User talk:Wanted

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Why do you want Image:Orange ribbon,Ukraine presidential elections 2004.jpg deleted? Please comment on the image page -- Chris 73 04:06, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

DVD[edit]

Thanks for your dvd pictures, my reply here --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 11:28, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I added it to DVD, nice image. --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 17:48, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This image was nominated at Quality images and recieved the following reviews.

Resolution too low (< 2MP).. I like this image a lot. If author could provide an image with 1600x1200 resolution or bigger as per guidelines, I would would promote this one immediately.

Is it possible for a larger version to be uploaded. Gnangarra 15:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menara Garden,Morocco,Marrakech.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

State flag of Poland[edit]

Replacing my version of an image on my user page with a version contributed by someone else amounts to forcing me to lie. Please do not do such a thing on my user page. -- Denelson83 07:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Wanted!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:23, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The explanation of the colours is excellent. However, I think it may be useful if there is a reference to sRGB requiring correct calibration of the monitor (most newer monitors should have this in the menu; the ubiquitous Dell monitors all have a rough sRGB setup thing in the menu), which you know involves the ambient light, light sources other than the monitor and so on. I write this here since I can't write in Polish :D.

Thanks, 118.90.28.56 01:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prezentacja żaglowców[edit]

Alexander von Humboldt, Gdynia 2009

Witam, przeglądałem twoją prezentacje żaglowców z naszych portów morskich. Jest świetna! Z informacji EXIF wynika że z rezygnowałeś z oprogramowania firmowego OLYMPUS na korzyść GIMP 2.6.6. Znam z własnego doświadczenia oba oprogramowania, jeżeli moje domniemanie co do twojej decyzji jest poprawne, proponowałbym eksperyment z programem graficznym ADOBE. Sam dysponuję zaledwie uproszczoną wersją w postaci Adobe Elements – pozwala na zdecydowanie mniejszy format opracowywanej grafiki ( GB ), natomiast typowe wykorzystywane wbudowane algorytmy są takie same jak w wersji profesjonalnej. Chociaż nie pracowałem na twoich plikach RAW ( E-510 ) ale wyniki uzyskane z Adobe Elements 5 są moim zdaniem zadowalające, ukazują w twoich fotografiach żaglowców więcej szczegółów. Jeżeli akceptujesz korektę mogę wywołać w Adobe Elements twoją prezentację żaglowców ( podaj które ) na potrzeby projektu Wikimedia Commons? Pytam się ponieważ po korekcie zdjęcia są bardziej techniczne, ale być może wyeliminowany zostaje nastrój chwili oraz odległości ( E-510, długość ogniskowej obiektywu około 55 mm )?


Alians PL (talk) 10:06, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 15:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:29, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Piękne zdjęcie.Szukam podobnego do prezentacji matematycznej dla instytucji edukacyjnej. Musimy mieć pełne prawa żeby przekazać klientowi niestety budżet jes symboliczny. w zamian jest miejsce w napisach końcowych audycji. wojciechbacal@gmail.com WojtekBącal (talk) 05:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Plik File:Logo-twoj-ruch2013.png[edit]

Potwierdzam, że plik logo, który przesłałem do Wikimedia Commons: File:Logo-twoj-ruch2013.png wykonałem na podstawie logo znajdującego się w internecie. Wykonałem go najpierw za pomocą legalnej wersji CorelDraw, a potem wyeksportowałem do postaci PNG. Jeśli życzysz sobie, podaj adres e-mail, na jaki wyślę plik CDR z materiałem wyjściowym, które skonwertowałem do postaci PNG. Wtedy prześledzisz etapy edycji tej grafiki, wskazujący na mój wkład przy tworzeniu tego pliku. Autorstwo hasła z logo: "Twój ruch", jest przypisywane Marii Czubaszek (Polskie radio: "Twój Ruch zamiast Ruchu Palikota. Autorką nazwy Maria Czubaszek"). Odnośnie tego, kto jest projektantem logo, odpowiedź udzielił mi poseł "Twojego Ruchu", że autorem jest Tomasz Budzyń Zboralski (talk) 11:26, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Plik:Zboralski-anthony-art07.jpeg[edit]

Witaj, mam problem z autorem zdjęcia: zmienił zdanie i wykonał zastrzeżenie "for non-commercial use only". W tej sytuacji musimy to zdjęcie usunąć z zasobów Wikimedii. Proszę, skasuj plik "File:Zboralski-anthony-art07.jpeg". Dziękuję za pomoc. Odnośnie logo "Twojego Ruchu": File:Logo-twoj-ruch2013.png, rozumiem, że nie masz zastrzeżeń? Szczerze przyznam, że byłem przekonany, że tylko loga firm, jak Mercedes czy LIDL, nie mogą być edytowane w taki sposób, jak to zrobiłem z logo "Twojego Ruchu". Jeśli jednak moja "produkcja" podlega tym samym ograniczeniom, jakie dotyczą logo Mercedesa czy LIDLa, oczywiście nie wahaj się podjąć właściwego działania, czyli "kasowanko" i zrób to już bez wstawiania zawiadomienia o kasowaniu do mojej dyskusji :) Zboralski (talk) 11:39, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Donoszę o zmianie sytuacji, odnośnie logo "Twojego Ruchu". Skontaktowano mnie z autorem projektu logo, panem Tomaszem Budzyniem i oczekuję teraz jego zgody. Jeśli prześle zgodę na wykrzystanie projektu (na e-mail permissions-pl@wikimedia.org), sprawa będzie wyjaśniona. Więc proszę, zaczekaj kilka dni na wiadomość od autora projektu, pana Budzynia, którego podałem jako autora projektu w opisie logo. Jeśli pan Budzyń nie wyrazi zgody, oczywiście logo pozostanie do Twojej dyspozyji. Zboralski (talk) 12:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sedov, Gdynia, 20090705, 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:55, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2015[edit]

Hello,

You receive this message because we noticed your contributions relating to the Moroccan natural heritage. We would welcome you to participate in the contest Wiki Loves Earth, which aims to encourage the development of natural protected areas throughout the Wikimedia projects (mainly Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons media encyclopedia).
The contest runs from 1 to 31 May 2015 and is open to all. Prizes will be awarded at the end.
A question, a problem? Do not hesitate to leave a message on the discussion page of the event.
See you soon, Reda benkhadra (d · c)

For more details | Contact

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Wanted,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Wanted,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:NEW Logo for Mazury Airport.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:NEW Logo for Mazury Airport.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:17, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of arms of Poland.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Eatcha 13:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As you requested, I moved this file, but afterwards I saw 7-16 on the photograph (july 1916). On older photocards they often used codes like 820 (august 1920) or 8-20 for the year and month. I have cards and photo's with dates like that. Shall I revert it back, or you think otherwise? Kind regards, - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 21:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sure (I have a collection card and photo's) that I reverted my own action. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:17, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Flag of Poland (state).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aʀvєδuι + 08:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]