User talk:Vengolis/Archive 1

Please categorize !!!

Hi Vengolis, did you understand that you necessarily must categorize your images to make them findable for other users? See Commons:Categories. Keep in mind that pure uploading of images (without giving them categories) doesn't make any sense. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 17:17, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank You . I will -- Vengolis (talk) 17:28, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Hii

Dude thanks for your contribution please upload the files with suitable name. ThankYou Perumalism Chat 03:36, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, mate .some of them are renamed :)Vengolis (talk) 07:14, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

File:TempName 09533.jpg

File:TempName 09533.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jakob (Scream about the things I've broken) 15:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Your uploads

Hi! I am trying to make sense of your uploads. Could you please add categories and a description of what actually is depicted? Currently all your hard work can't be found and used because nobody knows what it is. If you need help finding categories or otherwise, please let me know. Thanks a bunch! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:14, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I think you'd better ask for renaming of your picts to any descriptive name, please take a look at {{Move}}'s man page. --Vituzzu (talk) 19:59, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

And there exist categories for unidentified life forms, so I categorized your File:Tempname 01529.jpg and File:Tempname 01577.jpg in Category:Unidentified Orthoptera and Category:Insects of Kerala (determined by the coordinates). -- Olaf Studt (talk) 09:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

File:TempName 00033.JPG

File:TempName 00033.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 14:25, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eristalinus quinquestriatus 02840.jpg

There are some questions for you. :) Jee 08:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Eristalinus quinquestriatus 02840.jpg, which was nominated by Jkadavoor at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eristalinus quinquestriatus 02840.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/ Jee 12:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 1⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Vengolis,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:Unidentified plants in India

Hi Vengolis, imho to allow an 'easier' categorization respectively identification by much more experienced Wikimedians in botanical issues as me, i allowed to categorize your uploads (~135 in ~August 2013) in Category:Unidentified plants in India temporarly within Category:Unidentified plants in Kerala, as most of them having imho coordinates within Kozhikode/Thrissur (?) district or around. Reason: Category:Unidentified plants in India was respectively is still 'overwhelming' of files not yet identified. So i hope some experienced Wikimedian in Flora of Kerala issues will get a little help to categorize later. So you do not agree, please feel free to re-establish as of before May 20, 2014. Best regards, Roland zh (talk) 19:41, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vestalis gracilis 06845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:06, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loxura atymnus 02114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:26, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Uid DSC03222.JPG

---

Hello, Vengolis!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

FritsHG ^eh? 18:14, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Done - Vengolis (talk) 18:30, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eristalinus quinquestriatus 02840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Excellent photograph, everything perfect. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 04 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naxa textilis 03089.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Perfect hues, superb quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 04 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Striped Tiger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Dnalor 01 17:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castalius rosimon 07843.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. QI. --Dnalor 01 17:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomisus lobosus 08893.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:22, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hibiscus Flower 09062.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--NoRud 18:19, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crotalaria striata 07342.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:41, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crotalaria striata 07339.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:48, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asilus aurata 03327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Bff 10:26, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naxa textilis DSC03091.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unidentified bug 05637.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:30, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unidentified Bug 05634.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:36, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hibiscus aculeatus 09840.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO a closer crop is necessary. There is too much empty space.--XRay 09:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)  Support I think this is OK. Mattbuck 22:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hibiscus 06556.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice close-up of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis. --Zcebeci 15:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hibiscus flower 05032.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lycaenidae 02199.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice composition of Chilades sp. (pandava in big probability). It would be better if you clean the noise on background a bit. --Zcebeci 15:05, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olios milleti 01692.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very interesting and nice. --Alchemist-hp 16:29, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solanum melongena 03458.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:45, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ixora coccinea 03557.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support.--Famberhorst 05:51, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solanum melongena 03477.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would be great to have a deeper DOF, but since the yellow parts are in perfect focus, you're already at f/11 and I won't request focus stacking for outdoor closeups, I'm perfectly fine with this. Nice composition too. --El Grafo 11:06, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olios milleti 01704.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 5 March 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Charlesjsharp 12:04, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lycaenidae 02157.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Charlesjsharp 13:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Telamonia dimidiata female (♀) 08802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Charlesjsharp 13:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Commander (Moduza procris).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:04, 5 March 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Charlesjsharp 13:49, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ixora red 00996.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:17, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ixora coccinea 03549.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Charlesjsharp 12:27, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonneratia alba 00829.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 17:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Papilio buddha (Malabar Banded Peacock) - Ventral side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:29, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kandal 04869.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kandal 04783.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kandal 04784.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantana 05403.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gliricidia sepium 05461.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 19:41, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrrhocoridae 5266.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:34, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gliricidia sepium 05468.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 08:07, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrrhocoridae 05250.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 08:04, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xanthopimpla punctata Yellow ichneumon wasp, side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment We do not give value label for genus. You have to give the name of the species. The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the English vernacular name in parenthesis.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:10, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Good & useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kandelia candel 00812.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crocothemis servilia 02903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 15:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monkey Puzzle 08638.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agriocnemis nana (Dwarf Wisp) side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the English vernacular name in parenthesis.The sex of the animal could also be included in the caption and the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

 Done -Vengolis (talk) 15:32, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantana 05352.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 19:23, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gliricidia sepium 05464.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for QI. --C messier 08:00, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monkey Puzzle 07756.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:35, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathinda amor 07759.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:25, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acanthus ilicifolius 05507.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:49, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Commelina diffusa 08115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok and QI for me. gives me an good oversight, not just a close view. --Hubertl 21:17, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thomisus lobosus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope. The binomial name is always in italics. Give the common name in English as it concerns the species not the family.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Episteme adulatrix (owlet moth) dorsal side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope. The binomal name is always in italics. Limits the scope to the side show. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thomisus lobosus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope. The binomial name is always in italics. Give the common name in English as it concerns the species not the family.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Episteme adulatrix (owlet moth) dorsal side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope. The binomal name is always in italics. Limits the scope to the side show. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thomisus lobosus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope. The binomial name is always in italics. Give the common name in English as it concerns the species not the family.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Episteme adulatrix (owlet moth) dorsal side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope. The binomal name is always in italics. Limits the scope to the side show. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thomisus lobosus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope. The binomial name is always in italics. Give the common name in English as it concerns the species not the family.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Episteme adulatrix (owlet moth) dorsal side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope. The binomal name is always in italics. Limits the scope to the side show. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thomisus lobosus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope. The binomial name is always in italics. Give the common name in English as it concerns the species not the family.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Episteme adulatrix (owlet moth) dorsal side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope. The binomal name is always in italics. Limits the scope to the side show. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thomisus lobosus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope. The binomial name is always in italics. Give the common name in English as it concerns the species not the family.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Episteme adulatrix (owlet moth) dorsal side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope. The binomal name is always in italics. Limits the scope to the side show. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thomisus lobosus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope. The binomial name is always in italics. Give the common name in English as it concerns the species not the family.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Episteme adulatrix (owlet moth) dorsal side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope. The binomal name is always in italics. Limits the scope to the side show. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rathinda amor (Monkey Puzzle) Ventral side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It is a good idea to point the scope to the gallery, but you have to put the image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Done -- Vengolis (talk) 16:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
• Very good picture but it is also a geocoding and if possiblie a caption which gives the locality. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:11, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Done -- Vengolis (talk) 04:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thomisus lobosus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope. The binomial name is always in italics. Give the common name in English as it concerns the species not the family.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Episteme adulatrix (owlet moth) dorsal side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Look at the change in the scope. The binomal name is always in italics. Limits the scope to the side show. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hibiscus schizopetalus 00124.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 07:58, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malvaviscus aboreus 00231.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 20:18, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karaveerakam 05138.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:22, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monkey Puzzle 08317.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olios milleti 01703.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Latin name in italics, please--Jebulon 15:24, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junonia lemonias 03557.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good. Where was it taken ? (geolocalisation is helpful, thanks)--Jebulon 15:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hypolimnas bolina 03882.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:21, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Green Marsh Hawk 02945.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The file is not categorized, it will be good a category for the place too --Christian Ferrer 17:16, 10 May 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality, but it will be good to add some information about the place. --C messier 16:14, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junonia lemonias 03254.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But I see no sense in the second nomination, which looks almost identical. --Uoaei1 06:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orthetrum sabina 02950.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:49, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junonia lemonias 03257.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 11:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomisus lobosus 02150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:04, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Syzygium jambos 06359.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:36, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castalius rosimon 07887.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danaus genutia 06860.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:35, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

As Livioandronico already wrote you:

Please participate in QI-assessing not only with your own pictures. --Hubertl (talk) 06:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Not responding is also an answer..--Hubertl (talk) 06:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry mate.sorry for the 'selfish behaviour' -- Vengolis (talk) 13:18, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

So we can start again now. BTW: Making and uploading pictures - as you did the last days - is not at all selfish. Thanks. The main problem is, if we don´t spread the assessment process, only a few will do this. And this will become single-sided. We all need your expertise! --Hubertl (talk) 05:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussock Moth 05554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danaus genutia 06866.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capsicum annuum 'Black Pearl' 09287.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capsicum annuum 'Black Pearl' 9289.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.Vengolis this is the last photo of your I value until you do the same for others, please evaluate the photos of others! You did not even once !!! --Livioandronico2013 11:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malvaviscus aboreus 00232.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Danaus genutia 06847.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Danaus genutia 06847.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Excoecaria agallocha 06658.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:51, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tawny Coster Acraea terpsicore 08949.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 22:30, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Telamonia dimidiata (♂) 08176.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:03, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Telamonia dimidiata (♂) 08230.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:34, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Myrmarachne plataleoides 04478.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:22, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyllus semicupreus 06953.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:11, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chassalia curviflora 06801.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussock Moth 05558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asystasia gangetica 09277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 03:28, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potanthus pava 09782.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 03:28, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hibiscus schizopetalus 09923.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:09, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scytodes sp 08139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:23, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turnera subulata 04612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:14, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hibiscus 00526.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:32, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Evolvulus alsinoides 09186.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oriental garden lizard 09809.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melastoma malabathricum 09897.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:23, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castalius rosimon 09855.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hymenia perspectalis 09615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:12, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capsicum annuum 'Black Pearl' 03039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomisus lobosus 08501.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iambrix salsala 02021.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:30, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acraea terpsicore 08951.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 20:31, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Butterfly in Crete

Hi Vengolis, it happened to me in Crete to make this photo of a butterfly and I classified it as Colias croceus but I'm not so sure about it. What is your opinion? Cheers--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bocchoris inspersalis 00369.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:53, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Excoecaria agallocha 05938.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:53, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cicindelinae 08073.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you be please more precise about the species? Poco a poco 19:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC) Good quality. Lowest id level after professional advice. --Jkadavoor 08:49, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Blue flower 03944.JPG

You requested renaming to File:Thunbergia erectar 03944.jpg. This is a typo, isn't it? You requested renaming of a few other pictures to 'Thunbergia erecta' without an 'r' at the end. Shouldn't File:Blue flower 03944.JPG also be without an 'r' at the end of the name of the plant? --Stefan4 (talk) 17:08, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

See also File:Spider 02356.JPG, File:Spider 02347.JPG and File:Spider 02346.JPG: you are asking for an 'r' in one case but not in the other two cases. The variant without an 'r' seems to be the correct one (see sv:Polyboea vulpina). --Stefan4 (talk) 17:10, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

oh sorry.Its a typo.Thunbergia erecta is the corect name.-- Vengolis (talk) 17:16, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

I've renamed the erecta(r) file. Could you please confirm that the vulpina(r) file should be renamed into 'vulpina' instead of 'vulpinar'? --Stefan4 (talk) 17:19, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

It is Polyboea vulpina. Thank you :) -- Vengolis (talk) 17:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aciagrion occidentale 01927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 20:12, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Insect 00289.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:36, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tirumala limniace 04180.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:02, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angled Castor 02988.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Main body could be sharper - probably f/11 or f/13 had been better. Also composition could be better, nonetheless QI. --Tuxyso 18:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danaus genutia 06847.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:15, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamadruas sp 02346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:29, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Excoecaria agallocha 03277.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:57, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thunbergia erecta 03961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junonia iphita 03414.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments That little branch is a pity, but QI. --Kadellar 19:11, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sesiidae 05491.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A better description would be fine. --Hubertl 15:27, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aethaloessa calidalis 05673.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thunbergia erecta 04080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:12, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thyreus nitidulus 05196.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:43, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catopsilia pomona 02928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now, QI --Hubertl 01:22, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calotes versicolor - 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me, even when a part of the tail is not visible. But I can imagine it --Hubertl 16:04, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asilidae 04328.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:11, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junonia almana 07491.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:09, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tabanidae - Chrysops 05977.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:57, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tabanidae 07544.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Crop could be improved. --XRay 15:33, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eristalinus quinquestriatus 05050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:18, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lathrecista asiatica 07056.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:18, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hypolimnas bolina 07877.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mesembrius insignis 03041.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:15, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euploea core 07761.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taractrocera ceramas 07202.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:48, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerbera odollam 07637.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:19, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Syrphidaet 00006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:53, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taractrocera ceramas 09179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:58, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thunbergia erecta 00561.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lathrecista asiatica 07015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Clément Bardot 18:41, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oriental garden lizard 07372.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:30, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ageratum conyzoides 07833.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:20, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Common Pierrot 00348.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avicennia 07715.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:34, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taractrocera ceramas 07238.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Tsungam 17:41, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catharanthus roseus 08806.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The Latin name actually belongs in italics.--Famberhorst 05:00, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aethaloessa calidalis 05612.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 11:54, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxyopidae 02356.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:50, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxyopes javanus 09134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The crop is a bit tight (cuts off some legs) but it's good enough for QI I think. Dllu 17:34, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxyopidae 02351.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:17, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bocchoris inspersalis 00346.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image Charlesjsharp 19:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC) *  Comment pro or contra, Charlesjsharp?? --Hubertl 06:19, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spindasis vulcanus 09400.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:16, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thyreus nitidulus 09122.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:57, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spider 09129.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:57, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Insect 07443.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aegiceras corniculatum 07681.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The black spot at the left and the ampty space at the left is disturbing. The crop at the top could be improved.--XRay 05:53, 18 July 2015 (UTC)  Done--Vengolis 08:46, 18 July 2015 (UTC)  Support OK for QI. But the crop at the top isn't the best one.--XRay 09:10, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nagadeba indecoralis 09152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:33, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ypthima huebneri 00305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:33, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Discolampa ethion 00445.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spindasis vulcanus 09909.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:40, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Udaspes folus 01728.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:52, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Myrmeleontidae 09383.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 09:05, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spindasis vulcanus 09970.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Discolampa ethion 00184.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Gratitude from Austria

HI! Vengolis. First of all I would like to thank you for your positive reviews of some of my photographs. ;=) And then I would like to show you the page where you can find the amount of your QI entries and the your actual ranking:Click! Have a good time and many nice greetings from Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi! Thank you.very helpful :). Vengolis (talk) 13:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomisus sp 03329.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomisus sp 03316.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sesiidae 05470.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:09, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Excoecaria agallocha 03281.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:27, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spider08698.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:40, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spider 08697.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:40, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spider 09725.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:40, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cupha erymanthis 07118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cigaritis vulcanus 00415.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neptis hylas 00012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 18:53, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Project scope

Hi Vengolis, please respect that Commons has a project scope and that contributed images must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. For this reason please give useful categories and useful descriptions to your images. So that every other user can find your images through their categories and can understand what you want to teach with the images through their descriptions. To meet the project scope please keep everything as educational as possible. Keep in mind that most people in the world do not know what is visible in your images and therefore urgently require understandable descriptions and categories made by you! -- Ies (talk) 05:06, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lepidoptera 04449.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catopsilia pomona 02929.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junonia atlites 04194.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haematopota 00070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spider 09723.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:53, 22 July 2015 (UTC)