto. Vou enviar-lhe o meu endereço, mas não o quero escrever em público. Preferiria enviar-lhe um correio electónico. Se quiser poderia permitir nas preferências da página 'Laismartinsdacosta' que os outros usuários lhe enviem e-mails, veja a explicacão na página 'preferências', que encontra acima. Indique o seu endereço de e-mail e marque "Permitir que me enviem e-mails clicando em Contatar usuário". Atenciosamente --wau > 19:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of caption on Bienenvolk-Gemüll[edit]

Hi, I tried to translate the caption on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bienenvolk-Gemuell.jpg into English. It's based on the Google translation. Hope I got it right, I wasn't sure what verbaut meant. Keepstherainoff (talk) 16:55, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's ok. "Verbaut" means used for construction or built in (in honeycombs). Thank you for translating! --wau > 21:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I had a go at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Drohnenpuppen_81b.jpg as well. That one was harder! EDIT: And http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schluepfende_Biene.jpg Keepstherainoff (talk) 12:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm highly impressed. Your Google's German is quite perfect. Perhaps you want to try this one next: File:Bienenwabe mit Eiern 39.jpg (your masterpiece) or even the whole family: User:Waugsberg/Images/Bees and Beekeeping? Of course I can help if it's necessary. Best regards! --wau > 20:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Feira Nacional do Cavalo 67a.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:55, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Use of an image[edit]

Hi 

I am assisting Cheryll Williams with her book
Medicinal Plants in Australia Vol4 - The Australian Apothecary
and she would like to use your image of File:Bienenwabe mit Eiern und Brut 5.jpg

at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bienenwabe_mit_Eiern_und_Brut_5.jpg 

in the volume
If you agree please advise of the attribution that you require should the publisher use the image.
We are a non-profit group supporting Daintree Wildlife Rescue in the Daintree Rainforest in North Queensland, Australia
(daintreewildliferescue.webs.com)

Details of Volumes 1 and 2 are at http://www.rosenbergpub.com.au/handleProduct.asp?id=113&catid=7 

rgds
Tony Young Ringpicker (talk) 09:37, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
HI, you can use the image under the conditions that can be seen on the page of the file File:Bienenwabe_mit_Eiern_und_Brut_5.jpg, such as for example http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en, where you see a link to the complete license text. It is necessary to provide the name of the author (Waugsberg) and a link or URL to the license. --wau > 23:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Using one of your pitures in a textbook[edit]

I would like to include your picture of the Tomb of the Leopards http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tomba_dei_Leopardi_Tarquinia_c.jpg in a textbook, printed at about 1/12 of a page. I wanted to confirm that would be OK with you, and ask if you would like me to include in the credits maybe (in addition to Wikipedia, eventually) your full name, location, or anything else (which I would much rather do, this being initially a printed text with no 'links', and since someone may end up reading it well after The Age of Wikipedia).

I am a Wikipedia noob and I am not sure if you get a return address with this --just in case, thechabon ATTT! hotmail DOT! com.

Iiiiaaaa (talk) 04:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a famous photographer whose name must be kept in mind in the year 1000 after Wikipedia. So it's ok if you write "Waugsberg, Wikimedia Commons", in this case even without mentioning the license. --wau > 13:52, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Drone bee[edit]

Dear Waugsberg, May I use your picture of a drone bee featured on your page? I understand that the correct attribution would be Waugsberg, Creative Commons, but please advise. I am a freelance writer and commentator and I am creating a web site called Plight of the Bees for a company called Syngenta. Best wishes, Lionel

Hello, as I wrote above: It is necessary to provide the name of the author (Waugsberg) and the URL of the license or a link to it. Best wishes, --wau > 03:14, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your gif![edit]

Hello!

My name is Laurie and I'm the Project Manager for na2ure, an NYC-based startup toy company. We featured this gif of yours (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Muybridge_Camel_Racking.gif) in our upcoming app, and wanted to thank you. Thank you!

na2ure is all about designing science play. We developed a game-changing platform called ferret that classifies ecological data into an intuitive network that can be easily learned through play. The high end value of our work attracted STEM>STEAM icon John Maeda, as well as the VCs behind LittleBits, Sphero, Makerbot, and Shapeways. The science has been vetted by MD's and PhD's, tested by kids, and praised by educators as appealing to all ages.

None of this would have been possible without your work. Thank you.

The app is available on the iOS platform and will be released to the public soon. Be sure to follow us on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/Anigramit) and Twitter (@anigramit) for a quick, easy way to share the news with your social media network -- and to keep up to date on all the great stuff we’re doing.

Again, thank you! Laurie Vazquez Project Manager, na2ure manager@na2ure.com

Bild Stechende Biene 12a.jpg[edit]

Hallo Waugsberg, ich habe eine Frage zu dem Bild: Stechende Biene 12a.jpg

Wir möchten es gern für ein Bienenbuch mit geringer Auflage gewerblich nutzen. Wie genau sollte die Bezeichnung lauten, die wir dann unter das Bild schreiben, damit sie als Urheber genannt werden?

LG indysign

Hallo, du kannst schreiben:
"Foto: Waugsberg, Wikimedia Commons, lizenziert unter CreativeCommons-Lizenz by-sa-3.0, URL:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode "
Siehe auch: Commons:Weiterverwendung#Creative_Commons_(CC)
Grüße --wau > 08:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank :-)

Eadweard Muybridge Bison images set to motion[edit]

Hello,

I am the Production Coordinator for National Geographic Wild's upcoming series entitled United States of Animals. We have recently come across a youtube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gwmdcoz1Rbk) of Eadweard Muybridge Bison images set to motion.

We are trying to track down someone to contact in regard to finding out if this footage/the moving images are public domain or if not, who owns the rights to this footage. We are interested in incorporating it into an episode of our show. Please contact me directly at ashleyb@halfyardproductions.com with any information related to this moving image. Thank you in advance for your help with this matter.

Hello, I have seen your message. I shall answer soon. --wau > 21:24, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bild Bienen im Flug 52e.jpg[edit]

Hallo Waugsberg,

ich finde deine Bienenfotos sehr gelungen und möchte oben genanntes Bild gern für unsere Imkervereinsseite verwenden. Da ich es in einer Collage mit anderen Bildern verwende bzw. noch Schriftzüge einfügen möchte, bin ich mir nicht sicher wie ich deine Urheberschaft bzw. deine Lizensierung am besten kenntlich machen kann.

Reicht es dir wenn ich in die Bilder einen Schriftzug mit "Waugsberg, Wikimedia Commons" setze?

Vielen Dank für die Antwort und die tollen Bilder

Die Angaben können mit Verlinkung wie folgt unterhalb des Bildes erfolgen:
Bild von Waugsberg, Wikimedia Commons, Lizenz Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0
Zum Kopieren:
<a rel="Bild" href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bienen_im_Flug_52e.jpg">Bild</a> von Waugsberg, Wikimedia Commons, <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/">Lizenz Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0</a>
Grüße --wau > 01:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image Permissions[edit]

Hi there! I'm a producer on a web series called Animalogic, and I'm currently working on an episode about bees! You have so many amazing bee photos on Wikimedia and I was hoping to get your permission to use some of them in our little show. I'd love for you to check out our channel at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwg6_F2hDHYrqbNSGjmar4w and let me know if this is something that you'd be interested in contributing to. Though we're still a relatively small show, we're hoping to expand and possibly be broadcast on other platforms. Because of this, we are unable to use any images that are listed as "share alike" under the creative commons license. If you could email me at andrew.strapp@blueantmedia.ca and let me know if there are other licensing possibilities that would be amazing. We love your photos and hope to work something out. Thank you very much for your time, -Andrew Strapp — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.9.216.151 (talk) 21:11, 06 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teddy bear 27.jpg[edit]

File:Teddy bear 27.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fæ (talk) 12:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permission: Muybridge Running Buffalo[edit]

Mr. von Waugsberg, please contact me at mandrei@netad.unl.edu. We would like to use your Muybridge running bison gif in a short film about the American bison and need to acquire permission. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.93.4.65 (talk) 17:40, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Waugsberg&oldid=269911796"