User talk:UW

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Marcel Junod[edit]

All photos on WikiCommons must be allowed to be used by anybody for any purpose. The license you have included for the photos of Marcel Junod is incompatible with this, eg. they can not be used in an article critical against Mr. Junod or The International Red Cross. Unless the photo is relicensed it may have to be deleted. Thuresson 13:31, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have permission from the copyright holder to drop the ambiguous term "discredit" from the license on request. Regarding libel and slander, both of these would constitute a use which is illegal in any jurisdiction anyway. In so, these license term does not put any restrictions on the use of these pictures which is not already in place due to legal regulations. Thus, this requirement only reaffirms what's already written in the law. --Uwe 14:11, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Marcel Junod Monument[edit]

Hi UW, Thanks for using the photos of the Marcel Junod monument in Hiroshima. Best regards, Fg2 11:22, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Red Lion with Sun.png[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Red Lion with Sun.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.
Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

StuartBrady 14:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out. --Uwe 13:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Red Crystal[edit]

Yes, I thought you could ask me about that. But: on the images by Denelson and Zcout the colour is not red, it is:

#d62820 and the red colour (as 'Red Cross' and 'Red Crystal') is #ff0000 . Do you see differences between these two colours ?

I simply wanted to use a perfect red, but if you really think I'm wrong and I have to change the colour I'll do it, of course.
Regards, -- odder 14:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All images replaced. See here. Regards, -- odder 15:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
All images have now a white background inside. See here. -- odder 15:56, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, that's ok ;) Thanks for your hints about these images.
Grüß, (und einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr) -- odder 16:28, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done, please tell me if there is something wrong with this image. And if you can, add a category there, I didn't know where to categorize it. I've also translated IHL Symbol template into Polish for your request. Best regards, -- odder 16:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a small problem: I can make them not until Friday evening, when I come home and where I can use Inkscape (or I'll try to do it on my friend's laptop, but don't count on that, really). So if you can wait to Friday, I would be very happy ;) Of course I'll make these images, there's no problem with that. -- odder 15:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, first image done. These two I'll make at home, on Friday: there is no good mouse on my friend's laptop [you propably know how is it with laptops..]. Please add a category, license and a good description to the image, I would be very thankful. GruB, --odder 19:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Today is Friday, so: second and third image are done. Please add a good description there if you can. I hope they're not wrong ;) Regards, -- odder 20:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IHL Symbol[edit]

~Hi Uwe, I've translated the text into Dutch as follows :

Het gebruik van het afgebeelde symbool wordt geregeld door enkele internationale verdragen, in het bijzonder de Conventies van Den Haag (1899 en 1907), de Conventies van Genève (1949) en hun additionele protocollen van 1977 en 2005, alsmede door bijkomende zowel verdragsrechtelijke als gewoonterechtelijke voorschriften van het Internationaal Humanitair Recht. Misbruik van dit symbool is niet alleen verboden door deze verdragen, maar ook door de nationale rechtsregels van de ratificerende landen. Deze beperkingen staan bovendien los van de auteursrechtelijke status van de hier vertoonde afbeelding.
I used The dictionary of the European Union to retrieve the official translations. JoJan 16:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the ICRC wrote the foundation and said the image was wrong. I fixed the PNG image, but am unable to work on the svg image at this time. Cary "Bastiqe" Bass demandez 17:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And had you bothered looking at the superceded link I added, you'd have been able to find a link to the archived correspondence as well as the correct logo. It is wrong, the ICRC have asked us to remove the wrong image (and I'm offering an opportunity to update it), and you had no business reverting me. Cary "Bastiqe" Bass demandez 17:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clotrimazole[edit]

Well.. it's on my to-do list since yesterday ;) Like other non-SVG images from your featured articles in the German Wikipedia that could be redrawn into SVG :) (I've used this page, hope it's good for you). I really enjoy creating SVGs for your articles :) Greets, /odder 14:08, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, created. Here you are. /odder 16:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geneva Conventions[edit]

Aah, sorry for that. I didn't know that the location of these boxes (in line with the timeline) was intentional :> This of course needs to be fixed, I'm gonna do it in few minutes. odder 10:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Hope it looks like you want it to ;) odder 11:26, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Have a look. odder 13:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Norman_Davis_(1878-1944).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Uwe 18:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, UW!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:23, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canadian Women Hockey Team celebrating at the 2010 Winter Olympics - Flickr image 4392593365.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Leoboudv (talk) 22:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It would be good if you as the creator of the template took a look at the essay I wrote on the limitations of the template. Feel free to comment, either on the essay talk page or the template talk page. --SaMi 18:40, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to do whatever you believe to be correct. Splitting the template into whatever number is needed to specifically cover the situation for every country and symbol is as good for me as any other solution. --Uwe (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:Nobel Square, Cape Town (from Flickr 406562482).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 23:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. odder (talk) 22:25, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eddie Robinson (1919-2007) - Flickr image 5167733373.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 12:27, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GG Trissino a cavallo.jpg[edit]

{{delete}}

Dear Uwe, I'm the author of this upload, can I have more information about your request in order to understand how to respond to it, and potentially correct any inaccuracy or incorrectness? thank you very much. --GeorgesB (talk) 16:38, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I gave[edit]

my permission to delete the file Kriegsanleihe.jpeg as the uploader of that scan. Why does nobody delete it? Can I do it myself - and how?--Angel54 5 (talk) 17:20, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 02:50, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uf2008CoachesTrophy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Levdr1lp / talk 21:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Wellington Koo (Nationaal Archief - 900-8984).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:25, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stephen Myron Schwebel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:NFL-Logo Flickr 293146700.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 11:59, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polygamy Porter bottle - from Flickr 2044814836.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish ☎ 20:50, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Philip Short (1960-2018).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Philip Short (1960-2018).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:59, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Utah Utes vs. BYU Cougars, 2009 - Flickr image 4158421474.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IagoQnsi (talk) 21:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poster for the Mobile phone Payment service M-Pesa - from Flickr 3109301035.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]