User talk:WarX/3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

About the Simple English Wiki[edit]

I have a question. If the Simple English Wiki doesn't allow any other media files except the ones on Wiki Commons, does that mean that it is completely blocked off from all fair-use materials?

Your user page[edit]

Seems as you have some enemies arround, such as Josboroliv who moved your UserPage and UserTalk... I've found your UserPage, and retrieved it to your place. I do suggest you to protect it or something... Yuval YChat23:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. I am a new in here and i dont so good now, but teach myself. Sorry my bad english. I come from Finland.Tepi-7 15:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you sould {{Welcome}} people at first, since this page have a lot of explanations... Yuval YChat20:42, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ascariasis LifeCycle - CDC Division of Parasitic Diseases.gif[edit]

Hi, I think I can explain, however my English is not good. I've choosed the license of "GDFL content from English Wikipedia". And when I did that, I've seen GDFL license of the items. I don't know why it's been. I think I couldn't understand Wikicommons using rules. Sorry for it, really it's difficult to understand for me. Perhaps, you can control my all contributions and a little explaning for them, if necessary ? Thanks. The cat 23:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And a question, too:

[1] Couldn't I add this item to commons? I'm studying about it, on Tr Wikipedia. Thanks again. The cat 23:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sprzątanie[edit]

Witaj! Spełniłem Twoją prośbę i przeniosłem wszystkie (prawie) grafiki na Commons. Mam jednak problem z tą dyskusją. Rozstrzygnij sam co z tym zrobić. Grafika jest przeniesiona, więc ją wykasuj kiedy rozwiążesz problem ze stroną dyskusji. Zostawiłem też dwie starsze grafiki [2] i [3] w formacie png. Zrobię wersje wektorowe i wówczas je wykasuję. Ciekaw jestem co to za pomysł. Pozdrawiam. -- Bastian 00:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wszystko jasne. Te grafiki to tylko na czas przenosin. Ułatwiało mi to wykrycie tych, których nie było na Commons. Nie chcę zapeszyć, ale przymierzam się do tego spotkania w Chorzowie. Jeśli mi zdrowie nie wypłata figla, to być może pojawię się tam na jakąś godzinkę. Ponieważ to wielka niewiadoma, to wolę nie wpisywać się na listę. Pozdrawiam. -- Bastian 10:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SVG[edit]

Wczoraj zkasowałeś herb Rudy Śląskiej, ponieważ jest wersią png. Ja myśle, że "SVG" nie jest powód na kasowanje herbów. Specialnje w tym przypadku SVG-wersia jest kiepska i nie odpowiada herbu oficjalnym. Dziszaj na nowo załadowałem herb PNG i źyczę sobie, aby pozostał na commons. --PetrusSilesius 15:31, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

You said I had uploaded copyrighted images, could you please show me what they are? I remember I just uploaded two screen-shots, are they copyrighted? Tonybuaa 11:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then how to upload a screenshot?[edit]

What kind of license can I use? Or any screenshot is not allowed to be uploaded? What about those screenshots which have already been uploaded by others? Tony 11:43, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What about this one?[edit]

Tony 12:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These are fair use pictures, which cannot be uploaded in commons. Yuval YChat19:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

I understand ^_^

Hi, sorry I accidently changed your diagram's version while inspecting it. I already reverted my mistake though. btw: Very nice work! --Contributor 21:37, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

pajacyk[edit]

hi, skasowałeś logo pajacyka - Polska Akcja Humanitarna zachęca do publikowania go... Czy jest coś nie tak? Pozdrowienia Pundit 16:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Logomesbla[edit]

I don't understand why the image logomesbla, which I uploaded, was deleted. It's a logo of a company which no longer exists, because a Brazilian court declared its bankrupcy. Acoording to Brazilian law (and also other countries law), a bankrupted company lost the right on the use of its assets, including trademarks. I wish you reconsider your decision. Good day --Luferom 16:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

voilalogo deleted[edit]

why I am informed?

Lacerta logo.jpg[edit]

Witam, Proszę o informację dlaczego logo zostało usunięte z commons, a później z artykułu.

RfA[edit]

I have answered your comment, you can change your vote now. Cheers, Gizmo II 19:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Company Logo deleted[edit]

logfile: 12:43, 16 November 2006 WarX (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:Logo Freeport McMoRan.jpg" (logo - copyvio)

You deleted the Logo of the US-american Company Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. Why did you do that? --Echeetah 01:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Image:Lemmings cdtv boxshot.jpg[edit]

I'm sorry. --Gildos 16:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Polskie herby[edit]

W porządku. Nie zauważyłem twojego wcześniejszego wpisu. Jednak muszę zapytać: dlaczego nie na commons? Pozdrawiam --Qqerim 10:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Witam. Dlaczego przywrociles poprzednia wersje polskiej flagi? Poprawilem kolory, zeby byly zgodne z oficjalnymi (zobacz pl:Flaga Polski), i zeby to bylo oddane na wszystkich projektach Wiki. Pozdrawiam, --Mareklug talk 22:50, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Czy moglbys odblokowac image, zeby go uaktualnic? Wlasnie pl:Wikipedysta:DeJotPe wyjasnil sytuacje w dyskusji pl:Dyskusja:Flaga Polski, i podany przez niego wynik wyliczen nie jest rozowy: Zobacz pl:Dyskusja:Flaga_Polski#Jakie_naprawd.C4.99_s.C4.85_wg._ustawy_prawid.C5.82owe_kolory_flagi_polski.. Pozdrawiam, --Mareklug talk 23:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Dziekuje, juz poprawilem, i mozesz z powrotem zablokowac edycje. Natomiast, czy moglbys odblokowac z tego samego powodu Image:Flag of Poland (bordered).svg? Albo po prostu przeniesc tam Image:Flag of Poland corrected (bordered).svg. Dziekuje i Pozdrawiam, --Mareklug talk 01:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Dziekuje, ten tez poprawilem. Oba Image:Flag of Poland.svg i Image:Flag of Poland (bordered).svg mozna teraz zabezpieczyc, jesli uwazasz za stosowne. Pozdrawiam --Mareklug talk 20:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are ruining Wikicommons.--FlagUploader 17:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WarX, seeing that you are personally involved in this content dispute, I request that you do not block any users involved in it. Please ask another administrator to do it for you. That way, block will be determined by a neutral third party. I've unblocked FlagUploader so that he may continue to discuss the Flag of Poland issue. Please give him a chance to express himself. In the end, if there is no consensus over which flag to use, there's no reason we can't have both with an explanation of the differences. ~MDD4696 14:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About your warnings[edit]

Hello. I am slightly concerned about the message you put on talk pages of users who upload copyvios. Your strong wordings might scare of people who really do want to be valuable contributor, but are not so familiar with copyright laws as us. You might also no only want to tell them that they were wrong, but also how they can improve, by for example, linking to COM:L. Thank you for your understanding. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mógłbys byś skasować ta grafike? Na pl-wiki trafiła z mirroru en-wiki, a stamtąd poleciała jako NPA. Nemo5576 07:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please be so kind as to explain the deletion... You could at least have informed me. I did contact Smat before publishing the image here, and he gave his consent. What's wrong with that? See my discussion page in wiki de. --Atirador 22:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

22:59, December 6, 2006, WarX (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Badalo (contribs) (infinite, account creation blocked) (unblock) (upload of porn images!)

Infinite block, without warning or something like that, for uploading a porn image (and a bell)? Yuval Y § Chat § 15:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:903id[edit]

11:34, December 6, 2006 WarX (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "903id (contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (Sorry, but nobody is interessed in watching your penis)

Infiniate block? (I wouldn't mind watching the pictures)

Yuval Y § Chat § 15:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Let's continue the chat here..)

banning[edit]

Of course, if someone uploads hard porn pictures, you can assume good faith and negotiate, but I see no need of that :(

--WarX 16:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unless he's a good looking. . I guess you've banned them without negotiating once or ever, and I'm thinking about giving them one more chance. Besides, infinite is a very long time... Yuval Y § Chat § 17:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've unblocked them, and wrote them a message. I'll check them to see what they're doing.
Best regards, Yuval Y § Chat § 18:14, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Empty, moved to Category:Naval ships of Finland - Pibwl 21:32, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Dali Teatro-Museu painting.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:46, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does freedom of panorama apply to interiors? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
en:Public space seems to state that any place which requires a fee for you to get in cannot be qualified as public. This is the case of a museum. Besides, the Teatre-Museu appears to be privately owned by the Fundacio Gala-Salvador Dali. This seems to be a tricky question, I'll ask about it in Commons talk:Licensing. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 12:07, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Trombone.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Trombone.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 14:56, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA: Thanks[edit]

Thank you for your support on my RFA. Now that I have been promoted, I promise to be as hardworking and fair with the admin tools as I have been with the other areas here on Commons. See you around and happy editing. Zzyzx11 15:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ISS schemes[edit]

Hello WarX! You requested ISS schemes with numbers +. I made them. Do you use them now or in the future or was it just a "nice to have" question? Greetings! --Enricopedia 00:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Przepraszam - screeny z kolorkami[edit]

Przepraszam za zaladowanie screenshotow z wynikami przeliczen kolorow ze stron EasyRGB - http://www.easyrgb.com/calculator.php - nie pomyslalem o NPA, a powinienem byl. Poniewaz nie mozna ich podac na Commons, to nawet tymczasowo nie mozna umieszczac ich na polskiej wikipedii, rowniez. Zreszta, doczytalem teraz w "Terms of Use", co powiniemem byl zrobic wczesniej, ze nie zycza sobie zadnego "public display". Zmodyfikuje tekst w dyskusji na pl wiki, gdzie uzylem te screeshoty. Pozdrawiam, --Mareklug talk 17:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wst[edit]

Możesz gościa uspokoić? Ciągle usuwa szablon licencji z grafiki [5] Nemo5576 14:30, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Oil well scheme.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Oil well scheme.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 11:25, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hej! File:Legia.svg Licencja PD wydaje mi się wątpliwa. Margoz 13:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RZF-NRW logo.png[edit]

You deleted the logo of RZF NRW. Is there any reason? User:Traumtaucher 28 December 2006

Mapki[edit]

Witaj, załóżmy że mam książkę zawierającą m.in. mapki zasięgu różnych roślin, publikacja jest opatrzona copyright, pytanie, czy mogę użyć tych mapek po przerysowaniu ich do svg i jeśli tak, co umieścić w opisie? Dzięki i wszystkiego najlepszego w Nowym Roku :) --Nova 00:11, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki. A czy w takim razie warto podawać pierwotne źródło? Orientujesz się jakie są praktyki? --Nova 17:23, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal: Picture of the Year and Picture of the Month contests[edit]

I have posted a new proposal on Commons talk:Featured picture candidates regarding the creation of FP-related contests and would like your feedback on the idea. This message is being sent to some of the regular contributors to Commons:Featured picture candidates. Alvesgaspar 16:08, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Age Pyramids[edit]

I noticed that you created some 2000 census age pyramids for the US state of Illinois, located in Category:Age pyramids for counties in Illinois. I have placed the pyramids into the english wikipedia county articles, but there are only 52 of the 102 counties. If you have time, I was hoping you could finish the rest, or possibly publish the perl scripts so someone else can finish them. Thanks for your help. --Dual Freq 22:11, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio?[edit]

Hi, you delete the image Yahoo phishing.jpg and the log say "copyvio", copyvio from where? The image was taked from en.wikipedia, is a phising page, as you can see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Yahoo_phishing.jpg is not a yahoo official page, the image is used to ilustrade as example of phising page, you can restore the image please? Sorry about my english. --Kerosene 23:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mapa zasięgu[edit]

Zerknij proszę w wolnej chwili na tę mapkę w svg, na razie wgrałam ją jako png, jeśli svg uznasz za ok, też wrzucę. Pozdr. Nova 20:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SVG images[edit]

many of my diagrams have already a language neutral (numbered) version, it would be easier for me if you just let me know wichone you are missing. also your category seems to be the same as category:diagrams, maybe you should consider unifying them -LadyofHats 06:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jezeli jesteś tu adminemto wykasuj ten plik a zostaw Image:Getto pomnik.jpg. Paweł Drozdp 17:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Mógłbyś zmienić na white-crimson? Ta grafika jest używana chyba wyłącznie w szablonach.

Pozdrawiam, Nux (talk··dyskusja) 21:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

You are blocked ;)[edit]

Z powodu powtarzających się wandalizmów dokonywanych przez pewnego użytkownika Neostrady TP oraz przeciągającej się procedury abuse Telekomunikacji Polskiej anonimowe edycje z Neostrady w rejonie Łódź zostały całkowicie zablokowane do zakończ
Trochę to dziwne, ale ja mieszkam w Łomży a też należę do strefy łódzkiej ;) PS> Popieram ten pomysł z banem na pulę wandali :) Pozdrawiam, patrol110 09:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POTY 2006[edit]

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All the featured pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As the creator of one or more images nominated for the election we invite you to participate in the event. Alvesgaspar 17:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition[edit]

Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the
Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006
Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February.

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | português | svenska | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/−

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote). --MichaelMaggs 20:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm afraid that last edit of your messed up the voting table somehow. I've reverted for the moment, and updated the count manually. --MichaelMaggs 14:00, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. How often is the script running, and will it move the divider down as well? --MichaelMaggs 14:25, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you run your script again, please? The voting table is getting rather out of date now. Is there code that you could release for Alvesgapar and me to run if you're not available? --MichaelMaggs 17:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the automation. This is looking really good. --MichaelMaggs 11:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abandoning the POTY 2006 project[edit]

I’m abandoning the project. I don’t deserve, and can’t tolerate, to be treated like an intruder or a vandal. Have fun. Alvesgaspar 13:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support. I can’t stay not because some user was arrogant and presumptuous in his speech but because no one, except me, is opposing his actions. The obvious conclusion is that I’m in minority e.g. most of the users in our group agree with changing the philosophy of the election and are against making available to voters a sorted list of pictures. Being stopped from inserting such an innocuous link like this one [6] was too much for me. I am not that important, the election will go on and have an enormous success, that is what I sincerely wish. Alvesgaspar 15:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Checking of votes[edit]

A number of voters have posted invalid diffs, and I've struck those out and warned them when I've spotted it. But I suspect there may be others who appear to be valid but don't actually have 100 edits. Do you know of any way in which we could automate the check for that? --MichaelMaggs 16:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to help the bot, I have edited some lines so that their format (notably the leading list of numbers) is uniform; i hope this will avoid counting bugs. I have also commented the explaining page, urging users to respect the format, including for their changes (I have stroked the lines where changes were clear, but mixed numbers that were stroked and numbers that were kept, so that the definitive vote only shows the numbers in normal format.)
Otherwise, my own counting script were rejecting lines with invalid format.
Be careful when counting with your bot: there may be extra spaces, sometimes there are words like "and" in the middle instead of a comma. (I've manually edited these cases)
Make sure that the bot verifies the formats it accepts very strictly, and that it outputs the rejected lines so that they can be counted manually, and then edited for the next run of the bot. If possible, the bot should be able to recreate a list with the canonical format for number lists, and a required space and clear separator after it.
Can the bot also verify the signatures? some are using signatures refering their Wikipedia account, without refering to their Comons account, and without diff, even if their local account on Commons is valid. It's difficult to verify this, because one needs to look at the history to see who really voted.
Some users are also inserting links with their numbers, it breaks the format, and makes parsing more difficult.
I also hope that noone is trying to mix the numbers in the image gallery (the source list must be kept, and if someone changes the gallery, it must be reverted as soon as possible to keep the listed numbers associated to the same image (i hope that the script that randomizes the list does not mix them! That's why the source ordered list (gallery0) must not be changed and used as the reference.
My opinion is that the gallery should be completely protected, except for Commons administrators that may insert a new randomized and verified list.
Thanks. Verdy p 01:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Warning: i note that 2 images have been deleted from the gallery (321 images instead of 323 initially) but the list was RENUMBERED! This means that image numbers used after the removed images are no longer refering to the same one before the change or after it. If some images must be deleted (because they are no longer featured), make sure that the numbers are kept even for images after the deleted ones! the gallery should then display cells with a all blank image if the image was deleted, to preserve the list count, if this helps the list randomizer to avoid holes. My opinion is that we should not even try to delete any image now, even if it's deleted. The image will just be ignored from the final vote. We can inform users about images that will not be counted so that they can change their vote if they want. Verdy p 01:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry about the numbers. The number in the voting list (and gallery) was reduced from 323 to 321 here on 31st Jan, before voting started. It was to remove two pictures that had been de-featured. The entire competition has been correctly run with 321 images. --MichaelMaggs 18:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcia z forestryimages.com[edit]

Hej, http://www.forestryimages.org zawiera wiele zdjęć z taką adnotacją: http://www.forestryimages.org/about/imageusage.cfm, część zdjęć jest robiona przez pracowników USDA, więc ucieszyłam się, że można je na commons wrzucać z {{PD-USGov-USDA}}. Ale znalazłam taką adnotację: http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=1149050 (sekcja Image Use) i zaczęłam mieć wątpliwości. Żeby mieć dostęp do formularza zapytania o zgodę na wykorzystanie komercyjne (http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/permission.cfm?img=1149050&use=Media) trzeba założyć konto i zalogować się - zrobiłam to i ten formularz to jest prawdopodobnie jednolity interfejs dla zapytań o zezwolenie na użycie dowolnego zdjęcia, ale ponieważ prawo USA sprawia, że zdjęcia USDA są w PD, to chyba nie trzeba tego robić w odniesieniu do tych szczególnych zdjęć? Na commons znajdują się obecnie 3 zdjęcia z tego serwisu, jedno copyrighted: Image:Neodiprion lecontei.jpg, i dwa PD UsDA: Image:Serrated tussock.jpg, Image:Osmoderma eremita.jpg. --Nova 00:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Szczęśliwie dla mnie, uzyskałam pozytywną odpowiedź :) Jakbyś był ciekaw, jest tutaj. Pozdr. Nova 22:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POTY 2006 - missing votes[edit]

Please take a look here: User_talk:Verdy_p#POTY_2006_-_missing_votes. Thanks, -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your appreciation! I must remember that I'm not the only author of the image, the crowns are designed by Johnbojaen and parts of the keys are from the original Image:Emblem of the Papacy.svg. Thanks again and best regards, F l a n k e r 11:40, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POTY 2006 Phase 1 closing[edit]

We need your help for organizing the closing of phase 1 and prepare the final. Will you please check Commons talk:Picture of the Year/2006. - Alvesgaspar 14:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Diagrams[edit]

for the diagram i have done:. The reason for the background one the image is that thisimage and this image actually belong to each other. so that the background color, between other things conects them both. plus in the case of the vegetal cell it reduces the contrast between the backgound and the image. removing the all too white feeling that one get in a so sparced diagram.It also conects the 3 cells in diferent states, marking the central point on the diagram. And last it is grey for the same reason that the cell wall is dark blue or the vacuole is light blue. becouse when i did the diagram and found this color combination apropiate and armonic.

Hope this has helped you.-LadyofHats 08:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia map[edit]

I prefer to use Golbez's version of the Armenia map as its borders are more accurate than the Bastique one...I should know, I'm Armenian... :) Kindest regards, Aivazovsky 17:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! :) -- Aivazovsky 18:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm kinda new at this, so if I made any mistakes please feel free to correct them. Also be sure to look over Image:Flag-map of Greece.svg and Image:Flag-map of FYR Macedonia.svg. -- Aivazovsky 01:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cykl biochemiczny[edit]

Witaj:) odczytałem Twoją wiadomość po dokonaniu poprawek:) już je trochę powiększyłem, nadal jednak jest to jeszcze wersja eksperymentalna i będą jeszcze drobne zmiany bo prowadzę konsultacje:) Ramki niestety nie dadzą się już zbyt dużo powiększyć ponieważ planuję w ten sposób zilustrować wszystkie główne cykle biochemiczne i chcę zachować proporce w całej serii grafik a w niektórych z nich między ramkami będą związki przejściowe (jak to widać w pierwszej reakcji) i może być naprawdę ciasno a chcę umieścić jak najwięcej informacji na tych grafikach. A z tym marginesem to rozumiem, że chodziło o ograniczenie przestrzeni pomiędzy grafiką a krawędzią kartki:) wyeliminowałem to ale trochę przesadziłem (bo obcięło mi trochę dolnej błony cytoplazmatycznej glioksysomu :D) W dodatku planuję umieścić legendę z objaśnieniami ale zobaczę czy będzie trzeba:) Pozdrawiam Karol007dyskusja 18:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Już wiem co mogę zrobić z tym wszystkim, niedługo zrobię poprawki i załaduję nowszą wersję:) trochę obetnę ten mój glioksysom i powiększę czcionkę w ramkach:) zobaczysz jak będzie wyglądało po poprawkach, sytuacja trochę się poprawi:) pa Karol007dyskusja 20:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Vector versions of some Belarusian COAs[edit]

I noticed that you created Image:POL COA Abdank.svg. If you'll have some time could you please create SVG versions of Image:Coat of Arms of Vietka, Belarus.png and Image:Coat of Arms of Vałožyn, Belarus.png (but please use same file names - it's convention of Belarusian Wikipedia)? Thank you. --EugeneZelenko 15:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, shields are different. Vetka CAO as on Spanish shield (as on Image:POL COA Abdank.svg), Valozhyn COA is on Varangians shield (as on Image:HołowniaII POL CoA.png). However I don't know how standard type of shields in heraldry (dimensions/proportions and so on) in different countries. --EugeneZelenko 15:41, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Images[edit]

Mr. WarX: could you please be more carefull when deleting images? You don't seem to be very concerned on investigating a little bit about images, since there are a lot of users complaining. For example, you deleted Paila23.jpg, which was an image of a kitchen appliance, used in its respective wiki page Paila. So PLEASE, be more careful, ok?

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Emblem of the Papacy SE.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Emblem of the Papacy SE.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 11:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kasowanie grafik[edit]

WarX, przepraszam za zawracanie głowy, ale mógłbyś mi powiedzieć jak traktowane są grafiki w sytuacji w której strona z której zostały pobrane zniknęła? Bo wrzuciłem na commons trochę grafik ze strony http://212.84.179.117/list.htm zawierającej grafiki z http://www.probertencyclopaedia.com/ w trochę większej rozdzielczości (szerokość 300 zamiast 200 px) i teraz są one po kolei kasowane bo stronka z której je pobrałem jest niedostępna. Nemo5576 07:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Najpierw parę dni temu mi wcięło [7] , wczoraj [8]. Graficzki słabe, ale z braku lepszych się przydają. W dodatku z tej stronki załadowałem jeszcze sporo innych, a na dysku mam dalszych kilkadziesiąt (z powodu słabej jakości ładuje tylko potrzebne). Nemo5576 14:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Skasowałem fotkę[edit]

Dzieki za informacje, ale jest problem - nie moge porownac tych zdjec (bo nie moge znalezc nowego zdjecia, i nie mam kopii mojego starego). Czy moge cie prosic o restora i nominacje mojego na Deletion Requests by mozna bylo porownac? Prawdopodobnie sie zgodze i bedze supportowal, ale zasady to zasady...--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 23:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki, ciachaj, faktycznie lepsze. PS. Jakby co to moj gg 1298166, mozna takie rzeczy ekspresowo dyskutowac. PS. Wytlumacz prosze Leshahtowi ze ja nic do niego osobiscie nie mam, i jesli ma lepsze warianty moich bohomazow to chetnie z nim to na prive wyjasnie jak z toba, ale jak bedzie lamal zasady i kasowal 'od reki' to to sie dla kogos zle skonczy (bo mnie bardzo irytuje naginanie zasad - czyjas dobra wiara jest czyjas zla wiara, niestety).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 00:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think the deletions are problematic. Would you mind if I undelete the images and go through the regular COM:DEL process? --Cat out 15:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted images[edit]

Do not revert gif-files called 'Caspod 1-7' which are to be deleted from the Commons depository and, therefore, DO NOT violate the rights held by the author of the photos --Riva72 15:58, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Language templates[edit]

Sorry - I've had the same thing happen to my watchlist from other bots, and just took it as an occasional thing to live with. For what it's worth, I was quickly plowing through a large swath of the easiest case, and now any other language updates should be more spotty. --Davepape 14:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPA[edit]

[9] - pisałem mu na polskiej wiki o tym, ale mnie zlał. Masur 10:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Superb blue Wren1.jpg[edit]

--Benjamint444 04:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was just wondering what you ment on com:fpc when you said Oppose --WarX 12:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC) Bird was probably colored! (and the same on another similar image) were you saying the bird was just brown and I artificialy made it blue. or was it just a translation problem? --Benjamint444 03:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WarX, I need the help of a Polish speaker. Do these licenses include derivative works and commercial use, or should I make a deletion request? Sincerly, Kjetil r 23:46, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. I guess you have noticed Commons:Deletion requests/Template:SejmCopyright and Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PolishSenateCopyright? If someone is negotiating cc-by, write it on the deletion request pages so that they are not deleted before we get a result from the negotiations. Kjetil r 22:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to take another look, I found a larger version and removed some of the noise. ~ trialsanderrors 03:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rtc[edit]

Da się gościa jakoś zablokować? Zanim skieruje do skasowania 100% zawartości Commons :/ Nemo5576 19:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Przy takim wyjaśnianiu to tu za parę lat kamień na kamieniu nie zostanie. Ja to leje. Jak tak dalej pójdzie zacznę znów lądować grafiki na pl.Nemo5576 19:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio[edit]

Hello, I think there's case: this image: File:Colt Patterson 1836 lever.jpg has been taken from here: [10] --Atirador 17:58, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photos and your message[edit]

Your message was : (About) Photos Please do not downsample photos before upload on commons! --WarX 15:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't understood... Is there an exemple ? --Agora1950 07:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About low resolution

The photos are all in 800x600 pixel (old pictures taken during 2000 to 2006 and normalized for internet site). The new ones are in a modern resolution. I shall take new pictures the most bad from 1998 to 2000 (600px wide !!!)

Could you delete it, it's the same as Image:Aircraft Messerschmitt M17.jpg and not used. Pibwl 23:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TXS![edit]

dziękuję za faję, z numerkami zrobie, masz rację, i załaduję pod bardziej międzynarodową nazwą. Przepraszam, że nie podziękowalem odrazu, ale byłem wyjechany :) pozdrawiam --Steifer 21:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

my mistake, I gave the proper source in the description, but forgot to tag the license. Thanks for bringing my attention to this. Pundit 07:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj. Po raz drugi wraca - raz już rozstrzygnięty - temat plakatu Sarneckiego z 1989 roku. Niejaki G.dallorto - miałem z nim kilka starć na okoliczność jego myślowego schematyzmu w sprawach licencji - także i tu upiera się przy podejściu paranoiczno-literalnym, a nie racjonalnym. Być może zresztą to ponowne zgłoszenie (pomimo faktu, że raz już rzecz została zdecydowana) jest też trochę z jego strony rewanżem za poprzednią moją z nim dyskusję (dotyczyła {anonymous work} z 1920). Rzuć łaskawie okiem i daj głos w sprawie tego Sarneckiego. Pozdrawiam Julo 16:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Właśnie się przedzieram przez tzw. "wkład". Co za śmietnik! Świetnie, że go zabanowałeś, mam nadzieję że nie zrobi sobie pacynki. A.J. 10:25, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bend or bend sinister ?[edit]

Good afternoon,

You drew two months ago a beautiful SVG coat of arms of Dolwa family to replace the old JPG file. The description (in English) is Azure on a bend Argent three roses Gules, but your drawing shows a bend sinister whereas there was a bend on the JPG file. Do you know for sure which is the real blazon, and can you correct if necessary?

Best regards, Bruno Vallette 12:55, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cześć :) Możesz spytać User:Valentinian o co mu chodzi? Najpierw usunął z grafiki szablon {{PD-Poland}} i zastąpił go {{no license}} z opisem No license. {{PD-Poland}} does not apply. This is a post-1952 image, a kiedy mu napisałem że ta licencja obowiązuje fotki opublikowane pomiędzy 1952, a 1994, odpisał mi ze I don't dispute that the image was taken by a Polish citizen, but do we have sources that it was taken in Polish waters? AFAIK that is a requirement of the said law. [11]. Jakoś nie potrafię zrozumieć o co klientowi chodzi, widocznie mój en jest zdecydowanie za słaby :( Pozdrowienia (w końcu z domu) Nemo5576 20:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WarX, a co ma do tego gdzie było zrobione to zdjęcie? Ja sobie nie przypominam żeby w ustawie było coś wspominane o miejscu wykonania grafiki, jest mowa tylko o publikacji w Polsce. Nemo5576 18:30, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PD-Polish[edit]

Witaj. Rzuć okiem na wpisy Androsa u mnie tutaj i tutaj, przy czym prawidłowy link do dyskusji niejakiego Lupo powinien tam być: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lupo#Commons:Deletion_requests.2FTemplate:PD-Polish
Postawa naszych zagranicznych kolegów z Commons, którzy próbują "za plecami" wykonać operacje, na które nie udało im się uzyskać poparcia - podoba mi się coraz mniej. Może warto rozważyć przeniesienie grafik spod szablonu PRL-owskiego do naszej rodzimej wiki i machnąć ręką na commons? Julo 17:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Czy w zasobach jest mapa umiejscawiająca położenie Gminy Dobrzyca na mapie powiatu pleszewskiego. Będę wdzięczny za wskazanie grafiki, o ile taka istnieje, bądź też przygotowanie jej. Z góry WIELKIE DZIĘKI

Pozdrawiam Luca [conversacione]

Image deletion warning Image:Larry Wall2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

--rtc 01:12, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]