User talk:Urbandweller

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Urbandweller!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Urbandweller!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:22, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Albert Nicolai Schioldann.jpg was uncategorized on 10 October 2009.
Image:Hannes Finsen.jpg was uncategorized on 10 October 2009.
Image:Villars Lunn.jpg was uncategorized on 11 October 2009.
Image:Johannes Peter Lauridsen.jpg was uncategorized on 11 October 2009.
Image:Ferdinand Lewinsky.jpg was uncategorized on 11 October 2009.

File:Danneskiold-laurvig.jpg[edit]

File:Danneskiold-laurvig.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--80.167.179.233 15:36, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danneskjold.jpg[edit]

File:Danneskjold.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--80.167.179.233 15:44, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Both of the two preceding files are copyright violations. Though their original heraldic designs (blazons) date from the late 17th century / early 18th century, these artistic interpretations were created by Fr[iedrich] Britze (1870-1956) for use in the 1937 edition of Danmarks Adels Aarbog. As such they remain copyrighted until 2027 (70 years post mortem auctoris). If you want to find a copyright-expired version of the same symbols, the easiest match would be "Dansk Vaabenbog" from the early 20th century, as its artist, Hermann Baagøe Storck, died in 1922. His drawings were reprinted in 1973 as "Danske Adelsvåbener. En heraldisk nøgle" and published by Politikens Forlag. 80.167.179.233 15:57, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the correct date format[edit]

Hi Urbandweller,

Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you mentioned a date on File:Niels Christian Frederiksen by Jens Petersen & Søns Eftf.jpg. Please know that in order for dates to be automatically detected and translated into other languages it needs to be in the YYYY-MM-DD format (ie. 2024-01 for January 2024 or 2024-05-04 for 4 May 2024). Also, for other (less specific) dates use {{Other date}} for centuries, ranges, 'circa' etc. like this: {{other date|between|1899|1903}} for "between 1899 and 1903

". This way the dates will be translated internally into the user's language preference. I've fixed it for you here. See for example the result in English: here. Thanks again. –Krinkle^talk 19:33, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will use that format in the future. Thanks. --Urbandweller (talk) 05:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Max_Ballin_by_Julius_Folkmann_2.jpg[edit]

File:Max_Ballin_by_Julius_Folkmann_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Paulae 17:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Max_Ballin_by_Julius_Folkmann_1.jpg[edit]

File:Max_Ballin_by_Julius_Folkmann_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Paulae 17:47, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter_Martin_Madsen_(Halsted)_by_Julius_Folkmann.jpg[edit]

File:Peter_Martin_Madsen_(Halsted)_by_Julius_Folkmann.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Paulae 17:47, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frederik_Hey.jpg[edit]

File:Frederik_Hey.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Paulae 17:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anton_Bing.jpg[edit]

File:Anton_Bing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Paulae 17:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nina Bang.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ludvig Mylius-Erichsen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Johan Georg Forchhammer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Dansk Mønt - Kronebog[edit]

Hei! Vet du om vi kan laste opp bilder fra Dansk Mønt - Kronebog til Commons? Ser de blant annet har bilder av forskjellige kroningsmynter. Mange flotte bilder du bidrar med her, forresten! Vennlig hilsen --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 13:49, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

some questions answered please[edit]

What does being female or male have to do with politics?

How long is 60 to 70 real years in internet years? -- Queeg (talk) 14:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To me, it is simply vandalism. If you want to scrap the category, discuss the issue first. --Urbandweller (talk) 14:36, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting use of the "adverbizing" of the word "simple". Perhaps you should take a few moments to review the word "simple" and perhaps a few more moments to find a different phrase that describes what I call the "obvious solution" which was the removal of the unnecessary and useless categories.

Incidentally, I would like to point out that both your signature and mine are using a number that is greater than 2000 for the year. -- Queeg (talk) 03:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quellennachweise für Fotos[edit]

Sehr geehrte/r Urbandweller, in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia schreiben wir gerade über die Personen der Fotografen-Dynastie der Hansen's und ihrer Partner von Anfang an. Nun haben Sie dankenswerterweise viele Uploads von Fotos der Urheber getätigt. Wäre es Ihnen möglich, zu den Fotos überprüfbare Quellen-Nachweise zu erbringen, aus denen auch für Uneingeweihte die Richtigkeit der angegebenen Urheberschaften ersichtlich wird? Für Ihre Mühen herzlichen Dank und besten Gruß, --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 15:35, 31 August 2011 (UTC) P.S.: Ich bitte Sie deshalb herzlich um das Obengenannte, um gerade auch bei Wikimedia Commons im Sinne der Nachweis-Erbringung vorbildliche Anleitungen für zukünftige Uploader zu geben. Anderenfalls erleben wir vielleicht eines Tages, daß Informationen zu einem bestenfalls irrtümlich benannten Urheber sich als "Wahrheit" rund um die Welt verbreiten. Vielen Dank für Ihr Verständnis und Ihre Unterstützung, nochmals besten Gruß, --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 15:47, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sie können die Porträitsammlung des königlichen Bibliotheks hier finden (leider nur in dänischer Sprache). Und hier haben Sie ein Beispiel, wo die Quelle angegeben ist. Für die Zukunft werde Ich neuen Uploads mit Links versorgen, so daß kein Zweifel über den Urheber möglich ist. Mit freundlichen Grüßen----Urbandweller (talk) 09:36, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen, vielen Dank. Ich habe eine Zeitleiste bei Commons für Dänemark formuliert, um unter anderem historische Fotos und Dokumente dort einzusortieren. Eine Frage zu Ihrem nebenstehendem Upload: Ist Ihnen möglicherweise ein Fehler unterlaufen? Wie kann es sein, daß die Vorderseite beschnitten ist, die Rückseite aber unbeschnitten (cutted edges?)? Nochmals herzlichen Dank für Ihre Mühen, --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 19:19, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Max Dvořák.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Emil Haslund.jpg[edit]

Hvordan, vidste du billedet var fra 1945? --Gajolen (talk) 08:52, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Han har armbind på og bærer synligt pistol - så det må være fra befrielsen i maj 1945 eller senere på året. --Urbandweller (talk) 09:36, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anders Johannes Jørgensen May 1945.jpg[edit]

File:Anders Johannes Jørgensen May 1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

heb [T C E] 10:57, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:PalleHuld.jpg[edit]

Du lade till {{PD-1996}}, vilket bland annat kräver att bilden publicerades någonstans före den 1 mars 1989. Skulle du kunna specificera var någonstans bilden publicerades före den 1 mars 1989 så att dessa uppgifter kan verifieras av andra personer? --Stefan4 (talk) 13:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hans rejse blev dækket af dagbladet Politiken og senere beskrevet i bogen Jorden rundt i 44 Dage af Palle (1929). Billedet er publiceret i disse medier. --Urbandweller (talk) 13:35, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PD-Denmark50 is not enough[edit]

Hi there. You have left a note at my talk page pointing out that PD-Denmark50 is not enough and that a US license is also needed. Thank you for bringing my attention to it. However, it has left me a bit confused since I found the license on an existing file which had long been on Wikipedia Commons and I therefore thought it was enough. Now I am unsure of the implications of this. Could you point me in the right direction of the correct license that (might) solve the problem? Sorry about the trouble.Ramblersen (talk) 21:40, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A small follow-up. File:Leo Mathisen.jpg is the file where I became aware of the license and it is not listed in the category that you linked to. Should it be so or is there a difference that I am missing?Ramblersen (talk) 22:01, 18 August 2013 (UTC) Oh I suppose that PD-1996 is the answer to my last question. I will go through the files now. Sorry again for the trouble.Ramblersen (talk) 22:07, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hver_8._Dag[edit]

Hver 8. Dag has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

69.181.197.118 10:58, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Louis Tocqué[edit]

I have added a few works to Category:Louis Tocqué. Please do not revert or remove this category. Thanks you in advance. Coldcreation (talk) 17:30, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to over-categorize Tocqué's portrait paintings - Category:Portrait paintings by Louis Tocqué‎ should be enough. --Urbandweller (talk) 18:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Placing the works in a category such as portrait paintings is too specific and inaccurate. Many works in that category are not paintings at all, and many are not portraits, they a full figured persons painted within a particular setting or surrounding, beyond mere portraiture. In fact, several of the works are not even by the artist Louis Tocqué. They are engravings made by others, or they are paintings "after" Louis Tocqué. What we should do is merge all the works that both correctly and incorrectly form part of Category:Portrait paintings by Louis Tocqué into the more general Category:Louis Tocqué, where they will all fit nicely.Coldcreation (talk) 22:01, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I could not disagree more, and I find a strange, to say the least, that you insist on wasting my time by disputing the relevance of specific categories. Specificity is the raison d'être of categories. --Urbandweller (talk) 22:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion is now moved to Category talk:Portrait paintings by Louis Tocqué. Coldcreation (talk) 22:24, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:C.C. Hall by J.V. Gertner 1864.jpg[edit]

File:C.C. Hall by J.V. Gertner 1864.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

80.160.174.254 09:40, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Hi Urbandweller. I see you reverted my move of File:Frederiksborg Slot i måneskin 1817 by J.C. Dahl.jpg from Category:Frederiksborg slot - Depictions to Category:Frederiksborg slot in art where I strongly believe it belongs. Compare for instance with Category:Buildings in London in art. The whole idea with naming of categories on wikiepda and wikiepda commons is to use consistent naming practices to create a coherentsystem of categories amd subcategories whjich is easily navigable in terms of geography, time and topic. In general, subcategories of Category:Frederiksborg slot is a complete mess. The subcategories should reflect general wikipeda commons categories such as building time ("Built in Denmark in XXXX"), the name of the architect, the type of the structure (Category:Architectural elements, topic Category:Frederiksborg slot in art) etc.

As you can se, Category:Frederiksborg slot - Depictions in only located in category Category:Frederiksborg slot. It doesn't fit into other categories, unlike Category:Frederiksborg slot in art which also fits into Category:Hillerød Kommune in art and Category:Buildings in Denmark in art. Apart from that, it is incorrect to capitalize Depictions after "-". "slot" in "Frederiksborg slot" should on the other hand have been capitalized. It is also completely silly to have Category:Frederiksborg slot - Views from lake and garden both because this category doesn't fit in with wikiepda commons' standard categories and because it is the standard view of the castle which means that it belongs in the main category. If you think a whole subcategory is needed for the castle as seen from across the lake, it is most likely because there are far too many similar images and that a clean-up is what is really needed which only kept the best images from different angles. Again I suggest that you compare to the subcategories used for other similar buildings. If you disagree with these points, I suggest we start a formal discussion so that we could get imputs from other editor.Ramblersen (talk) 05:15, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Brockdorff Wappen.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Brockdorff Wappen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Bernstorff Familie Wappen.png[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bernstorff Familie Wappen.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete image[edit]

This logo is no longer in use. Please remove and replace with new logo. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kemp_%26_Lauritzen_logo.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 37.205.123.4 (talk) 07:22, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Samarbejde vedrørende kunstværker[edit]

Hej Urbandweller. Dejligt at se dig tilbage med nye uploads. Måske er du interesseret i at deltage i registreringen af malerier fra Bruun Rasmussen? Villy Fink Isaksen og jeg er startet på det, og din deltagelse vil være meget velkommen. Det handler om, at Bruun Rasmussen i 2003 begyndte at bruge en nummerserie i deres "klassiske visning", og ud fra den kan man følge alle deres auktionsnumre - men man kan ikke søge i dem. Jeg er startet fra begyndelsen og er nået igennem ca. 10.000 auktionsnumre (og mange uploads) og Villy arbejder fra 2010 og fremad. Vi registrerer numrene i hver sin fil, og fordelen er, at man også kan registrere de kunstværker, man ikke uploader, for eksempel udenlandske ting eller malerier, hvor kunstneren endnu ikke har været død i 70 år. Så har man muligheden for at finde tilbage til dem og hente dem, når tiden er der. Hvis du er interesseret i at gå ind omkring de aktuelle auktioner, kan du få en fil og et par tips til at komme i gang. Det ville være så fint. Hvad synes du? Venlig hilsen --Rsteen (talk) 06:01, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tak, det glæder mig. Det lyder storartet, hvis vi kan få fat i de ældre hammerslag på mere systematisk vis. Jeg ville meget gerne forpligte mig på at deltage i registreringen, men jeg har ikke meget tid til overs for tiden, så mine uploads kan mest blive en sporadisk overspringshandling, desværre. Derfor har jeg også været fraværende her i efteråret. Faktisk ville jeg have skrevet et længere 'nødråb' på Brønden her for at få hjælp til at løse det problem med fejlene i genereringen af billeder, som vi stødte på i foråret. Men jeg har ikke nået det. Engang til foråret regner jeg med at have bedre tid, så da kan jeg bedre påtage mig opgaven. Mvh. --Urbandweller (talk) 18:10, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dejligt at høre, at du er positivt indstillet. Vi vender tilbage til det, når du er klar. Mvh --Rsteen (talk) 20:13, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

H.A. Brendekilde[edit]

Hej Urbandweller

Kender du til portrætter af Brendekilde malerier, tegninger eller fotografier. Jeg kunne godt bruge et par stykker til artikler om Brendekilde. På forhånd tak. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 22:48, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, åbenbart findes der et portrætmaleri af Brendekilde af L.A. Ring fra 1882 (ligesom der findes et den modsatte vej, som findes her på Commons). Det er blevet solgt på Bruun Rasmussen på et tidspunkt, og er åbenbart for nylig blevet efterlyst til en udstilling. Jeg har nu uploadet det her. Måske kan du finde værket hos Bruun Rasmussen i en bedre opløsning?

Ellers kan jeg se, at sønnen Jørgen Brendekilde har malet faderen i 1941 (Roskilde Museum), men ophavsretten er jo meget langt fra at være udløbet, desværre.

Dansk Biografisk Leksikon nævner følgende gengivelser af Brendekilde: "Mal. af L.A. Ring, 1882. Afbildet på radering af Adolph Larsen, 1899: Musik i ateljeret. Buste af Rasmus Andersen, 1901 (Odense bys mus.). Mal. af Kamma Jessen, f. Brendekilde." Held og lykke med jagten, mvh. --Urbandweller (talk) 23:36, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tusind tak! --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:07, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Urbandweller,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Urbandweller,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Urbandweller,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Radiohuset[edit]

Hej, jeg så at du erstattede Frederiksberg med Vesterbro i Category:Radiohuset. Men selv den danske wikipediaartikel siger at bygningen er på Frederiksberg. Hvad var grunden til ændringen? --Ysangkok (talk) 21:18, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Det er nu fikset, beklager (den sydlige del af området ligger i Københavns Kommune og i postnummer København V). Urbandweller (talk) 23:20, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder[edit]

Hi Urbandweller. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than using the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 16:51, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reimar Hans von Bülow.jpg[edit]

File:Reimar Hans von Bülow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Wahldresdner (talk) 21:52, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nørholm?[edit]

Angående Category:Nørholm (Danish manor), så er den eneste herregård af det navn jeg umiddelbart kan finde, da:Nørholm (herregård) ovre i Vestjylland. Er du sikker på at du ikke har taget fejl? Hjart (talk) 19:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Urbandweller

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

File:Danneskiold-laurvig.jpg[edit]

File:Danneskjold.jpg[edit]

Please use the correct date format[edit]

File:Max_Ballin_by_Julius_Folkmann_2.jpg[edit]

File:Max_Ballin_by_Julius_Folkmann_1.jpg[edit]

File:Peter_Martin_Madsen_(Halsted)_by_Julius_Folkmann.jpg[edit]

File:Frederik_Hey.jpg[edit]

File:Anton_Bing.jpg[edit]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Dansk Mønt - Kronebog[edit]

some questions answered please[edit]

Quellennachweise für Fotos[edit]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Emil Haslund.jpg[edit]

File:Anders Johannes Jørgensen May 1945.jpg[edit]

File:PalleHuld.jpg[edit]

PD-Denmark50 is not enough[edit]

Category:Hver_8._Dag[edit]

Category:Louis Tocqué[edit]

File:C.C. Hall by J.V. Gertner 1864.jpg[edit]

Categories[edit]

Copyright status: File:Brockdorff Wappen.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Bernstorff Familie Wappen.png[edit]

Please delete image[edit]

Samarbejde vedrørende kunstværker[edit]

H.A. Brendekilde[edit]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Radiohuset[edit]

Reminder[edit]

File:Reimar Hans von Bülow.jpg[edit]

Nørholm?[edit]

Navigation menu

User talk:Urbandweller

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

File:Danneskiold-laurvig.jpg[edit]

File:Danneskjold.jpg[edit]

Please use the correct date format[edit]

File:Max_Ballin_by_Julius_Folkmann_2.jpg[edit]

File:Max_Ballin_by_Julius_Folkmann_1.jpg[edit]

File:Peter_Martin_Madsen_(Halsted)_by_Julius_Folkmann.jpg[edit]

File:Frederik_Hey.jpg[edit]

File:Anton_Bing.jpg[edit]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Dansk Mønt - Kronebog[edit]

some questions answered please[edit]

Quellennachweise für Fotos[edit]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Emil Haslund.jpg[edit]

File:Anders Johannes Jørgensen May 1945.jpg[edit]

File:PalleHuld.jpg[edit]

PD-Denmark50 is not enough[edit]

Category:Hver_8._Dag[edit]

Category:Louis Tocqué[edit]

File:C.C. Hall by J.V. Gertner 1864.jpg[edit]

Categories[edit]

Copyright status: File:Brockdorff Wappen.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Bernstorff Familie Wappen.png[edit]

Please delete image[edit]

Samarbejde vedrørende kunstværker[edit]

H.A. Brendekilde[edit]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Radiohuset[edit]

Reminder[edit]

File:Reimar Hans von Bülow.jpg[edit]

Nørholm?[edit]

Navigation menu

Search